Patriots 2009 schedule: a peek under the hood, Part II
In Patriots 2009 schedule: a peek under the hood, Part I, we learned that the NFL schedule isn't some random decision by the NFL and/or the competition committee. In fact, there's a carefully thought out formula to insure teams play each other on a predictable and regular basis. Let's recap how a team's opponents are decided:
- Each team plays the other three teams in their division twice: once at home, and once on the road (six games).
- Each team plays the four teams from another division within its own conference once on a rotating three-year cycle: two at home, and two on the road (four games).
- Each team plays the four teams from a division in the other conference once on a rotating four-year cycle: two at home, and two on the road (four games).
- Each team plays once against the other teams in its conference that finished in the same place in their own divisions as themselves, not counting the division they were already scheduled to play: one at home, one on the road (two games).
You may recall me wondering why we play the Colts so dang much; it seems every year we have our arch nemesis on the schedule. Don't get me wrong, I love these games because it's some of the best football around, but it's a curiousity why we seem to have them on our schedule every year. The intra-conference rule (bullet #2) would have us matching up against the Colts once every three years. This season, they're on our schedule for exactly that reason: our intra-conference division opponent is the AFC South. But, what about previous years?
As it turns out, even if the AFC South wasn't on our divisional opponent rotation, we'd be playing the Colts this season. Why? Bullet #4. Since we both were second place in our respective divisions, we would be back battling the horse...again.
The table below outlines why we played Indy in a particular season. The matchup reason will reference the corresponding bullet numbers (remember, matchup reason of 4 is based on the previous season). In each team's column, I'll indicate whether or not they won their division.
| Season | Patriots | Colts | Matchup Reason |
| 2002 | 2nd | Y | Didn't matchup |
| 2003 | W | W | 2 |
| 2004 | W | W | 4 |
| 2005 | W | W | 4 |
| 2006 | W | W | 2,4 |
| 2007 | W | W | 4 |
| 2008 | 2nd | 2nd | 4 |
| 2009 | 2,4 |
The reason for our incessant matchups has little to do with ratings or everyone and they're mother wanting to see Tom and Peyton duke it out. The reason for our continual matchups is because both teams are just that good, plain and simple. If we weren't matched up because of intra-conference divisional rotation, we were matched up because of identical positioning within our respective divisions in the previous season (ah, namely OWNING our division).
So, why the heck are we playing in Indy...AGAIN...this season? Well, I can't seem to find a reason why other than Indy came to Foxboro in 2004, 2005, and 2006 so we're heading to the Midwest for 2007, 2008, 2009. Based on bullet #2, we play two intra-conference divisional opponents at home and two away; I guess Indy is one of those away games this year to balance us out. I'd assume 2010, if we matchup, would be in Foxboro.
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
Ah...
it’s good to be King (of our respective divisions).
Hopefully, this year all will be right with the football world and each team will retake their division. A world without the Colts/Pats game just wouldn’t feel right. It’s amazing how accustomed I’ve become to our yearly shoot-outs.
It’ll be good to have Brady back under center. Last year’s win (even though close) wasn’t very fulfilling.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Apr 7, 2009 6:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ugh, don't remind me...
We were one Dave Thomas or one Jabar Gaffney catch away from a win. As WEEI’s Larry Johnson illustrated it after the game:

Keep the faith!
by Marima on Apr 7, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
should have read, one Dave Thomas penalty away
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Apr 8, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree
It’s good for teams (and football in general) when you have real rivalries that go beyond your own division. Certainly Colts-Pats has been a good one for a while now and one I hope we see continue. But of course, a rivalry can’t be a rivalry if the teams rarely play each other.
by JohnPaul on Apr 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















