Patriots Draft GPA
A look at the AFC East Draft GPA from progridironfootball.com
The Pro Gridiron Football Draft GPA will grade each teams pick and giving it and overall score...Like a report card. I will look at each player picked, the players available at the pick, the value of the pick, and how the pick will fit with the needs of their team.
Patriots GPA: 2.85 C+
Best 2 picks: Jarod Mayo, LB Tennessee
Terrence Wheatley, CB Colorado
New England added much need linebacker depth and got younger at the position with drafting Mayo, Crable, and Ruud. I would have like to seen them add some depth at the offensive tackle position. Decent draft for New England.
To view the Draft GPA pick by pick visit progridironfootball.com
0 recs |
4
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
bah...
I hate how people try to grade a draft right after it happened. I agree with Jaws on this topic, you need 2-3 years after a draft to figure out just how good the draft was. There is no telling how the players drafted by any team will perform next year. All the first rounders could end up being busts (sure its a long shot, but its possible), and all the 7th rounders could be hall of famers (again… long shot). My point is, until they play at the NFL level, you can’t tell how that player will turn out. There are numerous examples of this.
Plus if you grade the Pats on need for every draft they have had, they will probably flunk out. A lot of teams are in the same boat, they take the best VALUE available at the pick. I am sure they will go down 2-3 spots on their boards if a player is close, but needed. Overall though, the pats get who they think will best fit into their system, whether they need the player or not.
Not trying to trash your effort Jay, I appreciate any and all football articles, but everyone seems to want to grade the draft the day after it happened, and these guys haven’t even laced up their cleats for a game yet.
by Ogor on
May 5, 2008 9:45 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
Agree with Ogor
In my mind grading drafts is, at best, an intellectual exercise. My biggest issue with it is that value to the organization isn’t taken into account. Prime example: Kevin O’Connell. Why on earth would we need a 4th QB? To get him into the system early and he could be the next Brady, that’s why. Matt Cassel, backup QB, is a free agent at the end of the 2008 season so giving Kevin a year to develop in the system before the eventual departure of Cassel turns out to be a pretty good idea.
by MaPatsFan on
May 5, 2008 10:18 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
hogwash
when you were in shcool did you get a grade on a test BEFORE you took it? NO! Because you did not take the test yet, you did not show your performance on the test, and most of all you could not prove your intellect or knowhow until AFTER the exam. The same thing with these players, they have not performed yet, we have no idea what they will be like until we see them in action. You can make predictions, but that means nothing. You can’t get a grade on a test until you get the results back, and you certainly can’t grade a player until you see his results first!
by melagrano on
May 5, 2008 6:40 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
and another thing
don’t they know how many 4th, 5th and 6th rounders, (Tom Brady), Bill Bellicheck made into great players that were no names, also after they left how many players have gone down hill and never played like they did here. BB and his system is probably the hardest ever to grade, you never know who is going to be the stud with his system. There’s been so many that were supposed to be fair and ended up great in his system. So how the hell are these idiots supposed to grade bb’s first rounders when they gave his 6th rounder a D eight years ago. Again, in case you didn’t know, Mr. Thomas Brady!
by melagrano on
May 5, 2008 7:08 PM EDT
reply
0 recs











