Week 7 Power Rankings
SB Nation ranks them 2nd (+1): The Patriots avenged their 2009 playoff loss to the Ravens with a victory last Sunday. As usual, this team looks very tough to beat.
NFL FanHouse ranks them 3rd (+1): So that 2011 first-round pick the Patriots acquired from Oakland in exchange for Richard Seymour? Imagine if New England uses it to take Heisman Trophy winner Mark Ingram. A dominant RB is a definite missing piece for the Pats right now.
The Sporting News ranks them 3rd (+1): They adjust to personnel changes better than any other team. It still doesn't matter to whom Tom Brady is throwing.
National Football Post ranks them 3rd (+1): Randy Moss? The Patriots look like a more complete team without him.
Cold Hard Football Facts ranks them 3rd (+1): The "Old School" Patriots started 12 players Sunday that had never been regular starters in the NFL before this season. That’s usually top-five-pick-in-the-draft stuff, not beat-the-Ravens stuff.
Pro Football Weekly ranks them 3rd (+2): Branch matched Moss' four-game catch total.
Fox Sports ranks them 3rd (+8): The one noticeable thing missing from New England's offense with Randy Moss out of the picture is the deep passing game. Tom Brady seemed to have plenty of time to throw the ball against the Ravens, but he couldn't find anyone consistently open down field. At some point, WR Brandon Tate is going to have to get more involved, but Deion Branch already is starting to prove his worth.
WEEI ranks them 3rd (+3): The Patriots defense was very impressive down the stretch in the fourth quarter and overtime. New England’s D was able to stop the Ravens on their final five drives. Bill Belichick said it was the best game his outside linebackers have played all year. Their win over the Ravens should definitely be a confidence booster going forward.
CBS Sports ranks them 3rd (+2): They are a quiet 4-1, kind of flying under the radar. As long as Tom Brady is slinging it, they will be fine.
ESPN ranks them 3rd (+3): Deion Branch looks as though he never left Tom Brady. It's a dangerous combo.
NFL.com ranks them 3rd (+3)
Don Banks ranks them 3rd (+2): I think what T.J. Houshmandzadeh and Deion Branch have taught us this year is this: If you're a big-time free-agent receiver, stay out of Seattle. Don't sign with the Seahawks. Their money might be greener, but the grass isn't. (And besides, their lawns are wet a lot of the time, because, you know, it rains pretty frequently).
Peter King ranks them 4th (+3): This is the team getting jobbed at the top after the best win a team had all day Sunday. The reason I've got New England fourth instead of second is because of how I've always tried to do these rankings: If New England played Baltimore on a neutral field in Wichita tomorrow, I like the Ravens. Same with the Jets. For now.
USA Today ranks them 4th (+3): Tom Brady has won 23 straight regular-season home starts.
Yahoo! Sports ranks them 4th (+1): Am I the only one who thinks it’s unduly harsh that the NFL just docked Brandon Meriweather roughly 9 percent of his 2010 base salary?.
What If Sports ranks them 11th (+3)
AVERAGE RANK: 3.6
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
15 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't agree with Peter King's reasoning
The uniqueness of the NFL is that teams don’t have multiple shots to play each other, outside of division games.
It shouldn’t matter if he thinks the Ravens could beat them in Baltimore next week. He picked the Ravens to beat them last Sunday (31-23) and he was wrong. He could be wrong about a second game (on a neutral field? What does that have anything to do with anything?) too.
Keep the faith!
Next time they play
Pats win by more points in regulation. Then Suggs and King can say “Next Time” again.
hmm...11th? and they have the Chargers @ 1...yeah....someone is smoking something
Non Sibi Sed Patriae.
I love my ZX-6r Kawasaki.
I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
Pat McAfee -colts punter-"@StampedeBlue I hope your website gets exposed for a complete joke. There’s no reason for you to do that, and its completely ridiculous."
BBS=TOOL
And the 49ers
Ahead of the Falcons and Chiefs.
Is this all based off a formula or something? I can’t see anyone other than a computer actually believing these power rankings.
It's not really a "power ranking"
WhatIfSports.com utilizes its football simulation to rank all 32 NFL teams based on their likelihood of winning the upcoming week. To come up with the rankings, each upcoming game is simulated 10,000 times and teams are ordered by winning percentage. The predictions use the most up-to-date stats, rosters and depth charts.
They runs some statistical analysis on various team/player stats to conclude who has the highest chance of winning this week.
by Illini.Patriot on Oct 21, 2010 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions
This doesn't really add up, though.
How do the Chargers have an 85% chance of winning this week, and the Pats have 54% chance? Shouldn’t opponents’ winning chances be complementary? It’s not possible that the Chargers won 85% of the computerized matchups and the Pats won 54%, unless they were matched up against some sort of generic opponent. Useless.
by nbradley07 on Oct 21, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The 11th...
…is a huge outlier, and changes the average ranking by almost half a spot. Remove the highest and lowest rankings, and it sticks the Pats at 3.2 instead of 3.6. Interesting, but still as useless, really.
Teams that I feel are as good (or better) as the Pats right now: Jets, Steelers, Ravens. The Pats beat the Ravens by a FG at home (the generally acknowledged difference in homefield). About 3rd or 4th seems about right. (Nice to have the tie-breaker vs Ravens if it comes to an equal record too).
True wealth is a shelf full of unread books.
by Hometown Gyro on Oct 21, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions
3rd is solidly in the mix of playoff favourites
If you assume top-4 ideally go to AFC and NFC championship games, then that’s a one-in-two chance of making the Superbowl. Precisely where you want to be about this time of the season.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 21, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Except Top 4 are all AFC.
This might be another year where the Super Bowl is a formality (a la 2006), with the AFCCG being the real Tournament of Champions.
Then again, there was 2007…..
Mhmm - 'tis why I said 'ideally'
The NFC just looks flat-out like a weaker conference. I’d rather have the Pats play the top-ranked NFC side than whoever is the fourth-ranked AFC side.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Oct 22, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
That's why 2006 was so frustrating
Any AFC team that made it would have beaten the Bears and the Pats were so freaking close (aarrgghh!)
Keep the faith!
When one ponders
that if just two key calls were made in these last few years; we could be saying the Pats won 5 Super Bowls in 7 years (yeah, they would have beat the Bears).
Such as not calling PI on Hobbs at Indy (which many might recall was apologized for by the league as a bad call) or the Manning in the grasp, holding, etc. in 2007; (pick your call) on the Tyree catch.
It is regretful that the officials have such an impact on who is the eventual champ so often.
And anybody who wants to talk Tuck Rule, go ahead punk, make my day.
Bob Kraft describing the first time he met Tom Brady: "He looked me in the eye and added, 'I'm the best decision this organization has ever made."
by BabeParilli on Oct 22, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Oct 25, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions

by 


































