Ask Colts fans from Stampede Blue
Yes, we hate your team. But, we still respect you, and like Christmas, New Year's, and the first day of the NFL Draft, the seemingly annual Patriots v. Colts game is almost like a holiday you look forward to when November rolls around. This year, we Colts fans are happy to see Tom Brady back and healthy. It's just not the same without him. We're a bit sad that Tony Dungy isn't walking the sidelines for us anymore, but we are happy with the man who has taken up the job: Jim Caldwell.
Leading up to this game, we Colts bloggers and fans are happy to answer any questions you might have about our team, this game, or football in general. Despite the rivalry between the two teams, its nice that our two blog communities have such a strong connection. Much of that is attributed to MaPatsFan, who is a good man who knows how to run a blog. He's also a passionate Patriots fan who knows his football.
Please use the comments to ask me, shake n bake, and other Colts writers and readers about the game.
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
8 recs |
128 comments
Comments
Fast starts
are really nothing new to you guys; it seems like every season you’re 5, 6, or 7-0. That said, could you give us some insight on how your undefeated record so far this season feels in relation to past years? Do you think that this is one of the “start fast, burn out quick” starts, do you feel that you’re only undefeated because of an easy schedule, or do you think that those two criticisms being thrown around are just the media finding excuses to criticize a team that is ready to reclaim the top spot in the AFC from the Steelers?
by sc4rs on Nov 11, 2009 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well
The only seasons I’d say were we “burnt out quick” were 2005 and 2007, with 2005 being the one where it really stung. 2007, we lost Freeney for the year and Mathis was playing on one leg. As a result, we lose to the Chargers in a close one.
This year, for the first time, the fast start is much more about our defense than our offense. So, because of that, I’d say this start “feels” different than previous starts.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Nov 11, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Defense
Totally agree with BBS here regarding the defense. Our offense has only really been hot in the night games (Titans, Arizona, Miami), and, generally speaking, the other games have seen our offense be just better than average, with the defense really controlling the games for us.
So, this feels much more similar to the 2005 season where we went 13-0, which was highly based on our defense playing extremely well. Currently, I dont want to say we’re going through an offensive ‘slump’, but we’ve been a little choppy in the red zone and, in general, a little bit less exquisite than usual. Our defense has really stepped up. In particular, Freeney is playing MAYBE the best he’s ever played this year.
by clownsaw on Nov 11, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Different...
This is not the best Colts team i’ve seen. (the 2005 team was amazing.) That said they did not get to 8-0 by accident or a scheduling fluke either. The defense has been what is winning us games. The pass defense is for real. Probably the best in the league right now. The run defense is underrated as well. Aside from the Dolphins game, we have held some pretty talented runners in check. I atribute the Dolphins debacle more to an overpowering offensive line and we really seem to struggle with the direct snap runs.
The offense has been average. Manning is still Manning. Losing Gonzalez sucks, but it isn’t a season killer. I would like to have him back because Garcon just doesn’t provide the same reliability to move the sticks. Collie is a usefull weapon though. The guy can just play and catches everything in sight. The running game is still just average and misses the game breaking ability of Donald Brown. The offensive line is far inferior to what we have become accustom. LT Charlier Johnson has held up better than expected but RG Mike Pollack has been a disaster. Looks like he may have lost his starting job. Manning’s quick release keeps him off the turf, but when it comes to mauling a DT in the run game; we struggle to get it done.
by invisibulman on Nov 11, 2009 11:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks guys!
Freeney is having a monster year, that much I knew, but I didn’t realize that it was more of a defensive team at this point; seeing Manning’s stats you wouldn’t really know it.
Another question: What differences have you guys seen under Caldwell vs. Dungy? More conservative/risk taking? Different looks/plays? Or is it mostly the same since he’s been in the system for a while? I’m looking forward to how he reacts in a big game, since this is really the first major opponent that he’s had to face, unless I’m forgetting something.
by sc4rs on Nov 11, 2009 12:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Defensively, it looks like they're throwing more blitzes.
What have you guys noticed?
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 11, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yea but that is more of coyer our D cordinator than calswell i think although he plays a role
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 11, 2009 1:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is Coyer new?
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 11, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yes he is. when we
got caldwell he brought in a new defensive and ST coach.
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 11, 2009 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was the D coordinator for the Denver D
back when it was good for several years and was recently the D coordinator for Tampa Bay. He is well qualified and has been excellent to date.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 11, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
they are still near the bottom in blitzes
with Coyer/Caldwell, but they aren’t at the bottom like they were always with Meeks/Dungy.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 7:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
risk taking
Clearly more risk taking. More willing to go for it on 4th downs. Addai threw a halfback option pass, and Reggie Wayne threw an amazingly bad INT the next week. Maybe Manning or Moore dialed those plays up, but in any case, that sort of thing didn’t happen when Dungy was here.
We’ll know much more about Caldwell after this game, but at this point, it seems clear that Manning is running the Offense as usual, Coyer has us blitzing more, and that Caldwell has steered us to an 8-0 record with solid game management and no outwardly bad calls or clock management issues.
by clownsaw on Nov 11, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And the reverse
We’ve had several games where you’ll see Dallas Clark running the ball. It has been quite effective when we’ve used it.
by hoosierdore on Nov 11, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i have only seen one of those games which was last week but id did work well
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 11, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Double Reverse (or End Around)
against Miami, pretty sure. It was beautiful!
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 11, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it's an end around
There are people that get really upset about this so I’ll save them some stress and some of you from getting yelled at.
1 handoff (QB to WR) = end around
2 handoffs (QB to RB to WR) = reverse
3 handoffs (QB to RB to WR to WR) double reverse
unless you are Sean Payton (Mr. “Too Cute” Playcalling), you don’t call double reverses in the Pros.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do they work for him?
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 11, 2009 7:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the one I'm remembering was an abject failure in a key situation
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks,
I always confuse them.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 12, 2009 4:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
announcers do it all the time
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 12, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They do it with the flea-flicker too
and the Wildcat
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 5:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What's a pistol formation, daddy?
Commentators get paid to say popular things. Not necessarily correct things. So when the current flavour of the month is the Wildcat, things get misnamed.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 12, 2009 6:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate the pistol
bitched about it for most of the Iowa-Indiana game.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 12, 2009 7:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What do you think is the biggest weakness of this 2009 Colts team?
Is it the secondary? Running game?
by bbismyhero on Nov 11, 2009 1:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The O-line.
The secondary is one of our strengths right now despite the recent injuries. The main reason for this is the fact that most of the now IR’d players had lingering injuries all year and didn’t contribute much, if any, to our #1 ranked defense.
The O-line right now is horrible in run blocking and adequate in pass blocking. That’s our current weak point.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 11, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+100%
Absolutely the o-line. The pass defense is the strongest point on the team… > Passing offense. The running game is actually more efficient than it is given credit for. Not many yards because they don’t run much, but in the fourth quarter Addai really seems to grind out some tough yards when needed. (granted he does squat the other 3 quarters.)
by invisibulman on Nov 12, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i guess you can say running game.
i wouldn’t say that is the weekness though that is diff. than other seasons as we have struggled with the run a bit in the past as well. so besides the inconsistant running game id say our biggest weakness is on our offensive line. id particularly point to (pollak who has played inconsistant and has make some big mistakes).
i wouldnt complain about the secondary although we have two rookie DB in powers and lacey. they are both playing well withough making many costly mistakes at all (biggest test for them is you guys i think). also we do hold the best scoring D in the league just infront of you guys so i cant complain.
IMHO i think our running game and our red zone efficiency right now is directly effected by our missing (donald Brown) our second running back. he seems to do a better job at short yardage and is better going up the middle and hitting those gaps when they are there addai seems to worry a little two much about making the next cut and getting outside. also i say red zone cause that is the main area he has been used over addai and also he is our big play threat in the running game so when you dont have that the other team doesn’t fear your running game as much so they are able to drop more people in coverage.
the good thing is i expect him to be back for this game.
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 11, 2009 1:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Couple Q's.
1) With Bob Sanders gone, there’s no doubt the secondary will have its hands full covering the entire Pats’ receiving corps (both WRs and TEs). How confident are you in the rookies to step up to the likes of Moss, Watson, and Welker?
2) Jim Caldwell is among the short list of first-time head coaches gaining instant success (among them Mike Tomlin and Josh McDaniels to a extent). What do you think distinguishes him from those other coaches? Also, would you attribute your season more to Caldwell, more to the players, or both?
Beer is good! And stuff!
by R_Adragna on Nov 11, 2009 2:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think the Colts fanbase doesn’t feel as bad about losing Sanders as much as the media makes it seem. Yes, he is a great player and losing him hurts our depth, but Melvin Bullitt has pretty much been our starting safety the last two years. We are all very confident in his ability.
As for the rookies, it will be a big challenge, because they haven’t seen an offense like the Patriots yet. Last week, Andre Johnson burned out entire secondary on a play-action, but was over thrown. We’ll definetly have to pick our poison. Either we’ll try to shut down Welker, or we’ll try to stop the big play.
The rookies aren’t nearly as much of a concern as our nickleback, Tim Jennings. Jennings is Stampede Blue’s favorite player to make fun of. If an opposing team has a third and long, chances are that they’re going to throw to whoever Tim Jennings is covering. The thought of Tim Jennings covering Wes Welker gives me nightmares.
And our lack of depth is scary. If either of our rookie corners get hurt, we’re in trouble. However, I will say that the Colts have a really impressive rookie class. I never thought we’d have two rookie corners and I wouldn’t be worried.
by hoosierdore on Nov 11, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw BBS arguing that Sanders shouldn't have even gotten the start back
Depth and injuries are BIG stories heading into the back half of the season. It derails alot of team’s hopes.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 11, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Caldwell
I never understood why people thought the Colts would slump because ofthe coaching changes. Caldwell is a Dungy disciple who carries himself in a very similar manner, however, you can also see that he isn’t afraid to get mad. He’ll never display it publicly, but players commented during training camp that Caldwell was definetly louder.
Unlike McDaniels or Tomlin, Caldwell has been with the Colts for years. Last year he was our Assistant Head Coach, and was able to see all the little things Dungy did to make the team successful. Caldwell also didn’t have to reinvent the wheel. We had solid veterans and a solid philosophy, and shaking things up would have been a mistake. Instead, Caldwell tweaked the team.
