Week 10 Patriots vs Jets: 5 Things to Review
Word of the Week: Track. I think the Patriots are back on it.
1. New Weapons - Here are the Jets' passing numbers of the five top receivers before garbage time:
TE Dustin Keller - 2 rec, 37 yards
WR Plaxico Burress - 3 rec, 39 yards, 1 TD
WR Santonio Holmes - 4 rec, 66 yards
RB LaDainian Tomlinson - 1 rec, 6 yards
WR Jeremy Kerley - 2 rec, 29 yards
Total: 12 rec, 177 yards, 1 TD
Don't get confused by the final box score. The Patriots secondary absolutely shut down Mark Sanchez for the whole game. The defense almost matched their Round 1 performance, apart from one lapse in performance on a Keller throw up the seam. Keller had become Sanchez' favorite target over the past few weeks and the Patriots managed to shut him out, with a stamp put down on Rob Ninkovich's pick-6. The other receivers were kept in check for the majority of the game and there was no clear weak point in the secondary. Huge win for the injury-ridden Patriots.
2. Establish the Run - This did not happen. To be fair, this did not need to happen. The Patriots were finding pockets in the secondary all game and, once Tom Brady found his rhythm (I believe it happened with the perfect throw to Rob Gronkowski for their first touchdown), the offense could not be stopped. Brady has in an early funk and the run offense didn't help, but it seemed as if the Jets were willing to give up some throws in the air in order to stop the run. The Patriots adjusted (hooray!) and aired it out. Once the passing offense was in its full rhythm, Danny Woodhead had a solid day as a change-of-pace running back out of the no huddle. However, BenJarvus Green-Ellis had a quiet and ineffective day, as did Stevan Ridley and, most clearly, Kevin Faulk. It looks as if Faulk might be on his final season. Looking at the day as a whole, it's clear the run game needs some improvement. Loss for the Patriots.
3. Still Throw the Ball - I guess the Patriots found a way to throw the ball. Five receivers had over 40 yards. It was odd that Chad Ochocinco was quiet after his explosive first quarter (I still need to see that happen), but Brady managed to spread the ball all game instead of focusing on Wes Welker or Rob Gronkowski. Well...actually, Gronkowski was targeted all day and had an incredible performance. If he's not a first team All Pro, it will be a shame. Deion Branch took advantage of Jets cornerback Kyle Wilson and some soft coverage in the no huddle, while Aaron Hernandez and Welker put together some quality support games. It would be nice to see Brady put the ball more on target on a few plays, but the offense seemed to find itself. Win for the Patriots.
Pat on my back:
You know what should happen, right? The Patriots offense has only been able to move the ball in the 4th quarter from the no huddle and throwing to the tight ends. Solution: operate from the no huddle and throw to the tight ends.
4. Special Teams - Special teams had a solid day. Stephen Gostkowski had a great rebound of a day, with three crucial field goals before the score was blown open. Julian Edelman had a mixed bag day in the return game, with one solid return, followed by some terrible fair catches inside the 10 yard line (let those go!). He redeemed himself with some solid cornerback play (yeah, right?) but since this is a Special Teams section, it doesn't count. Danny Woodhead continued to return the ball on kickoffs and continued to struggle by running directly into the backs of the lead blockers. He needs to sit down, especially due to his value in the no huddle offense. Some other player must emerge. Looking overall, the Patriots special teams did okay; not fantastic, but just okay. Half a win for the Patriots.
5. Under Pressure - Andre Carter set the franchise record for sacks in a single game. Mark Anderson was phenomenal. Vince Wilfork was generating push. The Patriots were rushing the passer with only three linemen. That's incredible. This was a breakout game for the pass rush and they did it without Albert Haynesworth. I need to re-watch some of the pressure to see what the defensive tackles were doing, but the defensive ends were relentless, which usually means that the defensive backs were doing well in coverage.
On the offensive side, it took a while for the offensive line to gel and they struggled with a safety and a terrible snap early on. Still, once they got into their groove, they were fantastic. The Jets registered only one quarterback hit on the day (according to ESPN) and Brady had all day to throw the ball as the Jets dropped back into coverage. Brady got fidgety after the safety, but he settled down once he realized how much time he had and he elevated his game. Humongous win for the Patriots.
---
The Patriots win 3.5/5. Keep in mind that the game was a story of two halves- or really a story of 28 minutes and then 32 minutes. As soon as the Patriots marched down the field to end the first half, the offense seemed to click and they realized how to beat the Jets defense- don't let them settle and create their own match-ups. Still, the Patriots offense struggled for almost the entire first half, which prevents a better final rating. (Not?) surprisingly, the defense was stellar the entire game, despite all of the injuries.
This was a great win and now the Patriots can move on to a less difficult portion of their schedule.
16 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I liked that we seemed to run more spread sets.
Wish Ocho was in more of them.. but whatever Brady wants to have in the game, he gets.
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
So glad to see us get back to the no-huddle.
Worked great for the 1st three games, then we kind of got away from it. I recommend reading “”http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/6948865/speed-chess" >Speed Chess," a nice piece by Chuck Klosterman on “Grantland.” I don’t agree with all his ideas, but it’s a very revelatory article. One on-point quote is, “You don’t need a perfect play…you just need a good play.”
That comes from the OC at Amherst College, a team that plays a multi-form hurry-up, a la Oregon. Their philosophy is still very different from the Pats — the Patriots actually care what a D is giving them; in the NFL, you can’t afford to disregard the athletes and schemes of the opposition. But what the Patriots gain from going no-huddle is in some ways very similar. It allows Brady to dictate to the defense by trapping them in a variety of sub packages.
He doesn’t need the perfect play against any given front; he just needs 3 or 4 that would work pretty well — say, 4 yards minimum a play. Nothing earth-shattering, just ok, good, decent forward progress. When they go to the no-huddle, that’s what he gets if they execute. Get a couple going, now you’re dictating the pace to the defense which raises their anxiety — and tires them out, especially if they’re used to frequent situational substitutions (which most NFL teams are). If the D gets a break and subs in, you rotate over to the next package of decent, good-enough plays and continue the cycle. If you’ve got a nice, rotating quiver of plays and a really good QB to call them, your guys don’t have to think too much — just run it, take what you get and reset. Bang, bang, bang (just like Frankie’s Gun — the Jets thought Tom was all Hollywood blanks).
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
by JohnHannahRules on Nov 14, 2011 12:22 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Linky
Sorry for the sloppy code above.
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
by JohnHannahRules on Nov 14, 2011 12:23 PM EST reply actions
As much I recall...
Julian Edelman had a mixed bag day in the return game, with one solid return, followed by some terrible fair catches inside the 10 yard line (let those go!).
…I think Edelman smartly let one pubt to the ground, which bounced into the end zone. That was a good move by him. and it was a ST thingy:)
Yep.
I remember going, “thank goodness” on that one.
by Richard Hill on Nov 14, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions
Why not
Let Edelman try kick returns as well? He’s fast, and shifty, and if he got a running start he might be effective. I know he’s returned some kicks for the Pats in the past but took a seat to Tate and others who were better in the return game. With the roster what it is right now, though, I don’t see many better options.
?
He did earlier, and was not good at it
by frogfromthemud on Nov 14, 2011 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Anyone See This?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWkn_qbgC7Y
Hey President Brady, Can you sign my Son ?
The Ryan Brothers: Two brother's who never played a down as an NFL player, Yet feel the need to trash talk like they are in the Hall Of Fame
Is Guyton injured or really just that bad?
Inquiring minds want to know.
I'm not drunk, I'm......hydrated.
He was well enough to play...
…but he missed a fair amount of practice time. I’d say they didn’t start him because of the injury, but he stayed on the bench because his replacements were outplaying him.
by Richard Hill on Nov 14, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions
Tarpinian wasn't great or horrible.
Wasn’t bad for his first NFL start on defense. Need to watch again to get a better feel of how he did in coverage, but he did good for a completely-green UDFA rookie. Now if he can build off of that until Spikes is ready to return..
It is what it is
Can someone explain to me Branch's TD celebration?
Its intricate nature made me laugh, but I don’t know where its from or why he did it.
this
Oh my god a floor zombie! Oh wait, thats you
- Toby Turner
by New Century Silver on Nov 14, 2011 11:35 PM EST up reply actions

by 

































