NFL Draft 2011: Analysis of Saints Trade and Day Two Outlook for the Patriots
The New England Patriots traded the 28th overall pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, as many fans and experts both predicted and expected. Surprisingly, the pick isn't for a for a quarterback, which many people anticipated.
Instead, the Patriots shipped the 28th pick to the New Orleans Saints for the 56th overall pick in this year's draft, as well as a 1st round pick in 2012. While I was initially satisfied with the trade, based on how the rest of the first round fell into place, I'm not as content now. Here's how the rest of the first round fell into place:
Saints - Round 1, Pick 28: Mark Ingram, RB, Alabama
Bears - Round 1, Pick 29: Gabe Carimi, OL, Wisconsin
Jets - Round 1, Pick 30: Muhammad Wilkerson, DE, Temple
Steelers - Round 1, Pick 31: Cameron Heyward, DE, Ohio State
Packers - Round 1, Pick 32: Derrek Sherrod, OT, Mississippi St.
In those five picks, three of the Patriots top options for the 33rd pick were wiped away, including the best two five-techniques (bar none) on the board in Muhammad Wilkerson and Cameron Heyward. Because of this, the Patriots are unlikely to be able to fill that need this year. Had the team simply selected Wilkerson or Heyward at 28, then waited to move the 33rd pick for a first rounder in 2012, the team could have filled the need at right end while also picking up solid future value. You could simply say, "Well, in hindsight..." But I disagree. With three teams needing defensive line help (Bears, Jets, Steelers), there was no reason to take the risk of losing both of the coveted five techniques by 33. Then again, the Patriots simply might have not valued Wilkerson and Heyward that highly.
There are some positives to the trade, however. The Patriots will get a mid-late first round draft pick next year (if there is a draft next year) and they've picked up another second round pick for this year. That is terrific value. I mean Terrific (notice the capital "t"). We'll see what Bill Belichick can do with the five picks he owns on day two.
Trade Grade: B+
Lets move on from the trade and continue with the day two talk. There are still some good prospects left on the board. At outside linebacker, the likes of Jabaal Sheard, Justin Houston, Allen Bailey, Brooks Reed, Akeem Ayers, Martez Wilson, and the big fish: Da'Quan Bowers. At defensive end... well, there's Jarvis Jenkins and lets just move on after that (not sure Christian Ballard is a fit, but don't count him out). At wide receiver, there's quite a few options left, including Torrey Smith, Leonard Hankerson, Austin Pettis, Greg Little, Randall Cobb, Terrence Toliver, and Titus Young. At running back, only Ingram is off the board, so the likes of Mikel Leshoure, Jordan Todman, Ryan Williams, and co. are all still there. Along the interior line, there's still Ben Ijalana, Clint Boling, Stefen Wisniewski, Rodney Hudson, and others. There are also other options such as Rahim Moore.
In fact, there is so much value available in the second round, that I wouldn't be surprised to see the Patriots trade back to around 40-45 with a quarterback needy team such as the 49ers, Redskins, or Vikings, pick up a third round pick, and select at that next spot. In fact, the only way I see them sticking at 33 is if they're really sold on a certain prospect. Da'Quan Bowers or Mikel Leshoure could be options for the team at 33. But I really am not sure what to expect.
Either way, with the Patriots slated to make five picks on day two, it should be a lot of fun for Patriots fans.
146 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
There are still a lot of possible 5 techs out there
Jarvis Jenkins, Drake Nevis, Christian Ballard, etc
You’re not always gonna get the 1st round prospect at every position. I still like the trade, because we only had 5 picks next year. That extra first gives us the trade down options into the second round, where BB thrives in his selections + an extra 2nd this year.
WE ARE PENN STATE
Just throwing names out
These are just potential options. Personally I like Jenkins, but once you get past the first round prospects, everyone has their personal biases and niches. Just pointing out that Heyward and Wilkerson are not the only 5 tech’s in the draft.
WE ARE PENN STATE
Agreed
Though I’m still pretty irritated like most people. I have to think he assumed the Steelers weren’t going to pick an end and got busted.
Or that maybe he didn't have Heyward rated as highly as we did
we pumped up Heyward a lot here (sometimes respectfully so, sometimes not.) There are going to be upwards of 300 rookies (including UDFA’s once the CBA is settled) who are are going to be on NFL teams. Heyward is one guy who looked promising, and will most likely have a successful NFL career. Unless I see BB’s board, I can’t say as to whether BB had the same opinion.
WE ARE PENN STATE
I can agree with that.
We’re all technically being greedy because that was our 2nd first rounder lol.
come on Greg we talked about this
drinking on the job is fine as long as you add the disclaimer that you have the “flu”
I'll stop if you want me to Greg
just funning with you
I want you to. Does that count?
