Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Building Competitive Depth - Will the 2011 Draft be the Final Piece in the Puzzle?

Key rookie additions in recent years such as Devin McCourty and Kyle Arrington have given the Patriots some great depth and internal competition for places.

The investment in quality depth and internal competition are, in this writer's opinion, more important than ever.

The NFL has become a quarterback driven and quarterback friendly league.  Teams can rarely take a week or two off against weaker opponents with poor quarterbacks.  Divisions are becoming far more competitive because weaker teams are arming themselves with very good quarterbacks coming into the league off the back of superb quarterback coaching at the collegiate level.   The bust rate, particularly for first round quarterbacks appears to be trending down in recent years.  Of the six 1st round quarterbacks taken in the past three years, they have a combined 15 playoff appearances (8 victories)!  Of these six quarterbacks, all but Mark Sanchez joined a losing organisation and non have come anywhere close to a bust.  In fact, the five who joined losing organisations seem to have turned their respective teams around.  Whatever the reason for this quarterback success, be it better evaluation by scouts or a more thorough education of quarterbacks at the collegiate level, the league is very competitive at the moment and will be for much of the next decade.  You could make a case that there are perhaps only seven teams in the league with a poor starter at the moment at quarterback (Tennessee, Washington, Minnesota, Arizona, San Francisco, Carolina and Cleveland).  In my opinion, the remaining 78% of the league either gets very good production at the quarterback position or at least has a solid starter.  The league has arguably never been more competitive and as such, teams can rarely rely on weak divisions anymore to coast through to the playoffs.  Rather, it is becoming more of a season long battle which takes a physical and mental pound of flesh from players.  Building depth and internal competition has never been more important.

Star-divide

 The physical punishment in particular presents the second factor as to why depth is so important in the NFL.  Consider that in 2009, ‘08, ‘07 & '06 the number of NFL players that were placed on IR were 297, 305, 313 and 297 respectively, producing an average of 303 players per year, or an average of 9 players per team.  This doesn't even take into account the amount of players on PUP lists or suffering injuries which cause them to miss significant time without actually ending up on IR.  One only has to look at the 2010 Colts to understand the effect that cumulative injuries can have upon a team, without sufficient depth to maintain the desired level of play.  With the league looking to increase the regular season to 18 games, the number of injuries in the league will go up, meaning the need for quality depth will be especially important, as key players from every team are very likely to go down with serious injuries.  Furthermore, with two added games, quality depth will be needed to avoid simply burning out before the playoffs begin.

For any team to have sustained success in the NFL, particularly one which plays complex offensive and defensive football such as the Patriots, it is paramount to accumulate very good depth, incorporating a mentality of ‘there are no backups' and each player must understand the nuances and complexities of the system and his role.  Attempting to acquire this depth has somewhat held the Patriots back in recent years, particularly on defense, since broad draft classes have resulted in partial vanilla schemes while younger players immerse themselves in the system.  But, are we about to witness the turn of the tide and this squad take the next step?

Most Patriot fans realise that the team has been in transition in recent years, but what the league should be afraid of is just how much quality depth and competition the Patriots have accumulated in recent years.  It is universally accepted that the overall quality of collegiate entries in the 2007 & 2008 drafts were particularly poor.  As such, the Patriots chose to parlay a number of these picks into veteran players.  However, even from these poor drafts, the Patriots can console themselves with two key defensive starters in Brandon Meriweather (2007) and defensive captain Jerod Mayo (2008).

However, following these two poor draft classes, Bill Belichick made a commitment to get younger, particularly on defense, and more importantly, made a commitment to rebuild the depth of the squad and create significant competition for roles on the team.   Consider that in the drafts of '09, '10 and '11 (provided the Patriots don't trade out of the top rounds) the Patriots will have made 12 first or second round selections in the past three years.  Of those players, only three were 1st round picks (two of which are late 1st round picks) meaning the Patriots have retained great financial flexibility if and when a salary cap is re-introduced.  These twelve prime selections have and will continue to give the Patriots a tremendous base going forward.

Furthermore, in the drafts of 2009 and 2010, the Patriots have found starting calibre and depth talent outside of the top 2 rounds and have used this talent to gain significant contributions.

Draft Class

No. of Picks

No. of Players on Roster

2009

12

8

2010

12

9

Of these 17 Players on the roster, I would break it down like this (open to interpretation):

Starter Now and Future

 

Sub Package Starter/Very Good Backup Option

Good Depth Player

Unknown

Patrick Chung

Ron Brace

Darius Butler

Rich Ohrnberger

Sebastian Vollmer

Aaron Hernandez

Brandon Tate

Taylor Price

Julian Edelman (Punts)

 

Myron Pryor

Kade Weston

Devin McCourty

 

Brandon Deaderick

 

Rob Gronkowski

 

Julian Edelman (Rec)

 

Jermaine Cunningham

 

 

 

Brandon Spikes

 

 

 

Zoltan Mesko

 

 

 

The thing that jumps out here is the amount of young starters who we can see starting now and for many years for the Patriots, given their displays already at such a young age.  Furthermore, the depth or sub package players could easily jump up this table with more experience.  Darius Butler and Brandon Tate for example, could progress up this list with more polish added to their game.  Finally, the glimpse we saw of Taylor Price in the Miami game has some fans very enthusiastic that he can move up this list significantly in 2011.

This breakdown also doesn't take into account the depth players the Patriots have acquired as rookie free agents, such as Kyle Love, Kyle Arrington, Dane Fletcher and Brian Hoyer, who could all easily make next year's roster purely through merit rather than necessity.

Expanding this analysis to the whole roster, we can see what kind of depth and quality competition for places has been created, and also where any roster spots need to be filled in by either a starter or depth player (basing the numbers on the number of players at each position in 2010 shown in brackets in the table).  Players in the backup role are deemed good enough going forward to be good depth players (NOTE: Not all Patriot players signed to the roster are on these lists, nor are any free agents):

Offense

Position

Starter/s

Backup/s

Fighting for a spot

Potential Open Roster Spots

Quarterback (2)

Tom Brady

Brian Hoyer

0

Running Back (5)

Danny Woodhead

4

Wide Receiver (6)

Wes Welker

Deion Branch

Brandon Tate

Julian Edelman

Taylor Price

Matthew Slater

1

Tight End (3)

Rob Gronkowski

Alge Crumpler

Aaron Hernandez

0

Tackle (3)

Sebastian Vollmer

Nick Kaczur

Mark LeVoir

1

Guard (4)

Logan Mankins

Dan Connelly

Ryan Wendell

Quinn Ojinaaka

Rich Ohrnberger

1

Center (2)

Dan Koppen

Dan Connelly

Ryan Wendell

0

Analysis of the offensive depth going into 2011 suggests the team requires a starting RB, whether that is retaining BJGE's contractual rights as a starter or using him as part of a committee.  Whichever way you look at it, the position requires further depth.  At WR, the team has accumulated good depth, but would potentially like to add a starter capable of the big play.  However, that may come from someone like Taylor Price, so we will know more about this position perhaps next year.  Nonetheless, the depth is very good.  Even on the offensive line, the depth is set, with two solid backup guards, centres and tackle - the team IMO currently lacks a starting calibre RG and LT.  Of course, Dan Connelly could further improve his game and elevate to true starter.  But the Patriots need to address a starter for the LT or RT position.

Defense

Position

Starter/s

Backup/s

Fighting for a spot

Potential Open Roster Spots

Defensive Line (7)

Vince Wilfork

Ty Warren

Ron Brace

Mike Wright

Brandon Deaderick

Kyle Love

Myron Pryor

Landon Cohen

Kade Weston

1

Outside LB (4)

Jermaine Cunningham

Rob Ninkovic

Eric Moore

Tully Banta Cain

1

Inside LB (5)

Jerod Mayo

Brandon Spikes

Gary Guyton

Dane Fletcher

1

Cornerback (4)

Devin McCourtey

Leigh Bodden

Kyle Arrington

Darius Butler

Jonathan Wilhite

Tony Carter

1

Safety (5)

Patrick Chung

Brandon Meriweather

James Sanders

Sergio Brown

0

The Patriots have armed themselves with tremendous depth on defense.  The chances are they will look to draft a starting DL with a 2011 Draft Pick, but as backups, two in my opinion are set and two remaining spots will be fought for between 5 solid players.  At outside linebacker, again, the Patriots should be looking to acquire a starter, but have a solid backup in Rob Ninkovic and Eric Moore and Tully Banta Cain could fight for the remaining backup spot.  Inside Linebacker, cornerback and safety appear set (the Patriots could bring back free agents Jarrad Page and Tracey White).  However, if the Patriots decide to go with 5 corners in 2011, they may look to the draft to acquire a starting calibre slot corner.

Nevertheless, it can be seen from these tabulations that what the Patriots have done so successfully in the last two or three years is create outstanding competition for places on the roster.  Just look at the list of players who are simply fighting for a roster spot.  This list will grow even bigger once the Patriots make their draft selections in April, but already, this list has some very solid players on it.  Perhaps more impressive is the list of backup players.  Looking down that list for both the offense and defense, you could put together a respectable NFL team!  Competition breeds success and having solid depth is a key for long term success in the NFL, and let's not beat around the bush...long term dynastic success is the goal of this organisation.

How do you win a Super Bowl?  An outstanding draft class always helps and is certainly a good place to start.  You can always attempt to acquire an all star list of coaches and front office personnel, to make those crucial decisions that lead to a Lombardi.  Of course you could follow the blueprint the Jets laid down in 2010, and acquire a number of superstar players, past and present, on one year deals in a race for glory...and it has to be said; it almost worked!  One thing I think we can all agree on is that this is not a question which concerns Bill Belichick.  To Belichick, a title for one year is not enough...this is a man who wants to win now, tomorrow, ten years from now and everyday in between.  He demands consistent success from both himself and his team.  Bill Belichick has a much grander design for this team...regaining dynastic success.  And the scary thing for opponents, the NFL and general naysayers is that, whether people realise or not, Belichick might not be too far away from accomplishing this feat.

First of all, let us not underestimate the gravity of the task.  Whilst ‘dynasty' may be another of those sporting terms which is thrown around all too easily, the notion in its truest form when applied to the NFL is incredibly difficult to achieve - in fact no team has achieved this distinction more than once.  These Patriots are trying to reclaim the ‘dynasty' title less than a decade before it was originally bestowed.

To win on a long term scale in the modern NFL requires something more than the standard for winning a single Super Bowl.  To have dynastic success in the modern NFL, it requires a team in every sense of the word, a single vision of dominance with a self sustaining motivation for success pulsating throughout the entire organisation.  Whilst these intangible qualities are vital ingredients for long term success, they are baseless without a team invested in developing high quality depth, with every player being able to contribute and make plays when called upon.

So far, these Patriots seem well on their way to having a complete team.  This 2011 draft class could just be crowning jewel in a three year master class.

Comment 24 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yeah I feel the same

I felt like this class was the final piece. I wrote about it in December I believe. Good work man.

by pats4life on Feb 21, 2011 5:08 PM EST reply actions  

I've said before that we've taken plenty of depth the last two years.

This year’s class should challenge the starters.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 21, 2011 5:29 PM EST reply actions  

last year's class (would've) challenged the starters

if it had gotten a chance. McCourty? Hernandez? Gronkowski? Cunningham? Spikes?

by pats4life on Feb 21, 2011 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm thinking more on the Lines.

The O-line is old, and only Wilfork demands respect on the D-Line.
Nobody in last years class really made the cut, though Deaderick played some.

Also we’ve got a collection of so-so receivers. It’d be nice to see at least one big play guy and maybe Price is it. We didn’t get to see much of him. He certainly didn’t crack the start his rookie year.

I agree that McCourty’s a stud. We’re set at TE (although BB ditched everyone they would have had to compete with). Cunningham may be the most complete OLB we’ve got (if he can continue to improve). Spikes is a good 2 down player. If he can improve in coverage, he’d be a stud, too.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 21, 2011 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Last years rookies, see who improves or who stays Pat.....

…..BB watches for developement, if Sophomores continue to develope then they stay….three years is magic time put up or shut up…..injuries not withstanding. I see guys like Sergio Brown, Dane Fletcher, Taylor Price jumping up…..mix in a few DL as strong developers. Some name CB’s, RB’s, and OL cut….[insert names here] because they can’t develop past their limitations and almost time for our third year backup QB to show his “tradeability” by the end of his third year……wouldn’t be surprized to see three QB’s on roster this time around our Tennessee PS QB or a mid/late round draft candidate pushing the 4-6 year QB future….18 games a year is nuts from injury potential. Say NFL bumps the Practice Squad up a few with tighter rules for retaining them to allow teams to build toward the 18 game schedule and future manpower necessities that will occur when the gods bless that stuff.

by Blackbart on Feb 21, 2011 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting read!

Very entertining post. The pats have certainly positioned their organization very well to compete in the future with their past 2 drafts, by not only getting valuble starters, but solid contributers through sub packages. With the ne CBA and increased odds of an 18 game season, these young players who contribute become even more valuble. And the Pats are once again ahead of the curve in the constantly changing nfl.

by canadianpat on Feb 21, 2011 6:19 PM EST reply actions  

Just kidding!

