Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

State of the New England Patriots Nation: Tight Ends

Ben Watson and Chris Baker. Ghost 1 and Ghost 2. Where were they all season? One of the most important aspects of a successful Patriots offense is how well the Tight Ends are utilized in the game plan. Despite the seeming lack of incorporation into our offense (also known as "lack of passes thrown their way because that's all we really notice"), the Patriots were the only team in the league that had two tight ends on 60+% of offensive plays. That's right. Even though they weren't catching the ball, both Watson AND (surprise!) Baker were on the field for 60+% of the offensive snaps- EACH.

Here's are some facts for you:

  1. We won 5 out of the 6 games a Tight End caught a TD- the one loss was in Overtime.
  2. Another fact: We won every game that our Tight Ends combined for over 50 yards receiving. (If you drop that yards barrier to 46+ combined yards, we won 6 our of 7, our only loss coming to Indianapolis)
  3. Ever since we picked up Moss and Welker, our Tight End production has dropped- this past season was Watson's best since 2006.

So what does this mean for us as a team? Read to find out!

Star-divide

1. Ben Watson 6-3, 255 lbs. 29 years of Age, 6 year veteran.

Stats: 29 receptions, 404 yards and 5 TDs. 3 Dropped Passes

How he did: Statistically speaking, this was Watson's best season since 2006. Sure, he had a greater reception count in '07 and had 1 extra TD, but Watson got more yardage on fewer passes, while averaging a first down 2 out of every 3 reception. Watson saw 784 snaps, but only saw 40 passes come his way (on the other extreme, Washington's Chris Cooley saw 354 snaps and had 41 passes go in his direction). It's obvious that Watson wasn't utilized as much as he should have been in the passing game. In the pass blocking and run blocking game, the Patriots would often defer to Chris Baker (Baker blocked on almost 100 more plays than Watson).

Where he did well:

  1. In our victories, Watson caught 18 passes for 286 yards and a 15.9 yards/reception. He also caught 4 of his 5 TDs in victories.
  2. In the first 8 games of the season, Watson caught 19 receptions for 271 yards and 4 TDs. It's clear his production dropped as soon as injuries began to mount on the O-Line. (Week 8 is around the time Light, Kaczur and Neal all got injured and Watson had to help out Vollmer)
  3. Contrary to the Patriots as a whole, Watson excelled in the 2nd half, receiving 16 for 212 yards and 4 TDs.
  4. Great first down receiver, catching 15 for 261 yards.
  5. Most productive out of 3 receiver sets, with 13 reception, 183 yards and 4 TDs.
  6. 0 Fumbles!

Where he can improve:

  1. While pass blocking, he allowed 5 QB Pressures and 1 Sack on 52 attempts. That means Brady was hurried every 11 plays Watson was blocking.
  2. Was not utilized on 3rd and short or 3rd and long (as in 0 receptions)
  3. Average in completion percentage of Tight Ends on 60% offensive play count (13th best completion rate out of 27)
  4. 3rd to last out of the same Tight End pool in yards after catch (@ 2.9 YAC. Daniel Graham [remember him?] averaged 7.5 YAC)
  5. When he had the ball, he only forced 1 tackler to miss. That's not good enough.
  6. Only had 11 receptions, for 118 yards and 1 TD in our losses.

What does this mean?: Players on the Patriots will be resigned if they're multi-dimensional players who can participate and step up when asked to. Watson is unable to perform as a blocker, so when our O-line gets injured (as it will again), Watson will be rendered almost useless in our offense and our TEs are asked to block. I think we can say good-bye to Watson this off-season.

 

2. Chris Baker 6-3, 258 lbs. 30 years of Age, 8 year veteran.

Stats: 14 receptions, 142 yards, 2 TDs. 0 Dropped Passes

How he did: Contrary to Watson, this past season could be considered Baker's worst since his rookie year. He caught 3 of his 14 passes, 45 of his yards and 1 of his TDs in garbage season time (last two weeks). He was basically a non-factor in our offensive passing schemes, despite the obvious talent he displayed during pre-season. He DID, however, have a nose for blocking as he blocked on 72% of his offensive snaps. In fact, his best game came in week 3 against Atlanta, going for 2 for 42 and a TD. He barely saw action after that.

