A bye week for the New England Patriots
You may think this picture of Malcolm McDowell, from Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, is us fans watching the Miami Dolphins trounce our Patriots 38-13. That is certainly a plausible theory. However, I'd like to suggest another, if I may. This is film study time with the New England Patriots players and coaches. In particular, the absolute fileting of the defense for 461 yards. There's no need to go over that again; we've harped on it ad nauseum. Let's just thank someone we're in a bye week and don't play San Francisco until October 5th.
At first, I thought this was a crappy place to put a bye. I felt it was way to early in the season and should be placed more in the middle. Now I think it's a fine spot and thank the NFL gods for placing it here. It is certainly needed. Without getting too down on the team, I'd like to pose a few items in need of work, all in the spirit of constructive criticism:
- Matt Cassel looked very "pre-season'ish". From a passing perspective, I have two theories: a) either Matt or the receivers were messing up the routes or b) Matt and the receivers haven't established that elusive "raport" that Brady has with them. Some routes are planned and run just as scripted and some are reads on both quarterback and receiver's part. Brady is masterful at this; Cassel needs to pick that skill up.
- Stop turning Moss inside. That scares the living daylights out of me. He's tall, lanky, and awkward on Welker-style inside and underneath routes. Plus, Cassel is going to stretch him out and get him smacked by some linebacker. You could see a few Cassel-to-Moss misses where Randy would've gotten leveled. Keep him on the seams and develop a long ball.
- Get LaMont Jordan healthy. I'm not saying he would've been a difference maker, but the team clearly could have used his presence. With 79 yards on the ground and a 26% (4/15) third down conversion efficiency, anything would've helped and this is LaMont's speciality.
- The Offense is stale and predictable. I don't want this to turn into Q's lab in James Bond, but a little trickery never hurts. This may sound like a direct response to the now infamous Dolphins' Wildcat, but I beg to differ. I've been saying for awhile that gone are the Charlie Weis days of creativity and trickery. These plays throw a rival off balance and keep them guessing.
- Don't leave a gaping lane in the defensive middle. Somehow, Miami was able to spread our 4 linebackers to the sides, exposing a lane in the middle which they exploited continuously. Where was the nickelback to cover these situations? Why were they spread apart? Keep that lane closed. Tight.
- Anemic pass rushing. I know, blitz and you run the risk of leaving the field exposed. Don't blitz and you give the quarterback too much time. I say get after the QB. Create some pressure and force the QB into decisions he doesn't want to make. I've been saying this since the Jets game and I'll say it again: GET IN THE BACKFIELD! Where's Vrabel? He should've been planting Pennington.
- Defense not sharp. Overall, the defense just wasn't sharp. They looked like they did in the preseason: doing a lot of bending and many times, breaking. I can't really put my finger on it, but I think they were just giving the 'Fins too much room.
Those are my not-so-expert opinions on what needs to be fixed. Bill? You have my number. Or, better yet, cruise over to Pats Pulpit and read away. We're always here to lend a hand.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Funny you mention that about Moss...
I always cringe when I see him running those routes. He always looks like he’s going to break a leg or an arm or something painful – painful for us too, if it causes an injury. Moss needs the open space to fully take advantage of his long stride.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on
Sep 23, 2008 9:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I have to say...
… we also could use some revamping on the O line. I didn’t think it would be a problem but starting late last season and coming to a head in the Super Bowl, the O line started to suck hard. The Patriots are bearing the mark of a team that has been dominant for a long time— mostly older, veteran talent on both sides of the ball. This is why the league has such a good dominance turnover rate.
by PaulRevere on
Sep 23, 2008 11:11 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Miami has always
played us tough. Think back to week 7 last season where they scored 28 points, although one of the TDs was a pick-6 by Jason Taylor off of (drumroll, please) Matt Cassel. What I was really stunned by in Sunday’s game was how open the Fins receivers were and how the D didn’t collapse on the runner. They stood in place and let the runner get another 3, 4, sometimes 6 or 8 more yards. The aggressive defense from the first 2 games was nowhere to be found. I don’t know if it was disbelieve at some of the formations they were seeing, or if Miami drugged our Gatorade(I’m kidding, fins fans). But the entire team looked out of sync for some reason.
There could be a lot of good come from this, though. Sunday’s loss takes away the air of invincibility for the Pats players and gives them a reality check that they do have to do more than just show up to be able to win. They have to earn their swagger back. 3 games in, this team is still laying the foundation for what I hope can be a contending team in the playoffs by season end. I can’t speak for everyone, but I knew before the loss that there would be growing pains in order for the team, and especially Matt, to be able to win against the best teams in the league. This the time to give up big losses if we have to, because MC is going to have to learn how to win games. That may mean taking some chances with the deep ball and not locking in on his first read llike he did Sunday. The more he goes through his progressions, the better he will get at going through them. And he has GOT to quit throwing those dead ducks or his confidence will never be very high.
Almost every major media sportswriter has said we are done this year and some have said the dynasty is done. This has lowered the expectations of the media for us. That means we can fly under the radar for a while. We have 14 weeks(including our bye) to come together. I believe the talent is there in the backs and receivers, and great potential at QB. The defense has got to be a helluva lot more aggressive than Sunday or we can just throw in the towel now. This is a learning and growing year, especially for Cassel, but the defense is going to have to turn it lose and let the rough side drag for us to have success this year. I haven’t lost faith yet, because I already know we are not going to finish 1-15. LOL
Sorry for all the rambling. That happens when you get older.
IM63
"Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory...lasts forever."-Shane Falco, "The Replacements"
by Ironman63 on
Sep 24, 2008 12:51 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
not ramblings, valid points
The players pretty much said as much, listening to their appearances on WEEI on Monday. Wilfork and Seymour used phrases such as being a step behind, a bit too often for my liking. Seymour even noted that when the Pats defense adjusted, Miami had already anticipated their adjustments and played off of that.
I don’t think Belichick will allow himself to be made a fool of with any regularity, and I’ll bet they come out well-prepared and hungry in San Fran.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on
Sep 24, 2008 8:39 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs













