Pats Pulpit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Herald Appologizes

This will appear in tomorrows paper, the sneak peak is compliments of Mike Reiss' blog:

On Feb. 2, 2008, the Boston Herald reported that a member of the New England Patriots' video staff taped the St. Louis Rams' walkthrough before Super Bowl XXXVI. While the Boston Herald based its Feb. 2, 2008 report on sources that it believed to be credible, we now know that this report was false, and that no tape of the walkthrough ever existed.

Prior to the publication of its Feb. 2, 2008, article, the Boston Herald neither possessed nor viewed a tape of the Rams' walkthrough before Super Bowl XXXVI, nor did we speak to anyone who had. We should not have published the allegation in the absence of firmer verification.

The Boston Herald regrets the damage done to the team by the publication of the allegation, and sincerely apologizes to its readers and to the New England Patriots' owners, players, employees, and fans for our error.

The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.

0 recs | Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

No Way!

Thought they would have denied it to the bitter end. Thanks for finding this!

Keep the faith!

by Marima on May 14, 2008 7:38 AM EDT   0 recs

Me too...

Part of me wonders if Rocko and Guido showed up on the editors doorstep to break some kneecaps or something. I know that the 2001 Pat’s victory over the rams was shocking, but so was the Giants’ victory this year. Yet no one thinks (myself included) the Giants did anything but play some stellar football that day. This sport is one in which nothing is guarenteed, and even great teams can fall anyone. I actually saw one football journalist suggest that the Pat’s should forfiet every game that was taped (Around the Horn maybe?). What kind of a rediculous statement is that? Even if the pats knew the exact play called every time by the defense, they still need to make the plays. The line still needs to block (sure it might be a bit easier if you know where the extra man will come from, but its not a guarentee), the QB still needs to make the throw, the WR still needs to catch the ball and turn downfield.

The only positive to come from all of this is a much needed rule change was enacted as a result. The Defense can now get wired communication with the sideline. I am not sure if this will help much, as you can only have 1 such wired player at any one time. With defenses doing so much changing up of player packages in today’s game, this might not help at all.

I don’t see this being much of an advantage to the Pats for instance. I will use them as an example cause I know the players well enough to talk about it, but I am pretty sure most teams will be the same. One can assume the guy you want wired will be the Mike linebacker, or in our case Teddy. Rodney is another possiblitty, but Teddy being in the middle of everything makes the most sense. If we rotate Teddy out, who do you want to have the sound? Vrabel, Harrison, and Thomas are all excellent choices, but none can be used since you can only have 1 wired guy on the field at all times. The most likely guy to come in and replace Teddy will be Mayo at the start of the season and at the end probably Seau (as Mayo takes over the starting roll). At the start of the season, do we really want Mayo to be responsible for taking over that level of communication?

It will probably come down to Teddy playing a majority of the downs, which works, but isn’t all that optimal. I wish the NFL would have thought about the rule a bit more before putting that kind of limitation on the communication. Just let 2 people be on the field at the same time. WHO CARES?! 1 person will still have to lead the defense, you can’t have 2 people try to relay information, it will get things confused (telephone game anyone?). So in the end, 90% of teams will still only use 1 guy to relay whatever information the coaches send in.

Sorry for the tangent, but I have been thinking of this subject for a while, and it has bugged me a bit (as I am sure you can all tell now).

by Ogor on May 14, 2008 12:54 PM EDT   0 recs

I agree.

I have been wondering the same thing about the Colts. It’s not like the offense, where the same QB plays every snap, barring injury. The defense rotates guys in and out, and I doubt any defender often plays every snap. If I am wrong about that, someone please tell me.

It makes more sense to have a couple of the defenders wired in the same game. I wonder if the NFL has considered this and has a plan.

by coltsfanawalt on May 14, 2008 5:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Incremental steps

I see this rule change as a positive. It has been voted down in the past, so this is some progress. But the NFL seems to “test market” before they make a final decision with changes like this—that is, rule changes that deal with the logistics of the game rather than the actual play on the field (look at how the whole instant replay/challenge thing has developed). Until they see how it plays out in games, the NFL will be conservative (which in this case means only one player wired). In the meantime, if a wired player comes off the field, the replacement can always bring the play into the huddle.

by ctnyc on May 18, 2008 12:43 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

If I were coach...

