Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

Patriots Prognostication: Secondary

I'm sure you're aware of the process by now; unit-by-unit breakdowns, yada yada, ad nauseum. As you can see, this one's looking at the secondary (imagine that! Title and everything!). Everyone's favourite whipping boy when the defence fails, Football Outsiders ranks the Pats pass-defence (after opposition-strength adjustment) a so-so 16th overall. When ranked against Wide Receivers by type, the Pats were a pretty poor 26th against #1 wideouts and a surprisingly decent 8th against #2 receivers. Against 'other' wide receivers (3rd, 4th and 5th) they were a credible 10th.

Perhaps most troublingly, the Patriots pass-defence was the 3rd least consistent (behind the Jets at least consistent and Green Bay at second-least consistent). The Jets and Green Bay were both in the top 3 of pass defences, however, while the Pats lingered far further down the list. This suggests the Pats were particularly hit-and-miss over the course of the season, and when they were bad, they were really bad. This bears out in the performances - they destroyed the Titans (giving up negative total passing yardage!), and then got slaughtered in turn by the red-hot Saints. The mercurial nature even played out within games, being pretty good against the Colts for a significant stretch of their matchup, and then folding like a wet playing card at inopportune times.

For the purpose of this I'll evaluate only the players who saw time in their listed positions; there are also Safeties Matthew Slater and Bret Lockett and Cornerback Kyle Arrington on the roster, but who play primarily as special teamers. And so, onto the analysis, after the jump...

Star-divide

Safeties.

The Safety corps at the moment is likely the deepest and strongest of all the Pats position groups at the moment - there are three starting quality Safeties (Brandon Meriweather, Brandon McGowan, James Sanders) and a solid-looking backup Safety/Nickel-corner/Special teams contributor in Patrick Chung.

Brandon Meriweather, as we all know, made the Pro Bowl after a decent enough season, although questions still linger about his overall effectiveness as a go-to guy in the defensive backfield. He'll pop up for a game-winning play, but also suffer at the hands of good QB/WR combinations and good RBs, getting suckered by play-fakes in the passing game and shifty runners in the run game. His tackling technique isn't 100% and he's made baffling comments in the media about his mercurial defensive abilities (gangtackling? you high?), but his play ought to improve with age - there's a reason Belichick had traditionally only taken old/experienced Safeties before Meriweather.

Brandon McGowan was a situational starter: whenever a team had a top-line TE, be it Dallas Clark or Kellen Winslow, McGowan drew him in one-on-one coverage. While he faded down the stretch, he showed enough to suggest he'll be a valuable contributor, especially in shutting out those top TEs from being automatic safety valves/first-down machines. He also forced an impressive three fumbles, and was a force on special teams - versatility Belichick loves.

Patrick Chung played fairly well in certain packages - put on the field as a Nickel-back, often blitzing, he showed some pass-rushing talent and a nose for the ball on pass-defence. He didn't crack the lineup as a Safety per se, but then neither did Meriweather in his first year on the roster. Chung also showed pretty good nous as a special teamer, providing added value in the oft-neglected side of the ball.

James Sanders was the odd man out in the Pats Safety corps. Despite receiving praise from Belichick as a clubhouse leader, pre-season, Sanders slid from the depth chart almost immediately, and only played situationally with limited snaps over the course of the season. He might well be trade-bait as a solid-if-unspectacular option for a team willing to part with picks; he'd add great locker-room leadership to a team that may well need some bolstering. If so, the Pats may well pick up another Safety in the draft, or a free agent, or both. Otherwise, I don't expect another S addition to the roster, particularly with Matthew Slater and Bret Lockett providing depth at the position.

Corners

Again, a fairly deep stock already on the roster and signed up for the medium-term - 5 of them, plus Arrington, and Chung fits into Nickel cornerback situationally. By player...

Leigh Bodden was the standout cornerback, being very solid in a difficult position - no pass-rush and a pretty solid lineup of good WRs over the season. Although he showed glimpses of being a playmaker - he snaffled 5 picks - he impressed more as a solid run-stopper and trustworthy pass-defender (with emphasis on 'trustworthy' - unlike route-jumping, no-tackling Asante Samuel). He did particularly well considering the dearth of pass-rush; he rarely got beaten deep despite receivers often having forever to gain separation from his coverage. A keeper; I thought he was bound to walk in the off-season as he was one of the top available free agents in a coveted position.

Darius Butler. The 'dynamic' to Bodden's 'solid', Butler showed real flashes of why he had been projected as a first-round talent in the 2009 draft. While he got limited opportunities, he shined against the weaker opposition teams (where he was promoted to starter, uncoincidentally), in particular the Titans and Bucs, where he picked up his first two interceptions. He took on additional duties through the year, being trusted again with the CB position against the pass-happy Texans, where he nabbed a 91-yard pick-6. Having Belichick's faith when playing against Andre Johnson and Matt Schaub suggests Hoodie liked what he saw in Butler's first year, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's a genuine starter in 2010.

Shawn Springs. The elder statesmen of the secondary, Springs started the first and last four games at CB, with a 4-game injury period in the middle. Springs signed a 3-year deal for reasonable money, so he could've been viewed as a disappointment with his small-ish total of 40 tackles, 1 pick, and 4 passes defensed. However, he does add a certain amount of positional flexibility (he can play Free Safety), and he is an old head among a pretty young unit, especially if James Sanders is indeed trade-bait. I'd expect him to be back again in 2010, and with another year in the system, he might well improve. He's also got good size - 6'0", 204lbs - meaning he's got a point of difference over Wilhite and Wheatley.

Jonathan Wilhite. Although he started eight games, Wilhite was a tad underwhelming with 45 tackles, 2 picks and 5 passes defensed. Partly because he was a mismatch - he was a bit too small at 5'11" and 185lbs to muscle up to bigger WRs for long enough to allow the anaemic pass-rush time to work. Partly, though, it was a lack of finishing ability - a number of plays had Wilhite basically escorting a Wide Receiver over the first-down mark or end-zone instead of being able to tackle or break up the pass. He showed enough ability I don't think he'll be a casualty, but without a significant upgrade of the pass-rush I wouldn't quite want him matching up to Reggie Wayne or Marques Colston again any time soon.

Terrence Wheatley. An enigma; he showed a lot of promise in his rookie season, playing six of the first 8 games of 2008, and being particularly eye-catching in his first start against the Colts. He seemed to haveManning's number and was sat on Reggie Wayne, et al, pretty effectively. He had a trio of pass-breakups in quick succession, but whilst completing one he had the misfortune of injuring his wrist, getting himself on IR in the process. His 2009 was a washout; only turning up for 5 games and managing a total of 2 tackles. Again, I believe part of it was that Wheatley was a mis-match given the anaemic pass-rush; he's even smaller than Wilhite at only 5'9" and 183lbs, meaning big receivers that have plenty of time (ie - any the Pats played last year) will find a way to break off a small CB and get open. The other thing to remember about Wheatley is his very chequered injury history - as a sophomore in 2004 he had groin, hamstring, and (red flag!) wrist injuries. In 2005 as a junior he had wrist surgery (red flag! red flag!), the wrist bothered him so much his season was a wash; in 2007 as a senior he had a hairline fracture and missed everything past his first 10 games (red flag!!!!). He adds in the kick return capacity, but can the guy stay healthy and/or get on the field?  When he does, he's shown he's dynamic. But dynamism means very little when it's on the Injured Reserve list.

