The impact of sidelining "Fast Freddy", Patriots RB Fred Taylor out for ankle surgery
I love Fred Taylor. It's not in the man crush sort of way I love another Patriot, but yeah...I love Fred Taylor. My dad tells me it's because I had the chance to interview Fred. Well...yeah. He gave me the time of day and was a super nice guy. But that's not all of it. What I REALLY like is the idea of Fred. Now, before I get all existential or metaphysical or zen on y'all, let me just say I think you'll get it.
As most of you know, Fred was a Jacksonville Jaguar for the first 11 years of his career. At that point, Jacksonville decided to jetison "Fast Freddy" in favor of their younger back, Maurice Jones-Drew. For teams who rely on workhorse backs to carry the load, this was probably the right move for them. Not so for the Patriots. If you've been following this team, you know our current answer to the run game is "backfield by committee". Whether by necessity or strategy, it's what we have. It seems to be effective. In 2008, we were #1 in the AFC East and #6 in the NFL for rushing. You read that right. NE? A rushing team?!?! Apparently.
Back to the Idea of Fred (SMP, I need a special Fred font). Because we're a backfield by committee, we keep many different backs with varied skill sets. Laurence Maroney and BenJarvus Green-Ellis would be our general purpose backs. Sammy Morris may have been in that category until he became a receiving threat in our Baltimore Ravens matchup. Kevin Faulk? Mr. Third Down. Deadly holding the ball, deadly pulling it out of the air - he scares rivals. Now, Fred is what I would call a general purpose back. And, he's known for crazy downhill speed; when he breaks loose, it ain't pretty. However, during the Falcons matchup where he racked up 21 carries for 105 yards, we saw another side of Fred. That is, the "put your shoulder down, turn a bit, and blast through the hole" Fred. He created holes where none existed before.
My favorite side of Fred? That's the "do you really want to tackle me?" Fred. He blasts tacklers, explodes on them. It's like they're standing in front of a big "Fred Cannon" when it goes off.

The Fred Cannon. So, aside from his obvious talents as a running back, Fred is a true veteran presence. That shoulder drop, blast through the line stuff is something our "young buck", Laurence Maroney, is sorely lacking. Laurence dances, bouncing off the line, seeking a spot to run through. Fred has great downfield vision and "creates" a hole to run through. Sure, the O line does a bangup job of parting the 300 pounders, but ultimately Fred has to slice and dice his way through. And the young guys take notice.
In my humble opinion, Fred is on this team to be a mentor, most likely for Laurence Maroney. Taylor suffered unending criticism in his early years as he sustained an endless barrage of "Fragile Freddy" insults while he recovered from one injury after another. Maroney is experiencing much the same. Whether or not El Mo can develop this year into a Fred Jr. remains to be seen, but I think he's only got one year, THIS year, to figure it out.
So where does this leave our backfield? As many of you have surmised in other comments, Law Firm will, most likely, play a bigger role. Maroney and Green-Ellis will continue what they always do - general purpose running. Next, Faulk will assume third down duties and whatever else he's asked to do. Sammy will do general purpose and surprise 'em with a little option or screen from Tom Brady.
It's all good. We have depth. The Idea of Fred is not about the man. It's about the concept. Ohhhmmm... Ohhhmmm...
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I do like the idea of Taylor getting in Maroney's ear on the sidelines between plays
but I’m not sure he’d travel with them given his status. He is about the best guy you could hope for to set Maroney right mentally, given the criticism of “Fragile Fred” and his supposed penchant for avoiding contact as a youngster. Maybe now he’ll go from elder statesmen of the RB committee into a overseer and coach of Maroney.
And then Taylor comes back later into the season, all ready for playoff football. Right in time for a New England winter. Huzzah!
Maybe Maroney's dancing to the 1812 overture
and he’s waiting for the cannon part to run through the hole. Boom.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 8, 2009 8:42 PM EDT reply actions
Reconsidering the lack of fullback?
Strap some explosive to the rear end of Sammy Morris and fire him in there a few times.
Even bring back John Madden for the ubiquitous “Boom!”
Freds injured?
Thats because his nickname is not Fast Freddy but in all actuality it is Fragile Fred.
As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.
so
i think i’m gonna purchase nfl rewind.
and the question is what teams should i follow.
this is what im settling on.
from the nfc the giatns. probably the team to beat and a contender for the forseeable future
for the afc (more important conference from pats perspective) the jets the pats the ravens the steelers and the colts
i thought i’d skip the afc west
if you were going to try to closely follow 5 or so teams which would you pick? i am afc heavy because those are the teams we will face in the playoffs
In no particular order, but I'll number them just to make sure I have 6
1) Saints. Unstoppable QB who may or may not be a Terminator model in a really good disguise. Add in a dash of freakily gifted WRs and HBs, and it’s aerobatic and athletic. Also seemingly found a defence that can make big, spectacular plays. That kinda helps.
2) Denver. Nice mix of underdog status, Patriots ‘little brother’ affections because of the player/coach crossovers, and unexpected success means it’s an emotional favourite. Champ Bailey and Dawkins guarantee at least some exciting plays on defence; solid and shifty offence with stud WR that can make things happen in spectacular fashion.
3) Colts. Even if you hate Manning, you have to admit watching him is a lesson in professionalism. And his battery of WRs brings a great mix of athleticism and skill that a QB as good as Manning is guaranteed to maximise in spectacular ways.
4) Eagles. McNabb, despite having a strangely love-hate (mostly hate?) relationship with Philly fans, is still a very, very good QB. Add in Vick, Westbrook, DeSean Jackson and a couple of their rookies, it’s a dynamic offence, and occasionally a joy to watch.
5) Packers. I like watching Aaron Rodgers play. The guy can scramble pretty handily. He can stand up in the pocket and take hits (man! can he take hits. Eight sacks the other day, and a few added QB hits on top of that. And he’s still breathing!). He can throw. On the same day he took 8 sacks, he put up 384 yards. That’s ridiculous. It’s just a shame that the talent around him isn’t up to his level, or he’d be phenomenal. He’s worth watching the Packers for all by himself.
6) Vikings. I hate Favre. I can’t stand the indecision. I can’t stand the revenge aspect against a team that did nothing to him but take him for his word when he said he was retired. But I’d still watch him. If only because I kinda hope he’s hit around a little. And there’s also that other guy on that team. Some guy Peterson. I’ve heard he’s okay, sometimes. (A caveat on this; commentators LOVE Favre. Don’t worry about any clever commentary when watching Brett Favre the Vikings. It won’t happen. Learn to love your mute button. But not like that, that’s just sick.
I suppose I should've put it here
Michael Bennett’s a new free agent. Any thoughts whether Hoodie will show interest?

by 

