Where he did well:

  1. On 121 pass block attempts, Baker allowed only 2 QB Hits and 3 QB Pressures, for a rate of 1 hurry out of every 24 snaps. That's pretty good for a TE who averaged 45 snaps a game (and especially in comparison to Watson).
  2. Both of his TDs came in victories where we won by 15+ points.
  3. He split his numbers perfectly down the middle by halftime, going 7 receptions for 71 yards and 1 TD in the half AND the second half of games.
  4. Although he only caught 14 passes, he had the 2nd best completion rate out of all TEs who were on the field for 60% of their teams' offensive snaps.
  5. 0 Dropped passes or fumbles!

Where he can improve:

  1. Was rarely used in the passing game if we were behind (3 receptions for 21 yards).
  2. Last out of all 60+% Snaps Tight Ends in number of receptions (11 receptions behind 2nd to last place).
  3. Last place in Yards after Catch.

What does this mean?: Baker's under contract still, so expect him to be on the roster next year in his blocking role. Since Watson will probably be gone, expect Baker's offensive production to slightly increase. However, Baker's season performance does little to instill confidence in this position.

 

What does this mean for the off season?

In my opinion, Tight End is the weakest position on our team (I would call it worse than our pass pressure/rush). We will DEFINITELY upgrade this position over the off-season, whether it is by draft or by free agency. Unfortunately, Ben Watson is the best unrestricted free agent TE in the league, so if we're going to upgrade our TE spot, expect it to cost us a draft pick or two. Since picking up Alex Smith cost us a 5th rounder this year, I'd expect us to shy away from trading a pick for a TE again this off-season. I would say we'd more likely look to the draft to answer our TE problems.

We'll be looking for a receiving TE or (even better!) a Jack-Of-All-Trades Tight End.

Look for us to pick up Aaron Hernandez from Florida (6-3, 250 lbs) who is a great receiving TE, but a weak blocking TE. I can see him immediately stepping into Ben Watson's role and doing just as well. Perhaps, if we alter our offensive scheme back to "best open receiver", he could do even better than Watson. Hernandez did extremely well in college, despite the fact that Tebow always stared him down before throwing to him (and his slow release allowed defenses to get into better position).

Dennis Pitta, from BYU (6-4, 245), is another option. He was a great receiver as a TE, has solid blocking skills and (best of all) should be available in the 4th round, giving us more freedom of selection in the 2nd round. Colin Peek from Alabama would be another mid-round option, but he is more of a blocking than a receiving TE (which we have in Baker).


Verdict: Definite upgrade to happen in the draft, in either the 2nd (Hernandez or Rob Gronkowski from Arizona) or 4th round (Pitta).

 

Read more: Quarterback Situation, Wide Receiver Situation and Running Back Situation

Statistics courtesy of Pro Football Focus and ESPN.com.

Poll
Should we re-sign Ben Watson?
Yes! He's the answer, he just hasn't been asked.
57 votes
Yes, but also bring in a new TE for the future by FA or the Draft.
121 votes
No, bring in a new TE for the future by FA or the Draft.
83 votes
No, I want to enter the season with just Chris Baker.
11 votes
Hell, I want to cut Chris Baker. I want no Tight Ends!
18 votes

290 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 23 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think this position is inexcusable as it is now.

I wouldn’t mind if we resigned Watson for less pay AND draft a new player. However, I don’t see Watson doing that, so I hope we draft a stud.

by Richard Hill on Feb 24, 2010 2:09 PM EST reply actions  

agree

Non Sibi Sed Patriae.
I love my ZX-6r Kawasaki.....159 mph is my top speed..will top that this spring
I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
(formerly mathew.40)

by NinjaZX6R on Feb 24, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Two words: Aaron. Hernandez.

The 2010 New York Mets: Maybe it's the Phillies' turn to have 95% of its roster on the DL

The 2009 New England Patriots: At least we got our division title back

The 2009-10 New Jersey Devils: Allergic to second periods

by R_Adragna on Feb 24, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I sincerely doubt Hernandez is going to interest Hoodie

Belichick has primarily drafted blocking TEs, or blocking-first all-rounder TEs. Daniel Graham was primarily a solid blocker who could catch; Watson was a catching, athletic TE who never left the field and could block very well. Most of his other selections were blockers – Garret Mills projected as a TE or fullback because of his blocking ability.

More to the point, Hoodie already had a very good catching-but-not-blocking TE in camp last year – David Thomas. Thomas was a third-round draft pick who had a lot of potential as a pass-receiver, but Hoodie chose to flick off Thomas for a low-rounder to the Saints and only carry two TEs (although that was bumped up to three again via free agency). In other words, he’d rather not have a TE than a pass-catching-only TE, which says a lot about Hoodie’s ideas of TEs as blockers-first. And it wasn’t as if Thomas was carrying an injury – he was a late-season standout for the Saints on their run to the Superbowl. It’s just that Hoodie likes TEs who can block; Thomas didn’t fit the bill, and I’m not sure Hernandez will, either.

