Around the AFC East, Week 1 - Miami Dolphins
Hello Patriots fans. During the long, long, long, long NFL offseason, us writers try to do as much useful writing as we can. The draft provides weeks of material as well as the free agent market. Then, there's nothing after the rookie minicamp until OTA's start. It can be a snooze fest for one and all. Well, I'm here to take you away from all that!
Each year, around this time, bloggers from the four AFC East rivals get together for a weekly exchange of questions called "Around the AFC East". We exchange questions during the week and post a rival's answer on our blog. It's fun, promotes cross blogging (I didn't say cross dressing; mind out of the gutter please), and gets the juices flowing.
First up is Matty I from our Miami Dolphins blog, The Phinsider. Read on as I query the 2008 AFC East Division Champion about the 'Wildcat'.
PP: Miami did a number on NE in Game 3 with the 'Wildcat' and proceeded to have success throughout the season. Like any play, it seemed folks had film on it later in the season and were able to scheme against it with some success. Do you feel the 'Wildcat' can still be an effective play for the Dolphins?
Phinsider: Well let me start off by saying that the ‘Wildcat’ will never be as effective as it was against the Pats back in week 3 of last season. To be honest, it still baffles me how Bill Belichick was arrogant enough to seemingly refuse to make any adjustments to defend that formation as the game was unraveling right in front of his eyes. Reminds me of the Super Bowl against the Giants and how the "great" Belichick just refused to make the necessary adjustments to account for the Giants’ pass rush.
So can the ‘Wildcat’ still be effective? I think so. And I feel this way because the ‘Wildcat" is nothing more than a football formation. It’s not a gimmick – no matter how much the media wants to claim it is. It’s simply basic football. This formation was being used back when the forward pass was considered a "gimmick." And when executed properly, the ‘Wildcat’ is just as effective as any other running formation.
With the addition of Pat White, the ‘Wildcat’ is likely far from becoming obsolete. White changes the entire dynamic of the formation. Previously, to stop the formation when Ronnie Brown was taking the snaps, defenses were taking the free safety and bring him up into the box because there wasn’t much of a passing threat – though we know the Dolphins weren’t afraid to let Ronnie throw it every once in a while. But with a legitimate passing threat taking the snaps, defenses will have to make a decision. Do they want to bring their safeties up in the box and leave their corners one on one on the outside? Or do they want to keep at least their free safety deep, but run the risk of being "out-gapped" in the running game if White keeps it and runs towards the strong side of the unbalanced offensive line? That’s the decision defensive coordinators will have to make when they prepare for the Dolphins in 2009.
It's interesting how Belichick is viewed as arrogant because he wouldn't change his game plan. I think he was sticking with his game plan because he's had success using that strategy in the past - stay with what you planned for rather than making snap adjustments.
That being said, I do believe the Wildcat is something many teams are utilizing. NE experimented with it last year and even drafted a QB this year, Brian Hoyer, who's an equal threat as both a passer and receiver.
Props to Matty I at The Phinsider for his thorough treatment of the subject. Head on over to his blog for my answer to his question as well as Fins exchanges with the other AFC East blogs.
0 recs |
22 comments
|
Comments
Have to disagree with MattyI's BB arrogance theory
Jarvis Green and Rodney Harrison both diagnosed the same problem that the Patriots were having in that loss to Miami in week 3, which they were able to correct thereafter. (Unfortunately, the Herald article has been archived so I can’t link to it, but I remember it.)
The problem was in the defense not trusting the other defenders, resulting in players moving out of their positions – not doing their jobs – to cover for other players they weren’t sure were going to do their jobs. The consequenses were just what it looked like, players running around and being caught out of position.
It wasn’t the “great” Belichick arrogantly not adjusting to the Wildcat, it was the players not doing their jobs. And why didn’t the Dolphins not adjust the second time they played the Patriots? BB knew what he’d get from Miami, he was right, and the team stopped the Fins easily. Talk about being arrogant.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on May 15, 2009 12:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
true
The players had not practiced against the wildcat whatsoever, much unlike normal Patriot preperations, so they may have been struggling to keep disciplined in the face of weirdness.
"These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick
by Mainiac on May 15, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly correct.
During the first Wildcat game Miami rushed the ball 36 times for 200+ yard and 4 touchdowns. With all the work load on the runningbacks Chad Pennington only needed to throw the ball 20 times, completing 17 for 200 yards. We won 38 – 13. Offense played good, so did the D.
Contrast that with the second Wildcat game: Miami rushed the ball 18 times for 66 yards. The wildcat wasn’t working. What does a coach do? Adjust, of course! So Pennington starts slinging the ball around for 341 yards, 3 tds, 1 int, and even scrambled for another TD.
Putting up 28 points would beat most teams if the defense plays at least average, which Miamis secondary did not… by allowing Cassel to throw for 400+ yards. New England won 48-28.
Sparano did adjust accordingly to the wildcat not working. It was successful, as we can plainly see. The only half of the team that didn’t play effectively was the defense, particularly the secondary. The secondary that was the consensus weak link in Miami’s D. This game wasn’t even close to being over until the middle of the 4th qtr, so, “the team stopped the Fins easily”, keeping with the theme, is also incorrect.
But you won, why grind gears?
Winner of All Movie Quote Challenges
Unofficial Leader of the Sign Matt Jones Bandwagon
by DolfinPhan on May 15, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why grind gears?
why throw in the “‘great’ Belichick was arrogant” comments?
Keep the faith!
by Marima on May 15, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isnt he?
He isnt exactly the humblest guy in the world ;)
"How can I blame you
When it's me I can't forgive?"
-From the Unforgiven III off of Death Magnetic
by Patssuck456 on May 15, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I prefer aloof
He appears arrogant because he has little tolerance for niceties. At least that’s the way the folks that know him describe him.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
by MaPatsFan on May 15, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how can you say that?
He always takes the blame for a bad game, never calls out any of his players publicly – even that Colts game last year where the outcome clearly hinged on two Patriots players’ mistakes. He doesn’t look for attention in the media and tries to stay out of it completely, appearing a bit uncomfortable in front of the microphone. During press conferences he is always humble about his team’s win, takes responsibility for it’s losses, and makes sure to praise their opponents.
Even during that winning season in 2007, he’d always be talking about the work that still needed to be done on his side along with complimenting opposing team’s players and their coaches. Guess I don’t see where the arrogance is in that.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on May 15, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me just say this.
It’s impossible to prove if Belichick is or isn’t “arrogant.” But from where I’m standing, I think he is.
And I’m 100% sure that if he was so arrogant, he would have changed up the game plan of his offense in the SB and the Pats would be the only 19-0 team in history. But he never adjusted for NY’s pass rush – hence the epic fail.
by Matty I on May 16, 2009 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some arrogance
I agree that BB has a touch of arrogance, but I can live with it, since he has often backed it up with actions.
Re: superbowl. BB didn’t have one of his best game, but I tend to blame the defense more, since we were in a position to win it. Asanthe Samuel should have caught that interception and Eli Manning should have been brought down.
by hythlodaeus on May 16, 2009 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's also possible
that the Giants were the better team that day, regardless of any change in game plan. The guy’s a coaching genius, but not infallible or super-human.
Funny, lots of “I thinks” but no examples. Typical.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on May 16, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to disagree with Matty but
I don’t think Bellichik is arrogant. It might sound odd, but I think it’s his paranoia and intensity that make him come off as arrogant.
I know I’m not doing him any favors by saying that, though.
by icerob on May 17, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
maybe I should have said I was half-joking.
"It only ends once, everything else is just progress"
by Patssuck456 on May 16, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind
taht until the fourth quarter where tensions ran high read Matt Light fights like a 12 year old girl
Miami and New England were both in a very close game, dont deny that.
"How can I blame you
When it's me I can't forgive?"
-From the Unforgiven III off of Death Magnetic
by Patssuck456 on May 15, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh oh
INCOMING!!! FIRE IN THE HOLE!!!
I’ll admit Matt Light wasn’t on his best behavior, but neither was Channing Crowder. Both were fined which means both were equally as guilty of that little broohaha. But, what does this have to do with the Wildcat?
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
by MaPatsFan on May 15, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was just reaffirming what Dolfinphan was saying
That you guys didnt “stop us easily” In fact aside from the 2007 season youguys have historically had a hell of time beating us.
and yeah Crowder shouldnt have said Matt Light’s wife was loose blah blah blah.
"It only ends once, everything else is just progress"
by Patssuck456 on May 16, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Competition
In fact aside from the 2007 season youguys have historically had a hell of time beating us.
Very true!! I think many Pats fans, including myself, are guilty of calling the Pats/Colts rivalry one of the biggest we have. It’s not without merit, given the number of times we’ve met in the playoffs, but NE fans can look no further than their own divisional back yard for a pretty darn good rivalry every year.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
by MaPatsFan on May 17, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I definitely agree
As much as I dislike the Pats because of division rivalry, I still always hope to see the Dolphins Pats games, because of that rivalry. They are always good games (except for in 2007, those were just way to one sided), and you can tell both teams step up the intensity of their play.
The Colts/Pats rivalry seems to have spawned about who was the better quarterback, Brady or Manning. The Dolphins/Pats though, that’s just a good old fashioned “We don’t like each other.” division rivalry. And that kind of rivalry makes for some of the best games. I can’t wait for the 2 games this year.
"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
by Chupathingy on May 17, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Football formation
I agree with Matty that the Wildcat is essentially a football formation. It can be succesful if executed right. And it can be defended if executed right. But I still consider it a gimmick in the sense that it works best with the element of surprise included.
What will the wildcat be with Pat White in the lineup? Atlanta Falcons with Michael Vick, I would say. They were very succesful running, less succesful overall. Now, the Dolphins, obviously, will only play with White some of the time. That will give defenses more to prepare for – but it will also take practice time from the Dolphins’ – or any other team’s – regular formations.
Further, even though White will bring more to this formation than Pennington, the substistution will also alert the defense and give them time to adjust.
by hythlodaeus on May 15, 2009 12:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
White
If I were Sparano, I’d be doing as many head fakes with White as I could. Ex: put him in the lineup and watch the defense scheme for the Wildcat, then throw something else at ’em. Do that a few times and then run the Wildcat.
Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit
by MaPatsFan on May 15, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the end, the White pick will be judged by how well he can throw the football. The Dolphins believe he can throw it well. So do others. But the success of the wildcat will still be defined by the battle in the trenches, as well as Ronnie Brown. There isn’t much scheming to be done against it. Like Matty said, it’s simple, fundamental football. I like it very much.
by icerob on May 17, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BB's failure to adjust to the Wildcat
It may be true that the failure of the Pats to adjust to the Wildcat during the game was a matter of the Pats not trusting each other to carry out their assignments, though that would certainly be unusual for them. None of that would explain why Belichick didn’t, at halftime, put an end to that.
On the other hand, it’s hard to ascribe what happened to “arrogance”. If BB is proud of anything it’s of his ability to recognize what another team is doing and to make in-game adjustments. Somehow, he didn’t make the adjustments and Miami ran all over them in a horror show.
Perhaps the key acquisition in the recent draft is Chung. He played a rover position in college. He, then, becomes the player who plays to the flow of the Wildcat while others have the assignment of carrying out their usual duties. Let him blow a few plays up in the backfield and the Wildcat will turn into a common house tabby.
by Kenneth H on May 16, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















