Game Recap: Patriots defeat Panthers, 20-10 and find new identity
"We knew he was going to shut it down," Panthers cornerback Chris Gamble told me after the game. "That's what we wanted to do him. That's what we did. ... He'd just give up a lot ... Slow down, he's not going deep, not trying to run a route. You can tell, his body language." Gamble continued ... "I know everyone who plays against him, they can sense that. Once you get into him in the beginning of the game, he shuts it down a little bit."
It was an ugly win but a win none the less. Would I have preferred stellar, blowout, 2007-type play? You betcha. Would I have loved to see Moss connecting with Wonderboy on a long bomb or two? Sure. Is it going to happen this year? I don't think it will. So what do we have? What's going on that leads us to a glimmer of hope for the current incarnation of the New England Patriots?
I wrote at the beginning of training camp that I was so tired of all the hoopla surrounding Tom Brady's return. I was so sick of the ESPN/SI/Whatever... lovefest that I wanted to vomit. Every rival blogger I corresponded with would ask me what I thought and my catch phrase was, "Cautiously optimistic." The media billed the return of Tom Brady as the Return of the King (my guess is the Hobbits were named Wes and Julian, but I digress). Bleh. In reality, this is a team that for the first 2/3 of the season struggled to be a 2007 incarnation of itself. The difference? There were many, but I'll give you 2: Jabbar Gaffney and Donte Stallworth.
Neither of them is a stellar receiver, but they were lethal as #3 and #4 guys. Put Moss, Welker, Gaffney, and Stallworth on the field and you likely witnessed grown men on the opposition soiling themselves. Technically, it's called "spreading the field". I called it a freakin' JSF aerial assault. The biggest threat today? Well, other than Wes Welker, who's making a case for the best wide receiver of 2009, you have special teamer Sam Aiken and rookie Julian "Broken Forearm" Edelman. Hmm... What could be wrong, what could be wrong?
I had every intention of writing a full fledged game recap with stats and play-by-play analysis and things and stuff, but my ADHD brain got in the way (did you know the third of an Aminor is a C?). Where was I... Recap, things, stuff... Oh Yeah! This is a team that has struggled all year to find its identity. The absolute "broadside of a barn" misses with Greg Lewis and Joey Galloway cost us dearly. The loss of veteran RB Fred Taylor cost us dearly. Playcalling lost its creativity. I truly felt like this team was a ship without a rudder. Until this past Sunday, that is. No, I'm not delusional enough think the ship has been righted, but I do think they're beginning to find their way. Why? Read on, my captivated friends.
For most of the season, we have complained this team can't finish a game. They wrack up a crapload of points in the first half and then fizzle out in the second. We've seen it time and time again in big games against the Colts and Dolphins, to name a few. And it was true. Our New England Patriots seemed to have ZERO staying power. This past Sunday, however, I saw something that gave me hope. It was a running game. Bill Belichick has finally realized that his passing attack is not what it used to be, that Tom Brady bombs to Randy Moss are not going to work. So he put Laurence Maroney, Sammy Morris, and Kevin Faulk to work. They ate turf, they fought, they grinded to the tune of 187 yards and 1 TD. Finally, coach Belichick didn't abandon the running game. Oh, and did I mention TE Benjamin Watson scored the other TD? I have been whining that Brady needs to find Watson more often and gets the ball to him for 6. Coach? Call me anytime. Keep it coming, would be my advice.
Only time will tell, but I think they're finally finding their identity. They're abandoning 2007 and facing the cold, hard reality of what they have to work with. Let's hear it for the 2009 Patriots!!!
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
I think against a poor secondary the Pats can still put up good passing numbers
The Colts and Titans game is a good example. I think if the coaching can get the playcalling right and get more receivers involved with the game this can be a dangerous team because it has the potential to be a well balanced team. Our running game is better than last years in large part due to Maroney playing well.
Good points all
Just too many changes in every phase – offense, defense and special teams – including coaches, to process efficiently this year. No wonder they lost their identity, and to make it worse they get to find it while under the microscope of a press expecting nothing less than a 2007 performance.
Keep the faith!
Here's a good read.
It’s about the different OT lineups (Light/Vollmer/Kazcur).
Light + Kazcur = 0 TDs.
Vollmer + Kazcur = 1 TD, 1 FG*
Vollmer + Light = 1 TD, 2 FGs*
*-one of the field goals was split and all 3 tackles participated.
Common factor? Vollmer.
He dogged it
Seriously?? I’m a hardcore Pats fan too, but you can’t be blind to the fact that Randy was downright lazy against the Panthers. I’m confident he will bounce back and be great for us down the stretch, but he took the day off. We knew what we were getting when we traded for him. Unfortunately, you have to take a couple temper tandrems along with the touchdowns.
meh
I’ve had a feeling all year like he’s lost a step. Can’t explain it other than that or that he’s been consistently dogging it.
I think part of it is that Brady’s not himself yet, either, and Moss is a bit frustrated. Plus rain, plus getting shown up by being sent home, plus getting all the double-teams with no opposite threat. Bad day.
On the plus side, he was throwing some good blocks, so he didn’t completely vanish. We’ll learn a lot over the next three weeks about whether the guy can pull out of a funk.
As Mr. Sloan always says, there is no "I" in team, but there is an "I" in pie. And there's an "I" in meat pie. Anagram of meat is team... I don't know what he's talking about. --Shaun of the Dead
by JohnHannahRules on Dec 15, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
I just don't understand
How in the NFL a WR can be ‘doggin it’ and still have almost 1100 yds recieving (and 9 TDs!) after just 13 games?
The question isn't "has he been dogging it all year."
It’s “did he dog it against the Panthers?”
But the Randy I’ve seen this year — numbers or not — has not had the dynamism we saw out of him all last year. There are any number of reasons why that might be so. But I haven’t seen him doing the amazing things that it seemed like he did the first two years he was in New England — out-jumping DBs, reaching around them for impossible catches, splitting 3-deep coverage. He set an incredibly high bar. This year, he hasn’t consistently cleared it.
As Mr. Sloan always says, there is no "I" in team, but there is an "I" in pie. And there's an "I" in meat pie. Anagram of meat is team... I don't know what he's talking about. --Shaun of the Dead
by JohnHannahRules on Dec 15, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions
early in the season
he was a frequent scratch from practice due to a bad back.
I suspect that is what is bothering him. That would definitely result in stiff performances – and definitely keep you from lunging and leaping.
But the press won’t stop to consider that – its not as much fun.
One could say: “If he’s injured – why is he playing?” Well, who else? They don’t really have any depth at WR. Aiken sat this game out. Edelman probably should have (his arm is still in a cast). If Moss sits, they are totally screwed at that position.
Oh my gawd – did I just make an argument that Moss actually gutted out a game for his team? Say it ain’t so!
Could be right.
I know that he’s struggled w/ that. I also know Hobbs played while hurt and nobody said “boo,” and that Maroney had a broken freakin’ shoulder for two games before he sat.
As Mr. Sloan always says, there is no "I" in team, but there is an "I" in pie. And there's an "I" in meat pie. Anagram of meat is team... I don't know what he's talking about. --Shaun of the Dead
by JohnHannahRules on Dec 15, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions
If Moss actually took the next game off due to injury
The media frenzy would then be accusing him of faking it and giving up on the team, etc. etc. Revealing an injury now would look like it was made up after the fact.
He can’t win. If he plays hurt, he underperforms and gets criticized. If he takes a game off to try to heal, he will get ripped.
It just goes to show you can't live off of the opinion of others.
I think Randy is comfortable enough in his own skin that the mindless prattle shouldn’t bother him. He’s his own worst critic anyway.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Dec 16, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
Fine. I don't think anyone here is saying he had anything but a stinker of a game
But why the constant analysis on his every move, including the sidelines? Was it worth the entire national media corp turning it into a character and maturity issue, insinuating he’s ‘sending a message’ to whoever and all that nonsense?
Keep the faith!
If Moss and company aren't saying,
then anything the talking heads come up with is conjecture.
They are all making like “The Amazing Kreskin” here, and coming up short.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Dec 15, 2009 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
Seriously...
…everyone acting like Moss left the field with 8 seconds to go in the game.
by Richard Hill on Dec 15, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
He's been a good doobie here in New England
Everyone thought he was going to sulk and quit last year when his quarterback went down, remember?
Keep the faith!
I don't see it as being lazy, although it wasn't a good gae
Chris Gamble said he knew Moss had given up during the game. If so, why in hell would they bother have safeties over the top when Gamble is lining up against Moss? If Moss wasn’t really playing, they wouldn’t have bothered rolling safeties on him, they would’ve tripled covered Welker, and they would’ve won the game.
They didn’t do any of that. Wonder why? Because Moss was still playing. Add in some of those big blocks he made to clear holes for Maroney, and it was clear he was trying.
Wes Welker had another 10 catch, 100 yard game. The Pats didn’t have any other receivers worth mentioning on the field. If Moss wasn’t worth covering, just what was the Carolina defence doing?
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 15, 2009 8:28 PM EST up reply actions
They were dogging it covering a receiver who was dogging it.
You have to work too hard to cover Welker.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Dec 15, 2009 10:42 PM EST up reply actions
the blocks Moss threw for both Maroney and Welker are telling
that he was trying to contribute any way that he could.
A sore lower back would definitely interfere with being able to jump, twist and lunge for the ball, and make you shy about taking a body shot. But it won’t prevent you from pushing on a block.
They only threw at him 5 times. I suspect Brady and BB were perfectly aware that Moss was injured.
If Chris Gamble really truly 'read' Moss
so … what? They could play slack on Moss and … shut down Welker?
How well did that work?
Methinks Gamble should SHUT HIS PIE HOLE!

by 


















