Pats Pulpit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: ACC Power Rankings: 2.8

Tag, you're it - Patriots Franchise Matt Cassel

Cassel-brady_medium

Can you hear it? Huh? It's the collective groan from Detroit, Minnesota, and Kansas City.  By applying the franchise tag to Matt Cassel, he is, for all intents and purposes, off the market and no longer a free agent.  Now before you start screaming, "OMG!! OMG!! OMG!!, Brady's out for the season!", relax, take a deep breath, and think about your happy place.  With all of this snow, my happy place has something to do with a beach and people bringing me umbrella drinks every 15 minutes, but let's move on...

Let's review the rules, shall we?

The term also has a separate contractual definition within the National Football League. A team can designate a single player as its franchise player and therefore restrict the player from entering free agency. In return, the team must pay the player a premium salary. The NFL requires that a franchise player be paid at least the average of the top 5 players in the league at his position, or 120% of his previous year's salary, whichever is greater. The franchise player status lasts for only 1 year and can be renewed, but if not renewed the player is granted unrestricted free agency.

Back to Brady... Franchising Cassel doesn't necessarily mean Brady is out for the season...again.  With roughly three months until the start of OTAs, the Patriots need to invoke their insurance policy and hang onto the QB who led them to an 11-5 season and a gnat's hair away from a division championship.  Insurance, that's what I'll keep telling myself.

ESPN says:

Sources told ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen that the Patriots will use a franchise tag on Cassel that will give the team two options: trade him if all goes well with Tom Brady's rehabilitation from a knee injury or keep him because all is not well with Brady.

Mike Reiss has a most excellent analysis:

The Patriots’ decision to place the non-exclusive franchise tag on quarterback Matt Cassel today – on the first possible day – creates a larger negotiating window with teams that might be interested in acquiring Cassel in a trade.

The Patriots had until Feb. 19 to make the decision.

The Patriots could also give Cassel’s representatives permission to speak with interested teams about a possible contract – a key piece because any trade for Cassel would have to include a long-term contract extension.

With those pieces needed to fall into place – working out trade compensation, as well as Cassel’s representatives working out a new deal – the team might be thinking that "the more time, the better."

It also allows more time for a potential market for Cassel to take shape.

This is the time of year when most clubs are finalizing their free-agent and offseason strategy, the calm before the storm. The official start of free agency is Feb. 27.

And the Providence Journal says:

The move means the quarterback remains a free agent, but the Patriots can match any offer made by another team or allow him to sign with that team in exchange for two first-round draft picks.

If and when he signs the one-year franchise tag designation, worth $14.65 million for 2009, he will be under contract to the Patriots, who could keep him or trade him.

$14.65 million... spot on ya, mate.  Good for you, Matt.

0 recs  |  Comment 12 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Mike Reiss also notes
In the event a trade market does not develop, the Patriots would be tying up $29.2 million of their approximately $123 million salary cap on two players. That runs counter to the philosophy that has helped the Patriots thrive this decade, spreading the wealth to more players, and could handcuff other moves, such as signing nose tackle Vince Wilfork to an extension.

That ’s my one fear in all of this, is having anything jeopardize the Vince Wilfork negotiations.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 6, 2009 7:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It's my fear as well

My hope is some or many of the players will accept cuts or less than they normally would get from a renewed contract. We’ll see who has the team’s best interests in mind and who has there own.

Blogger at SBNation's New England Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit

by MaPatsFan on Feb 6, 2009 8:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

they’ll sign Wilfork – he’s too good for you guys not to. without him in the middle your d-line doesnt’ get as much push and that woudl be of great concern. so i wouldn’t worry about that too much

Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider

by J2 on Feb 6, 2009 9:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How could a trade market not develop? At the very worst you have to imagine Minnesota or Kansas City would give New England something for Cassel, which gets him out of town.

It might not be the king’s ransom we’re all hoping for but I really doubt the Patriots end up stuck with Cassel because every other team says “no thanks”.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Feb 6, 2009 9:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It might not be the king’s ransom we’re all hoping for but I really doubt the Patriots end up stuck with Cassel because every other team says "no thanks".

two points on this:

1) what if the Pats don’t let him go (insert reason here)

2) 2 first round picks are very expensive for only one season of work on an already talented team.

However, I think it is likely that the Vikings go after him. I wouldn’t say the Chiefs would – they pick very early and Thigpen is pretty good actually.

Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider

by J2 on Feb 6, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well...

It doesn’t necessarily have to be two first round picks. The Patriots can agree to trade him for less compensation than that.

by NESilver on Feb 6, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly. If the Pats need to keep Cassel because of Brady’s injury then it is what it is. If the Pats don’t need to keep Cassel then they won’t be stuck with him, he’s the backup QB New England can trade him for future considerations or something if the cap situation is that bad.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Feb 6, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The other thing

is that I’ve heard a lot that what happens to Cassel depends on Brady and his knee rehab. Will they even know that information by draft day? It’s only two and a half months away. Maybe there will be a confidence one way or the other by then, where the Patriots can decide on a course of action — trading him away or keeping him.

I tend to agree with Brady’s trainer who said in ’09 we can expect something like what we saw from Peyton Manning last year.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 6, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually had Peyton Manning in mind when I thought of Brady. Its going to take him a few weeks of playing actual games to get used to the speed and everything again. But by mid season he should be back to his same form I would think.

your right – we probably won’t have any idea what is going to happen by draft day because his recovery is going to go past that.

Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider

by J2 on Feb 6, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

doesn't need to be by draft day

The trade could be for 2010 draft. A lot of things can happen through out the postseason, a team that thinks it has a solution may have an injury or scandal to deal with.

"These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick

by Mainiac on Feb 6, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you're right of course

that’s just the time-frame I have in mind that other teams might want to deal by — as a plan instead of in response to one of those off-season scandals or crisis. Coaches must hate the off-season for that reason alone.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 6, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com

Start posting about the Patriots »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Smpavatar_small
Caption Contest

Recent FanPosts

Patriotsthrowbacklogo_small
Tom Brady vs. Peyton Manning: Who's the Best? - Part V
August_2008_175_small
10 Super Bowl Observations
August_2008_175_small
Parcels or Belichick?
Small
I've been looking for potential RBs in the second round.....
Bill_belichick-vader_mask_small
Patriots announce 2010 Defensive Coordinator... Bill Belichick?
12-22-07_1831_small
Luck or destiny?
Small
Patriots interested in CFL sack leader
Nnamdi_small
The End of an Era?
Bill_belichick-vader_mask_small
Is a Bill Belichick style defense now obsolete?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Buffalo Rumblings
Web Rumblings: Buffalo Bills Links, 2/9
Arrowhead Pride
Arrowheadlines: Chiefs News 2/9
Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: Make something out of nothing

SPONSORS


Managing Editor

Patspulpit_small MaPatsFan

Contributing Writers

Belichick_2_small Marima

Smpavatar_small SlotMachinePlayer

Small Comedic.Sans

Bg_small The Hill