THE WHOLE TRUTH

by lc fla on Jan 4, 2009 4:26 PM EST

TO TOM BRADY FANS, DO YOU WANT M. CASSELS NEXT FULLTIME QB, IF SO WHAT HAPPENS 2 TOM BRADY? M.C. HASNOT HAD PLAYOFF EXP. I GUESS THIS IS OUR FUTURE QB, IM PROUD OF THE TEAM, I HOPE BRADYS TENURE WILL BE LIMITED , THE PATS WOULD BE CRAZY 2 GIVE UP ON T.B.(2XSB MVP), GOOD LUCK THIS SPRING, THIS WAS UNDOUBTEDLY THE BEST NFL TEAM TO MISS THE PLAYOFFS,IF THEY DID MAKE IT,WE WOULD REPEAT AS AFC CHAMPS, WHAT OTHER TEAM CAN SAY THEY WON THEIR LAST 4 GAMES 2 CAP OFF THEIR CAMPAIGN? MIAMI,INDY ARE HISTORY, INDY WILL HAVE TOUGH SLEDDING AHEAD.

The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.

Tweet Comment 1 comment | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

gotta go with brady

Until Tom has shown that the injury has caused otherwise, I think the team needs to assume he’ll capably lead the offense when he returns. Franchising Cassel is an expensive insurance policy, but also buys the front office some time in terms of seeing where Tom is with his recovery.

Matt did a great job this season, but the statistical comparison between his and Tom’s first year really won’t yield a lot of useful data. Many cite it as evidence that Tom is actually better, given the quality of receivers Matt had over Tom’s in his first year, but I think there’s a lot more factors than that to consider as well. The continued proliferation of west-coast offense formations, the de-emphasis on workhorse running backs throughout the league, more teams employing cover 2…all this makes comparing their first seasons as starters kind of pointless to me. The game is always changing, and good teams adapt and trail blaze as needed.

by jctsai12 on Jan 5, 2009 1:27 AM EST reply actions