Horrible Day in Boston
What a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day to be a Boston fan...
Please...I pray for a day to come by and erase this bad day from my memory.
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
BRONCOS#24CHAMP
Watch it. Enough with the potty talk.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
I just hated how the flag was thrown before he started taunting.
by Richard Hill on Oct 11, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions
we were all up in arms about that
until we figured out that he must have been really talking some heavy-duty trash before swinging his arm because that flag was thrown well before he made any gesture.
Keep the faith!
I feel like he threw the flag for a late hit…and then reversed the call to be taunting…which isn’t fair.
Live by the officiating, die by the officiating
The Pats left plays all over the field, the officials were fine.
Defense:
Meriweather could have kept his mouth shut and not drawn a stupid penalty. Might have been a score.
2 Denver penalties were offset by stupid defense penalties. That was a 1 score differense.
DB’s allowed ridiculous cushions on a dink and dunk offense. No drive stoppage.
At least 4 times they didn’t set the edge on the run (poor tackling) allowing a 1 yard run to turn into a 1st down.
Offense:
Brady missed receivers at least 6 times (once to Moss for a score, once to Welker for a long gain/score), which ended drives.
Maroney started off decisively, but then went back to indecision.
Receivers caught most of the catcheable balls, and some very ugly ones. I don’t think this one is on them.
Aiken even broke up a Brady interception.
Officials gave us two drive extensions via special teams play, and we came up with bupkus.
Even Gostowski missed a field goal that would have been a game decider.
Shoot Vince could have called “Heads” instead of “Tails” and we would have had the ball in overtime.
Alot of football left out there, the Pats didn’t do enough to win. Officials or no officials.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 12, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Coin-tossing at practice?
Unless Vince can hit 8 from 10, he isn’t doing the toss again… uh…
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 12, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Vince is big enough to scare the coin into tails.
We always joke about winning the toss and winning the game. Since 1994, the toss winner wins the game 60% of the time (29% of the time the opponent doesn’t touch the ball). If you factor in the numbers before 1994, it is more like 52% of the time the toss wins it.
Four people at my house watching this game all called heads (the call most people make), Vince called tails and we never touched the ball. Bend but don’t break doesn’t work in overtime where a field goal decides the game most of the time.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 12, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Bend but don't break works fine if your offence is putting up points
because all the d has to do is wear the other team down, ramp up the pressure and wait for a mistake. When the offence isn’t scoring enough, there isn’t automatically pressure on the opposition offence, so a bend but don’t break defence is left rather exposed. One or two proven playmakers would be nice around now. Anyone wish to abduct Ed Reed or Troy Polamalu or Champ Bailey in the meantime? Champ Bailey would be easiest to convince; the Pats uniform is almost close enough to the Broncos to confuse him into it.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 12, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm fine with bend but don't break most of the time
Because the penalty for bending isn’t that high. In overtime, how much bending can you do? Just until field goal range. You need to be more aggressive there.
Also when the Broncos were going to tie the score in the fourth, we bent way too far. Given the situation, a more aggressive approach was called for.
Just like when you quit pounding the ball when you’re behind 2 scores in the fourth, you need to change defensive strategies to win the game.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 12, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure
But you also need the personnel to do it. Bodden and Springs have looked solid-bordering-on-good, but not explosive, per se. Mayo’s been out; Adalius Thomas has been AWOL. Meriweather’s been hit-and-miss (occasionally literally). McGowan’s solid and makes plays, but lacks some athleticism.
I’m just not sure which of them I’d choose to say… make a 100 yard intercept for a TD, Steelers Superbowl style, or charge down a field goal and take it to the house, or a big strip-sack at a vital time. Banta-Cain’s been the closest thing to, and that’s not necessarily a good thing.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 12, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Booze erases all
Seriously though. I wouldn’t want to be an observer in the locker room or at practice this week. It’ll be murder.
I'm drunk right now
at least the pats can eat humble pie. Sox gotta practice golf swings
"These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick
Papelbon definitely
His ‘epic fail’ cost the Sox their season. Pats still have 11 games left to play.
Keep the faith!
Pap’s been doing it all season. Just unfortunate that the biggest collapse had to occur in an elimination game. Bring on Bard!
by Richard Hill on Oct 11, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions
sometimes
you just gotta hand it to them. they beat us straight up.
"These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick

by 