In saying that, I highly suspect that Hoodie will draft a TE this year. He regularly takes them – he’s drafted 8 TEs in his tenure at New England, including 2 first-rounders and 5 in the top 120 picks of the draft. I would expect him to take another one this year, even if it’s only in recognition that carrying two TEs for most of the season was a mistake (he cut ex-Giant blocking TE Michael Mathews to make room for Seau early on in the season). He needed another TE to spell Watson and Baker; 60%+ of the snaps for both of them was ludicrously high.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Feb 24, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they'll at least give Hernandez a look.

His potential as a receiver is as good as any Tight End- the only difference is that he’s shorter than the other TEs being looked at (by 4-5 inches).

But I agree, Belichick enjoys his multi-talented TEs. That’s why Watson’s probably not going to get an offer- he’s lost his value as a blocker.

I’m hoping that we snag Pitta because he’s a low-risk pick, and it also allows us more freedom in the 2nd round with our selections. Instead of DL, OLB, *, TE, we can go DL, OLB, *, *. The * could be anyone from RB, to CB to (fingers crosses) another LB.

My Dream first 4 picks go → DE (Odrick), CB (Wilson), ILB (Spikes), OLB (Norwood/Bowman)

by Richard Hill on Feb 24, 2010 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I still like Hernandez for his receiving and his playmaking abilities.

That being said, I wouldn’t mind seeing the Pats go the Pitta route, as it looks to be a safe bet, particularly at that point of the draft, and allows creativity with the picks.

So I’ll go along the lines of either Kindle-Wootton-Saffold-Hardesty or Kindle-Wootton-Warren-Saffold.

The 2010 New York Mets: Maybe it's the Phillies' turn to have 95% of its roster on the DL

The 2009 New England Patriots: At least we got our division title back

The 2009-10 New Jersey Devils: Allergic to second periods

by R_Adragna on Feb 24, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

how is bowman fit in the pats system?

he is 6’1 232lbs

Non Sibi Sed Patriae.
I love my ZX-6r Kawasaki.....159 mph is my top speed..will top that this spring
I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
(formerly mathew.40)

by NinjaZX6R on Feb 25, 2010 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

TBC is 6'2, 250

Burgess is 6’2, 260

Bowman could easily throw on 10 pounds and be a solid 6’1, 245. Most importantly, he has a nose for the game and is a smart player. I’d prefer Norwood, which is why I had him first, but our defense needs play makers now, not scheme fitters. We need players who step up and make the defense their own, instead of being “just another piece.”

by Richard Hill on Feb 25, 2010 2:36 AM EST up reply actions  

i project him as a 4-3Sam LB or a 3-4weak ILB

Non Sibi Sed Patriae.
I love my ZX-6r Kawasaki.....159 mph is my top speed..will top that this spring
I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
(formerly mathew.40)

by NinjaZX6R on Feb 25, 2010 4:01 AM EST up reply actions  

The more I read up on Odrick, the more likely he seems

Size, pass-rush ability, versatility enough to play RE and NT, and Hoodie’s penchant for drafting DEs in the first round. He’d just make everyone around him play that much better. I’m also holding my breath for March 5 – I haven’t heard a peep from Adalius Thomas saying he wants out of town, nor the Pats saying they want to trade him, so I wonder what’s going on there. He could still be an effective OLB if he’s motivated and knows what his role is; if he’s good to go, Kindle and/or Graham might be bumped way down the level-of-interest scale.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Feb 25, 2010 4:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm actually thinking there's more going on with Thomas.

Can’t put my finger on it exactly, but I’m thinking it’s less likely he departs.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 25, 2010 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

It doesn't matter who is at the position as much as how the position is used.

As pointed out here, when the position is utilized in the passing game good things happen.

The stat relating to 2 TE formations over 60% of the time and leading the NFL, when you put that stat next to passes thrown to TEs (Pats can’t be greater then 10th here) you see what the problem is.

1. This shows lack of confidence in the OL. TEs were used more to protect Tom Brady and/or create running lanes then they were as part of the passing game.

2. General lack of creativity from the offense. Again assuming the Pats are not near the top of the league in passes thrown to TEs, its frustrating. You would think with that many 2 TE formations, play action or TE seem routes (like vs Buffalo in week 1) would do wonders for the O.