So is there a pressing need to upgrade corners? While it's always a possibility (especially if a top corner slips down the draft to a place he's not meant to be), I don't quite buy it. I don't really see the Pats targeting a top corner, especially with Bodden and Butler looking pretty good as prospects and Springs providing a sure hand and experience. Any new corner would probably be competing for a Nickel-corner spot, and would be head to head with Wilhite, Wheatley and Pat Chung. I suspect that the corners would benefit a lot more from an upgraded pass-rush than the pass-rush would benefit from an upgrade at nickel CB. If the Pats were blitz-heavy, then they'd need an on-an-island Darrell Revis-type; he has to be a shutdown corner because everyone else can/will blitz. The Pats are about coverages and getting Safeties into positions to make plays, so a stud CB is less of a concern.

Given that, it's likely they'll soldier on with a Bodden/Butler starting pair and a Springs/Wilhite/Wheatley rotation lower in the depth chart. Also factor in the dark horse in Kyle Arrington; he was a standout in special teams with his speed and tackling, and he might push for an increased role on defence, too. He also masses more than Wilhite and Wheatley, meaning he'll get thumped around less by the bigger WRs.

Comment 27 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm thinking this is put up or shut up for Wheatley.

His gig is speed, and while he is fast, he also overplays his man severely. He’s got closing speed and needs it because the receiver caught him flat footed time and again. As a smaller corner, he’s going to have to be superior in coverage to stick around. This is probably his last year to really crack the line-up.

Wheatley is serviceable, and that’s about it. Very Ellis Hobbs like, but definitely NOT a top two CB (as Ellis Hobbs is finding on the Eagles). If the offense goes spread, he’s OK on one of the poorer receivers.

Springs may have been one of the poor attitude guys in the locker room. There is no other reason to get rid of him, so if they do, that would be it. It will be interesting to see.

These guys are good enough to hold most receivers to a 3-5 second count. That’s when you are in pass-rush territory and we had none. I’d be surprised to see the secondary addressed (except maybe a 6th – 7th round guy) until next year at the earliest. Next year we’ll know a little more about the Wonder Twins and some other guys and may need to improve.

Good stuff.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 20, 2010 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

great analysis

I always wonder y ppl say pats need to draft a db in this draft when it’s pretty obvious we have depth there and untapped potential.

by lololol on Apr 20, 2010 4:32 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

It's the fact that the potential remains largely untapped.

They’ve got a new coach back there I believe, so that may help to bring some of the potential to the fore.

The lack of a pass rush also makes the secondary look worse than it is. In 2008, receivers were getting open in under 3 seconds. That’s piss-poor coverage there. In 2009, that improved quite a bit, though the 1st and 2nd year guys got burned on occasion. Hopefully, another year older and another year smarter.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 20, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

CB arenas

i think the pats end up taking him in the mid rounds

needs to see improvement from chung and wheatley this year

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

"…traded as many times this summer as a bad hooker’s phone number at a Vegas convention of Proctologists ."

by remembering9ergods on Apr 20, 2010 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Chung probably contributed more in his rookie year than Meriweather did, so signs are good...

Meriweather barely broke out of special teams in his rookie year; Chung was at times the first choice nickelback, especially for blitzes.

If you go solely on stats, Meriweather only managed 19 solo tackles and 9 more assists with 3 passes defended in his rookie year. Chung got 25 solo tackles, 12 assists, 2 sacks (13 yards), 1 pick (2 yards), 1 pass defended in his rookie year.

I’m fairly happy with Chung thus far, and even if he doesn’t crack the starting line-up per se, he’s a pretty useful special teamer who can easily cover FS or SS at a pretty high standard.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 20, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's the game where the overall depth of the secondary was challenged and found wanting.

Guys hadn’t grown up yet, and Brees had his way with them.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 20, 2010 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

is it truly fair to judge a secondary only

against the best passing offense, and best overall offense in the league though? Especially since our secondary was very young?

by patriotguy2 on Apr 20, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

About as fair as judging it against the most inept.

The answer is probably somewhere in the middle.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 20, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Consistency is the name of the game, especially in the secondary

It’s no good to destroy the Titans and them get whomped by the Saints a month or two later; it’s part of the reason Bodden is so valuable to the team, he is very consistent. If he instills that in some of the young guys, things ought to be a lot better overall, especially against top teams.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 20, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that the Saints game really falls a lot on the coaches.

The Saints took advantage of the fact that the ref crew in that game was known to keep their flags in their pockets and so they beat up our recievers in order to create coverage pressure with just a 3 or 4 man rush.

Yet we played our secondary really really soft on their WRs. Way out of character with the way they played in other games.

The only games all year where the Pats D gave up a lot of points were the Colts, Saints & Houston games – and the last one hardly was a legitimate effort. Going into that last game, the D was rated 3rd in pts surrendered. I certainly feel that the defense could use some key improvements (specifically a big time DE would be nice) but the defense last year was NOT the weak side of the ball for this team.

by mmmmm on Apr 21, 2010 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I believe a lot of it was also conditioning of Pats fans

They’re so used to game-winning defensive stands – those times that Ty Law or Asante Samuel or Rodney Harrison or Tedy Bruschi would get a game-winning interception, or that Bruschi or Mike Vrabel would get a game-winning fumble, that when the Pats defence ‘seemed’ susceptible (whether the stats say they were or not), that Pats fans jumped on the lack of obvious game-winning plays at the end of close games. And even the games the Pats won with defensive efforts – say, the Ravens game where the WR dropped an easily catchable ball – it wasn’t as decisive as a pick, so Pats fans disregarded it as being ‘weak’.

Stats-wise, the Pats defence was actually fairly good. But perception-wise, the lack of game-winners in comparison to the unrealistic expectations borne of years of Bruschi/Vrabel/Harrison/Law means people were… uncomfortable about it.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 21, 2010 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

colts game

Non Sibi Sed Patriae.
I love my ZX-6r Kawasaki.....159 mph is my top speed..will top that this spring
I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
(formerly mathew.40)

by NinjaZX6R on Apr 20, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Darius Butler

He was a great player for Uconn and hes going to be a great CB for New England for years to come

by Meatface on Apr 20, 2010 6:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Looks like it, yes.

It’ll be very interesting to see his leap from being a rookie to a second-year player, particularly if the Pats upgrade their pass-rush significantly (which they really have to do, surely).

With opposing QBs throwing more rushed passes, he’ll have more lee-way to show off his play-making abilities, especially when paired with such a solid coverage guy as Bodden. Bodden strangles the #1, the pass-rush forces the QB to spray it at #2, and Butler picks off the poor throws… ideally, anyway, hah.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 20, 2010 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I hope he can improve our defence next year

He looks awfully good in our team colours. If we don’t improve our pass-rush, though, everyone will be in a bad humour.

…Sorry. I’ll stop now.

Oh, if a man tried to take his time on earth, and prove before he died
What one man's life could be worth--oh, I wonder what would happen to this world.

by LegendaryTadpole on Apr 20, 2010 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that there is untapped potiential in all of our secondary

While the saints did show them up last year, I have a feeling that our front 7 is more guilty of playing bad then our secondary., especially the linebackers

"Imagine the Flying Elvis with a Mickey Mouse hat. That's me"

by Give Me on Apr 20, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent work

Since it happened so long ago, I had forgotten that Wheatley actually did show some promise as a rookie before apparently entering the witness protection program last year. If he can stay healthy…..if he can stay healthy….he might, just might, live up to his second round potential. But even if he doesn’t, improvement by the other young guys, the return of Bodden, the possibility of another rookie in this year’s draft, and—let’s all hope—a vastly improved pass rush will make a difference. If Wheatley comes through, too, that’s just the icing on the gravy as my wife says.Rec’d.

by ProfessorTodd on Apr 20, 2010 9:17 PM EDT reply actions  

I just remember watching that Colts game and thinking "man, he's going to be a stud"

and then about a play and a half later, his wrist decided it was made of glass and he flipped over Wayne and into the Injured Reserve.

Not many CBs make Wayne-Manning look average, especially not several plays in a row, and especially not rookie CBs. He’s definitely got some talent, but he has to actually be on the field to use it…

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 20, 2010 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just to let you know, unless you show me something...

… Weatley was covering Harrison the entire game. He only covered Wayne on that deep route he was injured on. I remember saying, “Wow, he’s completely demolishing Marvin Harrison.”

by patriotguy2 on Apr 20, 2010 9:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Either way, he was in Manning's head

It wasn’t so much that he was all over the WRs (although he did a decent job of that), it was that he actually read Manning well enough to get his hands on the ball and tip it, which means he read Manning more than just flopping all over the receiver. That’s quite impressive for any CB, let alone a rookie.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 20, 2010 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is very true.

I was impressed by Wheatley by the way he was covering the WRs, and making pass breakup from Manning. I was very excited for the guy.

by patriotguy2 on Apr 20, 2010 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whipping Boy?

I was nearly offended by the writers use of the term “whipping boy” as it seems to be a slam on those of us who put heavy burden on the shoulders of a SECONDARY. I am one of such individuals. Football is a game where any one player’s performance can make the other ten look good or look really bad right along with him. A fullback who misses a block on a LB blitz makes the entire offense look foolish…. Yah! I get it!

Look, NFL offenses are throwing the ball at least 40% more than they did 15 years ago and DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS. If these are true, consistently great teams must have defenses that disrupt the passing games of offensive juggernauts. I believe that starts with the corners!

After the QB….. The two most important players on the squad are the two corners (that’s my humble opinion). If I were an NFL GM, I’d aquire the very best corner studs available via the draft or free agency and pay them what it takes to retain them long term.

I HATE the NY Jets…. but, I have to say they their season’s success hinged on the strength of their defense which was anchored by two of the best corners in the game. Their offense was absolutely terrible. Sanchez played poorly most of the time, but he did not make mistakes that lost games.

Another example….. Indianapolis has had a dynamic offense for the last ten years. Yet, they could not get over the hump until their defense caught up. They achieved that 3 years ago which is exactly why they’ve been playoff powerhouses all three!

Dude, I am one of those who puts a crap load of onus on the secondary and I think I’m right in doing so….. Sorry to disagree.

by Bills friend on Apr 21, 2010 12:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Well...

…any offense with a lot of time can find an open receiver, regardless of how talented the corners are. The longer the plays are allowed to develop, the greater the chance of a good offensive play being made. With a incapable pass rush, plays have a much longer time to develop. With a good pass rush, the quarterback is forced to make decisions and try plays that might not be there- which is when average cornerbacks are able to take advantage of bad decisions.

Above average pass rush + average secondary > average pass rush + above average secondary.

Just ask the Oakland Raiders. No matter how talented Asomugha is, if their defense can’t reach the QB, there will be big plays given up.

by Richard Hill on Apr 21, 2010 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps... but consider this
If these are true, consistently great teams must have defenses that disrupt the passing games of offensive juggernauts. I believe that starts with the corners!

Could you name the Saints cornerbacks before they won the Superbowl? I’d put money on the fact that you couldn’t. And in that Superbowl, while Porter got a great pick-6, it wasn’t by any means because he was a stud, shutdown CB – it was because his pass-rush got in Manning’s face and Manning locked in on his go-to receiver. That’s on the pass-rush. And that suggests that so-so cornerbacks can benefit from an otherwise great defence just as much (if not more) than as a so-so defence can benefit from a great cornerback.

Corners are, in the scheme of the NFL at this pass-happy moment, particularly expensive. The Pats have veered away from investing heavily in this position (hence the departures of Asante Samuel and Ty Law for monetary issues) and have still put out above-par defences. The Saints followed the Pats blueprint, invested in Linebackers and Safeties over Cornerbacks, and reaped a Superbowl out of it. Winning a Superbowl suggests the defence-as-a-whole>stud Cornerbacks tactic works, wouldn’t you agree?

Compare that to the Jets, who had great cornerbacks, but neglected other parts of the defence (pass-rush, for one). They did fairly well, but only had a 9-7 record in the regular season – hardly dominating. The Raiders? Again, great CB, average defence as a whole. So the whole stud-CBs-worth-as-much-as-QB thing… not so much.

The final thing to bear in mind is that if you do espouse the CB = QB importance thing, you’ve got all your investment in a shutdown cornerback or two – that’s what franchise players are paid. So that necessarily means your entire defensive scheme hinges on those one or two players, and thsu your entire defence could be derailed by one or two knee injuries. Where would the 9-7 Jets have been without Revis?

If I were an NFL GM, I’d aquire the very best corner studs available via the draft or free agency and pay them what it takes to retain them long term.

Admirable sentiment, perhaps, but that’d be tying your entire franchise’s future on the health and wellbeing of one, maybe two guys who are around 200lbs soaking wet. Little men get injured; injured stud players with gigantic long-term contracts are also called ‘busts’. It’s a hell of a risk to tie your entire future on two of the smallest men on the field. I’d rather get depth, if only because I know that at least I’ll have men on the field if something goes wrong. And that best-corners-in-draft-and-retain-them hasn’t won the Raiders many games in the last few years, despite having Nnamdi Asomugha for that whole time period.

Don’t worry about disagreeing; feel free. It’s just that investing in your skill position guys (corners in particular) is riskier because they’re more fragile. If they’re healthy, it’s great. But if they’re not, then all your cash and all your talent is sitting on the bench or in a hotel somewhere watching the game, which means you get hammered. Considering the last few teams to win the Superbowl – Saints, Colts, Giants, Steelers – all did so without genuine shut-down corners, I’m pretty happy with my suggestion that an All Pro cornerback set won’t guarantee you Superbowl wins.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.

by Comedic.Sans on Apr 21, 2010 6:58 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed..... somewhat

Consider this,

When a team has two studs who are terrors on the corners, the Defensive coordinators can call much more aggressive defenses that put serious limitations on an offense.

Last year, the New York Jets had that very situation. As result, they were quite comfortable sending 5 on the pass rush routinely. They blitzed about as much as any team in the league and they mixed up their blitz packages well. These blitz packages kept opposing offenses operating somewhat “defensively” even though that sounds like an oxymoron.

Teams that have average, or below average cover guys have to center their attention of mixing up their coverage schemes to disrupt the opposing offense using occasional blitz packages to throw them off gaurd. The Pats generally take that approach when going against a reliable QB. That’s a big differense in defensive philosophy! I believe a defensive coordinator’s ability to even consider that option routinely comes down to the trust he has in his cover guys and whether or not they need help. The Jets cover-guys were so good their coaches had the confidence to put a target on the opposing QB and go after him. They got burned once in a while but overall they did so with much success.

In any event, your comments about cover guys being fragile is understood and well taken.

by Bills friend on Apr 28, 2010 12:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

_e__sorry_small
NCS's Epic Weekly Caption Contest: The 13th
Smpavatar_small
OTA - Off Topic Activities: #23 - Human Genome Edition
Small
Nate Ebner is Leonidas
Covers_small
Are you ready to step your fantasy football game up to the next level?
_e__sorry_small
NCS's Epic Weekly Caption Contest: Tom Brady's Edition

Recent FanPosts

Bruschi_small
The Big Nickel and BB's upcoming defensive revolution
Small
Looking to the AFC-East: Predictions, Analysis
Russ_3_small
Mike Reiss And Dan Leberfeld On Latest Edition Of Patriots Fourth And Two
Small
Welker taking a risk?
_e__sorry_small
NCS's Epic Weekly Caption Contest - The 11th

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe