New England Patriots 7 Round Mock Draft
After the first and second rounds of my mock of the 2011 NFL Draft, as expected the Patriots have been the dominant player moving around the draft board to acquire a player in a position of need or to acquire more draft picks. To summarise my two round mock and how it relates to the Patriots, some of the major moves they have made are as follows:
- Selected their future left tackle, right defensive end and outside linebacker, while giving up a 2011 4th round pick to move up from 28 to 25 and select Cam Heyward.
- Acquired a 2012 1st round draft pick from the San Francisco 49ers after trading down from 33 to 45, giving the Patriots two first round picks in 2012.
- Acquired a 2012 2nd round draft pick from the Cleveland Browns by trading out of the 60th slot. Furthermore, in this complex trade, the Patriots recouped a 2011 3rd round pick while giving up a 2012 3rd round pick.
Anyway, onto my final 2011 Patriots Mock Draft. This of course includes the trades made from my 2 round mock draft...
Round 1, Pick 17 Anthony Castonzo (6'7 - 308lbs) OT Boston College
The Patriots main weakness on their offensive line has been Matt Light. That is not to say he has not played at a good level but he is a weakness nonetheless. In Anthony Castonzo, the Patriots have selected a player who can play either tackle position, has great size, intelligence and athleticism and can start from day one - all prerequisite characteristics of a Patriot first round selection this high in the draft. Castonzo is a blue collar player who works very hard to improve his game. He also plays with a nastiness that has been missing on the offensive line, particularly in the playoffs. Castonzo will need to be coached up a little on dealing with speed rushers, but he will be learning his craft under one of the best in the game and will provide excellent protection for Tom Brady for the remainder of his career.
Round 1, Pick 25 (from Seahawks) Cameron Heyward (6'5 - 294lbs) DE Ohio State
At this point in the draft, Cam Heyward is the last blue chip five technique available and so the Patriots choose to eliminate any risk he ends up with the Ravens and trade with Seattle to move above Baltimore. In this writers opinion, Heyward represents the ideal player both physically and mentally to take over the reins at the right defensive end position. Heyward has outstanding size for the position and plays with tremendous power and tenacity. He has long arms and very strong hands and his first step speed will give the Patriots a solid contribution in their pass rush. Furthermore, Heyward can play all across the defensive line in either the base defense or on sub packages - providing the type of value Bill Belichick seeks in first round selections. While he needs to develop more consistency and more of an arsenal to rush the passer, Heyward is a very coachable player and has a strong work ethic. He would add a much needed pass rush and run stuffing ability in a key position of need for the Patriots and is well worth the trade up.
Round 2, Pick 45 (from 49ers) Brooks Reed (6'3 - 263lbs) DE/OLB Arizona
The Patriots entertain a bidding war for the 33rd selection from quarterback needy teams and it's the 49ers who offer the best deal. After trading down, the Patriots return to a familiar source from 2010 in the Arizona Wildcats and if Brooks Reed can provide the impact and show the same promise of former teammate Rob Gronkowski, the Patriots will have found the pass rusher they seek. He has great speed (4.65 40 time), strength (30 bench reps at the combine) and excellent explosion and change of direction skills - all essential for a Patriot outside linebacker. His ability to drop into coverage was showcased at his Pro Day although proof on film is somewhat lacking. Reed showed significant improvement throughout his collegiate career which culminated in 17 career sacks and 25 tackles for loss. Reed has the work ethic and talent to succeed at the next level and would thrive playing outside Cameron Heyward in the base defense.
Round 3, Pick 70 (from Browns) Will Rackley (6'4 - 309lbs) OG Raleigh
After addressing the tackle position in round one, the Patriots look to address their interior offensive line and solidify its future. Rackley has everything a good interior lineman needs in the Patriot system - size, power, athletic ability and intelligence. He did not allow a sack while playing tackle in his senior year at Raleigh and he was extremely durable. He was also a captain in his last two years, showing his leadership qualities. He has long arms which have helped make him an accomplished pass protector and he is a very good run blocker. Importantly, Rackley plays with bad intentions and will bring that attitude to form a fearsome guard combination along with Logan Mankins. Given Dan Connelly's presence, Rackley would not have to start straight away. After learning the Patriot system under Dante Scarneccia, the Pats will have found themselves a steal in the third round.
TRADE: New England Patriots trade the 74th pick to the Seattle Seahawks for the 99th pick and 2012 3rd round draft pick.
In this scenario, the Seahawks trade up to select Ricky Stanzi, the best of the remaining quarterbacks on their draft board.
Round 3, Pick 90 Brandon Fusco (6'4 - 306lbs) C Slippery Rock
Dan Koppen is a free agent after the 2011 season. While he has been a solid player for the Patriots, like Matt Light, his performance (particularly in the playoffs) has slipped somewhat. In the 3rd round, the Patriots draft what they hope will be their Center of the future in Brandon Fusco. Whilst he comes from a small school, Fusco has ideal size and athleticism to play the position in the Patriot's system. He has solid strength and plays aggressively with a mean streak. His leadership skills are outstanding as he was a team captain for a number of years. He will need to work on his strength and use of leverage, but he will be afforded time to improve his skills under Scar and develop into a quality Center. While some may see this as a reach, more teams (including the Patriots) are looking at Fusco, particularly in a poor Center class, so this seems an ideal place to take him.
Round 4, Pick 99 (from Seahawks) DeLone Carter (5'9 - 222lbs) RB Syracuse
The Patriots continue to address positions of need with hardnosed, tough players. Carter embodies the physical running the Patriots expect from their running backs - he doesn't dance and picks up plenty after initial contact. Like current starter Benjarvis Green Ellis, Carter takes care of the football and his combination of patience and power would be an ideal fit for the Patriots. Despite limited production in the receiving game, Cater is a very productive runner; he responded after injuries early in his career with back-to-back 1,000+ yard seasons and has seemingly put the injuries behind him. He has some character concerns to overcome but could thrive in the right environment. He has decent but not great speed but it would certainly represent a very solid pick at this stage of the draft.
Round 5, Pick 159 Stevan Ridley (5'11 - 225lbs) RB LSU
Perhaps optimistic to expect Ridley to fall this far, although a number of mocks have him a late round or even free agent prospect. Stevan Ridley had an awesome 2010, to the tune of 1,147 rushing yards and 15 touchdowns. He has great size and good frame with solid but not great speed. Ridley would be a powerful runner who would excel in goal line and short yardage situations, but could certainly contribute as a consistent between-the-tackles runner. Ridley is a patient but decisive runner who doesn't often lose yards. He is also a solid locker room presence who would also contribute on special teams. Despite a lack of elusiveness or breakaway speed, Ridley produced big time against top SEC defences in 2010 and would be a great pickup if he were to make it this far.
Round 6, Pick 193 Mistral Raymond (6'1 - 200lbs) FS/CB South Florida
This former walk-on turned team captain would represent terrific value for the Patriots in the 6th round. Having already held a private workout with Raymond (and Belichick himself saw his Pro Day) the Patriots brain trust will be familiar with Raymond's impressive coverage skills and versatility. He would provide solid corner depth for the Patriots but, significantly, could be a great free safety project particularly with uncertainty surrounding the future of Brandon Meriweather. Raymond has solid character and has worked extremely hard for everything he has achieved so far in his career, both traits which appeal to the Patriots.
Summary
Following on from the 2010 NFL draft where the Patriots sought to draft high character, team captain-type players, the 2011 draft somewhat follows that mantra with an added emphasis on drafting players who play with a sense of urgency and nastiness, wanting to punish those who they play against. The obvious quality of these additions would really go a long way towards giving the Patriots the edge they have missed in recent post-seasons.
Furthermore, this draft would allow the Patriots to stack their 2012 draft board knowing they have two 1st round, two 2nd round and two 3rd round picks in consecutive years. Before the 2011 draft began, the Patriots had 6 picks in the first three rounds. Under this mock, the Patriots will make 5 of those picks (making a trade up for one) whilst acquiring future 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks - excellent business in my opinion which would set the Patriots up once again with 6 picks in the first three rounds of the 2012 NFL draft!
