Pot calling the kettle black, Peyton Manning plays well into 4th quarter of Rams drubbing
In other news, the pot was caught calling the kettle black. Colts fans, who called the Patriots the Unclassiest Team of the Decade are left eating this:
...while living in one of these:
While the Colts hammered the crap out of the Rams, Peyton Manning was left in WELL INTO THE FOURTH QUARTER. But Colts fans will figure out a way to twist and turn that one to STILL portray their QB and team as the classier winner. Just wait, it'll come...
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
216 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Do you really mean the Seahawks?
Because that game was a couple of weeks ago and Peyton came out because the 2nd team defense went in and couldn’t get off the field. Had they been able to, Sorgi was all ready to go in. We also alowed them 2 garbage time TDs.
Or, do you mean the Rams, perhaps? Hm…I could have sworn Sorgi played.
Comparing a point deferential of 36 to one of 59 is a little ridiculous, imo.
This is something I’d expect from Babe not so much from you, MaPatsFan. It just seems a little angry is all.
And, not all of us agreed with that post by the way.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
Peyton also only threw for 24 yards in that entire 4th quarter
3/4 for 24 yds and a TD. I’m not so sure you can call that stat padding. Jim Sorgi came in for the rest of the quarter.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
If Sorgi came in, there is no record of it
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions
1 hand off
that went for 35 yards
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Not on NFL.com
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
his one play that he was in our backup backup backup backup RB
went on a long run for a TD
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Just pointing out that it isn't listed anywhere.
Just some pre-season play.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I was at the game and I can assure you that #12
was on the feild and his first play was a handoff to chad simpson that went 35 yards for a TD…
Bob Sanders does not play Hide-and-Seek, He plays HIDE and PRAY-HE-DOES-NOT FIND-YOU!
by coltsfan723 on Oct 28, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Last game Sorgi is listed as playing was Week 17 in 2008 against Tennessee
Painter isn’t listed as playing a game either, so no help there.
Seahawks game (34-17) (Week 4): Peyton Manning threw two touchdowns in the 2nd Quarter, the other two touchdowns were rushes (but Peyton handed them off :-)
Titans game (31-9) (Week 5): Peyton threw a touchdown in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quarters.
Bye (Week 6): Peyton played better than either Titans quarterback.
Rams game (42-6) (Week 7): Peyton made two touchdowns in the first quarter and one in the fourth. The other fourth quarter Indy touchdown was a 31 yard run to the left by Chad Simpson. Those are the facts.
Actually, it is impossible to run up the score in professional sports. Offenses are paid to put up points. Defenses are paid to stop them. It’s like complaining because a plumber unstopped too many drains. Um, that’s what they get paid to do, duh.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah you definitely can't call the Titans game running up the score
what is Brady supposed to do quit playing in the 2Q? I mean come on. Thats how I feel in that argument.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Exactly.
If you can put up that many points in a half, then it is within the realm of feasibility that they can, too. Brady played one more drive to see if the first half was a fluke, and then he was out. BTW, the first quarter was a well played game by the Titans.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
BTW I'm not saying the Colts ARE running up the score
I’m just stating facts for the he said/she said debate.
I think it is a stupid thing to say of any team. They get PAID to do their jobs. They get BONUSES for doing them well. What a load of BS.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I think MaPatsFan and the rest of the fans here
are tired of people pointing out the Pats for doing it, and giving the entire rest of the league a pass.
45-10 Cincy over Chicago, Cedric Benson stayed in the WHOLE DAMN GAME to get revenge. Stupid.
38-0 Jets over Oakland, Up 24-0 at the half, added a TD in the 3rd and 4th with all the starters in.
44-7 Giants over Oakland, 31-7 at the half, another 13 points added to that.
41-0 Seattle over Jacksonville, Up 20-0 at the half, another 21 points in the second half.
There’s plenty more, but the Pats are the only ones accused of it. Even though the idea of running up the score in professional sports is ludicrous. Pats had 1 record breaking quarter, that shocked everyone because Brady hadn’t been connecting. The moment he does, you think they want to stop? They just got it fixed. Dumb.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't have a problem with leaving players in the game
but keeping the pedal to the metal in a blow out (Cedric Benson), that eats at me. Let Brady stay in to hand the ball off and throw on 3rd and long, but don’t be bombing it deep on 1st and 10 (Peyton did this yesterday on one play, irked me a bit). That’s all I’m getting at when I talk about “running up the score”
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Brady played one series in the third quarter - a total of 35 minutes in the entire game.
Keep the faith!
oh I'm not saying that game
I’m just trying to give a hypothetical example with my favorite punching bag.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
The reason I said it was stupid to keep Benson in has nothing to do with running up the score.
If someone had taken his knee out, the Bengals season would look alot different. Keep Palmer in, he wasn’t getting much pressure anyway, but take out the running back that you might need next week.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I still have a problem
when you obviously have outclassed an opponent to keep throwing your starters out there to keep scoring. Unless of course its a big rivalry, then I insist the Broncos beat the Chargers by 100, Peyton throws for 9 TDs against the Patriots, so on and so forth.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Here are the two places that call for mercy in sports:
1) Little kids learning the sport. If you allow them to be disheartened, you might miss out on a future Troy Palumalo (sp?) or Peyton Manning. The are children, think like children, and have childish methods for coping with life’s troubles. This doesn’t apply to adults, especially adults that are getting PAID to compete.
2) In boxing, or MMA, when an opponent is no longer able to defend themselves. The bout should be stopped, so the physically injured participant isn’t killed. In football, they stop play to remove injured opponents. They don’t stop play to remove opponents who no longer try. They are PAID to play. As professionals, they should play.
Neither of these really apply to professional football, where men are PAID to play and are given BONUSes to play they’re best. If you think the NFL should institute a Mercy rule, then that is another discussion. There have been alot of come-from-behind victories that we would miss out on with such a rule.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Since when is the Colts-Rams a big rivalry?
Manning stayed in the entire game, yet the Pats caught a boatload of grief because Brady played 5 minutes into the 3rd freaking quarter.
Keep the faith!
Ever since that game way back in 2009.
The Colts hate the Rams because neither of them are in Illinois, even though they are very close to Illinois. Despite the fact that the Colts were from Baltimore, and the Rams were from L.A.
It’s been in all the blogs (starting with this one), Marima, I’m surprised you missed it.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Here's the link:
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
we here in Indiana enjoy pointing and laughing at Illinois
so thats not it. :-)
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
I never said they were a rivalry
I don’t have a problem as long you don’t keep the pedal to the metal. If Brady or Peyton wants to stay in the game to hand the ball off like they both do, I don’t have a problem. Now I would have had a problem if they came out throwing and throwing and throwing.
I’m far from one giving grief to the Patriots for keeping Brady in the game in the second half. Those people are just irrational and haters.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
When Hoyer was in there
He had 11 yards per attempt throwing, and the running back Green-Ellis had 10 yards per rushing attempt. I don’t see alot of difference, other than it is easy to get a turnover from a rookie QB passing than it is from Green-Ellis running.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Green Ellis and Hoyer ARE the bottom of the depth chart.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
thats perfectly fine
by placing those two in the game is taking the foot off the gas or to the best of one’s ability. If a team can’t beat your 2nd, 3rd, practice squad teams, then they deserve to get rung up for 59 points.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Maybe so...
but the current NFL trend seems to be that if the Pats do it, it’s running up the score. If anyone else does it, the defensive team brought it upon themselves.
That applies to the Tennessee game – the Titans spent the entire second quarter basically handing the Pats field position and possession. What could the Pats do but score when they’re given the ball in the opposition red zone? But apparently that’s running up the score.
The double-standards thing is more infuriating to Pats fans than the accusations of running up the score, from what I’ve seen.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
What's with 12 yard punts anyway?
That was pathetic. My ninth grade son does better.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Haha, I've seen fumbles that have got more yardage than that
Next time, the Pats should march down to the Tennessee 1 yard line and take 4 consecutive knees. That’s about all they can do to avoid accusations of running up the score (unless they get a safety afterwards, I guess). And then you’d get right back to the accusation that the Pats are so arrogant, etc, that they patronise the other teams in the league.
It’s a no-win situation.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions
speaking of the Titans game
did Brady make a TD pass that you and I couldn’t make? It seemed like all 5 were to wide open receivers. He’s getting credit for the TDs when it should be Moss and Welker getting credit for getting so wide open. That is what is infuriating me. :-)
In address to your statement, I don’t know. I see it the other way in the mainstream media, and the Patriots constantly getting unwarranted fellatio. I believe that is why the team is widely hated in the blogosphere. West of Pennsylvania no one widely gives a crap about Boston, New York and Philly and its shoved down our throats on ESPN.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
So Brady's running up the score by making passes that are impossible to screw up?
That’s even worse. It’s punishing him, and the team, for doing something that he can’t fail to do.
HOW DARE HE COMPLETE BASIC PASSES?! The sheer temerity of it… haha.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn't say he was running up the score!!!!!!!!!
Have you read anything else I’ve said on here? I’ve stated over and over and over on here “yeah you definitely can’t call the Titans game running up the score
what is Brady supposed to do quit playing in the 2Q? I mean come on.”
I was just observing how bad the Titans are and how Welker and Moss aren’t getting the credit that is due. Brady is stealing it all.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
I think Brady getting the credit for this one
was that he finally seemed to click, after some pretty poor performances.
And I know you didn’t say it, but it was worth bearing in mind when anyone says anything about running up the score – there’s always other issues going on. In some of those 2007 “running up the score” games, the opposition committed hara-kiri in the same way as the Titans, yet the Pats got put to the sword then, as well. If the Titans game doesn’t count, then some of those 2007 games shouldn’t, either.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree
some of them though………. ehhh…. we probably have different viewpoints. I think one was against the Bills, I don’t recall correctly though. I try to suppress memories of that season.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
It is very difficult for a fan to quit looking through their fan-o-vision.
The truth probably lies somewhere between our point-of-view (POV) and yours. Of course, alot closer to ours. :-)
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions
That was the kick-the-tyres game
“I have these wonderful new toys to play with, I wonder if Randy can catch this, Deion Branch never could… 80 yard TD? Cool. Wonder if I can do that again? I can? Even more amazing…”
He was deprived as a child. Never had first-round WRs to play with, unlike Manning. I guess he wanted to make up for lost time or something.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions
And 3 if you count Dallas Clark
who spends half the time as a WR anyway.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah but he blocks with the best when he does block
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Oh, I'm not criticising
I’m envious. He’s good at both. He’s just another first-rounder to keep in mind as a target.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions
hopefully Brown can be that RB
if the Colts establish a “first round” running game, whew, you don’t wanna think about it.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
You had one for a while
when Addai was healthy. Which happened to be around the time that the Pats’ Maroney was healthy. Same draft, too. Coincidence? Hah.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Tyres
Haven’t seen that since England. Brings back memories.
Wind screen, boot, bonnet. Do you carry a brelly when it rains?
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Brelly? Rain?
I’m from a South Pacific island, not the UK. What is this ‘rain’ you speak of?
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry
Rain – noun – the precipitation that falls in the British Isles 90% of the time when you’re off work.
Sun – noun – Star at the center of our solar system. Not visible in East Anglia or most of the British Isles..
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
In 2007
the Patriots scored 2 fifty-burgers and 2 forty-burgers. That’s the extent of their scoring extravaganza.
Some of the games in the 30’s weren’t as close as the score, but could scores of 38-14 or 34-17 accurately be labeled as running up the score???? I don’t think so.
Keep the faith!
Actually, it is the Media GIVING it to him.
He keeps pointing back to Moss and Welker. (Marima can have links here in seconds if you want/need them).
Like they GIVE credit to Favre:
Adrian Peterson gets more yards when Favre hands the ball to him.
Greg Lewis makes better circus catches when Favre throws to him.
Look at the back pick up that blitz. He does it for Favre.
On and on ad nauseum.
The difference is Favre basks in it.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Favre is another story
The constant Patriots coverage has stopped for the most part, but the seed has been planted.
Something that we can both agree on, aren’t you tired of the Yankees and their billion dollar payroll. I mean if you spend that much more money than everyone else you should win the World Series every year. Ammaright?
//end rant
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
That's different.
They are New York based and most of the media is New York based. That bias exists ALL the time.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions
not to us (people outside of the Boswash)
to us its the same damn thing. We see it as always those teams out east and never anything to do with us.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
BTW, I'm from Illinois and live in Minnesota
Never been to Boston. Don’t know what the heck a Hoosier even is.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions
not sure anyone does
our Indiana history books in the fourth grade gave us several versions of the origin of the word. They’re all pretty dumb.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
It sounds like someone that makes panty hose.
Can’t imagine there’s enough call for everyone in the state to do that.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions
bar fight
next morning bartender finds a ear while cleaning up and asks Who’s ear? (aka Hoosier)
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
here are more if you're interested
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoosier#Origin
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Moss had double coverage on one.
but he threw A SCREEN to Faulk that ended as a touchdown. Welker is always open. It’s a new rule they made, that says Welker always has to be open. NFL Memo #8131-4.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
NFL Memo #8131-5
says that Brett Favre is, and always will be, the greatest, most gifted and most unimpeachable QB ever to touch the football, even if he’s in the process of self-destructing and destroying his team with interceptions and fumbles.
They call it the “John Madden” rule, in shorthand.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I read that in a blog somewhere....
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually am growing
a hate manning group in my back yard if you wanna join
Jack of all trades-Master of None.....
by Yardpenalty.com on Oct 31, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions
hell I'll join
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Nov 1, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
Now
THAT’S funny!
Can’t we all just get along…and hate Favre? =-)
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Oct 26, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Leaving players in the game but telling them not to play hard is going to get them injured.
You really want to get your multi-million dollar running back injured because you told him to just waffle into the scrimmage and start tap-dancing?
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
when did I say I don't want them to play hard?
at certain points starting RBs need to come out, especially if they are running all over everyone. QBs can stick around and hand off to the backup RB if they like and WRs can take a seat because they shouldn’t be getting much thrown their way anyway. Linemen are different. You can’t sub linemen without extremely screwing up some things there.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Double standard plain and simple
BBS at Stampede Blue just excused Indy’s beat-fest on the Rams in one sentence:
This was not a case where the Colts went into someone’s stadium and beat the snot out of a team that had quit on their season and forgotten how to win.
How is 42-7 not beating the snot out of a team? Just saying that you like the Rams and that “they played with a lot of fight, but in the end the Colts simply overwhelmed them” doesn’t make them any better than what they are – winless. They’re no better than the 0-6 Titans or the 0-6 Buccaneers.
Stampede Blue feels the need to throw this snide point in there as well:
“Maybe the Patriots would have continued to just ‘run their offense’ by going for it on meaningless 4th and 6 opportunities so their QB could get the record, but Indy doesn’t do that.
No. Instead of scoring the easy field goal, the Patriots decided to give the Titans a chance to stop them on 4th and 6. The Colts, on the other hand, at 28-6 in the 4th quarter decided it would be more fair to score two TDs on the Rams with starter Peyton Manning still in there throwing. One TD was scored with 3:46 left on the clock, and the last one with only 2:37 remaining. But no worries, the Colts “simply overwhelmed” them. My foot.
I could care less about the 42-6 score except for the fact that they give the Patriots nothing but grief. It’s a double standard where every single thing the Pats do is wrong. It’s hard to take anything else written over there seriously when the bias is so unbelievably glaring.
Keep the faith!
They always claim Brady pads his stats.
They can’t stand anyone have better stats than Peyton Manning in any category. It’s childish. Stats were made to be broken. That’s their nature. It gives someone else a mark to shoot for.
I don’t want the best QB on my team. I want the best team and the QB that can make that happen. If that means throwing 50 TDs, fine. If it means handing off for 50 TDs, that’s good too. The Pats have been more successful, and they have a QB that allows them to be successful. Don’t care about the stats.
If we had Manning and he had great stats, but the team wasn’t successful it would piss me off. Like Jay Cutler was in Denver.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Manning's lack of success
reflects more on the team than the individual. Brady and Manning are basically the same QB (rating wise) in the playoffs. A major hole in their D and run game are what stalls a lot of Manning’s success.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
I've never said I wouldn't want Manning as my QB
He’s very good at what he does (though the song and dance pre-snap gets annoying after awhile). Tom is very good at what he does.
The whole Brady vs Manning argument boils down to this:
The Patriots team has been more successful than the Colts team.
If you can say for sure the Pats would get more wins with Peyton under center, or the Colts would get more wins with Tom under center you MIGHT have an argument. You can’t. So the argument is over before it starts. I’d have no problem with either of them if the team wins are #1 priority.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd rather go 0-16, than have Favre as my QB.
Winning isn’t everything.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd rather have Adrian Peterson as my RB and Jared Allen as my DE
than old “I’m a pirate who loves working the land.” At least you know when they’re going to come to practice, rather than “I’m bored, I’m going to retire again”
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd take Brady for a game in the snow, hands-down,
but by the same token, I might take Manning in a dome-game, if only because he’s had more experience and does the arm-flappy screaming fit that would work better in a loud dome.
Otherwise, there’s so little in it…
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions
The arm-flapping is his chicken dance.
He’s very good at it too. They should make a stat for that.
No. No. Someone would try to break it. Can’t have that.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions
You put your left hand in, and you shake it all about...
I wonder if Guiness Book of Records has one for the longest performance of the Hokey-Tokey? Manning’s been in the league, what, 13 years?
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 26, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Let's discuss this in ohhh.......
10 years sound fair? When both are said and done then I’ll tell you how great Manning is compared to Brady. Until then its an argument that winds up like this.

Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Does Manning have any of Brady's records? HAHAHA
Jack of all trades-Master of None.....
by Yardpenalty.com on Oct 31, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not BBS so don't pin his beliefs on me
however the last TD came from our bottom of the depth chart RB. As stated above you can’t ask players to go out there and not try or they’ll get hurt. Peyton’s TD (the second to last one) was a drive of run, run, pass that just happened to end with a pass. If you want to take the emotion/biases out of articles over there just read shake and mgrex, they’re the numbers guys and tend to just throw out the facts and let you decide for yourself.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
actually if D.Brown doesnt play this weekend...
Mr. SImpson will get 10+ carries
Jack of all trades-Master of None.....
by Yardpenalty.com on Oct 31, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
SLOTMachinePlayer i see your point but
just for your info in that one over oakland the starting QB only played the 1st quarter just thought u would want to know also yea jets were up 24-0 but that is only 3 TD and a field goal and although you know that you are playing the raiders it is not impossible to come back from in mater of fact it happens and you are playing with a rookie QB who needs the confidence and has not played great pluse he wasn’t used as much as there RB who is now out for the season
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Oct 26, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
wow sorry didn't realize it would jump so far down but im commenting about one of the early ones i think u know which one
the one with the scores you gave
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Oct 26, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions
good lord i couldn't find what that was a response to
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
haha i must go now but i had no idea how far the reply to that was lol
it was to the list of scores he gave at the top adios till i get home
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Oct 26, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Understand your point
When you want to call “Running up the score”, what is the threshold?
How many points is too many? Is the first half off limits? What if they give you 12 yard punts, your 2nd string QB is in, and yards last string RB and you still score? What if they give you the gift of a pick 6? Do you drop it? Give it back?
When you are getting PAID to play, you are getting BONUSES to play well, and you’re a third or fourth stringer trying to impress do you play poorly intentionally. Running up the score is impossible in pro sports. Scoring is their job. PERIOD.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll try and clarify from my opinion
When it gets over a four score differential, so 29+ point lead. First half is fair game, if you suck that bad you deserve it. If its your backups doing the scoring keep it up, they suck, their fault. Gift pick 6? Take it to the house.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
agreed and some, u know it is dumb
for are game when you think about it two of the scores were 1. our 3rd or 4th string running back and no one even the coaches didnt expect that run. then the pick happened well like you said is he going to just drop it. anyway
when it first accured my thoughts on the pats game were they ran up the score but really what made me mad was just the way they did small things that i didn’t feel were necessary but overall you cant really blame them i mean the titans kept giving. you the ball for crying out loud.
anyhow here is to logical conversations later
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Oct 27, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions
disagree somewhat based on the rules
for good or bad, the plain fact is that one of the tiebreakers used in the NFL includes points scored.
Because of this, the teams really need to score as many points as they can, period.
Thus, no matter HOW or WHEN the points are scored, there is no such thing as running up the score. So no team on the list above is guilty of such.
It doesn’t matter how many you have already scored – you may need more points at the end of the season.
The only reason that one can legitimately use to ‘ease up’ is to limit starter’s exposure to injury. But in that case while I can see removing those guys, anybody still on the field should be going 100% at it.
Note – in a playoff or superbowl game, the above tiebreaker rule issue does not come into play and it could be argued that a team might be guilty of running up the score. A good case example of that might be the Bear’s thrashing of the Patriots in ‘86. Review the game score and situation when the Bears decided to have William ’The Refrigerator’ Perry run it in for a score. If they had instead used that situation to get Walter Payton a chance at his only SuperBowl TD then I don’t think anyone would have a problem with it. But they didn’t.
Mike Ditka
has no patience for this conversation. You’ve heard the expression, “There’s no crying in baseball”? Well for him it’s “There’s no running up the score in football.” Ever.
He was so disgusted with the question when the panel was talking about it last week, and at least he wasn’t being a hypocrite. He enjoyed beating other teams senseless, enjoyed completely dominating the Patriots in the Super Bowl, and thinks if there are people upset by a lopsided score, they should be more upset at the team that didn’t show up to play.
Keep the faith!
The only reason Eli came out cause he was injured from the week B4
Hes a padder too!lol
Jack of all trades-Master of None.....
by Yardpenalty.com on Oct 31, 2009 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions
At least Brady gave the ball away - TWICE - to the Bucs
To give them a couple of extra possessions. You have to admit that was more than generous to a win-less team. ; )
Keep the faith!
lol
Agreed. =-)
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Oct 26, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
sorry, meant rams
yes, you and others had a voice of reason. this was aimed those that did not.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
by MaPatsFan on Oct 26, 2009 3:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
well you all have to do something to start the trash talking again
the colts are only 4 short weeks from upending your darling patriots.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
our darling Patriots have already been upended - twice
It’s the Colts that need a little upending. We wouldn’t wish the pressure of an undefeated regular season on anyone, even our worst enemies. It’s the only decent thing to do.
Keep the faith!
oh no pressure needed
they’ll lose eventually. Much like the Giants (until two weeks ago), they just have had a cake-walk of a schedule to date. The Patriots will be their first TRUE test. I’ll comment on the team’s ability with some certainty after then.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
test of the Colts ability against a competitive top tier team
we can only speculate until then actually how good they are
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
bullard is going to invent that button someday
and he’s gonna be rich and give us some of his money
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Don't believe in Karma
I believe in the redeptive work of my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Karma doesn’t fit into that mind state.
I do believe that people find motivation where they choose to find motivation, and some of that may be to try to hurt other players. That has nothing to do with Karma, it is simply their perception of revenge. Which in my world view, no is allowed to exact.
We live in what is refered to as a causal world. This event causes that event. All Karma does is tries to force causes upon certain outcomes. The light went out. It’s because you kicked that poodle yesterday. It couldn’t be a bad bulb, or that you forgot to pay the electric bill. What a load of dribble.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 3:50 PM EDT reply actions
Oops
Which in my world view, no one is allowed to exact.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I had a feeling
Keep the faith!
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions
MaPatsFan is trying to stir something up to get out attention off the buy week.
Thanks.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 4:02 PM EDT reply actions
Some reasoning
First, a thanks to the REASONABLE Colts fans for an intelligent back and forth. AJforAZ and peytonsthebest rep your team well.
As you know, I’m usually very mild mannered and try to stick to talking about my team and not writing specifically to trash another team. Sure, I’ll throw the occasional barb in here and there but on the whole, it’s Patriots all the way. My tiny brain can only keep track of so many things, so one team is enough.
Every once in a while, something gets the best of me. The StampedeBlue FanPost linked above was one of those times. By and large, most of the regulars and the folks I respect, either kept quiet about it or piped in with their disagreement. Even if posters DID feel it was running up the score, they at least had a cogent argument as to why and were willing to intelligently discuss the subject without descending to “Belicheat, Cheatriots” B.S.
It got to me because this whole discussion about class is a bit ridiculous. It’s a highly overrated term, one that is so subjective as to render it an irrelevant as part of any useful discussion. I especially find it silly to say one team or player has “classier” wins. It’s consistently used by fans of one team to differentiate themselves from a rival’s fanbase. Utter hogwash.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
Ha!
Ain’t it the truth? lol
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Oct 26, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions
trying to come up with a smart ass response to this
I’ve got nothing right now.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
All I can say is the Colts better not go undefeated because of their simple schedule so far
I’m expecting a win when you guys play them or a few of the other teams that they face. As usual Peyton Manning is getting all the credit and claims of him be a contender for MVP is all about. It is annoying, so shut him down or I’ll expect the Ravens, Texans, or Broncos to do it. I wish my team played the games they did that way people would be screaming Chad Henne for MVP. I’ve officially decided to support Tom Brady over Peyton in the Brady-Manning debate. But don’t get me wrong I still want my team to do better than yours this is just the one instance where I cross the border.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 26, 2009 6:00 PM EDT reply actions
Miami did very well against the Colts
just not long enough. That’s happened to alot of teams including the Pats at times.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I support neither Brady nor Manning in the debate
I refuse to have that debate.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 26, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions
But there always is one and now I decided that I dislike Brady more than I hate Peyton.
lesser of two evils.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 26, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions
you can't tell me Peyton isn't having a great year
against a bunch of college teams.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
lol yeah well we gave a good game and so did Jacksonville.
but other than that not so much.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 26, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
wow that should say I dislike Brady less than I hate Peyton.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 26, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah our team was basically the only exception
and Jacksonville the first game.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 26, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Pats are still paying for '07 scores...which leads me to the Saints
Colts…meh, Peyton is having a good year, as usual against the amazingly difficult and consistently over hyped AFC South.
Nothing against him, I wouldn’t see he is exceeding expectations vs his opposition. Nor is Brady at this point either.
With respect to running up the scores – Pats are still paying a perceived debt from ‘07, and that’s fine.
Even as a Pats fan I felt there were a few games at least in ’07 where they were running up the score – but I also felt they were flipping a giant bird to the entire NFL in doing so.
“You think we are cheating? Well it should be easy for you to stop us now….oh….you can’t? Suck on it some more then NFL.”
So many people felt they got cheated by spy gate and the Pats in the NFL – that seasons Mantra seamed to be “leave no doubt.”
Of course then the rest of the NFL took offense to that too, not that they were cheating anymore but that they were that much better then their opponents.
This year – it’s hard to say a team is running up a score simply because of the final outcome.
I will be curious to see how the Saints are covered moving forward, now that the stories are being circulated that they are on pace to break the ’07 pats scoring record.
I guess you can’t run up the score if your defense can stop the other team huh? Total dominance – unacceptable. Dominance on one side of the ball…people aren’t so offended.
Key word: "Perceived"
Actual facts, though not as sexy, put a damper on the whole “flipping a giant bird to the entire NFL” theory:
Here are the Patriots final scores in 2007:
Jets 38-14
Chargers 38-14
Bills 38-7
Bengals 34-13
Browns 34-17
Cowboys 48-27
Dolphins 49-28
Redskins 52-7
Colts 24-20
Bills 56-10
Eagles 31-28
Ravens 27-24
Steelers 4-13
Jets 20-10
Dolphins 28-7
Giants 38-35
Keep the faith!
A few are close but the Pats just out played other teams which isn't running up the score.
Some aren’t pretty scores to look at but I wouldn’t consider it running up the score.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 27, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
if i recall correctly
both 50 pointers were ridiculous displays of lets just see how much we can score
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
Soooooo...
…what? Fifty-burgers don’t happen too often. The gap between the top-tier teams and the bottom feeders has never been wider than it has been this season. As someone already pointed out, it’s almost impossible to NOT score against them – and when the back-ups go in (for the Patriots, QB Brian Hoyer is an undrafted rookie) they’re playing for a job and a contract. How do you tell them not to score?
Like it or not, this is a statistics-driven league. You Colts fans all know it because that’s how you all say with confidence that Peyton Manning is the best QB in the NFL. What is said to anyone who tries to argue otherwise??? Look at Peyton’s stats. That’s the end-all, be-all answer.
What about the Patriots three Super Bowl wins? Some say they weren’t dominant wins because they only won by 3 points each time (and lost by only 3 points – argh -in their last appearance.) Who would guess, years from now, if the Patriots could have won each game by 3 TDs, but chose to keep the games close to spare the feelings of their opponents?
Statistics are how teams, players and coaches are judged and paid. Long after this generation is gone and can’t re-tell the stories of how great our teams/QBs were, the statistics will tell the stories for us. Wins matter. Playoff appearances matter. Super Bowls matter.
Keep the faith!
You just said it, What about the Patriots Super Bowl wins?
It isn’t Tom Brady’s Super Bowl wins, it is the Patriots. Which is a great metric to measure a team. You can’t fault individual players for the failures of the teams they were on. But that is an argument for another day.
The post that you replied to has nothing to do with this season, so pointing out that teams are easy to score on this season isn’t helping your argument. The Titans suck, they can’t beat your second-third string teams so keep scoring. You can’t tell Hoyer to go out there and not try.
The issue I was concerned with was the two 2007 drubbings of the ’Skins and Bills. Brady was not only playing in the fourth quarter (which is perfectly acceptable), but he was throwing down field against obviously incapable defenses when the game was so far out of hand it was comical. Hence, Brady (and Moss at that) was padding his stats. That is where the stat padding issue comes into play. There are a billion instances I can point to where when the game gets out of hand Peyton starts handing the ball off or simply throwing to the flats (which essentially is a run play). That is my problem with a few of the games in the 2007 season. Not this one.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
it is when those few games
are in the record books.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
How so? For who?
The discussion was good, but this comment is overly partisan. Manning didn’t get all of his 2004 record 49 TD passes on what an objective observer would consider to be “necessary” touchdowns (cough, Detroit, cough) against all quality opponents.
Manning broke Dan Marino’s NFL record set at 48 in 2004. Simple. Did he know that number? Of course. Manning had 6 games that season where he threw 4 or more touchdown passes. He’s a competitive guy, and so is Tom Brady. They’re both students of the game and are very aware of what they’re doing and where they stand in relationship to history and milestones (not to the selfish point where it would ever hurt their team or their team’s chance of winning, don’t misunderstand).
There’s nothing wrong with that. For either of them. That’s how records are set, that’s how they’re broken, that’s how they’ll be remembered.
Keep the faith!
yeah I just realized that might come off a bit ehhhh
I was just coming back to reply to myself, that’s my opinion of course. It probably has some homer leanings.
Not sure I can or am willing to argue with that. I’d probably just end up saying something stupid. So I’m going to throw on the filter now before I say something dumb or inappropriate. Of course Manning broke the record in only 15 games. (Sorry had to get that jab in there)
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
knew that was coming...lol
(I certainly wasn’t going to offer it up. Gets too nit-picky and we’re thrown back on the treadmill.) I understand what your point is though. Good discussion.
Keep the faith!
You decry the easy teams the Colts have beaten,
but statistics show that destroying bad teams is a much better indicator of playoff success than beating good teams. Check out the FO article here.
I’ve been giving that article a lot of circulation since Shake introduced me to it.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This video right here has produced one of my favorite lines ever. It was so awesome that there has been 2 sequels. One where you must put a banana in your ear, and another where you must grab their tongues. Purely awesome.
It is a good link...
…but no one succeeds beating up only on horrible teams (read: 2008 Dolphins). Teams still need to beat good teams. I don’t think (I hope no one is) anyone is saying the Colts are a bad team. We’re just saying that, thus far, they haven’t been challenged so it’s hard to say where they really are.
by Richard Hill on Oct 29, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Not to be petty,
but the Colts have been challenged this year against Jacksonville and Miami. Both were incredibly tough games.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This video right here has produced one of my favorite lines ever. It was so awesome that there has been 2 sequels. One where you must put a banana in your ear, and another where you must grab their tongues. Purely awesome.
Yeah...
…challenged by a team that, only a couple weeks later, were taken into OT by the Rams. (I’ll give you Miami, since they should have won the NO game, if not for officiating).
by Richard Hill on Oct 29, 2009 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Division games are generally hard.
You should know this from that Bills game earlier this year. The Jags are always a different team when they play us.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This video right here has produced one of my favorite lines ever. It was so awesome that there has been 2 sequels. One where you must put a banana in your ear, and another where you must grab their tongues. Purely awesome.
Hah.
I was going to post stats that would be contrary to your statement, but your statement is correct and there are no stats contrary to it. My only excuse (weak as it is) is that it was Brady’s first game back and the Bills/Pats game are never that close. Also, those Bills DID beat the Jets.
But regardless, the Colts have a pretty nice schedule this season- there’s no refuting that. See you at the actual game and we’ll see who prevails.
by Richard Hill on Oct 30, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions
No problem.
It’s a surprising article because the facts don’t follow “common opinion.” I was shocked when I read it.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This video right here has produced one of my favorite lines ever. It was so awesome that there has been 2 sequels. One where you must put a banana in your ear, and another where you must grab their tongues. Purely awesome.
Ok, just wanted to point out a couple of things.
I live just outside St. Louis, and I was at the Rams/Colts game this past Sunday.
First, Sorgi did come in about halfway through the 4th quarter, but it was only for about 3 plays over 2 drives because 2 of those plays were runs in for TDs. The Rams had the ball for the rest of the half. SMP, I don’t know why he has no stats on NFL.com, unless its because all he did was hand off, not make any throws. And for reference, I had no problem with how long Brady was in the game against Tennessee. They took him out at the half, which was fine by me.
Secondly, the Colts did one thing that I was upset about and thought was a little lame. With 5:56 left in the game with the score 38-6 and they were on the Rams 46 yard line, they went for it on a 4th and 5. I didn’t think they needed to go for it on that occasion, the Rams were not going to make a comeback, and I thought they should have punted the ball. That being said, I don’t believe this can be blamed on Peyton Manning. he was headed for the sideline and taking his helmet off and the coach ran over to him and told him to get back on the field. I got the impression that it was a coach’s call, not Mannings.
Not trying to take a side in the discussion, just pointing out a couple of things from someone who was at the game. =)
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
4th quarter
The two touchdowns scored by the Colts in the 4th quarter came with 3+ min. and 2+ left. To say that “the Rams had the ball for the rest of the half” is silly. Less than two and a half minutes???
FOURTH QUARTER (2:29 remaining)
The Rams once again failed to convert on fourth down and the Colts quickly took advantage. On the first play of the ensuing possession, second-year running back Chad Simpson ran 31 yards for the touchdown, the sixth Colts touchdown of the game. COLTS 42, RAMS 6
FOURTH QUARTER (3:42 remaining)
Looking to milk the clock and put some insurance points on the scoreboard, the Colts mounted their longest drive of the afternoon, going 93 yards in 11 plays and 6:43 seconds. Manning passed for his third touchdown of the game when he hit rookie wide receiver Austin Collie on an eight-yard slant over the middle. COLTS 35, RAMS 6
Keep the faith!
Keep in mind that quote is from the official Colts.com website
“Looking to milk the clock and put some insurance points on the scoreboard…Manning passed for his third touchdown of the game.”
That was with 3.42 remaining. Yep, especially against an explosive team like the Rams when they’re already down 28-6, ya need to have those insurance points. And even that wasn’t enough.
Keep the faith!
neither.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 27, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions
It was perfectly okay
The whole point of this post was to show that Stampede Blue’s outrage over the Patriots classlessisity (about as real a word as “unclassiest”) in running up the score on the poor, hapless Titans was out of line and ridiculous.
If your own team’s official Colts website is joyful about scoring with 3 minutes left, why are your fans so against it? Or rather, why are they so against it when the Patriots score a whole lot of points against an opponent as overwhelmed as the Rams?
Keep the faith!
I think the "Padding the Stats" comes from
Week 7 of 2007, when Brady was taken out of a 28 point game against the winless Dolphins, and was put back in, in the 4th quarter, still up by 3 scores.
My thoughts are if the team that is getting blown out still has their starters in, thus “trying” to win the game, it’s fair game to score at will. If the losing team pulls the starters, it’s time for either the backups, or handoffs to the RBs.
Again, if Manning gets put in when he was coming out, it's the coach's decision
If Brady gets put in when he was already out, it’s Brady’s decision? Don’t follow the logic there.
Under the coach’s job description is a line about determining who will play and when.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 27, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Another thing about 2007, was how 2006 ended for the Pats
They didn’t play all 60 minutes against the Colts. Belichick made them play 60 minutes for all of 2007. It worked.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 27, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
This isn't a Manning vs. Brady discussion
This is a Colts vs. Patriots discussion, with regards to how they handle blowout victories. This is a better discussion to be having than arguing over top 5 draft picks, but I digress…
It’s all about perception. Bringing a starter, who had already thrown 5 TDs in the game, back into the game, and continuing to throw the ball, will be chastised. There’s just no way around it.
And just so we’re clear, what happened to the Titans was not bad whatsoever.
My argument all along is that no amount of scoring should be chastised in pro sports
Offenses are PAID to score, they have contract incentives to score alot. Most even get bonuses for going to the Pro-Bowl. How would you like to miss out on a million bucks because you were 1 TD short of your contract bonus by sitting the bench in a blow out? Think the team will still give it to you?
Defenses are PAID to stop people from scoring. If they quit trying, fire them, but don’t blame the other offense.
Beat the Pats 100-0 if you want, I’ll never accuse you of running up the score. I’ll yell at the defense for letting you.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 27, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I hate Manning.
I just really can’t stand him or the Colts. It has gotten to the point where they can’t point the fingers and say Tom Brady pads his stats but it is more obvious that is what Peyton is doing. I’m so over Peyton, not like I was ever for him.
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 27, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Ok, sorry.
I guess I wasn’t clear. I was meaning that after they went for it on that 4th and 5 with 5:56 remaining, Manning finished that drive, which I believe ended with the TD pass at 3:42. The rest of the game Sorgi was in for a few plays which ended with the other TD. I was meaning the “rest of the half” to be from that 5:56 point.
Again, I’ll apologize for the confusion, I’ll try to be more clear next time. I wasn’t watching the exact times that the TD happened, and I was trying to remember exactly what happened after having more than a few beers that day.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
3 games spoiled the bunch in '07 - I don't think the 4th call is running up the score
with regard to 2007 the first phins game, the skins and the Bills 2nd game – all within 4 weeks of each other was what caused the biggest stir I think. Brady took all the snaps and they were running a lot of open, 4-5 wide sets into the 4th Q of those games.
Relating to the 4th and 5 call, Pats have done that at times with the 2nd unit in on 4th down as well. I don’t think it’s really a bad thing, if you play action on the down and go for the end zone that’d be bad, but the idea is simply to keep the ball so you can run out the clock most times in that situation.
Alternative to the clock stopping on the change of possession, incomplete passes, etc. Just end the sucker.
going for it on 4th and 5 or 4th and 6
is a different animal than going for it on 4th and 1. In the Patriots case against the Titans, they went for it on 4th and 6 because they were too close to the end zone to punt. Their only alternative was to kick a field goal. (Please, no one even try to argue that taking a knee would have been an option.)
Keep the faith!
did you wear Dolphins stuff to the game?
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 27, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions
No, I don't like going to a game and wearing gear of a team that's not even playing.
I think that’s just kinda pointless.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
So you just wore non-NFL related stuff?
and who did you cheer for?
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 27, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I cheered for the Rams.
I support the Rams as they are my hometown team and in a different conference than the Phins. As I like to say, I will cheer for the Rams in every game as long as its not against Miami.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
which I understand.
I wouldn’t do the same because the Bills are my hometown team so that isn’t happening. Did you break out your Rams gear?
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 27, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I wore my Torry Holt jersey
which I bought about 2 months before he was released. Kinda like how my wife got me my ZT jersey and then he was traded about a month later. Apparently, if I get someone’s jersey, they get traded or released from their team shortly thereafter.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
Glad you don't have any Patriots gear.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, no worries.
I just can’t bring myself to buy any Pats gear of any kind. I’m sure you understand. =)
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
No problem, but will you accept some as a Christmas present?
What’s your size? :-)
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Nevermind, Galloway's not on the team anymore.
We’re all good.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
You could actually give him Galloway himself
“Here. Have a receiver. He’s pretty fast. You could use him as a lampshade. Just don’t put anything in his hands that you don’t want dropped.”
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 28, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, that sucks. maybe you should buy a Ginn one?
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 28, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think he needs my powers to help get him outta Miami.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
Yeah, what's up with Ginn?
Is he going to the Joey Galloway school for receiving or what?
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I think he enrolled there right outta college.
He’s pretty much on his last legs. Most of us are pretty conviced he’s gone after the season is over.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points
Kinda like Chad Jackson for the Pats
The talent is there, but he never makes the jump to the pros.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I liked him but I'm slightly disappointed with how he has been playing as of late
Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman
by dolphinsinbuffalo on Oct 28, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions
for me, the bottom line
is that, however improbable the chance, total points are still part of the NFL’s equation for determining standings as a tiebreaker, and thus still can affect a team’s postseason fortunes.
Yes, it’d be nice if we could see “sportsmanship” in all facets of the game (as if scoring lots of points is the most egregious violation of the player code, worse than standing over fallen players, spitting, twisting other guys’ limbs in fumble scrums, celebrating a routine pass breakup like you won the lottery). But if people want to eliminate teams pouring it on when the opponent is clearly beaten, the NFL needs to remove total points from having any kind of mathematical impact on a team’s success.
Otherwise, who can blame anyone, whether it be the Colts, Patriots, Jets, Saints, Bengals for doing everything they can to make sure they get a playoff spot?
They also need to remove incentives from player's contracts for doing well.
Pulling a player who could hit a mark in his contract just because the opponent is pathetic doesn’t sit well with said player, his agent or the NFLPA. “Sorry, one more TD and you’d have made another million dollars, but you’re sitting the bench because you’re too good and they’re too bad.” Think the team will give him the million anyway?
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 27, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
contract incentives
That’s the other point no one brings up. They’re important to players, to be given a viable chance at attaining them – why should they be punished because another team is rolling over?
Keep the faith!
If I was being paid relative to my production,
and my coach yanked me right when I was having the best day of my career – throwing 6 TDs or catching 4 or rushing for a half-dozen – I’d demand a trade. Why? He’s ruining my earning potential. I’m being paid to do well this year, and my contracts in future are predicated upon my performance now. Professional sports performances are up-and-down – if my downs aren’t balanced by those rare days I have an amazing upside, then I’m not only shortchanging myself now but I’m shortchanging my career in future. That’s basically contract-tampering, defrauding athletes of the ability to earn their incentives, contract extensions, and lucrative free-agency contracts. In any other industry it would be a cause for massive legal wranglings – “I see your construction project is ahead of schedule, we’re going to stop you now because we don’t want to pay your early-finishing bonus”.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 27, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Perception has a lot to do with it too -
A team that is known for piling on points is much more intimidating than a team that isn’t. The mental game can be won before the teams even take the field.
Keep the faith!
Rewarding mediocrity
If you don’t play 100% of your ability for 60 minutes, then you’re effectively giving the mediocre teams carte blanche to not try. The salary cap and reverse draft order is there to guarantee some semblance of parity in the league – if some teams blow draft picks or salary cap on poor players or don’t spend in the first place, that’s their prerogative, and they should be punished for it. If that means they get stomped on every game, and lose viewers and supporters and revenue, that’s their own fault for shortchanging their franchise by not investing in their product correctly – good players, coaches and the like.
Face it – it’s a business. It’s big business. And they should be treated accordingly – if the particular franchise won’t invest its revenue properly, they should deal with the resultant consequences. Letting off the accelerator against “weak” teams only gives those teams a reason not to do business properly. Given the revenue-sharing deals between the owners, why should a good owner (say, Kraft) basically lend money to an incompetent organisation whom he knows won’t use it wisely and give a good product? It’s in Kraft’s best interests to force the lesser teams to pick up their act and actually produce a good product and team through wise husbandry of resources.
I justify it...
…by just saying Wes Welker is our 5th Running Back and he’s just handling long-ball handoffs. We don’t have a RB to run down the clock, nor do we want to just hand the ball back to the other team. We have WRs who stay in-bounds and pick up yardage on little dink and dump passes (unless someone’s painfully open downfield) and keep the clock running. I guess the passes make us get down the field twice as fast, but it’s our only real option apart from physically stopping our own offense by running the ball with SloMo.
I don’t think anyone’s really been running up the score, just taking advantage of mid-season games at a pre-season difficulty level, ironing out plays that need work and giving bench players valuable in-game experience. Seriously, if the level of parity in the NFL is so shot, no one and no team can be blamed for ending up in the end zone.
so umm MaPatsFan you going to fix the demonstrably false claim that Peyton played the whole game?
http://www.nfl.com/players/jimsorgi/gamelogs?id=SOR431260
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
They finally updated it. They don't say, though that he played for less than 3 minutes.
4th Quarter
3:42 IND TD Peyton Manning passed to Austin Collie down the middle for 8 yard gain (Matt Stover made PAT) 35 – 6
2:29 IND TD Chad Simpson rushed to the left for 31 yard gain (Matt Stover made PAT) 42 – 6
That last TD, was a Sorgi hand off. At 3:42 left in the fourth Peyton was still tossing pigskin for points. Of course, he wasn’t padding stats or anything because, well, he’s Peyton and he wouldn’t do that.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
He could have...
he was short 65 yards to tie the record for 6 consecutive games with 300+ yards. But, he’s Peyton, so of course he didn’t do that. lol
just sayin’ =-)
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Oct 28, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought it was funny when he laughed at Suzy Kolber
for bringing it up after game 5 and then told her she shouldn’t be interviewing Austin Collie because the kid doesn’t need it. But that’s a discussion for StampedeBlue, I won’t let Peyton’s awesomeness hijack this thread. ;-)
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
I would say that he wasn't padding stats
due to what we’ve already established as MY standards to running up the score/padding stats. But yeah, I don’t feel like going over all of that again. In short, it was an 11 play drive of hand offs and dump passes that just happened to end in a dump pass for a TD. Meh, it would be unreasonable if the players in the game were asked to not try to score (as you’ve stated yourself). As long as it isn’t a starter going for the long ball on a series in a 4th quarter blow out.
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
I don't think you CAN pad your stats.
Players get paid to play, and they get paid better when they play well.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
That drive started with 10 minutes to go though
and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a QB pulled mid-drive for that.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Oct 28, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
link
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/boxscore?gid=20091025014&page=plays
Indy got the ball with 10:29 to play and ran 7 minutes off before scoring.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Oct 28, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Not blaming Peyton or the coach (whatever his name is - just can't remember right now)
Just pointing out that you can’t have it both ways. I have alot of respect for the Colts and Peyton. They’re fierce competitors, and I respect that. I don’t respect the Titans right now for rolling over, but I respect their fans, because I’ve been there and done that. I know the frustration. Keep in mind that most of their fans blame their defense, and not our offense for the score being what it is. That’s exactly as it should be. The Titans need to get better. It’s good for the health of the AFC South, the conference, and the NFL.
If we beat the Colts and the Steelers, our team gets stronger. If you beat us, your team gets stronger. That’s as it should be, so the strongest team can bring the Lombardi back to their conference. If the Pats were push-overs, you wouldn’t even be here chatting with us. Strong teams strengthen us.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure
See, even you had to dig for that. Show me where it says Sorgi came into the game in the play-by-play which is where I looked first.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
It's not in the play-by-play
all I could find was this:
Backup QB Jim Sorgi had a productive day against the Rams. Sorgi replaced Peyton Manning late in the fourth quarter (3.56). On his only play of the game, he handed off to RB Chad Simpson. Simpson bolted 31 yards for the Colts’ final touchdown of the day. “Crisp, clean handoff,” Sorgi joked later.
Manning went back in after the TD.
Keep the faith!
yeah the play by play is linked
the Colts had two 4th quarter drives. One was with Peyton, started at 10:29 to play in the game and bled 7 minutes off the Colts and was 2/3rd-3/4ths running. The other was one run play that the 3rd string RB broke for a TD.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Oct 28, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Just a quick props to you guys here at PatsPulpit
This has been a great discussion and I really enjoy talking to you guys. Since the change in leadership you guys have been really welcoming and accommodating. I would just like to let you know that I enjoy reading what you guys and gals have to say about our differing opinions. If you don’t mind I’ll probably be here to toss in a Colts bias and as objective as possible commentary when its not Colts related and seems appropriate. I’ll try not to wear out my welcome (please let me know if I ever start).
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
I'm sure you will, lol.
Nothing like another team’s homer to keep our own homerism in check. Somewhat anyway. A bit???
Keep the faith!
I like other POV's, keeps you from viewing things too muck from the Patriots-colored-glasses.
I pop into alot of sites with my opinions. If you start with respect, you can’t go too far wrong.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks!
Thoughtful, intelligent back and forth is always welcomed. That’s how we learn and that’s why I do this.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
One more point of view
I’ve played soccer competitively in three countries. When my son got into soccer (our town was just starting a soccer program), I started coaching soccer U14 (12-13 year-olds). Younger kids are easier they’ll listen. These guys were like, “I’ve got a foot, I know how to kick, you can’t teach me anything.” They really thought they were good. They went into their first game and lost 14-0 (In football that would be like 98-0). Didn’t bother me a bit. They needed to be broken. They needed to learn their weaknesses. They needed to become a team. It gave us a point of reference to build on. Were they down? You bet! They were all about, “We suck. We’ll never be any good.” That, I can work with.
“Remember, when you stopped the ball, and they just took it away?” “Yeah.” “Here’s how you stop that.” “Oh, that works?” “Yeah, that works.”
A few more shut-outs in the 5-0 range, celebrating our first goal, our first win, our first winning streak. We became a team. I was very happy for that 14-0. If they had stopped at 4-0, there would have been no living with them. Oh, and those were kids.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 28, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions
i def. see your point though i
think it is a little diffrent. i also played soccer for a very long time then i reffeered it for a few years. wow 14-0 that is bad lol.
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Oct 29, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions
yeah man
the high school boys I coached we popped a team 12-0 and I thought that was a shellacking. I can’t imagine another 2 goals. Let alone we play 80 minutes compared to what 60 minutes for U-14s?
Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.
In the 1995 Rugby World Cup
New Zealand played Japan in pool play and won 145-17. Yes. 145 points. And the scoring system is similar to the NFL – a try and conversion is worth 7 points, which is basically the same as a touchdown and PAT.
Those were top-level international players at a World Cup, all professionals. Nobody considered it racking up the score – in fact, the Japanese raved about the performance so much that they effectively adopted the New Zealand team from that point on as their favourite non-Japanese squad. Maybe NFL supporters are too precious? Heh.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 29, 2009 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions
wow i didn't even think it was possible to score that much in the amount of time they have.
i think country against country is a little diffrent but i do see what you are trying to say but country against country and two teams in one sport in a season in the same country i find to be diffrent cercumstances
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Oct 29, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
The main point being the reaction of the Japanese fans
They considered it the greatest honour to be treated like an equal and have the New Zealand side play full-throttle for the whole game. It would have been abhorrent to them to be patronised and have the New Zealand side let off at half time – in fact, it would have been bordering on insulting. At the very least, they were given the opportunity to see a very efficient, very skilled team play to their utmost ability for an entire game, and the Japanese fans truly appreciated it.
I’m not sure every fanbase would react the same to what really was a complete bloodbath, but I can really see their point. If a team I support had to lose, I’d probably choose to lose 70-0 and watch Drew Brees or Manning throw for 1000 yards, than I would want to lose 45-0 to a bunch of scrubs dithering around and still putting up points. At least in the first scenario you can admit that you got beaten by a consumnate professional at the height of their game. The second is just embarrassing.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 29, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions
pot clling kettle black
I don’t care who scores as much as they can as a life long PATROTS fan I have sufered through DECADES of inept play and coaching andwe took our drubbings as we should OUR ineptitude! Any one remember SHANNON SHARPE onthe phone in FOXBORO begging the president to callin the national gaurd"cause WE ARE KILLING THE PATRIOTS’ All part of the game but now because a lot of the country is sick of seeing BILL B. win the double standard comes up every time the pats win by more than 20 Any one remember the AFC playoff when the PATS led the colts 31-10 and LOST ? YOU can bet your ass BILL will never let his team forget that lost tip to the super bowl.Every one better score and win while the can cause those hard times last a lot longer(at least in my first 40yrs) than any perfect storm of talent ,coaching and luck!If any of you wre in our place for the last 50 yrs. you would realize that and appreciate the hard work it takes to do it,by the way I don’t see many veterans loking for aring condeming them.
That's the game that started it all
The “sixty minutes” mantra… So, blame it all on the Colts.
Keep the faith!
sounds like one of my dad's stories of "back in the day." lol.
some people need to find stupid reasons to hate a team that either does better than them, enjoying great success, getting more noticed, or any other immature idiotic ignorant person would think of.

by 




