 - It would slow down blitzes, force LBs and Safeties to account for TEs and read if they are staying in, running a route, or perhaps delay for a screen or flat route
- it would create better running lanes, for the reasons stated above
- if they actually when out in the old Ben Coates 7-10 yr routes, it would give Tom a 3rd
target, and a big one at that for consistent moderate gains.
-

Any of the above players could be great, I personally think Chris Baker is very good for this type of offense. Given the # of 2 TE sets and running plays the Pats execute from the formation, you need a TE who can block well in addition to catch well.

Hernandez is a great Hback type, but he hasn’t had to show his blocking skills at UF. Watson is a solid pass catcher, average blocker, and arguable below average possession guy.

by JonnyNYC on Feb 24, 2010 5:08 PM EST reply actions  

We actually had...

…the 2nd fewest passes towards our TE. We had 59 between Baker and Watson and Matthews (he had 1 pass towards him, we released him). Arizona was last with 23. Then again, Arizona was MUCH deeper than us, in terms of receiving core.

by Richard Hill on Feb 24, 2010 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Watson's a solid blocker

You’d have to bear in mind that he was lining up alongside Kazcur and an injured Neal most of the time; Baker had Light and Mankins. Sliiiiight difference in ability and health there, at least in 2009.

More to the point, it looked as if quite a few of the plays were drawn up for Watson to chip a DE, whereas Baker was to bracket Brady’s blindside OLB. Watson surrenders 50lbs to a lot of the DEs they played(just think of how many 3-4 teams the Pats played last year), whereas Baker was on equal terms with an OLB. And on the occasions that Baker slipped off his guy, that blind side was usually where Faulk slid to on pass-protection schemes – Faulk was often there to clean up (which is also why Baker was tasked with the OLB instead of the bigger DE – they could afford the numbers because Faulk slid left and covered whoever got through).

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Feb 24, 2010 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Watson was used in the Pass Block only 52 times (less than 1/3 total TE Pass Block plays)

And also, one could argue that Neal did just as, if not better, than Mankins this year in the pass blocking. (I think this is kind of moot, anyways, since both Baker and Watson lined up on both sides of the line)

by Richard Hill on Feb 24, 2010 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I should clarify...

…Watson played on the Right Side when both the RG and RT were healthy (first couple of games with Neal and Kaczur, last couple of games with Neal and Vollmer). During the time of injuries, he swung over to the left side. Baker, on the other hand, was primarily on the right side all season.

by Richard Hill on Feb 24, 2010 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Mhmm, Baker was seen as the more solid blocker

although it might’ve been a vote of confidence in Watson’s pass-catching, instead – he did have a pretty good year as a receiver, considering how few times his number was called.

After going over the stats, what really stood out to me was how awful the YAC of both Watson and Baker were – it seems they were always thrown to right about the time they were getting hit, meaning no chance of breaking tackles because they were concetrating on the ball. If anything, it brought to mind the Brady interception against the Ravens, when he picked out Watson as he was being sandwiched between Ray Lewis and Ed Reed (ouch, by the way). You can’t get YAC when the play has you running into the teeth of Safeties and Linebackers every time you’re a legitimate target. Ugh. Baaaaaaad playcalling.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Feb 25, 2010 4:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Some TE's earn their bread and butter in LB land. Alas, ours do not.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 25, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Playcalling gives the guy his routes.

Brady can only decide to throw or not to throw.

He made a bad decision, but putting the TE there to begin with was the playcalling.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 25, 2010 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gronk_02_small
OTA - Off-Topic Activities #17: Careful with that Glock, son.
Huggins12_small
A long analysis as to why the future is bright, both near and far.
409745_835081218497_11607473_36756822_1545123165_n_small
The Five Stages of (Patriot) Grief
Small
Who Stays? Who Goes?
Super-bowl-ring_small
The Front Rank

Recent FanPosts

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small
Akiem Hicks, DT/DE
Small
Fun With Predictions: Pats Moves, FA and Draft
Patriots-ring-player-catch_small
Interesting free agents
269791_251807884833897_100000140615173_1189794_2843345_n_small
Wes Welker Is Bill Buckner? That's Baloney
Nnamdi_small
A Beautiful Game
Phanatic_for_profile_small
A Game of Feet (and ankles)?!?
Phanatic_for_profile_small
Trade Brady?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

Amd_mccourty2_small UtopianAverage