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess so
just having fun with Greg….since he is never around
/wipes tear from eye
doing important editor things.
Like BBS.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Busy being an actor. So little time on hand...
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
How are the Vikings quarterback-needy?
They just spent their 12th pick on one.
I see a 'FORK in the road!
by New Century Silver on Apr 29, 2011 12:43 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t look at what other teams did and say “oh we lost out to them.” I know you may look at it that way, but there are other talented players in this draft. The guys you mentioned are just the name guys that everyone knows. There are guys in this draft that will reach unexpected heights. My thoughts now are to let this whole thing play itself out. I’m not mad with either move. The offensive line was my greatest concern. I feel that need wasn’t really addressed as much as it was more defused than anything. DT is a need position. But Bill has said that you do not draft for need. We’ll see what day 2 brings. And it should be great stuff.
the thing is bill already knows who he's going to draft
the fact that these guys are available (jordan, heyward, wilkerson) and we have to pass on them, is disappointing to see as fans, but at the end of the day they just can not deviate have the plan they have set in place.
by beantownboy171 on Apr 29, 2011 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Exactly
Those guys you mentioned are just like last year’s Jared Odrick.
by DrJgopatsgators on Apr 29, 2011 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, and it is for the best. Bill said last year after the draft that the fans may not like the pick but he is the one making the decisions. They go through a lengthy process to get to this point. We get excited about the draft normally when football ends. Big difference.
well, yeah thats pretty much follows my thought process
am i disappointed we didn’t get cam heyward? yes
But i’m more-so disappointed that Cameron Heyward did not meet bill’s standards then I am with bill not selecting him.
As a fan you can only hope that Cameron Heyward (going to keep using his name as an example) can be the next Seymour. We have no clue if he is, or if he isn’t. And by passing on him at 28, bill essentially told us he is not.
That’s why I feel a let down at this point in the process.
by beantownboy171 on Apr 29, 2011 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions
filled a need with a talented player? check
traded down? check
got a future 1st rounder? check
didn’t take Mark Ingram? thank God and check
I don’t know how much better it could’ve gotten
by pats4life on Apr 29, 2011 1:02 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I'm stoked too
Still can’t believe some fans are somehow upset at how this turned out.
by DrJgopatsgators on Apr 29, 2011 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions
lol
Thats not fair. One of our biggest needs was a 5 technique, and we missed out on the perceived upper tier. Not trying to be an ass, but our long mainstays were all 1st rounders, Wilfork, Warren, and Seymour. These style of DEs do not grow on trees.
I love hearing about "our biggest needs"
cause McCourty wasn’t a big need, and he turned out pretty good. Rob Gronkowski, a tight end? Uh, definitely not big on the need scale last year.
Belichick is currently drafting the right way. It might not be popular, but as long as he maintains draft leverage and drafts the players he deems fit his system this team will never be bad under his reign. They got a top flight offensive tackle, have 3 well positioned picks in the 2nd round, and Belichick already got another 1st rounder for 2012. he doesn’t sacrifice the present or the future anymore like he did back in 2007. He won’t let this team hit lulls anymore.
by pats4life on Apr 29, 2011 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
TE was a need.
There was Crumpler, and … someone on the practice squad? We needed a TE or two, and he drafted them. 08, we needed an ILB, and he drafted one. He drafts for need, but he sees those needs in a different order to everyone else. Probably because he knows what he has.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Ingram would have been an "impulse buy."
I’m glad Belichick resisted temptation and made a great value trade. I am a little disappointed that we lost out on both Wilkerson and Heyward as a result, but I’m still a big fan of Brooks Reed, and I they will definitely be able to snag Leshoure or Todman in the second.
Bet Bill's annoyed with himself for that.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
missing out on Heyward or Wilkerson, if it wasn't clear.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Here is why I don’t see it as a successful first round…
Lets take a trip back to the 2009 draft. The Pats were on the clock twice, but traded down, because we saw “value” in having more later round picks. When all the picks panned out on those two trades, they gave up the chance to select Michael Oher and Clay Matthews, for more picks which were used to pick Darius Butler, Brandon Tate and Julian Edelman. Now admittedly, Tate is a decent receiver and a good return man, and Edelman has shown himelf to be a serviceable 3rd receiver. However, because the team saw “value” in later round picks, instead of pulling the trigger on two all world talents that would currently fill huge holes in this team. Now, you say hindsight is 20/20, which you may be right, however, there would have been value in taking those two players there, as they were projected to go 5 or so spots ahead of where they were available to New England.
However, the point is not to complain about 2009, was it a blown draft, yeah, but you cant win them all. However, my problem with this is how the Pats didn’t seem to learn anything from this.
Fast foreward to this year. We had number 17 and number 28. Now, Cam Jordan was suppossed to go around number 10ish. So, when you are on the clock at number 17, and he is still available there, that is a value pick. You are drafting a very talented player later than where he should have gone. They took a guy in Solder who is a project at tackle. Tackle is definately a need for this team, and if a guy like Solder pans out and turns into a good tackle, thats good value too, so I am not upset about that. However, I feel like a pass rushing OLB/DE is a much more glaring need than Tackle. So while I am not mad about this pick, I do feel like the wrong guy was chosen. Fast foreward to pick 28. And this is the point in which a lot of you are probably going to yell at me. At pick 28, there is a young man sitting there named Mark Ingram. Now, you have 2 serviceable running backs in BJGE and Danny Woodhead. These guys are both decent, and put up good numbers on limited carries this year. However, these guys are not guys that are going to be franchise backs for this team. Mark Ingram is a guy that, within the next 3 years, will have a 1,700 yard rushing season for New Orleans.
Which is where we come back to value. Cam Jordan was projected to be drafted at around 10 overall, but was available at 17. Mark Ingram was projected between 15-20, but as available at 28. Both of those are great value. The pick we get back from New Orleans is probably going to be within 3-4 picks of 28, so we really don’t gain that much value there, and we pick up a late second round pick. Which is exactly the problem I have with the way the Pats have been drafting lately. The pats see more value in having an extra second round pick than they do in actually drafting two incredibly talented players who will fill a need on this team.
by BlueNGoldBomber on Apr 29, 2011 1:24 AM EDT reply actions
don't take this the wrong way
but you are wrong on all sorts of levels.
1. They traded back twice, and the results of that brought Darius Butler, Brandon Tate, Julian Edelman, AND Rob Gronkowski.
2. Just because a player is valued by mediots and other teams doesn’t mean he is valuable to you. Cam Newton went 1st overall. Had he fallen to 17 should we have picked him then?
3. Mark Ingram? Still on that eh? So many people on here need to stop with this Ingram crap. He was a good running back at a top flight school with all world talent everywhere. His success better have happened. He didn’t fill a need. He isn’t any better than Green-Ellis. And he definitely is worth more as a 56 and 2012 1st than he would ever be as our running back.
4. Your perception of value is a joke. The way you said 2009 was a failure pretty much proves it. These kids haven’t been given a chance to succeed, but you have written them off. Also, comparing them to 2010’s class should come with the disclaimer that 2009 is what caused 2010 to be so great. Belichick’s trades are what have made this team so stacked with these picks that you so casually and foolishly proclaim as wasted value. Do some research and you’ll find out that most of Belichcik’s best drafts come from him trading like a maniac.
5. Your last line tells me that you didn’t pay attention to the Patriots much this offseason…or in general. They didn’t just get an extra second rounder. They got that and a 2012 1st from a team that will likely fall in the same range the Patriots traded away. The Patriots moved down 28 spots in the draft and got a pick in the 1-32 range next year. Also, they drafted a highly talented offensive tackle in Solder. They also have the best offensive line coach in the business, or at least one of the best. Oh, and if you didn’t know, the Patriots currently have 2 spots on the offensive line filled definitely, center and wherever Vollmer plays.
Please, spare me this missed value crap. The only thing that was missed today was Patriots fans seeing the brilliance of Belichick…yet again.
by pats4life on Apr 29, 2011 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
Not sure I would say BJGE and Ingram are equivalent
Ingram probably is a much better running back, but you have to ask how much better your team is getting by improving at the running back position, generally. Bringing in one very talented guy to complement a stable of more-than-competent RBs is sort of unnecessary, and probably doesn’t make the overall team that much better. Additionally, how many times a game is Ingram going to touch the ball? 11-12? How many snaps will be see? 20-22? That’s not the sort of production you aim for with a first round pick. These are the reasons it was smart not to take Ingram; it’s not that he’s not a talented guy, it’s just that regardless of his talent, he’s not going to be a high-impact player due to his position and its place in the New England offense.
Im sure one of our 3rd-4th round Running backs
would give out just as much production in our system as ingram. lol
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
Yep...
Especially if they turn the 56th pick into a guy like, say, LeShoure (assuming they want to go RB at all).
That means they get a RB who’s not significantly worse than Ingram, plus they get the Saints 1st rounder next season.
At worst; bonus first rounder! At best, two+ starters (56th + 1st rounder in 2012 + anything picked up in further trade => starters)
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions
I understand what you are feeling. But one thing you should know. Even though the Patriots have had issues getting off the field on 3rd down as a defense. They have had greater issues protecting Tom in their season and playoff losses. The offensive line is a huge need. And this whole thing is a process. Clay Matthews is a talented pass rusher that plays in a zone blitz system. The Patriots run a read and react system. Their linebackers must be able to do many things. And Clay as talented as he is, is not a Patriots type player at this time. Cam Jordan is also not a good fit here. His is small in weight and Bill didn’t think he was a good choice. I dispute your Mark Ingram claim too. But I’m just saying that the players we have gotten over the last 4 drafts have contributed to where the Patriots are now. You may not like the whole value thing. But these picks have made the team better.
totally disagree
i’m thinking ingram is gonna be a bust, or a 2nd string back at best. now way was he worth a 1st round pick. a lot of fans were praying they would pass on ingram and they did thank god
Bingo
Saints re-signed Pierre Thomas and just drafted Ingram. They also have the option to re-sign Reggie Bush (which I doubt they will, now). They also have Chris Ivory.
So what does that make Ingram? The Saints burned their 2012 first-rounder plus the 56th overall in 2011 on what? A part-time guy who will share reps with Pierre Thomas, maybe Reggie Bush, and probably Chris Ivory?
Meh. I’d rather have two+ starters (which is what Belichick will turn 56th + 2012 first-rounder) than a half-starter (since Ingram will be getting 50% of reps at best, if he’s sharing with Thomas).
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Me thinks Pierre will be gone from New orleans.....
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
They just re-signed him, so I'd be really surprised
They would want a tandem, if not more – they were hoping to carry three RBs in 2009 (Bell, Thomas, Bush) and three in 2010 (Thomas, Bush, Ivory).
I’d imagine another 3+ game-day RBs in 2011 (Thomas, Ingram, Ivory). No way they only go in with one RB, they saw what happened to the Cowboys, Giants, Cardinals, etc when they decided to give the young RB the entire load. Eww.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions
This important part draft really starts here in rounds 2 and 3
it’s crucial we get some good players out of the 2nd round.
You can’t deny the value of the trade (a late-first for and unknown but most likely late-first and a second rounder).
On the other hand the Patriots need to take advantage of those acquired picks at some point. It’s too early to second guess BB and company at this point but I still feel like we will have a hard time to find difference-makers on defense in this draft.
One possibly overlooked aspect assuming free-agency begins soon is that the trade also frees up cash for free-agent signings (even if there won’t be a cap this year there will be sometime in the future).
In hindsight
So if we would have chosen according to my board we could have gotten:
Cameron Jordan and Gabe Carimi
Now we got Nate Solder, a 2012 1st, and the 2011 2:24 pick.
Not a whole lot of difference and we won’t know the outcome until a few years down the road. What really worries me is the absence of defensive difference makers.
Like BlueNGoldBomber I’m afraid of a draft full of Darius Butlers and Brandon Tates another time around. The second round becomes crucial.
you haven't given them a freaking chance!!!
Darius Butler had a good rookie season and then had a bad sophomore campaign. Bad seasons happen. Brandon Tate only got to play last season. Technically his rookie season was last year. Julian Edelman is more value than many expect from a 7th rounder, especially a former quarterback. PLUS he is a killer slot receiver. And then there is Gronkowski, the result of those 2009 move downs everyone likes to scoff at.
This team won 14 games last year. They were the #1 seed. They were incredibly young. They are stacked for tomorrow (today?) and for next year’s draft already! Wah wah wah we didn’t get (insert player that is now completely irrelevant). Stop crying everyone and realize that you just saw what was SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN.
by pats4life on Apr 29, 2011 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
They wanted a name pick that sounds good. And I can’t blame them completely. But this whole thing is a process. You work to find the best man for the job you need. It just happened to be Solder. I’m glad it wasn’t Castonzo. There are more really good players in this draft to be had. People just need to be patient.
I can blame them for being stupid
they are the ones being stupid
by pats4life on Apr 29, 2011 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I understand. Some of these fans want their heart’s desire justified. I wanted Robert Quinn. But I can accept what we have now. It is a process.
well if anyone on this site is devastated
it is Ninja….but he has moved on, so I am pretty sure anyone else who can’t is just being a sissy
I was but I've moved on.
guess BB didn’t value Jordan, Wilkerson or Heyward. Hill was right. He said he would be shocked if the Pats ignored that area.
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
Nah...
Just Belichick doesn’t fall in love with names. He has grades, he has picks, and he has a certain grade that he’d spend on picks. If they don’t match up, bail.
He might have loved Heyward, but he might have only loved Heyward with the 33rd, 34th,.. 40th picks. He didn’t love Heyward more than the 56th + 2012 first-rounder, and I can’t blame him.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Or bound by the reality that we haven't had success on the D Line after the 1st round of any draft this decade
But that’s just another stat right?
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
Didn't have much success with TEs until Gronk.
I wouldn’t be too worried.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions
We've had much more success from TE than late round D line talent
Watson and Thomas were great compared to the rejects and failures of past drafts for DE or DT.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
we run a 3-4 right?
so Seymour in 2001 took the RDE.
then Ty Warren in 2003 took the LDE
then Wilfork in 2004 took the NT
and they were all on the team together dominating until 2009. and you just expected a replacement this fast?
I expect that with almost a dozen "value" guys that we'd have no reason to grab old veterans to fill the spot
Stroud and Warren prove that wrong.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
well everyone on this site seems to love depth
so I don’t know what to believe any more
Because when you're drafting 6th rounders,
guys that have played for 8 years should beat them out at first.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Drew Bledsoe completely agrees with you.....
Talent is talent.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
The veteran has the experience.
Knows how to throw an out against NFL CBs, for example, so that it won’t turn into 6 points. Knows how to bull rush an NFL Tackle. But once the 6th rounder learns what he can and can’t do in the league, he can beat the older, slower veteran out.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Kade Weston completely disagrees with you..
Some people just can’t handle it.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
He was on IR.
Hard to have an impact from there.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 5:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I mean...
…he was traded before the ’09 season, so he was playing behind Seymour/Warren his whole career.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 5:18 AM EDT up reply actions
In the sixth round?
Absolutely. The Patriots and Belichick have only drafted two defensive linemen in the second and third rounds combined. One was Marquise Hill, which had a tragic ending, but he was during the same time span as Seymour, Wilfork, and Warren. The other is Ron Brace and he was starting last year before he was injured. Both were second round picks and the only defensive line picks before the fourth round. Ever. You’re looking at a really small sample size of players the Patriots are interested in drafting to compete to be starters. The rest are late round fliers for depth.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
The only reason I remember him
is bc he had like 1.5 sacks on black sunday.
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
That's how he's groomed every single player.
Wilfork had Keith Traylor. Brady had Bledsoe. BJGE had Fred Taylor. Vollmer has Light. Edelman has Welker, Price has Branch. The way the Patriots operate is that they have a veteran split time with a young player so they can adjust. It’s what we’re all recommending the Patriots do with Matt Light- sign him to a two year deal and let Solder develop. It’s the same thing, just with an external player.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 2:56 AM EDT up reply actions
We have Ty Warren and Wilfork and HAD Gerard Warren.
That’s plenty of people to tutor people. Much less, what does Stroud know about the defense? Nothing. Bringing him in wasn’t to teach anybody.
Same thing can be said about Shawn Springs a few years ago.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
Stroud's a veteran. He provides leadership.
He allows the pressure to not be completely on the rookie. He’s been around the lague and there’s more to teach than just the Patriots’ defense. I’m sure he’s faced numerous offenses and he knows how to read them. He can teach players how to decipher offenses. That’s plenty in my opinion.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 5:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Then why have a defensive line coach at all?
I mean, we have 3 very experienced people to teach the line how it works and a few others that have seen a variety of schemes in their time scattered around the professional football world. Wilfork’s the captain, do we need more leadership? Do we need a leader specifically for DE that’s not named Ty Warren?
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
except that Stroud can PLAY THE POSITION
with all the uncertain labor crap you had to figure they’d do more than just sit still
NO HE CAN'T
He sucked at it last year and he know’s the 4-3, not the 3-4. He’s older AND more prone to injury. Yet after all that, he’s still good enough to sign and likely start because that’s how uncertain some of the backups are in certain areas. Backups signed and drafted over a decade.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
they were never intended to start
and never were intended to start long-term. and I’d say our defensive line did damn well last year with just Wilfork. now they get Ty Warren back and the revolving door at RDE can actually get more of a “this is what we need” look
It's arguable if some were ever intended to play at all
Wilfork did ridiculously well last year. He was great. The other line positions were all over the place on performance. Most of the guys could do one thing but not another. It just wasn’t pretty. On top of that, we sucked at stopping running teams. Even the Lions did well running the ball on us and they sucked at it.
The 2 units that played well were the secondary (most of the time) and the linebackers.
You can say they weren’t expected to start or weren’t ready or whatever. The fact is we have had 11 guys drafted for that position and a host of free agents and all we have to show for it is a 5th round pick, a guy who’s a failed NT but an ok but slow DE, a DE that’s great at rushing the passer but sucks at stopping the run, a DE who can’t seem to make appointments, 2 older veterans and a DE that seemingly has injury troubles.
Sure they weren’t intended to start. But at least on offense we drafted for the future and it worked out. That hasn’t happened on defense.
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
well when you are comparing their abilities to what Richard Seymour did for us
then they will pale in comparison
cause our success of quarterbacks is the inverse
we only get good ones after round 5 (6 and on). maybe next time we trade Cassel for a DE
Gronk and Hernandez aren’t official successes yet. It takes more than one season to cement a HOF career. I have hope though.
But seriously, when you look at D-Line...
…there was Richard Seymour who was elite at that spot from ‘01-’08. You have Wilfork. You have Ty Warren. That means the Patriots have been “searching” for two years to fill Seymour’s spot- that’s really it. They haven’t had success on the DLine because they haven’t been looking to fill that spot. You could say “the Patriots really haven’t had success drafting centers recently” but that’s an unfair statement because that role is filled.
In reality, they’ve only looked for a new DE for two years. They found Brace to be insurance in case Wilfork left, which means that he’s only starting to play DE. Other than that, they haven’t really invested early picks on the defensive line.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions
My God!!!
Quit whining about the picks people! As has already been said, the jury is still out on Butler and Tate! Butler could end up being a GREAT CB, this past year was only his sophomore year in the NFL! Same goes for Tate, the man has speed, and in essentially his rookie year, he ran two kickoffs back for TD’s! He may end up being a GREAT Deep Threat, so quit worrying! He’s already showed more promise than the likes of Bethel Johnson or Chad Jackson EVER did!
I’ll admit, I didn’t jump up and cheer when I heard Solder’s name called, however I recall last year being pissed when we picked McCourty while Kyle Wilson was still on the board! Hopefully this Solder pick turns out similar!
Let’s remember, the Patriots have scouts that have gone over EVERY play of EVERY game that these guys have ever played. We have all just mostly seen highlight reels. I’m pretty sure the Patriots are FAR more qualified than ANY of us to make a call on who is a good fit for the team.
Lastly, I’m SICK of hearing people complain about not getting Mark Ingram! He was the 2nd best RB on his OWN team! Ingram is just another BJGE, not explosive, but a hard runner between the tackles who takes care of the football. The way I see it, drafting Ingram in the 1st Rd would have been no different than drafting a QB in the 1st Rd. We already have the exact same style of RB already on the roster.
A team that makes the pick that is popular with fans...
isn’t always the team that makes the best pick. Just look at the Jets for example. Kyle Wilson was popular with fans, mediots and the like, but he just ended up not being very good his rookie year. Same thing they did with Sanchez and Gholston, very popular picks with fans, but in the grand scheme of things, was a turnover prone QB worth the 5th pick in the draft? I think Tannenbaum just reads random Mock Drafts because it’s cheaper than actual scouting, and makes his picks based on that. I think Wilkerson will turn out similar to the other picks they have made to be completely honest.
Wilkerson will give the Jets…something. I can’t say what. But he should be a solid player for New York. You’re right about Sanchez but part of the reason the Jets broke the sound barrier to get him was the fear of the Redskins drafting him. Desperate teams hurt themselves in the draft. Atl to me gave up waaaaaaaaaay too much to get Julio Jones when there were other players that they could get where they were in the draft. They traded up for a possession receiver. I could see if it was Jerry Rice, but Julio?
I see. Don’t be mean though. Matt Ryan is okay. They needed more offensive weapons to me. And they could have used a pass rusher, bigger linemen on defense, and a bit more speed defensively too. When the Packers beat them, it wasn’t just because they lacked speed on offense. And they still don’t really have it either. So go figure.
Falcons went for one guy to go all in this year.
Won’t work, but they should still win the division.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions
They got absolutely hosed by the Browns in that trade.
They’re not that talented a team that they can sell the farm for one guy for a Super Bowl this year.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions
As soon as I saw that trade, the first words out of my mouth were "They sold their soul for somebody..."
If knowledge is power and power corrupts...
If he's the next Jerry Rice, might be worth it...
Anything short of Jerry Rice might make it hard to justify, though.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
With all of the other wide outs in this draft. Like Edmund Gates, Ricardo Lockette, Greg Little, and Titus Young, the Falcons still could have gotten a good prospect to go in their offense. And not have given blood to get him.
I don't mind it,
But it shouldn’t have cost them a first next year. I would have offered a 2nd if I were Dimitroff, and if Holmgren didn’t want it, then the Falcs stay put.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, i think a trade up of this magnitude for any position
really makes a statement about how confident you are in finding talent later in the draft.
by beantownboy171 on Apr 29, 2011 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it was one of those things that the Falcons were clearly in love with Jones. And they decided that he was worth it. Five picks for one guy.
Apparently they were after Green, first...
Loved both dudes.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions
well the media's performance on player valuation wasn't much
I believed he would swap a for a 1st rounder to 2012,but, not with a super bowl contender…oh well. I knew he was going O LINE and I think Solder is outstanding. Von Miller said Solder was the best O lineman he played against in college.
I know Belichick is not a sack guy. I know he prefers to drop the extra man into coverage rather than chasing around the QB…but he could have traded and gotten pretty much any of the premier defensive payers from #6 on down and he walked away…hmmm.Is this a vote for Cunningham and Spikes?
Hundred bucks he trades down from 33 tomorrow.
No-one here will take that bet.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions
He would get a first for certain if he does. Wonder if the Chargers would give us all of their second rounders for the top of the heap?
Who would the Chargers be gunning for so much to trade with the Patriots?
I would imagine the team that comes calling BB is one that needs a QB and that ain’t the Chargers.
Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.
1 Cor 13:13
Bowers?
Maybe they’re in love with Martez Wilson?
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Well since insertscreenname was throwing out outrageous scenarios I just thought I’d add another. That’s all.
That's not an outrageous scenario...
Wilson’s been mocked to SD before…
But I know what you mean. And I doubt Bill takes that trade from the Chargers, since he’s already passed (kind of) on some of the top guys in this draft. I think he takes a bit less this year for a first next year, especially if it’s a team that should be much worse than the Saints.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:56 AM EDT up reply actions
MR
Calls fielded on 33rd pick. Belichick said that the Patriots have already received calls on the 33rd overall selection, at the top of the second round, from teams who are in the middle of the round. “I think right now the most important thing for us is to just re-group, get a good night’s rest, take stock of everything, re-assess the board, take a look at ourselves, take a look at what some of the teams around us might be doing, and then see what happens,” Belichick said. “There are still a lot of quality players up on the board. We hope that we will be able to get production out of whatever we do with our picks.”
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
He's gonna say that anyway,
just to drive up interest and/or price.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions
He said he's received interest from teams in the middle of the round.
My guess is SF or Wash. That way they’d be willing to give a 2012 first and their current 2nd.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 3:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Please let Washington do that. Please.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Washington also has the 41 and 49 picks...
…wouldn’t be surprised if the Patriots accepted both for 33.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 3:43 AM EDT up reply actions
mmmm.
Would prefer a first next year, but that’s probably their fall-back trade if no-one offers it.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 3:45 AM EDT up reply actions
I'd prefer a 1st later too
no need for 4 seconds
that's double the pts for 33
would teams do that?
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
A team that needs a QB.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Plus, a team that needs to jump another team to get that QB.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions
so we can trade 33 to the Colts???
too soon?
He probably already had the board reorganised,
and then got some intern to keep blocking calls for him. Sleeps til 5, then walks into the war room ready to go.
Teams start to panic when they can’t get through, and think they have to offer a lot more to get him to listen to them…
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
MR
Solder to work at left tackle. “Nate [Solder] was a player who we’ve been on for a long time,” Belichick said. “Nate has been a solid player for Colorado at left tackle. Certainly there’s a lot of things that he’ll need to do to improve but we feel like he’s a good, talented guy, a hard-working kid and if he can keep doing that then I think he’ll be able to contribute for us. We’ll work him at left tackle.”
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
even better
New coach lends insight on Solder. New assistant strength and conditioning coach Moses Cabrera, who was hired last month, gave the team insight on first-round draft selection, offensive tackle Nate Solder. Cabrera served on the strength and conditioning staff at the University of Colorado last season.
Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
Rich beat you to it by about ten minutes...
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions
hey there! first post :)
I hope I’m not the only one to remember that the Saints just lost a playoff game to a 8-9 team, and their QB threw 22 interceptions, 2nd most in the league. I’m not saying the Saints will give us the much promised top 10 pick, but I think it will be higher than their 24th this year, and surely higher than 28th. By the old trade value chart, 28th is worth 660 points, and 52nd is worth 380. So even if the Saints win the Super Bowl next season (32nd pick is worth 590), the Patriots still got AT LEAST a 310 point steal from them. To face how valuable that is, the 59th pick in the draft is worth 310 points. So that’s a lot, to get a trade of a 1rst for a 1rst and a 2nd and get another 2nd in point differential. To have an idea, to make the trade mathematically fair, the Patriots should’ve sent their 60th along with their 28th, and would still get 10 points over the Saints. I know the trade value chart won’t be gospel when/if the rookie salary cap actually happens, but even if changes, it won’t chance that much to erase a 310 point difference off a trade. Great trade. I remember saying in this thread that, if any team would give a 2012 1rst and a 2011 2nd for 28th, Belichick would be crazy not to make it. And he did, so I’m glad, and happy, and satisfied. 2 first rounders in 2012, more leverage, more young talent for a team that will stay competitive for years and years and years to come.
For day 2 I like these guys to be 5 tech:
Da’Quan Bowers or Allen Bailey if they bulk up
Christian Ballard
Jarvis Jenkins
Kenrick Ellis
Cedric Thornton (big sleeper, might be great at NFL)
Jerrell Powe
Stephen Paea
And most OLBs:
Da’Quan Bowers or Allen Bailey if they keep their weight
Justin Houston
Brooks Reed
Martez Wilson
Sam Acho
Chris Carter
Greg Romeus
KJ Wright
Jeremy Beal
well future picks are alwas viwed as less valuable
which helps the trades go down easier for the team that makes the trade and gives up future value.
good post, but it is worth mentioning that Belichick having that extra 1st rounder has a lot more to do with his freedom in that draft than anything.
think about the last couple of drafts for a second.
2007: had 2 firsts. 24 was used on meriweather. 28 was traded to the future. (go to 2008)
2008: had 1 first (you know why). 7th traded back to 10th and got Jerod Mayo.
now imagine if the Patriots had still had that 31st pick (you know why). that could’ve been traded similar, and the pick they got in return would most likely have been an improvement.
People don’t seem to realize that the Patriots trade their 1st rounder for other teams’ future 1sts because that pick will generally be higher than theirs.
The Saints need to make it to the NFC Championship game for that pick to be worse than the 28th the Patriots traded. The Patriots, meanwhile, get their pick and the Saints pick. The worst those picks could be next year are 31st and 32nd…which still wouldn’t be all that bad. just saying
Kenrick Ellis
I think I remember seeing somewhere that they Pats had several visits with Ellis. More than one suggests they’re doing a little more than ruling him out; watch out for him.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Apr 29, 2011 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Has everyone forgotten Greg Romeous????
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
i was under the impression he'd be going mid-late 3rd rnd
by beantownboy171 on Apr 29, 2011 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
He probably is.
Just an option though. I would want him.
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
Doesnt this seem familiar guys? a 1st rounder, and 3 2nd rounders.
like last year? XD
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
yup, and two 3rds
one of which we’ll trade for a future 2nd
hahaha
by beantownboy171 on Apr 29, 2011 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
A couple questions
Why does Bill always aquire multiple 1st round picks but never use them? How does this help the team?
Why do you guys want such a raw player like Nate Solder when there were more polished players available?
Not meaning to be too critical here I was just wondering what is going through your guys heads.
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
by seton hall and steelers on Apr 29, 2011 11:00 AM EDT reply actions
1) So he has versatility. He has a choice to trade up or not with two 1st rounders and get a playmaker that he likes, or he can trade it for not only a 1st rounder next year, but a 2nd this year(which he did yesterday. in a way, he got an extra pick out of it which is great considering there is still really good value in the 2nd round).
2) Solder is a beast. Von Miller even said that he was his toughest matchup. he has a very high ceiling, and he’ll be learning under the best OL coaching staff in the league.
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
solid answers
I figured that it was for versatility. When do you think he stops aquiring two 1st round picks for the next year and actually uses 2 in a season? Also, I think Solder is a year or two away from being a very good LT but if you guys have patience that pick will pay off .
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
by seton hall and steelers on Apr 29, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
He'll use two when the value is there.
If the Saints, or some other team, weren’t willing to give up a first round pick, then I’m sure the Patriots would have drafted. They just believed, and I totally agree, that a first + second is worth more than those on the board. My guess is that they’ll be able to make trades of greater value for a while.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions
This is the better answer. lol
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
When do you think he stops aquiring two 1st round picks for the next year and actually uses 2 in a season?
The thing is, he’ll be spending 1st round money on both of them. Not very ideal.
Another thing, every team starts out with one 1st rounder. By trading one of our two first rounders, for another 2nd rounder, and a 1st next year, he is essentially adding 2nd rounders to his draft, while still picking well in the 1st round.
I think Solder will be great to tell the truth. Maybe he’ll start next year, but as far as Im concerned, getting rid of light, and having him start is not out of the question, but also not totally ideal i guess..
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
Wait for my article at 2PM.
It makes business sense.
by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
QB-needy teams?
Vikings took Ponder 12th overall.
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Apr 29, 2011 12:45 PM EDT reply actions
After a night to sleep on it
I am still kind of disappointed we didn’t get a 5 tech, but the upside on Solder is amazing. Scarnecchia must be foaming at the mouth to mold this kid into an elite left tackle.

by 





























