Multiple Reports: Julian Edelman has a broken arm
by jctsai12 on Oct 21, 2009 1:27 AM EDT
12 comments
Multiple on-line sites, including ESPN.com, NESN, are citing a report from the Boston Herald that WR Julian Edelman suffered a broken arm in New England's win over the Titans.
http://www.nesn.com/2009/10/report-julian-edelman-has-broken-arm.html
Don't know how to react to this other than to say, "Man, this sucks." Given Galloway's play this season, I don't think keeping him on the roster even in light of this made a whole lot of business sense, but it does leave the team thinner at receiver. Fortunately both Moss and Welker appear to be going full speed right now, but I wonder if we'll see more roster moves in the coming days to adjust to this development.
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
0 recs |
12 comments
Email
Print
Comments
He did look like he got up holding his arm after one of his catches
But he stayed in the game. If his arm is broken, it can’t be that bad.
by RSNexile on Oct 21, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Edelman’s final play came in the fourth quarter, when he caught a 4-yard pass from quarterback Brian Hoyer and was tackled by Tennessee cornerback Cary Williams. Edelman’s right arm took the brunt of the fall on the play.
And as Belichick would say, if it was season-ending, he’d be put on IR – and he’s not.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Oct 21, 2009 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
too bad
He was really playing well, even if perhaps people were crowning him “the next Wes Welker” a bit prematurely. He’s a good young player who is still just leaning the position, yet already making an impact. I’m really quite excited to think what this guy will be another year or two down the road after working with Belichick, Brady…and Welker…for a couple years.
To answer bbismyhero, it’s not necessarily season-ending. All depends upon which of the arm bones it is, where along the bone the break is, and how bad the break is. “Average” time for a complete recovery is usually considered 6-8 weeks…but again, that can vary GREATLY depending upon the extent of the break.
by JohnPaul on Oct 21, 2009 2:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and who knows if we'll ever find that out
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Oct 21, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll know a little by when he comes back
If he’s out for four weeks, we’ll know it was a hairline fracture not on a joint. If he’s out for 6-8 weeks, we’ll know it was a little more serious.
by RSNexile on Oct 21, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So who is the third wideout now?
Sam Aiken? I ask because I’m wondering if I should pick Aiken up in fantasy.
by Brendan Scolari on Oct 21, 2009 3:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't
Yeah, he’ll be the third receiver this week, but what does that get you? 50 yards at most? And the Pats go into the bye week after that, with Tate likely to be ready for Miami.
by RSNexile on Oct 21, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sam aiken vs. terrence nunn? Who would you pick?
I’d like to see terrence perform. see how he does.
by patriotguy on Oct 21, 2009 3:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Crap, but good timing
With the Bucs and the bye coming up there the staff will have a couple of weeks to figure out what to do with Edelman. I hope he can be back, because he really has been the primary target after Moss and Welker.
by hythlodaeus on Oct 21, 2009 5:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
With any luck
Tate will fill in nicely until he makes it back. Then, two good young WRs. Nice.
'A warrior may change his metal, but not his
heart,' as the saying is upon Barsoom." Dejah Thoris
by ba-shiznit on Oct 26, 2009 4:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Media requests: Please email patspulpit@gmail.com
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