Our improvement on defense and special teams can be contributed to Caldwell. He fired the coordinators of yester-year and brought in people that would be more agressive. The blitz at the end of the Houston game that resulted in an interception won us that game. Last year? that wouldn’t have happened.
Small things changed, but overall, it is still the same team. The players already knew Caldwell and trusted him. We were able to come into this season with a business-as-usual approach which has been key to our success.
by hoosierdore on Nov 11, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome point about Caldwell.
Which leads me to Tom Moore, who I thought was primed for Dungy’s spot. There were suggestions abound that Caldwell had a sort of quarrel with Moore, which led to Moore’s brief leave and the ensuing outburst by Peyton. Thankfully (for you guys, at least), it was resolved and it’s as if nothing happened. What was your take on this whole ordeal?
Beer is good! And stuff!
by R_Adragna on Nov 11, 2009 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i dont really think anything like that ever happend the reason for the short leave
was he was leaving cause of pension issues with the league as well was the reason for mudd leaving but they got that worked out
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 11, 2009 3:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It never happened.
It was a complete media fabrication by the likes of scum that Mike Florio. Moore and Mudd retired because the league made a change in the pension plan that would have prevented them from taking their pension in a lump sum. They were then able to retire, take their lump sum, and then return as consultants.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 11, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the clarification. Appreciate it.
Beer is good! And stuff!
by R_Adragna on Nov 11, 2009 7:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Caldwell vs Meeks on the other hand...
I think there may have been something to that. I think Meeks felt he was in line for a head coaching job. When Caldwell was made coach in waiting, i doubt it went over well at the Meeks house. Not really a surprise that Meeks was dismissed as DC soon after Caldwell assumed the top role.
by invisibulman on Nov 12, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Who is Sanders?
Our starting DBs are Hayden (injured), Powers, Lacey, Bethea and Bullitt. This has formed the best pass d unit in the league over the last year and a half. They have kept both Larry Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson in check this year. The Pats passing game is top notch, but I don’t fear them any more than that of the Cards or Texans.
It’s strange, I almost don’t even want to compare Caldwell as a “first time coach.” The transition from Dungy to him has been so flawless it’s like he has been there all along. Obviously there are a few new wrinkles on defense, but I would attribute that more to Coyer vs. Meeks. Caldwell is probably more like Tomlin in that he took an already great team and squeezed the extra effort out of them. McDaniels was given a train wreck, (made it worse) and then rebuilt it from the ground up… and has somehow managed to win a bunch of games.
by invisibulman on Nov 12, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Any team with Peyton Manning is already halfway there in terms of coaching...
considering the guy has been in the league forever, seen everything, and operates as a brevet offensive coordinator when he’s on the field. That automatically means the HC and offensive coordinators have far less to worry about – Manning will do half of his job for them by marshalling personnel, playcalling, etc etc, all those things that makes Manning one of the best around.
McDaniels didn’t have a veteran presence at QB – if any, he couldn’t have had any more turmoil at the position (not counting Mangini-idiocy). That makes McDaniels’ achievements even that more impressive. Taking over a veteran team with the key positions locked down by utterly professional experienced vets ought not be too difficult in comparison.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 12, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think that moss may beat them a few times but hope they can limit those.
also sanders hasn’t done anything really this season and the rookies have been starting all season and doing a good job so id say i am very confident.. havent really thought about your second question
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 11, 2009 2:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Who is scarier to you, Moss or Welker?
by bbismyhero on Nov 11, 2009 4:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Moss.
That’s the easiest question I’ve been asked all year. Welker is a great slot receiver, but (as DZ of 18to88.com is fond of saying) Moss is the greatest offensive weapon since Jim Brown. The only thing that has stopped him from being one of the greatest players to ever play the game is himself. He scares me to no end.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 11, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
depends on the defense
we can stop moss going deep but then welker would have like 25 receptions or something. we can stop welker but then moss would burn us for like 5 touchdowns or something. the truth be told they both scare me. welker is by far my favorite non-colt player. this game will definitely come down to who has the ball last. i can feel it.
As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.
by skywalker on Nov 11, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Welker
I know that Brady has looked like his old self, but in the Titans game, nobody was covering him. Against the Dolphins, Moss was beating man-coverage. We won’t be using man coverage, so I don’t see him putting on the moves like he did last week. Also, we normally do a good job of preventing the deep pass.
Welker freaks me out. I have no idea how we’ll stop him. They’ll use him to convert third downs and take time off the clock. We’re going to have to rely on Freeney and Mathis putting Brady on his back to get your offense off the field.
by hoosierdore on Nov 11, 2009 7:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Welker
Moss is the better player, but Welker’s style and usage is better suited to beating Indy’s D. The big threat with Moss is the deep ball, which the Tampa-2 is built around stopping. It does this at the expense of forcing the OLBs and CBs to cover wider areas underneath, which means bigger holes. Some of this is countered by using LBs that are smaller, faster and better in coverage (which weakens the run D), but a quick guy with the football IQ of Welker finds those gaps very well.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 7:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You might be short-changing Moss a little
when Welker was out in a couple of games earlier this season, Moss went into a somewhat Welker-like mode – lots of short slants over the middle and the like. He got a dozen catches and a hundred yards, and they were all Welker-like routes, no over-the-top bombs. And this was done while he was struggling with a sore back.
Moss is capable of running the routes that can beat the Tampa-2; it’s just when Welker is in the lineup there’s not much call for Moss to do so. A Tampa-2 defence might be the impetus needed to make Moss go back to it – he’ll realise before he even steps on the field that the deep-ball is necessarily an unattractive option, so he might decide to Welker it from the start.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 8:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
possibly
he might run the same kind of gameplan they had with Andre Johnson last week. Working into holes in the zone midrange for 3rd down conversions.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 8:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That seems likely
because it uses his height and speed effectively – trying to squeeze him down those gaps in coverage between the press CBs and the deeper safeties.
How has the Colts D gone against good pass-catching TEs? I haven’t caught many games, but this season both Watson and Baker have been playing fairly well for the Pats both as safety-valves and as genuine weapons in the passing game.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 8:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
FO ranks them pretty high against TEs. 7th best DVOA vs TEs with unsexy fantasy numbers (unless it's PPR)
but they’ve really only faced two good TEs. Vernon Davis and John Carlson.
Carlson went 5 for 39, Davis 3 for 30 with a TD. The Carlson game is kinda hard to judge since Hasselbeck was out, but so was Gary Brackett so the guy throwing to Carlson was 2nd string (as was much of the Seahawks OL), but the guy covering him for the most part also was 2nd stringer.
Overall I think they are pretty good against TEs. There’s plenty of dinks and dunks open, but not much deep or to the seams.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 8:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, that's a pretty good assessment of what I wanted to know
although the dink-and-dunks thing reminds me – how’ve they gone against pass-catching RBs this year? The Pats themselves have struggled to set the edge against decent pass-catching RBs, so it begs the question as to how the Colts have done, especially against a Kevin Faulk-type player.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 9:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
same deal. FO ranks them 7th, lots of receptions, not many yards
can’t really remember anyone being particularly successful and they’ve faced some really good receiving backs in Steven Jackson, MJD, Chris Johnson and Slaton.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 9:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but Kevin Faulk always seems to make a key 3rd down conversion with a catch or on a draw
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 9:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Faulk's got a great ability to get precisely the yardage necessary for a first down...
So I think Pats fans would be more heartened by the number of catches being high than discouraged by the resultant yardage being low.
Faulk’s special gift is his ability to turn touches into the first downs; he’s not a MoJo Drew or Chris Johnson home-run hitter. Giving him a lot of chances to do it bodes well for the Pats.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why must I be prophetic?
It’s a curse. Call me Cassandra.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 18, 2009 5:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather call you Icarus.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 18, 2009 5:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Speed Kills
The one thing the Colts defense has always had is great speed. Running sideways or passes into the flat get hunted down and ruined with much prejudice. Most successful offense have worked dink and dunk 5-10 yard routes underneath the zone. Either that or teams that can man handle the Colts front four in the running game (this is getting much harder to do.)
by invisibulman on Nov 12, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the usual Colt's scheme, yes
but I wondered if they’d changed it slightly to cater for the dearth of secondary players – dropping back the LBs into deeper coverage instead of guarding the flats, for instance. I haven’t seen enough of the Colts to tell.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 12, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have a feeling...
…and it makes me wonder. The Colts seem to have to deal with either a lot of injuries on defense, or a worn down defense towards the end of the year. I feel like that has a lot to do with going with speed instead of a mixture of size and speed. Do you think that they’re lack of size has something to do with them always being roasted at the end of the season?
by The Hill on Nov 12, 2009 5:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Small guys get knocked around and that compounds over a full season.
For instance, take Bob Sanders. When he’s healthy, he’s as deadly a safety as anyone around. But he’s significantly smaller than Ed Reed or Rodney Harrison, and he gets punished because of it. He has missed half of the regular season games during his career, and a significant reason for it is that he’s getting the raw end of the hits he deals out because he’s smaller than the guy he’s hitting.
The benefit the smaller guys have is in their speed, agility and acceleration. However, there are also detriments. Like Bob Sanders, smaller guys are more likely to get season-ending or -shortening injuries. There’s also another consideration. Everyone on a football field regularly is likely to pick up niggles and recurring injuries over the course of a season. Those injuries affect smaller guys more, because their key attributes are stunted – they lose pace, stability, and the like. So when playoffs come around, they’re slower than they were, they’re less able to rip, pull and stunt, and aren’t able to do the things they’re used to. The bigger guys who may have the same issues are able to fall back on their main attribute in the post season – size. IN comparison, smaller guys are effectively deprived of their main weapon come playoff time.
It’s not to say a team built on speed won’t be able to win Superbowls and go deep into the playoffs – the Colts did it, after all. But it does mean they’re less likely to do it consistently, sheerly because the smaller, quicker guys are more prone to get injured over the course of a season, and because those injuries affect their performances more thoroughly.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 12, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A general query for Colts fans
I’ve always found it interesting to learn the opinions opposition fans hold of Pats players, in particular who is threatening to their gameplan, or who they foresee posing particularly matchup issues. So in that vein, what Pats players are you particularly worried about, or foresee problems nullifying or avoiding?
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 8:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
is Mayo back?
he’s very good.
Welker obviously for what I talked about above. Moss is one of the greatest talents to play the game when he actually comes to play. Wilfork obviously got embarrassed on a key play against Jeff Saturday in 06, but he’s still the kind of guy that can muck up the middle for Indy.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 8:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bill B. He’s not a player, but he is far more important than any player.. He scares me on a personal level and he scares me as a coach. I really believe that Peyton is a better offensive coordinator than almost every other OC in the league and certainly is better than the defensive coordinators tasked to stop him, with one huge exception, Bill B. He knows how to use his personnel, he knows Manning’s tendencies, and he always manages to make Manning look human, which is an impressive accomplishment.
by sandsnake on Nov 11, 2009 9:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mayo's back and getting closer to 100%
although he’s still not there, apparently. He gave himself a passing grade after making the game-high 12 tackles last game, so even if he’s not fully there, he’s in pretty good shape.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 9:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Welker
I fear the slot possession receivers that are good after the catch and bring the defense up. Brandon Stokley, Wes Welker, and Austin Collie are good examples of players that I like when they are on my team and hate when they are on the opponent.
I also am very glad that Richard Seymour is gone. Overall the defense doesn’t really scare me besides Mayo.
"Brett Favre was a man who thought he was retired, but he knew it wouldn't last."
by Colts Homer on Nov 11, 2009 9:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not worried about Meriweather as a play-maker
or McGowan’s ability to shut down TEs? Or just nowhere near as much as Mayo?
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 9:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More from FO
Pats 14th vs TEs. However the raw numbers are pretty low. So TEs haven’t gotten a lot of yards against the Pats, but the ones they’ve gotten have been very effective/valuable ones (3rd down conversions, etc)
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the stats don't quite reflect Belichick-ian policy.
In games where the TEs were the premier threat (and thus Belichick specifically planned to take them away from the opposition), the catches and yardage were low – Atlanta got one catch for a handful of yards out of Tony Gonzalez; Tampa Bay got only a miserly performance out of Kellen Winslow.
The games where the Pats have given up yardage to TEs were the games that Belichick’s gameplan was to force the opposition onto their secondary weapons – taking away Denver’s WR battery, closing down Ravens WRs, removing Terrell Owens from the Bills.
In a pick-your-poison league, Belichick has a surpreme gift at analysing what’s the best thing going for the opposition, and taking it away from them. He’ll really be pushed this week – Manning has a bunch of very, very good targets. However, I’d still lean towards Hoodie doing his utmost to remove Dallas Clark from the game, probably through liberal use of Brandon McGowan in the heavy-nickle package. Clark will be given the same looks as Winslow and Gonzalez, trying to force Manning to throw to Garcon or Collie. Not saying it’ll necessarily work, but this isn’t a time where Hoodie will willingly give up TE yardage and catches.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 11, 2009 9:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Y DO DA COLTS SUCK SO MUCH LOLOLSLSOALMAO
by The Hill on Nov 11, 2009 9:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Seriously,
The Patriots pass offense did well enough against Miami’s young secondary and it seems like they’re facing another young and inexperienced backfield in the Colts. I know Bullett (Bullitt? sp?) is very good in Sander’s place, but he is no Bob Sanders. I also feel like the Phins’ young secondary is more talented and athletic than the Colts.
I think that we underutilized our passing game against the Dolphins because our running game was doing so well. I don’t see that success continuing against the Colt’s strong front line, meaning I think that Brady will be throwing in the air more than against the Dolphins. I expect to see more 4 and 5 receiver packages in order to exploit the secondary.
How do you think the Colts will defend against the pass and will they be more successful than the Patriots?
Also, the Patriots have been able to shut down some pretty good pass rushers this year, to the demise of the opposition. Are you confident in your pass rushers’ ability to get into the backfield?
by The Hill on Nov 11, 2009 9:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Phins safeties aren't very good
which along with the young CBs makes them give up a lot of big plays. The Colts averaged over 10 yards a play on offense against them because of this. I don’t think they are a good comparision for a Colts pass D that’s been one of the best in the league while only getting two games from Sanders, having Marlin Jackson confined to the nickel when he did play and losing time from Kelvin Hayden.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 9:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a difference in the secondaries we've faced.
The Colts faced their “experieced” CBs while we got to face their Rooks (who have much more potential than their previous CBs). The only good passing team you’ve “shut down” were the Arizona Cardinals and that was with a much healthier and put together Colts’ secondary. The Texans almost stuck it to the Colts (and I give credit to the Colts for stopping them), and that was without their TE Daniels, who is just as important to their offense as Dallas Clark is to yours. I can see that a healthy and finally getting together Pats offense will be able to do a better job than the Texans.
by The Hill on Nov 11, 2009 11:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Kelvin Hayden and Bob Sanders missed the Zona game
so Marlin Jackson in the slot was the only difference.
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Nov 11, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well there goes my point...
I made a guess on Colts personnel without knowing the facts. I’ll go with my second half of the previous post.
The Texans were almost able to win without Owen Daniels. The Pats’ offense is more dangerous, in my view, so how do you think your defensive personnel will match up with the Pats’ offense?
by The Hill on Nov 11, 2009 11:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
our defense actually did well against texas our issue
was our own efficiency in the red zone and on third downs that made the game so close. however andre johnson started getting two us on third downs in the second half and the only time we struggled on D was in the second half on third downs it seemed
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 12, 2009 12:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
…what adjustments do you think will be made? The Pats are sure to watch the tape of the game and Moss will try and pull an Andre, while Welker and Watson will attempt to wreak havoc elsewhere.
by The Hill on Nov 12, 2009 12:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i watched the game online so i didn't see everything but.
i think when the colts look at the film they will see what they did in the first half and try and figure out what the were doing wrong/ diffrent in the second half that allowed andre to get open better and fix that. however moss is a little diff. than andre so it is diff. they may allow around a 5 yard cushion and have the saftey over top on him. to me this will work better than it did for andre because i think you guys dont have multiple true deep threats.
please correct me if im wrong but it seems that brady when looking to go deep about 805 of the time chooses to go to moss. playing these odds per say i dont think it would be two risky doing so and allow the FS to roam. there for we would also limit the efficiency of welker although they will both get there yards. my feeling is if we stop the deep ball and can hold welker and the running game down and we have been doing a good job against the run which i dont think should change as your run game isn’t the best and tend to throw more
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 12, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm...
…I’ve noticed that we’ve been using Aiken and even Tate for the long balls, so I’d say it’s closer to 60% Moss on the deep routes. I think the important thing with Moss is that he no longer is JUST a deep threat. He plays inside and on the sidelines making him much more valuable.
by The Hill on Nov 12, 2009 9:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yea ok.
just seemed that way to me from what i have seen but living in CAL i dont see the pats often but from what i remember seeing thats what it seemed like and what it probably was more like in 07.
GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
by TheAngelsColts on Nov 12, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Aiken and Tate
Aiken was buried in the depth chart and started off the season as a core special teamer, but got elevated after some good performances and the sheer hopelessness of Joey Galloway, as well as the injury to Edelman. He’s also faster than Edelman or Welker, so he’s finding a niche in deep routes that would otherwise have gone solely to Moss.
Tate recently got activated from the PUP-list and is being slowly acclimatised to the offence. He’s been put out for a few long balls, and he’s trying to get on the same page as Brady by running a few deep routes every game.
Between the two of them, they’re taking away a couple of deep passes from Moss, but also forcing opposition safeties not to cheat across to Moss’s side of the field every play.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 12, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Freeney will get there but
He’ll get dt a lot but this is a different Colts D with a new defensive coordinator in Larry Coyer, now we Blitz a lil more so i expect either Brackett or Wheeler to put some pressure too.
by thebossuzzi on Nov 11, 2009 10:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think...
…that if your LBs start trying to put pressure on the QB, Welker will have a field day in the middle of the field. In order to best beat the Patriots, you’ll need to be able to get in the backfield with your front 4 or 3.
by The Hill on Nov 11, 2009 11:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would agree with this. I will be quite upset with coyer if he decides to blitz brady. Blitzes work as well on brady as they do on manning, which is not that well. If we can get consistent pressure with the d-line we will win the game, if not, then it gets a lot more interesting.
by sandsnake on Nov 11, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Since we so rarely play your team, I've got a few questions.
Who is your starting quarterback this year? Is he any good?
Do you have any good receivers or tight-ends?
Any running backs I might have heard of?
Who’s your best defensive player? I mean that’s not injured all the time?
What? It’s the Colts? Oh, I’m good, nevermind.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 12, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
OK......
1. Sorgi’s awesome. Thanks for asking.
2. Not since we got rid of Craphonso Thorpe.
3. Chad Simspon. That guy is a beast.
4. Tim Jennings.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 12, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks!
we’ll rush this secret information straight over to Hoodie ASAP.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No problem.
Glad to help out :-)
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 12, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LMAO
Too funny. I DO miss Craphonso.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 12, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We've got a couple of decent players. Since you may have never heard of them before, here's some introductions...
Reggie Wayne WR:
LIKES: Burning your DB’s with his lightning speed, TD’s, stiff-arms, and the smell of victory.
DISLIKES: Being touched by other people (he avoids this at all costs) and the Pats.
Dallas Clark TE:
LIKES: Crossing routes, being covered by LB’s, close physical contact, and tractor pulls.
DISLIKES: People touching his stuff (that football is HIS, so don’t even think about it) and the Pats.

Dwight Freeney DE:
LIKES: Sacking your QB, sacking your QB, sacking your QB, and your shirt (I think you better give it to him).
DISLIKES: Everybody, but especially the Pats.

Robert Mathis DE:
LIKES: Strip-sack/fumble recoveries, sneaking up on you from behind, and that football in your hand (why don’t you save yourself some embarrassment and just give it to him?).
DISLIKES: Smiling, mercy and the Pats.

Peyton Manning QB:
LIKES: Breaking records, breaking down defenses, breaking your team’s spirit and breaking out the double fist-pump.
DISLIKES: Boston baked beans, Boston cream pies, New England clam chowder, crabs, lobsters, the entire New England area, Paul Revere and the Pats.

by peytonsurdaddy on Nov 12, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, at least he likes Samuel Adams. It's something.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 12, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you damn communist
The patriots Are the best I dont care what you say what you think, Nothing!!!!!!!!!
by andrew29910 on Nov 18, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Excuse me?
I’ve been called a lot of things but a communist? Really? Do you even know what that means?
Kid, I was in uniform in Germany when the Berlin wall came down. (I was on the other side of the wall from the communists.)
Making Peyton Manning (the Colts quarterback) drink a Samuel Adams (a New England beer) is COMEDY. Calling someone a communist is NOT COMEDY.
Do you see the difference? Hello? Anybody in there?
Call me names again and I’ll set you on fire and punch through you.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 18, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But the Politburo said Samuel Adams was The People's Beer.
So, umm, that makes Peyton Marx Manning a communist, and somehow that makes you, SMP, a communist, for spreading socialist propaganda. Or something. Yeah, I can’t even come up with a coherent fiction to explain this one.
I like the fire-punching idea, though.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 18, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fire punching makes everything better.
Great stress reliever. You can write anything on the boards, and bam, it’s gone.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 18, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What the hell is fire punching youll burn youre fucking hand
The patriots Are the best I dont care what you say what you think, Nothing!!!!!!!!!
by andrew29910 on Nov 19, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Haven't yet.
A little knuckle hair, maybe. But I’m fast.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 19, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I replied I was sorry after I posted this.
The patriots Are the best I dont care what you say what you think, Nothing!!!!!!!!!
by andrew29910 on Nov 19, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Faggot anger problems
The patriots Are the best I dont care what you say what you think, Nothing!!!!!!!!!
by andrew29910 on Nov 19, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You have faggot anger problems?
If you mean the English faggot meaning pile of sticks, that might be funny. If you mean homosexual, you twit, then you can only be angry at yourself for your choice. Don’t take it out on other people.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 19, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Same reply as the other one. Im sorry.
The patriots Are the best I dont care what you say what you think, Nothing!!!!!!!!!
by andrew29910 on Nov 19, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Me too.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 19, 2009 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Think before you type, seriously.
Ugh.
What could you possibly get out of mindless abuse, anyway?
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 19, 2009 5:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know Im sorry!
The patriots Are the best I dont care what you say what you think, Nothing!!!!!!!!!
by andrew29910 on Nov 20, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Very un-American of him to dislike Paul Revere!
Hang him! Hang him!
Beer is good! And stuff!
by R_Adragna on Nov 12, 2009 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you really happy about the prospect of going undefeated?
I know 2007, was a major distraction / pain-in-the-backside for the Pats.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 12, 2009 2:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
On the flip-side, it would be nice if Mercury Morris and crew would shut up already.
2007 got them very worried.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 12, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not a popular opinion, but for me,
yes, yes, a thousand times yes! I would absolutely love to go 19-0 and be declared one of the greatest teams the league has ever seen. I keep hearing people say (seeing people type?) that they would rather drop one or two in the regular season and then win the Superbowl, but I disagree. I still have vivid memories about what losing feels like (3-4 with 2 beatdowns will do that for you), and I don’t ever want to feel that again. I know that’s not a realistic goal, but if we can go undefeated, I’d be the happiest person in the world.
Of course, I’d trade a loss in the regular season in exchange for a Super Bowl (I think we all would.), but there is no way to guarantee that. So, yes, I am happy about the prospect of going undefeated. It means I won’t have to feel the pain of a loss at all this year.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 12, 2009 4:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just hope for the whole shebang
‘cause that one teeny-weeny, it’sy-bitsy loss tacked on at the very end is a killer.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention:
“So what are your thoughts on going undefeated?”
“Have you heard what Mercury Morris said?”
“Do you think your team can stay undefeated?”
“Are you worried about a let down like the Patriots had?”
“With all of your injuries, do you really think you guys stand a chance?”
“Tell me Peyton, have you talked to Tom Brady about the pressure of going undefeated?”
“Do you guys realize you haven’t lost any games this year?”
“How are you planning to stay focused with all the distractions (media implied) this year?”
“If you guys go undefeated, do you think it will detract from Dunghy’s legacy here?”
I could go on and on, but the BS grows weekly.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 12, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Most of those questions are already being asked.
Just substitute “undefeated” with “winning the Super Bowl.” Otherwise, our team is full of vets who wouldn’t be distracted by all that stuff. Just look at the Pats. They didn’t look distracted at all. The Giants just played really, really well and still needed a couple miracles to win that game. I didn’t get the sense that the Pats were distracted, but even with they were, 1 team is a really small sample size to use as the new rule.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 12, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They kept the questions at bay as much as they could
You won’t find one single interview with Pats players doing anything but spouting the one-game-at-a-time mantra, no matter how many times the questions were asked, both locally and nationally, in print, on the web, or on those cable “specials”. Yet the perception (among the Stampede Blue crowd as well as others) was that they were arrogant and cocky, trying hard to bulldoze everything in their path for that perfect season. Nowhere was that evident except as assumed by a speculating media, and only because they couldn’t find a willing player to admit it during the season.
It is distracting, and there is added pressure, no matter how veteran the player.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 4:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What I noticed was the number of microphones go from the typical 8 or so
To around 3 dozen by the end of the season. Like a snowball rolling down the hill.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 12, 2009 5:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is probably the most under the RADAR 8-0 team ever...
It has become so routine for the Colts to run off 7-10 wins to start the season, that no one notices. Most people are all in a tizzy about how great the Saints are and how they might go 19-0. Obviously it would be fun to run the table, but I sort of like not having all the spotlight on us all the time. This is not the best Colts team I have ever seen, but there are really only a couple games left on the schedule that could trip us up. Still, I would much rather have that +1 than any of those other 18…
by invisibulman on Nov 12, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How's donald brown doing?
I freakin’ love the kid(figuratively speaking).
by patriotguy on Nov 12, 2009 5:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He's doing well
he’s off the Injury Report this week and is going through full practices. The guy is a stud. He will offer the Colts a great run game in the future…if this O Line was good Donald Brown would be unstopable. The only issue is the shoulder injury he has now, he said it was something in delt with at UCONN, so we are all hoping he wont be an injury prone back. We haven’t seen speed like his from a RB since James, maybe even Faulk. He can find holes even when they aren’t there. I believe the Colts are limiting him in games now so he will be healthy for a super bowl run. But I expect him to get a few more reps on Sunday than he usually does.
Bob Sanders does not play Hide-and-Seek, He plays HIDE and PRAY-HE-DOES-NOT FIND-YOU!
by coltsfan723 on Nov 12, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
James was nowhere near as fast as Brown..
Brown still has a lot of growing to do, but he is the most explosive runner we have had since Faulk. Addai, in my opinion, is still the better all around back. But the two of them need one another to be at their best.
by invisibulman on Nov 12, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
James was still
fast even after the surgery he had he has some pretty good speed
Bob Sanders does not play Hide-and-Seek, He plays HIDE and PRAY-HE-DOES-NOT FIND-YOU!
by coltsfan723 on Nov 12, 2009 7:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think brown is a lot better than addai
i hope brown doesn’t become injury prone, and he kind of reminds me of a mix between laurence maroney and ronnie brown(and i happen to love both of them as well). Finding holes was always the guy’s talent, and he is also dangerous outside. I want him to be very successful(i think he’ll be one of the top 7 backs in the league if he manages a start over addai(i don’t know if he already is or not), and starts all 16 games. The guy is pure, all around talent(and he has a GREAT personality that would get Belicheks stamp of approval).
by patriotguy on Nov 12, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no he;s not
starting over Addai, but maybe next year
Bob Sanders does not play Hide-and-Seek, He plays HIDE and PRAY-HE-DOES-NOT FIND-YOU!
by coltsfan723 on Nov 12, 2009 11:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if Brown is an every down back...
He’s seems to find the holes well and can break a long gain, but his blocking leaves something to be desired. He’s not nearly as powerful as Ronnie Brown… think more Cadillac Williams. Addai is a great pass protector and I like Addai’s hands in the passing game (though Brown is pretty good too.) Neither one of them is a complete back, but they complement each other very well.
by invisibulman on Nov 13, 2009 9:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No Brown is an everydown back
Look at his last year at UConn. Unless if you are talking about skill-wise and not endurance-wise. If that is what you are talking about, then there is no every down back anymore.
"Brett Favre was a man who thought he was retired, but he knew it wouldn't last."
by Colts Homer on Nov 14, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As long as Manning is around
the Colts will feature a guy more like Addai (soft hands and great at picking up the blitz). I get tired of the media saying we have no run game. We don’t really need more than 60-70 yards on the ground.
by SupermanWearsBobSander'sPJs on Nov 13, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. The press says the same about the Pats on occasions, too.
If they’re running enough that the opposition defence is forced to put out run-stopping personnel and packages where they might just stack the defensive backfield, and the run game is enough of a threat to make the defence bite on play-action and the like, does it really matter if they only get 70 yards instead of 140? When you’ve got a Peyton Manning or a Tom Brady behind center, keeping the ball in their hands isn’t exactly a liability. Addai, Brown, Maroney, Taylor are there to keep the defence honest, and close out games by ticking the clock over and moving the chains; they’re not really there to rack up massive yardage.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Nov 13, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is true,
and exactly what the Colts have been able to do the past few games.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.
by Cassieper on Nov 13, 2009 11:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brown is quickly becoming one of my absolute favorites...
a little more time in the system and he will be “the” guy, imo. He does have a great personality as well…seems like a really nice kid.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 13, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think historically there is a difference though regardless of the QB
Manning and Brady certainly aren’t liabilities, but I think it’s hard for either team to say they don’t need more yards on the ground.
Passing is addictive. It’s exciting, it’s fast, it’s hard to let go of. But in terms of putting teams away, putting the pressure on the other team – running the ball is absolutely the most effective.
Taking time off the clock and scoring, or just taking time off the clock – especially with a two score lead in the 2nd half changes everything. Even when you fail, you take 2-3 minutes off the clock per possession.
You force the defense to move up in the box to stop the run, opening up play action to Wayne, to Moss, or more effectively to Watson or Clark.
You also take the option of the running game out of the opponents hands and can dial up the rush on D.
I would argue the best team from either Indy or NE this decade was the ’04 Pats with Correy Dillon and the D.
The ideal game plan was that AFC championship game vs. the Colts, take the lead early, bleed the clock late.
by JonnyNYC on Nov 17, 2009 2:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
hey guys
what a great football game that was i hope to see it again jan 17
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Nov 25, 2009 10:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 