Granted that is quite a reach, but if I were the coach, and I saw the main wired player taken out of the game for a bit, you better believe I am going to the no-huddle to prevent just what you are talking about. The “backup” won’t be nearly as proficient as the main guy in calling plays at the line and such. It is a huge advantage, one that must be thought about and backup plans need to be just as viable as the main/normal plan.

by Ogor on May 18, 2008 7:41 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Unintended consequences

Remember that anti-Patriot NFL rule change back in 2004 after the Pats’ Super Bowl win?

Spurred on by Colts’ team president Bill Polian, “the members of the competition committee determined that game officials were not enforcing a longstanding rule prohibiting a defensive player from making contact with a receiver more than five yards downfield.” Coincidentally, Peyton Manning broke the league record for single-season touchdown passes the very next season.

But, what was good for the Colts at first turned out to be even better for the Patriots in 2007 when Brady surpassed Manning in the record book for touchdown passes, and Moss set the record for touchdown receptions.

We won’t see the results of this next rule change until the season begins, but if it was done with the intention of outsmarting the Patriots, maybe the competition committee should think twice.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on May 19, 2008 8:41 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't think it was to outsmart the Pats

This rule change had been proposed before Spygate went down; it was rejected during last offseason’s meetings. As far as I’m concerned, whether it’s the 2004 emphasis on calling illegal contact or today’s defensive wiring, as long as everybody’s playing by the same rules, that’s all we can ask for. Smart teams will always find ways to gain an edge; as long as it’s done legally, more power to them. When rules are broken, the offending parties should be penalized appropriately. Again, as long as the rules are the same for everyone and enforced consistently, nobody should have reason to complain.

And Ogor makes a good point: this is a perfect example of how a smart team could gain an edge. I would think in that case, the NFL would eventually “catch up” and adjust the rule. But as long as a team is playing by the rules, good for them.

by ctnyc on May 19, 2008 10:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Slightly satisfied

The problem with this apology is that it won’t reach nearly half the audience that the actual report did (a day before the Super Bowl). I think one of the Krafts mentioned this in a statement. However, it’s still pretty nice to see them taking responsibility for what they did.

BUT, I still won’t read the Herald as long as Tomase is writing for them. He’s been awful for them ever since he first started (want proof? look up his report saying that there was a rumor the Pats would cut Randy Moss before the season started… that’s just damn funny after looking back at the season he had). The football section for the Herald went bad the minute Albert Breer left to Dallas. The Globe is really kicking their butts as far as everything Patriots goes.

by NESilver on May 14, 2008 1:00 PM EDT   0 recs

Gotta go with the Globe over the Herald

Religious, political and ideological philosophy differences aside, generally gotta go with the Globe for local sports. Rumor-based reporting is just so aggravating, especially since the Pats have been the brunt of so much negative speculation. Sometimes I find myself reading it with only one eye open, as if physically trying to shield some of the written garbage from entering my brain.

The one problem I have with the Herald’s apology is that they waited until today, almost as if they were hoping and praying that Walsh would somehow pull a tape or some juicy bit of info out of his ass and vindicate them. Yeah, I’m glad they had to sacrifice their front and back pages (a ratings ploy?) for an apology, but it was a backed-against-the-wall kind of apology. As Belichick says, “it is what it is.”

Keep the faith!

by Marima on May 14, 2008 1:49 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ookla_small
A little confused
Belichick_2_small
Pats sign Crable and O'Connell
Thefantasysportsforum_logo_small
Patriots Fantasy Depth Chart
Nfl_a_thomas_195_small
Intro for 2008 NFL season- AFC South
Nfl_a_thomas_195_small
Intro for 2008 NFL Season- AFC North
Nfl_a_thomas_195_small
Question about fanposts
Nfl_a_thomas_195_small
Intro for 2008 NFL Season- AFC EAST
Belichick_2_small
Patriots announce Training Camp
Bob-sanders-081107_small
NFL coaches vote Rodney Harrison dirtiest player in NFL
Belichick_2_small
Patriots sign Bo Ruud

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Patspulpit_small MaPatsFan

ad

Site Meter