51 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m not overly thrilled with this draft. But this is just a mock. Two running backs? No depth in the defensive line? Just asking why.
The defensive line has depth already
Wilfork, Stroud, Warren, Wright, Brace, Deaderick, Pryor, etc. All defensive linemen. Problem was that most of those guys are decent, not great.. other than Wilfork and Warren. The others have holes in their game that make for great sub package guys but not 3 down starters. Heyward would fill that need and cement things better. Brace can play on running heavy teams. Wright can play 3rd down and pass rushing role like last year. Heyward gets everything else. Reed and Cunningham would have more opportunities as well.
Two running backs I don’t mind given how late in the draft they were and most of the other needs were already addressed (OG, T, C, OLB, DE). I’m not entirely sure about 2 though… but not bad.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
Really!? Amazing comment!
The only running back currently signed to the roster that will definately be here on opening day is Danny Woodhead. Sammy Morris and Fred Taylor are likely done, no guarantees Faulk will be back and hes obviously not an everydown player. BJGE needs to be resigned. So, the Pats are short on between the tackles RB depth.
Defensive line has plenty of depth already. Wilfork, Brace, Wright, Deaderick, Pryor, Stroud Ty Warren back from injury. Its another starter we need, not depth.
I don't mind the second RB...
I just wonder what OLBs were on the board at that point, and maybe if there were any big-bodied WRs to have a look at as Branch-replacements.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 28, 2011 3:23 AM EDT up reply actions
*sorry about that...
I think they approach the RB depth similar to TE in 2010, where they can take a couple of good runners from a relatively deep RB class. And I think the depth is set at D-Line, we take a starter this year. That way the depth will be experienced, having started significant games over the past couple years, and can make plays when called upon.
Better than the one I just saw at NFL.com
Watt and Ayers… blech
I’d be happy with this one. Don’t mind the two RBs from the 4th and 5th. See what sticks…
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 27, 2011 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Better than Don Banks' too.
Bowers @ 17, Ingram @ 28
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 27, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Watt over Jordan at 17? No thanks.
Ideally, it’s Quinn/Smith or the top ranked O-lineman with the 17th (whether picked there or used to trade up), then grab Heyward or Wilkerson in the 20s.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 28, 2011 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Honestly, if this draft turns out this way, we’ll have an amazing position for 2011 (and potentially a shot at the #1 pick if the 49ers fall apart) and I’d be thrilled.
But I don’t think it’s realistic to see the 49ers to give up a 2012 1st and their 2011 second rounder to move up 12 spots. But stranger things have happened. Maybe Jim Harbaugh is willing to pay out of the nose to get an impact player for his first year.
I’d have preferred to pick up a large WR in one of the later rounds (maybe instead of one of the two RBs).
We're thin at RB atm. Not direly so enough for anything before the 4th round though.
Taylor might retire, Morris and Faulk are both older and nearing retirement, if they don’t do it soon. It makes sense to pick up a late round guy or a UFA (they’ve worked out great so far :P ). WR we’re somewhat stacked at. Anyone we get would likely get cut unless they were phenomenal. They’d have to beat out Tate, Edelman AND Price for time and roster spots because Branch and Welker are solid locks to be starters. If we want 4 wide, we just move a tight end out.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
Harbaugh could see them putting together a good run.
They are really only a QB away from being a good NFL team. They have targets in Davis and Crabtree, they have a very good RB (when he’s not injured), and they have a good defense. If they feel they have no shot at Luck #1 next year (and they really don’t, given the division will let them win at least 3 games), and he really likes one of the guys still there, it might cost him the 1 to make sure he clears the Bengals, Bills, Titans, etc.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 27, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
That was my though process
paying a 1st for a player you think can be THE guy at the most important position in the game is not Herschel Walker overpaying – i’d say it’s a reasonable asking price.
You also can't overpay for someone you think is a franchise guy.
That’s why the Panthers are probably going QB, even though they have Clausen (which doesn’t mean anything, he sucks).
