The Next Brady
Did I get your attention with the headline? I have been reading and hearing so much talk about Tim Tebow and the New England Patriots. Personally, I would love to see the Pats draft him. However, he wouldn't be my first choice to someday to take over the job as quarterback of the New England Patriots.
This quarterback is not in this years draft. Jimmy Clausen and Sam Bradford could be very good pro quarterbacks. In my opinion they will not be the quarterback that the "Next Brady" will be. Matt Ryan and Matthew Stafford currently playing will also be very good quarterbacks. I am looking for a guy who can take over the mantle of a "living legend".
This quarterback is currently playing College Football close to where Tom Brady grew up in Northern California. His name is Andrew Luck and he plays for Stanford. Next year he will only be a sophomore. His first year playing at Stanford he was a redshirt freshman. He is 6ft. 4 inches tall and weighs 235 pounds. He resides in Houston Texas and his father Oliver Luck was a former NFL quarterback with the Houston Oilers.
Now what makes this redshirt freshman the "Next Brady"? In my opinion it is the intangibles you just can't measure. Tom Brady is extremely intelligent and has excellent pocket presence. What separates Tom Brady from the rest comes down to his decision making. Drew Bledsoe had all the natural ability to be a great quarterback. The difference between Bledsoe and Brady are the intangibles. To me the intangibles are the difference between good and great quarterbacks.
I was watching an ESPN College Football show and they were touting Andrew Luck. Stanford was about to play Oregon. The hosts of the show kept mentioning you need to check out this redshirt freshman form Stanford. I had no plans on watching this game. I took their advice and sat down and watched the game between Stanford and Oregon.
Two players jumped out at me right away and they both played for Stanford. Toby Gerhart is a great running back and I would love to see the Pats draft him. However, it was the quarterback Andrew Luck that caught my eye right away. For a freshman his pocket presence was fantastic. He knew just when to release the ball and it was a laser to his receiver. He did this time after time in this game against Oregon. Stanford won this game in a shootout 51 - 42. I am not a stat guy to be honest with you. I go by the eye test. In this game he was 12 - 20 for 256 yards and 2 touchdowns. The eye test told me he was better than the statistics in this game. This team you could tell was more about the running game than the passing game. With all that said, Andrew Luck was extremely poised in the pocket and made great decisions.
Now, that was just one game. What would happen next week against USC on the road? I decided I needed to see more so I watched this game. Would Luck get rattled in this game against USC? In the beginning to be honest he was a little shaky. As the game went on he settled down. Again, he made good decisions when under pressure. Stanford beat USC 55 - 21. His statistics won't overwhelm you. He was 12 - 22 throwing for 144 yards and 2 touchdowns. Again though the eye test told me he was better than the statistics. After this game I thought he might be the "real deal".
Now, the next week Stanford would play California. Andrew Luck came back to earth and had a very bad game against Cal. He was 10 -30 and threw an interception in a 34 - 28 loss for Stanford. Again, he is only a freshman and every quarterback has bad games. The question is how would he bounce back.
The next game was against Notre Dame. Andrew Luck was 14 - 20 and threw for 198 yards. His completion percentage was 70%. Luck did bounce back and help lead Stanford to a victory against Notre Dame 45 - 38. To me a quarterback that has a short memory, and can follow up a bad game with a good game is extremely valuable.
Andrew Luck's statistics are not going to overwhelm you. He played in an offense that was geared more for the running game last year. What impressed me is the intangibles you just can't teach. Luck is an intelligent quarterback with great instincts for football. He knows when to make the right decision. He throws the pass just at the right time. He also can take a hit. After watching a good sample of games from Luck I realized he was a special quarterback.
I am in no hurry to replace Tom Brady. I am as huge a fan of Brady as they come. I even named my son after him. At some point though life goes on and the Pats are going to need a new quarterback. Why not replace him someday with someone that has those similar qualities that Brady possesses?
Andrew Luck is going into his sophomore season at Stanford. This will be he third year at Stanford as he redshirted his first year. When he decides to go into the NFL draft I hope the New England Patriots do whatever they can to draft Andrew Luck.
If you want to see for yourself watch this youtube video of Andrew Luck.
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If only it were that simple
Ryan Fitzpatrick is probably the smartest QB in the NFL, but you’re in trouble if he’s your starter — he’s not bad, but he’s not good enough.
And even “good enough” isn’t good enough for this comparison — you have to be Hall of Fame caliber to be “the next Brady.”
Want to try and grab Mercury next?
Luck certainly does look like a solid young QB….but really every few years there are QBs who could fit that bill.
There’s theory and there’s reality though, and to me the difference between Joe Montana and Tom Brady, who I consider two of the best QBs, and Dan Marino and Peyton Manning is in nature of their paths to greatness.
Montana was a 3rd round pick, Brady was a 6th. Peyton and Dan were major QB prospects. The humility & determination that comes with not being the ‘best’ at your position is what defines them JM and TB.
To not have the strongest arm or be the ideal height, to have scrap and claw your way onto the practice field, to earn reps vs have then anointed to you.
To have to use the players around you and understand their skills to make you better vs believing it’s your skills that make your teammates better…..
That to me is the difference, and that’s not something you can really find on a stat sheet.
I made a mistake on my last comment. I do hear what you are saying about that every few years there is a quarterback that fits this bill. In my opinion he is different. He also has an advantage that most quarterback don’t have. His head coach is an ex NFL quarterback Jim Harbaugh.
Only time will tell if I am right.
I watch Harbaugh quite a bit with Chicago.
He was alright, but not necessarily anything special. Maybe his experience could help, maybe not.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 2, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Having Harbaugh as a HC and a father who was an NFL QB will raise his stocks to Hoodie
Belichick’s all about having pedigree, both blood-lines and in coaching trees. He’ll love that the kid will be familiar with NFL ideas both in terms of coaching and in terms of being around the system through his father. He’ll be on Hoodie’s radar, I’d put money on it.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Even this guy doesn't know who the next Tom Brady will be

oh and When 900 years you reach, look as good, you will not
by JonnyNYC on Apr 2, 2010 12:04 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Definitely has similar intangibles.
I made a similar accusation when I first saw Matt Ryan play in the year before he went in the draft. I said he was the next tom brady. He is doing great, but we’ll see.
I watched Matt Ryan at BC a great deal and he doesn't have the decision making intangible Luck has at his stage in College Football.
The decision making he can build on.
His accuracy and pocket presence are what impressed me. His intangibles overall reminded me of brady a great deal.
Honestly I am not someone who throws it out there unless I believe it. When I saw his accuracy and pocket presence I was sold. I am telling everyone that he is different than Matt Ryan and Matthew Stafford.
okay then.
I don’t throw it out either. I evaluate a prospect, then I make a decision on him. Luck has very similar skills to Brady, and I also think Matt Ryan has similar to Brady.
We’ll see how they both go.
i think it might be Matt Barkley from USC
Non Sibi Sed Patriae.
I love my ZX-6r Kawasaki.....159 mph is my top speed..will top that this spring
I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
(formerly mathew.40)
Well... he could get Lucky.
The Post W'Rec'ker
by Choose your screen name: on Apr 2, 2010 3:25 PM EDT reply actions
Really and truthfully.. who here looked at the draft when we got Brady and said..
“Thank God! Adrian Klemm, J.R. Redmond, Greg Randall, Dave Stachelski, Jeff Marriot, Antwan Harris were just a facade for the arrival of King Brady! I will need no more and I hope Bledsoe breaks something so he can play” .. Interesting note, anyone realize Adalius Thomas was drafted slightly higher than Brady.. at 186.

by 

































