Pats Pulpit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NFL Twitter List

Patriots 2009 Draft Grades: Special Teams earns an MA

Jake Ingram LS was selected by the New England Patriots with the 198th overall pick in the sixth round of the 2009 NFL Draft.  Ingram, 6'4" 245lbs, played four seasons for the University of Hawaii.

Jake Ingram LS was selected by the New England Patriots with the 198th overall pick in the sixth round of the 2009 NFL Draft. Ingram, 6'4" 245lbs, played four seasons for the University of Hawaii.

Mission Accomplished.

The Patriots had been well served by LS Lonie Paxton, who snapped on every punt, extra point and field goal attempt in the 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 seasons.  In 2003 he missed the last three games of the season plus the playoffs when he tore his right ACL, and Russ Hochstein had to fill in.   When Paxton agreed to a $5.3 million deal with the Broncos last February, the Patriots picked up veteran Nathan Hodel from Arizona to replace him.

Belichick also addressed the long snapper position in this year's Draft, picking Jake Ingram from Hawaii in the 6th round.  Here is what his Patriots.com player bio has to say:

A former defensive end switched to long snapper during the 2005 season, head coach June Jones believed Ingram was too valuable to be a reserve on defense. Ingram is clearly the top prospect in the country at the vital, if underappreciated, position. He's not a big bruiser who could play center in a pinch but his accuracy and velocity will be valued by teams looking for a reliable snapper.

The experts at NFL.com and Draftcountdown.com offer a glimpse into his strengths and weaknesses.

Why he will succeed:

  • Excellent velocity on punt snaps, with ball consistently reaching punter in less than 0.7 seconds.
  • No wasted motion in snap.
  • Very good accuracy, punter rarely has to work to secure the snap.
  • Works hard to maintain his lane on punt coverage.
  • Decent athleticism, outstanding balance.
  • Not fazed by pressure.
  • Strong work ethic, team leader.

Why he might fail:

  • Not especially quick getting downfield on punts and didn't make many coverage tackles.
  • Lacks great size although there are snappers his size in the NFL.
  • Inconsistent accuracy on placement snaps, puts them high at times.
  • Needs to get stronger, not real fast.

Results?  The Patriots now have two long snappers, one a proven 8-year veteran with the Cardinals and the other a newbie with positive reports out of Hawaii.  Lonie Paxton was picked up as an undrafted rookie free agent and the Patriots haven't had to think about that position in years.  It's easy to see Belichick repeating that plan with his pick of Ingram, while relying on the immediate veteran services of Hodel.

As it stands, Stephen Gostkowski remains the uncontested starting kicker.  Until someone else is signed, I take it as a sign that Gostkowski will be offered a new contract before his ends in 2010.  Chris Hanson appears to be the starting punter, with the only competition coming from Tom Malone, who was signed to the practice squad last season.

Not too many changes.  We needed a long snapper and got one.  What remains to be seen is who the kickoff return man will be, as Matthew Slater's job performance was less than stellar in '08.

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

In regards to the “Why he will succeed” and “Why he might fail,” wouldn’t it be appropriate to just say “strengths” and “flaws” instead? Just a suggestion.

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!

by R_Adragna on May 3, 2009 5:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

good suggestion, but they both mean the same thing

I tweaked it a bit from one of the draft websites I was looking at that had “why he will succeed” and “why he will fail” columns for each prospect. The latter category seemed a bit too harsh, but I liked them over the usual “positives/negatives” headings.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on May 3, 2009 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good information

Thanks, Marima. I will admit I knew nothing about Jake Ingram before New England drafted him and you’ve given us all some excellent information here about him. Sounds like he could really challenge Hodel. I know they had to let Paxton go because you just can’t pay that much for a long snapper, but your article makes it clear that Paxton was there, snapping on kicks, from the outset of the dynasty. He’ll be missed. But I hope Hodel and/or Ingram can make us forget him soon enough.

by ProfessorTodd on May 3, 2009 8:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog Community Guidelines Commenting Guide
Start posting about the Patriots »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Picture_161_small
Joey Porter and Charlie Brown
Images_small
Ribbing Massachusets
12-22-07_1831_small
Ramblers, let's get rambling...
Small
The Hill's Week 9 Power Rankings
Belichick_2_small
Week 9 Power Rankings
Small
Pats play spoiler in weeks 10 and 12 (T.O. get your popcorn ready!)
Phinsider_s_small
Ask The Phinsider
Small
Check out NFL Fan in ENGLAND's pics from Pats game in LONDON baby!
Small
Who Will Replace Troy Brown (aka the Naked Patriot)?
Dalailama_large_small
17, 16, 10, 14, 20, 0, 7 - or why the outlook at the midway point is great

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Rams get ratings; TST joins Sprint's NFL Mobile Live
Cincy Jungle
The Cincinnati Bengals should think about lower ticket prices to close the home schedule
Mile High Report
Broncos add Ty Law, Waive CB Jack Williams

SPONSORS


Managers

Patspulpit_small MaPatsFan