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 27, 2011 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions
>I don’t think it’s realistic to see the 49ers to give up a 2012 1st and their 2011 second rounder to move up 12 spots.
i agree completely. if they did, it would be a very weird day indeed if that happened
i’d fire the 49’ers coach if I were the owner.
to get a realistic trade, you really have to look at the trade value chart give or take a 100 points
position 33 for future first is cleanest trade for both teams if san francisco truly believes they will make playoffs next year. worse case for pats is slot 32.
1 tweak!
I would be extremely excited if this was our draft. What I’m not crazy about is DeLone Carter, I think we need a compliment not a replacement. Todman adds a lot more speed and can be a change of pace back, but he’s not the best receiver out of the back field. Rodgers is another back that gives us the COP and is an excellent receiver.
If you think Ridley can do that role, why not pick a WR at Carter’s slot like Aldrick Robinson, Lockette or Toliver?
Not sure of the QB draft next year, but do you see us grabbing one then?
by Robert Kaminsky on Apr 27, 2011 2:04 PM EDT reply actions
I honestly think the Patriots won't actually target a quarterback early
not anytime soon anyway despite the talk of looking for Brady’s replacement. However, I think if a prospect fell enough (like Aaron Rodgers did for Green Bay, who were not actively targetting him) the Patriots would be interested. So far, Matt Barclay, Andrew Luck and Landry Jones seem to be the highly touted guys. If Barclay fell, then who knows?
I was thinking
this year, someone like Adam Froman, Enderle or Potts. All have the tools, just need to work on the pro level game. 4 years under Brady would be great.
by Robert Kaminsky on Apr 27, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I think this year they will wait and see what they can get from Jonathan Crompton
he’s signed to the roster and they already have Hoyer.
i think pats could have one of the best back up QB’s in nfl in the form of Hoyer. If Brady was older, he would have a chance at being brady’s heir. i think the patriots coaching staff believe that he is better than matt cassell.
lol.
I read that quickly and I thought it said “If Brady was older, he would have a chance at being brady’s hair”
by Robert Kaminsky on Apr 27, 2011 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions
ahaha me too.
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
Cameron Heyward- Future 3-4 RDE for the New England Patriots.
This would be unreal.
We get a LT, G and C of the future, a star at DE and OLB – those are our biggest needs. Then, we come back with some solid, power backs. They do seem redundant so I might go for Taua, Helu or Powell to mix it up a bit (assuming Todman and Vereen are off the board), but I can’t really complain with Carter.
One question – maybe I missed something, but what happened to our current 4th rounder?
Nevermind!
Oh, and we are stacked for the next draft.
Why don't we draft Houston or Ballard (at any point)?
I could sense some kind of Cheech & Chong / Jay & Silent Bob / Dazed & Confused / Big Lebowski thing if we did that…
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 27, 2011 2:36 PM EDT reply actions
I'd like this very much.
It addressed the needs very well, and the picks for the future are a beautiful sight to behold, the San Fran trade was a beaut, if only that would happen in a couple days time…
Just trying to keep up.
I would be shocked if they picked at 17 and move up from 28
My guess is they trade down from 17 to the early 20s and then trade 28 for more than its worth to a team that needs a QB.
Deep in enemy territory
“•Acquired a 2012 1st round draft pick from the San Francisco 49ers after trading down from 33 to 45, giving the Patriots two first round picks in 2012.”
that is unlikely to happen IMO, 49ers are capable of winning more games but a new system, bad QB’s, no real #1 WR and a young shaky O-line will likely keep them picking in the top 15 next season. not going to give that up for a 2nd rounder, IMO
"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Apr 27, 2011 4:07 PM EDT reply actions
If they view Dalton as the quarterback to take them to the next level
(and he is ideal for Harbaugh’s system) then the price is a 1st round pick. Not too steep really. Their O’Line will be better and they have Crabtree and Vernon Davis to build around plus a talented defense. The way the 49ers will look at it is that of they get Dalton, they hope their 1st round pick will at least be in the twenties anyway.
To be honest, the Titans would be the best trading partner but I think they like Kaepernick and know he will probably be there when they pick.
Would the 49ers take themselves out of the Andrew Luck sweepstakes?
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 28, 2011 3:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Depends...
Does Harbaugh “sabotage” 14 games, looking for the #1? How does he even rate Luck (probably highly)? Would he still be coach if he threw a season away in the NFC West, when they could easily win the division?
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 28, 2011 4:50 AM EDT up reply actions
If you really wanted Luck in 2012...
That gives you a carte blanche to draft “developmental” players in 2011, knowing that if you tank, you get a great QB out of it.
So a stud LT prospect, some pass-rushers, maybe some boom/bust WRs or whatever. Voila, 2012 adds Luck and gets a good team out of it.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 28, 2011 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Has to 'merely' get the owner to give him permission to suck in 2011
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 28, 2011 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Most get a long leash early on (Oakland's the exception).
He could go 2-14, work out what players are worth keeping, and then build “his” team. But where could he go now? Take Bowers and let him get back to 100%? Nick Fairley?
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 28, 2011 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
My thought on the defensive line:
I wouldn’t be surprised if they completely ignored it. I wouldn’t be surprised if they addressed it. Same with OLB. The only positions I feel like they’ll definitely address is tackle and interior line. The rest is up in the air/traded into the future.
I would possibly view it the other way
that they definately address the defensive line. I think since that is the strength of the draft, you have to take advantage of that.
Way to be decisive with your predictions, Rich...
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 27, 2011 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions
what is with the whole Qb thing
we got one. the best one. he is in his prime. We only need a backup, we have one a ok one. Better then anything your going to get out of drafted guys this season. We need front 7 players on D and Oline help. We want a breakthough edge guy like Willie Mac used to be. We want a RB just so the backfield isnt all AARP members. I still dont understand why Alabama RB is not worth it. Why not
Jeffrey M Melhorn
Belichick treats his QBs like currency.
Take one, flip them for gain/loss.
by Richard Hill on Apr 27, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Look at the recent trend in Superbowl winners and their RB corps
Packers – committee (Grant, Kuhn, Starks)
Saints – committee (Thomas, Bell, Bush)
Steelers – at the time a committee since Willie Parker wasn’t always healthy (Moore, Davenport)
Giants – committee (Jacobs, Ward, Bradshaw)
Colts – complimentary backs (Addai, Rhodes)
No dominant runner in the group. Not saying having one is a bad thing, but it’s a fact that the NFL is more of a passing game – teams with the best passing attack will have the best chance at winning the SB. The running game needs to be good but only as a compliment.
by Ashto12 on Apr 27, 2011 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
All I am saying is
let TFB hand the ball off more and the edge rusher wont be on time everytime he drops back. Make the defence be honest with you and then take advantage. I like our committee but if we could include a RB with elite talent that will give another Head if you will. We dont have a deep threat and I think Ingram and Williams could fit that bill. I know you dont need a lone ball carrier I am just saying with one it can extend the career of your QB. Go PATS
Jeffrey M Melhorn
why is it that depth is used as an excuse not to draft more talented players at a specific position?
the defensive line has depth, sure. but what it doesn’t have is 3 quality starters. you can have as much depth as you want but if none of it is effective you are just wasting space.
All that defensive line depth is supposed to be for just-in-case purposes. You still need quality ahead of it. Right now the Patriots lack that 3rd defensive linemen. This is a fact. It became painfully obvious that the team lacked talent once Ty Warren went down before last season. Luckily Wilfork did his best Peyton Manning impersonation for that defensive line.
If we are still thinking that running backs and wide receivers are going to solve our problems we have unfortunately become too much like the Colts. Talented trenches wins championships. Let’s get back to doing that
It wouldn't surprise me. . .
that BB has something up his sleeve with a veteran free agent or two at RB and WR. Therefore, unless a pick slips down to him that he can’t refuse, I would expect him to draft at most just one at each of these positions. It seems to me there are too many holes in the OL to ignore.

by 































