Both Halves of the Issue: Patriots Need Half Time Adjustments
Congratulations to the New England Patriots! They led the league in first half scoring differential. And not just barely. They had a different +63 points greater than the 2nd place New Orleans Saints. It seemed so frequent last season that the team would come into the game guns blazing and try and bury their opponents early- and it usually worked. The Patriots usually had their opponents so far behind that no matter how they tried to claw back into the game, the Patriots' bend-don't-break defense would hold them off.
Unfortunately, after the Patriots had built up large leads at the half, they usually gave it away. The team ranked 24th in Third Quarter differential and 17th in Second Half differential. That's huge for a team that was the best in the league in the first half. This means that opposing teams would come out after the half and score, usually at will, against the Patriots. They would claw back into the game and make the games nerve wracking for fans everywhere.
After briefly scanning the box scores, it looks like the Patriots let opposing teams claw their way into in the game 8 or so times after the half. That's far too many times for a team trying to crush the spirits of opposing teams. Clearly, opposing teams are figuring out how to beat the Patriots defense and stop the Patriots offense.
So what happened in most of these games? It's pretty simple. Find out after the Jump!
On defense, the Patriots would play prevent. They had a lead and they banked on milking the clock and slowing opposing offenses into scoring only a few times. They would try to not give up the big play, but were okay with allowing teams to get a field goal if it stopped a touchdown. However, this style of defense banks on the offense matching the opposing team in terms of points. They did not.
The offense came out of the half slinging. Everyone here's complained at some point or another about how the team abandoned the run after the half. The real difference is that teams figured out how the Patriots offense worked. I advise you to look at the split statistics provided at ESPN. Looking at the numbers of Laurence Maroney, Kevin Faulk, Sammy Morris and Fred Taylor, I can figure out the following:
- The Patriots run on first down. They rarely run on second down. They definitely won't run on third down. They'll probably run on fourth down (hint: It will go to Sammy Morris).
- Maroney becomes less productive as the game progresses (1Q: 5.2 y/c, 2Q: 3.3 y/c, 3Q: 3.5 y/c, 4Q: 3.0 y/c) and is not a workhorse back.
- Once Tom Brady has thrown 10 passes, Maroney is really the only back who will run the ball- and since he gets worn down as the game progresses, this is horrible offensive scheming.
- Seriously, once Brady had thrown 10 passes, Maroney ran 67 more times. Faulk, Morris and Taylor combined for 23 carries.
- That also means that the Patriots lead backs only ran the ball 90 times after Brady had thrown 10 times. Brady hits that number, on average, in the middle of the 2nd quarter. That means 77.0% of the Patriots running attempts came before Brady had thrown 10 times. Which means early in the game. And not after the half.
- Most of the late game running plays were hand-offs from Hoyer.
- Morris and Maroney's yard/carry dropped by over a full yard from the first half to the second half.
Just looking at how the team abandoned the running game can show why the Patriots dropped so many leads over the season. Passing wins football games, but running the ball is how you run the clock. Hopefully Bill O'Brien has learned how to run an offense this off-season.
So how do I think the team will win next season? I'm glad you asked.
1) Keep doing what it was doing in the first half. Be balanced. Run the ball AND pass the ball (what?!).
2) In the second half, don't play prevent defense. It's nice to expect the offense to score in the second half, but it's not a guarantee. Don't let the opposing team claw back into the game. Maintain aggression.
3) Be balanced in the second half. It's nice to try and bury the other team, but that's high risk. Why not drain the clock and score on a grinding drive? That's a bigger stake in the heart, in my opinion.
4) Give Maroney some freakin' help. Morris and Taylor were both injured for large portions of the season, so the offense had to rely on Maroney. He has proven that he's a great compliment back, but not a feature back. Look back to all of those time you thought Maroney had turned the corner- they're all most likely plays in the first quarter. Look for Taylor and Morris to get more of the early carries so Maroney can shine in the second half- just like he did in his rookie season.
5) Don't suck in the 2nd half. Simple enough? The team seemed to have mastered the art of snowballing- when one thing went wrong, the whole house of cards collapsed. Let's see this team hold itself together when tides turn. Adjust at the half to give new things to opposing defenses. They know you're passing. So change it up. Please?
What do you think the Patriots need to do in order to have better second halves next season?
15 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent read...
…and wow! Some of those statistics just jump right out of the page. I knew we had some second half problems, but this hits the nail right on the head.
by DrJgopatsgators on Jul 25, 2010 5:28 PM EDT reply actions
This is great stuff.
I think everyone had a general sense that this is how things happened last season, but you hit the nail on the head with these stats. The stat about Brady throwing on 77% of plays after his 10th completion is mind-boggling.
Also, common knowledge seemed to be that Maroney was supposed to be one of those “better with more carries” backs. That is apparently not true, by this info. The main argument people have been throwing out there in support of Maroney was that he wasn’t used enough, yet he got the most opportunities at points in the games where it mattered the most, and only got worse. What does that say about Maroney’s place on this team, which is in need of a “closer”-style back?
Great work.
Agreed for the most part, but...
Also, common knowledge seemed to be that Maroney was supposed to be one of those "better with more carries" backs. That is apparently not true, by this info
It seemed to me that a lot of those second-half runs weren’t so much ‘attacking’ run plays, as they were runs-to-set-up-the-pass. Maroney would do a halfback dive for only a yard or two, but the real intention was to make sure the Safeties had to think about the run-threat instead of sitting in Cover-2 deep coverage. If Maroney had been given ‘real’ run plays, he could well have lived up to expectation. Might not’ve, but it was also a function of bad play-calling, not just Maroney’s inability.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Jul 25, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions
That makes good sense.
And I hope it’s the case. Everything about the play-calling last year was somehow flawed. Just when we saw Maroney turning into a hard-nosed, north-south runner, they stop calling “real” running plays in the 2nd half. Gah.
It's just that most RBs run better against tired defences
and right about the time that the opposition defences got tired, Brady would go robo-QB, Maroney would get limited carries, and his average dropped down considerably whenever he did get the ball because the playcalling was odd. With some new blood in the TE corps, and the ability to rotate TEs on and off the field (which was lacking in 2009), the second-half run game ought to be more than a side-show to scare Safeties.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Jul 25, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
If welker comes back, what do you think might happen to our "spreading the ball around" though?
I love welker, but I feel that when welker comes back, Bill O’B will be too excited to use him, and he will abandon our versatile players and play calling, as well as the running game.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
I think O'Brien will use the rest of them...
because a significant number of them came into the system under his watch. Edelman, Tate, Price, Hernandez and Gronkowksi could be seen as ‘his’ guys – they were drafted during his tenure, so he’s got a blank slate in drawing up plays to use them. He’s shown a little creativity – he got good performances out of Edelman and he showed a little flair when calling Tate on an end-around, so perhaps he’ll find as much use for the other new guys, too.
I guess it’s the difference between feeling like you ‘inherited’ Watson, and the feeling like you’ve been ‘gifted’ Hernandez, et al. You don’t have to wean him off something someone else taught him or something.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Jul 25, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Maroney as a compliment back is perfect...
…and should do wonders for our outlook as him as a football player. Imagine if Maroney gained 600 yards and scored 6 TDs as the #2 back- I would look at him impact differently. He just isn’t talented/skillful/big/what have you enough to be the full time #1 workhorse back the team asked him to be due to injuries to Sammy Morris and Fred Taylor. If Morris and Freddy can stay healthy for most of the season, I wouldn’t be surprised if all three backs picked up over 600 yards each.
If all three are healthy, expect a heavy dosage of Morris and Freddy in the first half and Maroney in the second. Or maybe even:
1Q: Fred Taylor
2Q: Maroney
3Q: Sammy Morris
4Q: Maroney
Because Maroney isn’t the type of back to wear down defenses- he’s the type of back who takes advantage of pre-worn down defenses.
I'd be more happy when they use him as a pass catching RB in the back field as well.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Please hold O'Brien accountable
from game 1 on. It is simply unacceptable [at the very least ridiculous] to have the success of a team of this caliber and potential rest on whether the offensive coordinator actually uses the diverse weapons at his disposal.
And, of course, let’s scream praise to the rafters if O’Brien does use the diverse offensive weapons at his disposal.
To be fair to B'OB...
…his only real weapons were Moss (injured after Denver game), Welker (started and ended injured), Edelman (first year as a WR) and LoMo (hah) since the offensive line was so decimated with injuries (Light, Vollmer, Kaczur, Neal) that the tight ends were forced to play on the line the entire season as blockers. The running back stable was injured. There were no wide receivers.
All opposing defenses had to do was double Moss, and contain the run to stop the Patriots offense. Welker wasn’t going to score any touchdowns, so that’s how you beat the Patriots last year.
by Richard Hill on Jul 25, 2010 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Hah, I'm sure there was a conversation...
something to the effect of:
"Now, O’Brien, we’ve gone out and bought you these shiny new toys this year. You better play with them properly and not break them, or we’re not going to buy you any next Christmas draft"
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
by Comedic.Sans on Jul 26, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions
;-) Wonderful
I agree that several issues reduced the play calling options, but a delayed release by the TE for a 5 yard dink pass, after he chip blocked the OLB or the DE, would have helped a lot. Something that simple would force the defense to “defend” something else. It might have reduced the blitzes and the all out bull rushes since a guy like Watson was fast. And, he could run for a l-o-n-g ways if he was uncovered.
An occasional pass to Maroney in the flat on a delayed release after a play action, or motioning Maroney to the slot for a quick slot screen pass [i.e. David Givens] would have presented something diffferent.
These aren’t necessarily game breakers, but they certainly could have helped move the chains, run off more clock, and lessened the rush. And this is why I question the use of “coordinators-in-training” simply because they don’t seem to have the ability to make even simple adjustments during the game [or at half time]. I’m just guessing, but it may have helped to positively impact those dire stats regarding 3rd and 4th qtr results.
Study of box scores is revealing
Thank you for your articles Richard! We all seek a “reason” for 2009. The only consistent factor I could find was inconsistency. Brady was hurt. There is no question that ribs, finger, knee and God only knows what else, were behind many key incompletions.If you were the offensive coordinator what would you do? Bypass Brady/Moss/Welker/Faulk? O’Brien’s tendency was to go with the “A team” and it is difficult to fault this approach. We forget that we got into the playoffs and Brady just had an awful game. Watch it again if you dare, Brady stunk..If he has his “average game” against the Ravens..the Pats win. Would a solid running game have helped the pats in ’09? Yes. The issue is they do not have a solid running game. This leads to the core decision on the part of the offensive coordinator….pass, pass, pass. The Colts game tells the tale of the tape. Need a yard or two with the game on the line in the fourth quarter? Pass to Faulk.

by 



