Excellent post. I completely agree. That’s why I’m advocating for the Patriots to trade down from 17 and up from 60 to try and get 5 picks between 28 and 40. One could be traded forward for another future first rounder, but the point is that the Patriots could stock up on 3-5 first round caliber players. I believe that players drafted between 20 and 40 are all extremely similar, it’s just a matter of positioning to get the player you want. The Patriots can maneuver around and get future picks while getting their guy and improving the team.

This needs to be a big draft. It will determine if this team is “above average” or “elite.”

by Richard Hill on Feb 21, 2011 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Any thoughts on whether BB might actually go against the grain and actually trade up?

I know its totally out of character. But the roster has a lot of youth and depth and it can be difficult to absorb a ton of picks. Six picks in the first three rounds are going to result in some very difficult player cuts when camp gets here.

Would it make sense in this draft for BB to try to trade a couple of those picks upward to go for an impact player in an area of need? Do you think he might want to try for Quinn, Bowers or Jordan? I’d rate any of those guys as worth the 17th plus a 2nd rounder. You’d still have the 28th to take an OL with.

by mmmmm on Feb 21, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

He's done it before if he thinks there is a guy up there with enough value.

My guess is there is less than a 10% chance, but he’s done it before.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 21, 2011 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, but I don't see a huge trade up

Maybe a few spots if they though Miami or someone was after the same player and the Patriots had their heart set on someone.

by Ashto12 on Feb 22, 2011 1:30 AM EST up reply actions  

If we move up for anything, my guess would be DE or OT.

My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Feb 22, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I honestly don't see him staying at 17...

…he’ll either go up or down, but 17’s a pivot point in the draft where the elite talent is gone, but the next 20 players are all comparable. It depends on who falls beyond 10th overall.

by Richard Hill on Feb 22, 2011 2:18 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah

I think this is right.

by mmmmm on Feb 22, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol

I’m completely on board with trading up from the 60 spot, however I dont really want to trade down from 17. The reason being the more this draft plays out, IMO those true 3 down DEs who can rush the passer and stop the run will start to rise up draft boards. I don’t want us to get another 2 down lineman and have to potentially take other roster spots away from other areas on the team. I’d rather take someone like JJ Watt at 17. He can fill both roles and then we don;t need to keep someone like Myron Pryor…a pure sub rusher…and dedicate his roster spot perhaps to another receiver for example.

by Ashto12 on Feb 22, 2011 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

and agree with everyone: Great Article, Ashto12!

Very, very useful to see the depth charts laid out like that.

by mmmmm on Feb 21, 2011 7:09 PM EST reply actions  

Great read. Rec'd.

Also
for the 2010 draft class. 2 of the 4 players who did not make into our rosters; 1 (Welch) is a starter for the Bucs and the other (Robinson) is a backup for the Lions I believe.
BB’s draft classes in the last 2 years minus Scott P might (jury is still out) be his best. I hope the 11 class along w. the 09 and 10 class turn out into that 70’s Steelers draft classes.

Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life
Cameron Heyward-Future 3-4 RDE for the New England Patriots
Jets org and fans-bunch of trash talking & snitching inbreds trollops!

by NinjaZX6R on Feb 21, 2011 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

You mean Ted Larson for the Bucs?

Yeah, it seems so far that we missed out by putting him on the practice squad instead of someone like Ohrnberger

by Ashto12 on Feb 22, 2011 1:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Keep adding picks

As said about the 17th pick, I don’t think we’ll get sure thing there so should drop down a few picks if a team foolish and desperate enough are willing to pay for it. I’d be happy for us to do the follow (if we don’t move up)

17th-21st (pick up a 2nd in next years draft)

Then maybe even drop down again a few slots if we can get another pick in the process.

People ware talking about adding the 33rd to the 17th to move up, but i’d rather take two players as the risk is too great f to put your eggs in one basket.

I have a feeling we will drop down from 33rd anyway as there is bound to be someone desperate enough to over pay and i’m sure we could drop a few places to about 40 and pick up a 2nd rounder next year or even a 1st next year and move down to the third this year.

by adundeemonkey on Feb 22, 2011 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

agree about 17 and 33

17 is not the greatest place to draft, but a great place to deal from. 33 is kind of the perfect pick, like 34 was in 2009. if they get a great offer they’d trade, otherwise just pick a stud (like Pat Chung)

by pats4life on Feb 22, 2011 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe