A Few Good Questions With.....TheSportsGuru, Broncos Blogger
Hello Pats fans, Guru here from Mile High Report welcoming you to Broncos/Jaguars week. As part of the cross-blogging that will be going on all week between MHR and PatsPulpit we figured we would create these FanPosts on each others sites to answer any questions that were out there about each team.
Got a Broncos question? Fire away! I am looking forward to a great game Sunday. The Broncos have had some rare success against Bill Belichick and Tom Brady(5-1), so despite the fact Brady is gone it should be interesting to see how the game unfolds, and it doesn't get any better then Monday Night Football!
So good luck, and ask me any questions about the Broncos, the game, etc!
I'll check back in regularly to get those questions answered!
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
15 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Welcome!
I’m not allowed to go to this game. I went to the Dolphins @ Patriots and, well, we all know what happened there.
Blogger at SBNation's New England Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
3 top acquisitions and why
I always like to ask this question: who are your 3 top acquisitions for 2008 (draftee or FA) and why.
Blogger at SBNation's New England Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
Whew... We've gotten so much production from so many new guys...
I don’t know where to start! I guess I will with our o-line signings. Ryan Clady was an excellent draft pick that overshadows recent first round woes when drafting o- linemen (cough George Foster cough.) Right now, he looks like a Pro Bowl LT, and would be my pick for Rookie of the Year if I got one. While not a new guy technically, first year starter Ryan Harris has been lights-out at RT, and looks like a guy who could be a perennial Pro-Bolwer opposite Clady. Also, Casey Wiegmann was probably our best free agent signee of the off season, as he has stepped in valiantly for the injured Tom Nalen and leads an o-line that has only given up one true sack all year long (technically two, but one was that pseudo- fumble-that-wasn’t against San Diego.) As you can tell, I have been extremely satisfied by our o-line this year.
For skill positions, you have to look at Eddie Royal. He’s surpassed everyone’s expectations and developed into a lethal #2 wideout. We only hope he’ll available against you guys on Monday, because he makes us that much better. Also, Michael Pittman, who many of us thought wouldn’t make it out of camp, has stepped up nicely in a steadily increasing role, and has become our featured back. He is the hardest runner we’ve had since Mike Anderson.
Rookie Spencer Larsen and signee Niko Koutouvides have helped out in special teams kick coverage, and our young K/P tandem of Matt “Elam Who?” Prater and Brett Kern have been Pro Bowl worthy as well. Rookie Peyton Hillis has been excellent at FB, but was replaced for aome reason by Larsen. Remember this name: Ryan Torain. He’s the new 1,500 yard back that Mike Shanahan seems to find every year, just as soon as he gets healthy. Early reports had him back for this game, but right now it looks like we’ll have to wait until after the bye.
I think that about covers it. Good luck on Monday, even though we’ll be playing against you.:)
4-2.
Answer
Good Question —
I think it is pretty easy to answer as well.
1. LT Ryan Clady(First Round – 2008 Draft) – Has started at LT since Day 1 and has been awesome. He has yet to allow a sack and has just one holding call(last week and it was totally bogus) Clady should garner some Pro Bowl votes for the job he has done in a pass heavy offense.
2. WR Eddie Royal(Second Round – 2008 Draft) – Royal has been just as good as a rookie, starting opposite Brandon Marshall. Even after missing last week, Royal still leads all rookie receivers with 30 catches. He should be healthy and ready to go for Monday night and the Broncos need him.
3. K Matt Prater – Prater was actually signed late last year, but I am going to count him anyway. He has made everyone forget Jason Elam very quickly, and what some considered a huge concern heading into the season is now a strength of the team.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
Hochuli
Do you feel you won that game against San Diego fairly? How does it feel to win a game like that? Will you defend our 2001 playoff ‘tuck rule’ game now? ;-)
Did the Broncos catch a lucky break, yes? Did they win it fairly, yes as well
Personally, I consider the refs part of the game and as long as they are not purposefully trying to affect the outcome, then it is won fairly. It was a nice surprise to get that call to go our way, but I am sure SD fans were thinking the exact same thing 30 seconds before when they saw the ball pop out of Cutler’s hand for no reason.
As for the tuck rule game, I think most Broncos fans were rooting against the Raiders from the opening kickoff.
Blaming the refs is easy
Last week is a perfect example, we had three horrible calls against us that did change the outcome of the game, yet we all said that bottom line was we still had oppurtunities to either stop the Jags or score and we didn’t do it, that is why we lost, not the refs. San Diego after the blown call still could of stopped Denver, but they failed so yes it was a bad break for SD, but bottom line was their defense couldn’t stop us.
As for the Tuck rule, I don’t like it, but that is the rule and it was called correctly, it was also used in a Denver game a couple of years ago to our benefit, so I can’t complain. In addition, having Raider fan mad because of bad refs calls is too ironic, anything to make Raider fan bitter and unhappy is a good thing in my book.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
Couldn't have said it better
There are going to be missed calls so teams need to make sure the ref isn’t in a position so that one call really changes things. Sometimes you just have to make a play.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 4
I've always defended the Pats for the Tuck incident.
1) The rule itself was introduced by none other than Al DAvis himself.
2) Like the rule or hate it, it was the rule in place, and the official called it properly.
The only reason there is such a big deal made is that the Raiders lost, and they always blame officials for their own shortcomings. Last year they cried about a last minute time out by Denver to throw of the kicker (which is perfectly legal). Yet they did the same thing in there next game. The Raider faithful also complain about (and confuse) chop blocking with cut blocking (one of the biggest myths regarding zone blocking today), yet Oakland runs the same system.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 17, 2008 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
sweet irony regarding the tuck rule
I don’t remember any ref ever invoking that rule before Brady made it famous, but since then it’s a different story. It almost seems as if the refs had to start calling it to make it seem more legit.
Keep the faith!
Tuck rule introduced by Davis.....didn't know that.
That is funny looking at it now. He introduced a rule that prevented him from winning a playoff game.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 4
What is your opinion
As to why the Broncos have had so many wins over the Pats in the “Brady” years.
Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on.............. or by imbeciles who really mean it. Mark Twain

by 




















