Tag, you're it - Patriots Franchise Matt Cassel
Can you hear it? Huh? It's the collective groan from Detroit, Minnesota, and Kansas City. By applying the franchise tag to Matt Cassel, he is, for all intents and purposes, off the market and no longer a free agent. Now before you start screaming, "OMG!! OMG!! OMG!!, Brady's out for the season!", relax, take a deep breath, and think about your happy place. With all of this snow, my happy place has something to do with a beach and people bringing me umbrella drinks every 15 minutes, but let's move on...
Let's review the rules, shall we?
The term also has a separate contractual definition within the National Football League. A team can designate a single player as its franchise player and therefore restrict the player from entering free agency. In return, the team must pay the player a premium salary. The NFL requires that a franchise player be paid at least the average of the top 5 players in the league at his position, or 120% of his previous year's salary, whichever is greater. The franchise player status lasts for only 1 year and can be renewed, but if not renewed the player is granted unrestricted free agency.
Back to Brady... Franchising Cassel doesn't necessarily mean Brady is out for the season...again. With roughly three months until the start of OTAs, the Patriots need to invoke their insurance policy and hang onto the QB who led them to an 11-5 season and a gnat's hair away from a division championship. Insurance, that's what I'll keep telling myself.
Sources told ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen that the Patriots will use a franchise tag on Cassel that will give the team two options: trade him if all goes well with Tom Brady's rehabilitation from a knee injury or keep him because all is not well with Brady.
Mike Reiss has a most excellent analysis:
The Patriots’ decision to place the non-exclusive franchise tag on quarterback Matt Cassel today – on the first possible day – creates a larger negotiating window with teams that might be interested in acquiring Cassel in a trade.
The Patriots had until Feb. 19 to make the decision.
The Patriots could also give Cassel’s representatives permission to speak with interested teams about a possible contract – a key piece because any trade for Cassel would have to include a long-term contract extension.
With those pieces needed to fall into place – working out trade compensation, as well as Cassel’s representatives working out a new deal – the team might be thinking that "the more time, the better."
It also allows more time for a potential market for Cassel to take shape.
This is the time of year when most clubs are finalizing their free-agent and offseason strategy, the calm before the storm. The official start of free agency is Feb. 27.
And the Providence Journal says:
The move means the quarterback remains a free agent, but the Patriots can match any offer made by another team or allow him to sign with that team in exchange for two first-round draft picks.
If and when he signs the one-year franchise tag designation, worth $14.65 million for 2009, he will be under contract to the Patriots, who could keep him or trade him.
$14.65 million... spot on ya, mate. Good for you, Matt.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mike Reiss also notes
In the event a trade market does not develop, the Patriots would be tying up $29.2 million of their approximately $123 million salary cap on two players. That runs counter to the philosophy that has helped the Patriots thrive this decade, spreading the wealth to more players, and could handcuff other moves, such as signing nose tackle Vince Wilfork to an extension.
That ’s my one fear in all of this, is having anything jeopardize the Vince Wilfork negotiations.
Keep the faith!
It's my fear as well
My hope is some or many of the players will accept cuts or less than they normally would get from a renewed contract. We’ll see who has the team’s best interests in mind and who has there own.
Blogger at SBNation's New England Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
they’ll sign Wilfork – he’s too good for you guys not to. without him in the middle your d-line doesnt’ get as much push and that woudl be of great concern. so i wouldn’t worry about that too much
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Feb 6, 2009 9:03 AM EST up reply actions
How could a trade market not develop? At the very worst you have to imagine Minnesota or Kansas City would give New England something for Cassel, which gets him out of town.
It might not be the king’s ransom we’re all hoping for but I really doubt the Patriots end up stuck with Cassel because every other team says “no thanks”.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
It might not be the king’s ransom we’re all hoping for but I really doubt the Patriots end up stuck with Cassel because every other team says "no thanks".
two points on this:
1) what if the Pats don’t let him go (insert reason here)
2) 2 first round picks are very expensive for only one season of work on an already talented team.
However, I think it is likely that the Vikings go after him. I wouldn’t say the Chiefs would – they pick very early and Thigpen is pretty good actually.
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Feb 6, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions
Well...
It doesn’t necessarily have to be two first round picks. The Patriots can agree to trade him for less compensation than that.
Exactly. If the Pats need to keep Cassel because of Brady’s injury then it is what it is. If the Pats don’t need to keep Cassel then they won’t be stuck with him, he’s the backup QB New England can trade him for future considerations or something if the cap situation is that bad.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
The other thing
is that I’ve heard a lot that what happens to Cassel depends on Brady and his knee rehab. Will they even know that information by draft day? It’s only two and a half months away. Maybe there will be a confidence one way or the other by then, where the Patriots can decide on a course of action — trading him away or keeping him.
I tend to agree with Brady’s trainer who said in ’09 we can expect something like what we saw from Peyton Manning last year.
Keep the faith!
I actually had Peyton Manning in mind when I thought of Brady. Its going to take him a few weeks of playing actual games to get used to the speed and everything again. But by mid season he should be back to his same form I would think.
your right – we probably won’t have any idea what is going to happen by draft day because his recovery is going to go past that.
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Feb 6, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
doesn't need to be by draft day
The trade could be for 2010 draft. A lot of things can happen through out the postseason, a team that thinks it has a solution may have an injury or scandal to deal with.
"These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick
you're right of course
that’s just the time-frame I have in mind that other teams might want to deal by — as a plan instead of in response to one of those off-season scandals or crisis. Coaches must hate the off-season for that reason alone.
Keep the faith!

by 























