Analysis: New England Patriots defeat Eagles, 27-25
It was many things, but it was the return of Tom Brady to a live game situation. And he performed like Tom Brady should. Sure, there was a little rust. An underthrown ball to Moss, a rocket to Joey Galloway's knees. But it was good to see Brady back on the field. Throwing 10 for 15, 100 yards, and two touchdowns, Brady was productive for the time he was under center. But it's not all about Brady.
On offense, two were standouts: Chris Baker and Julian Edelman. Baker may herald the return of a smashmouth offense, one in which big men catch the ball and stampede over tiny little defensive backs. I like it. I always have. With two touchdowns, Baker proved he's a valuable addition to the offense. Big tight ends can handle those close quarter fights and Chris is no exception. And Edelman? What can you say but...ON...FREAKIN'...FIRE!! It was hard to miss that 75 yard punt return in the second quarter; very...Welker-like. It was clear why Wes on the sidelines - Belichick wanted to see what Julian Edelman could do. Good call.
Defense was ok overall, holding Philly to three field goals mid third quarter. It appeared there was a switch for many positions as things went to hell in a hand basket shortly thereafter. There were good plays all around, but nothing really stood out. It was cool to see Darius Butler make some plays and Patrick Chung seemed to be in the mix. FA acquisition Derrick Burgess made an impact after barely a week in training camp. I want to see more of him in the backfield. Pierre Woods seemed lost on a few plays as did Adalius Thomas.
The key to the Patriots win? Dominating the red zone. While the defense may not have looked that hot, they were able to keep Philly to 2/5 in the red zone. It doesn't matter that they smoked us in just about every yardage category available. The Eagles simply couldn't capitalize on their yardage.
Belichick will have a few words for the defense. Practice this week and weekend will be about the soft middle and about not getting into the backfield. Generate pressure and you force the QB to make bad decisions. That's what pass rushers are for. It will be interesting to see Burgess's progression through the pre season. It's all about the pass rush for me.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Tom looked GREAT...
except that interception… Really, really, really, can’t wait for September 14th!
yeah... just a little rust, that's all
Nothing at all to worry about – the knee looked fine, his movement looked fine, he was relaxed and joking around on the sidelines with everyone (except immediately after the interception of course). Better than I hoped for.
Keep the faith!
yeah he was VERY P'O
but better now then in real games its rust and he will no what not to do later.
by Patsfan4life on Aug 14, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
The 4-3
kind of puts the OLB issue in perspective. And Burgess is a perfect guy to either play DE or OLB. With him on the field the offense might not even know which configuration the Pats would use even right up to the snap.
Warm up the Duck Boats!!!
That's the key point I think
the disguise of what BB plans to do, and the ability of our players to pull it off
Keep the faith!
I also wouldn't be surprised to see a pre-snap 4-3 look with Wilfork and Brace
that turned into a 3-4 defense with Wilfork and Brace each eating 2 defenders. Last man in the backfield is a rotten egg.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Aug 14, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
imagine
during a 4-3 on 3rd downs, we have seymor, brace or pryor(can’t decide which to choose), wilfork, and BURGESS. that would be great. but what do you think? would that work better in passing downs than burgess playing OLB in a nickel formation?
Good recap but...
The offensive side of the ball always gets the early leap ahead. The defense will come around pretty quickly. I thought overall they did some nice things, and it can only get better from here. I will take 2/5 in the red zone. As BB would put it “we scored TDs, they had FGs… that is why we won”
It would be nice to have seen a 3 and out
but if we have to wait for the Super Bowl to see it, I’m game.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Aug 14, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions
Oh, I guess we had some early on
I was teaching class and missed the some of the first half.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Aug 14, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
















