Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Sportfolio Management: Annuities and Perpetuities

By now, you are all familiar with the Patriots trading Richard Seymour for Oakland's 17th overall pick in this year's draft. You also should know that the Patriots shipped their 28th overall pick for New Orleans' 2nd round pick and a first round pick in 2012. Let me put my Finance major to good work and try and explain what the Patriots are trying to accomplish.

Definitions:

Annuity - A fixed sum of money, paid to a party each year for a set length of time.

Perpetuity - An annuity with no end; a fixed sum of money paid each year for an indefinite length of time.

Coupon - The fixed sum of money.

My theory is that the Patriots have utilized Richard Seymour as the payment for a draft perpetuity. That's right- the Patriots will be reaping the benefits from Richard Seymour long after he's left the franchise and the league. Coach and GM Bill Belichick makes it clear that his main concern in the draft is the upkeep of the franchise. He never has the "win this year, or bust" mentality. He puts the team in the best position to compete this year, while still thinking of the health of the franchise's future. Belichick understands the value of building a team through the draft and he will continue to take draft picks to flesh out the roster.

Star-divide

"But how is Seymour an endless supply of money?" you may be asking. Think of it this way:

1. The Patriots traded Seymour to Oakland in 2009 for the 17th pick in the 2011 draft.

2. The Patriots were free to trade the 28th pick in the 2011 draft because they already had a first round pick.

3. The Patriots traded the 28th pick for a 2012 1st round pick, as well as a 2nd round pick in 2011.

Do you see what happened? The trade of Seymour gave the Patriots additional ammo for the first round; the Patriots were able to trade out of the first round because they were able to pick a first round player. So the trade of Seymour netted the Patriots a bonus second round pick. This second round pick is the "coupon payment." However, this is an unnatural market and realize that the Patriots received just a 4th round pick in the 2007 Draft, to trade with San Francisco. Average the two (rough, I know), and my theory continues and states that the Patriots are in a position to receive a third round pick every year at no additional cost.

1. Seymour -> Oakland 2011 First + Patriots 2011 First -> 2x 2011 First (the Patriots' first and the Raiders' first)

2. 2x 2011 First -> 2012 First* + 2011 First + 2011 Second

3. 2012 First* + Patriots 2012 First -> 2013 First* + 2012 First + 2012 Third

4. 2013 First* + Patriots 2013 First -> 2014 First* + 2013 First + 2013 Third

In each year, the Patriots will receive the coupon payment of a third round pick, for however long the Patriots continue to trade. Of course, just like any investment, there is a time where the Patriots can cash in and turn a profit. To find this, we need to analyze the draft value chart as well as the perpetuity formula.

PV = C/r

PV = Present Value of Perpetuity

C = Coupon Payment

r = discount rate (rate of interest, etc)

So we know that the coupon payment is supposed to be a third round pick and in order to find the value, we'll look at the middle of the NFL Draft Value Chart. We'll use the mid-point of the third round because it's an average; the Patriots will receive a range of third round picks over the time frame of "forever" (remember: perpetuities have an indefinite time span), with the average landing in the middle of the round.

C = 190

Now, we need to find the discount rate. My belief is that the Patriots will utilize their earlier pick in the first round and will trade forward their lower pick. I have full confidence in Belichick's coaching ability, so I will say that the average pick that Belichick will trade forward will be in the second round of the playoffs (25-28), or a point value of 690. We'll say that the average forward first round pick will, like the third round of the draft, be found in the mid-point of the first round for a point value of 975. When the Patriots spend the mid-first pick, however, that is an incurred cost instead of spending their own late-first pick because the increase in first round position is removed from the price. For example, when the Patriots utilized the Raiders' pick, as opposed to their own pick, they were spending the value of the earlier pick. However, instead of reinvesting the added value of the mid-first pick (value that can be recovered by trading back down), the Patriots will be spending that added value. As a result, we must add the "cost" of spending the new pick over the Patriots' pick. Here's the math to find the discount value:

r = (975 - [975-160])/975 = 16.4%

With these two values, we find that the value of this perpetuity is:

PV = 160/0.164 = 975.6 points

So this perpetuity is equivalent to the 16th-17th overall pick in the NFL draft. Therefore, the perpetuity could be considered valued at 16.5th overall. As a result, if the pick that is traded is below the mid-point of the first round, then the Patriots should continue to reinvest and take advantage of the perpetuity. This is because the Patriots will be receiving the value of a 16.5th pick from a lower value pick, which can be considered "turning a profit." However, if the pick the Patriots are trading forward breaks into the top half of the draft, the Patriots could either trade down below the mid-way point, pick up additional and continue to turn the profit, or they could decide that the market has a fair value for the perpetuity and cash in.

If the pick is in the top half, then it is implied that both the Patriots and the team they traded with are in the bottom half of the league. If they continue to trade down, then they will only be receiving the benefits of the 16.5th overall for a higher cost and they will be losing value. Therefore, if both picks are in the top half of the draft, then the Patriots could cash in and make a sound financial decision. However, they do have the option of trading down and continuing the perpetuity.

I believe that the Patriots are putting themselves in a position where they will never be in the bottom half of the league and, as a result, will never be in a position where it makes financial sense to "cash in." Instead, the Patriots will continue to take advantage of this perpetuity and earn a coupon equal to a third rounder every year, all thanks to Richard Seymour.

Comment 25 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Love it.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Essentially we could use this first round pick (saints)

and turn it into an extra 2nd rounder for all of eternity…. i love it

by beantownboy171 on Apr 29, 2011 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

It's the goose that lays the golden egg.

Making a selection with (instead of continuously trading) the perpetual first rounder would be killing that goose.

by nbradley07 on Apr 29, 2011 2:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Or drinking the milk instead of killing the cow for the burger.

(Ok, I’m not really a goose guy)

The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 29, 2011 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fantastic!

This is excellent thinking and analysis Richard, and frankly I love BB’s approach here.

The strategy might be even more valuable than the point value return they’re getting, since Bill obviously believes that the rate of talent drop versus pick number is more shallow thatn the point value versus pick number curve.

Thus, the actual return in terms of football player is very valuable.

by Lt. Tyler on Apr 29, 2011 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

So what happens if we have 3 x 2012 First??

At the same time, any thoughts on if that is possible from a trade with our 33rd pick in a few hours? What do you see happening with that pick?

by DrJgopatsgators on Apr 29, 2011 2:45 PM EDT reply actions  

With three firsts?

They have the chance to have two perpetuities going on, but I feel like it’s most realistic that they grab the top players. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re stocking up to grab a quarterback, while still having additional picks so they don’t trade their whole draft for the qb.

by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pick at the two highest, trade the lowest into the next year's.

You come out with 2 firsts the next year too. The value shifts around from year to year (of course, we can’t trade with the Panthers for next year’s pick in perpetuity), but 2 1sts are 2 1sts.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK Richard I agree but.....

you are correct until the Pats are faced with the Brady replacement issue. Hopefully, they will get “another Matt Cassell” with a 2nd or 3rd, but, in order to “take care of the future of the franchise” letting Seymour go was a legit Andrew Luck play. He would have been number one and Oakland was weak…we may never know.

I suggest that Seymour was traded to assure flexibility within the next two years to draft a “top 3” QB and it has. Many of us assumed the 1st rounder swap to 2012 and
I think this year’s version was not the swap they were hoping for. Swapping with the Saints means a high 20’s first rounder when a top ten was the preference, obviously.

Belichick is endlessly managing circumstances. A major Pats draft challenge is an endless stream of mid to late 20’s draft picks along with mid 50’s to 60’s 2nd rounders. The New England Patriots are too good to secure top ten draft picks. Little weight is given to Pats draft position when discussing Bill’s effectiveness. He does not get the top guy at a position, the lousy teams do. A lousy team (OAK), offers a first rounder and Bill signs on the dotted line.

I think they will cash out in 2012 or 2013 for a top 3 QB and this was the primary motivation for the Seymour deal.

As far as today goes? Too many are assuming he will trade out of 33…he may flop to 34 or 35, but, I think he will pick at or near the top oft the round.

by tstorey1 on Apr 29, 2011 2:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Hah, literally wrote what you just said in response to DrJgo.

My thought is that they’d can grab a franchise QB in the middle of the first and they won’t have to go all the way up for Luck. They’ll grab a guy and still have additional picks.

by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

You think next year is the year to get a top QB then...

Obviously there is a small margin between drafting the QB of the future too early or waiting until it is too late. Personally I think next year is a little early. Brady probably still has 4 or 5 years left in him. That worked out for the Packers with Aaron Rodgers, but you are wasting a large percentage of the prime of a guy’s career if he sits until he is 26 or 27 years old.

by DrJgopatsgators on Apr 29, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Next year or the next.

I can see them sitting the player for 2-3 years. No rush at all.

by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or even better:

When a truly special player comes out. Some guy that really stands out.

Then it can happen when it happens, and you’re not slotting it.

The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 29, 2011 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Simple Math

I agree with Pats Pulpit, but in more simpler terms the Pats are using the Seymour pick to effectively be an extra second round pick every year in perpetuity, taking advantage of some perceived willingness of teams to trade into the lower first round with next year’s first round pick and a second round this year. It’s “win-win” solely for the Pats because – at best – it’s a fair value trade, but if a team like NO stumbles with injuries or the like and their expected low 20’s pick becomes a mid to upper rounder, the Pats really win, something like equity warrants in next year’s first round. In that since, it’s better for BB to trade with seemingly good teams, because he gets better value when they unexpectedly fail – as opposed to Oakland who seemingly exceeded expectations last year. I assume BB can only pay one first rounder per year (or something similar) and just will continue to trade like this for years to come (as in years past). Ultimately, in BB I trust, not all of his picks are great (and some fail miserably), but he learns from his mistakes (as we all do), and seems to be doing a very nice job lately and finding good value players to fit his system and his team’s needs.

by #1Pats Fan on Apr 29, 2011 3:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Absolutely!

Worst case scenario, the Patriots receive a future first of equal value to the pick they traded. Best case scenario, they have an improvement of a couple positions in the draft order. I’m sure the risk can be analyzed and the Patriots will find that that they have a much greater chance of improving their spot.

by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

This has Ernie Adams written all over it!

Let me first say that this is one of the coolest things I have seen on here and I have been reading everything on here for about 6 years. It puts things into context. I will also say that I think they were going to try this after 2007, but the Goodell prick stuck it to them. It also for some reason made me think of Ernie Adams. Didn’t he leave football for a while (for Wall Street) before signing on with BB again to work for the Patriots? This piece is excellent Mr. Hill. I know BB was an Economics guy in school, but this seems to be so out there even for him. My money is on Mr. Adams. It is also simple enough to understand, but most teams can’t do it because they don’t have quite the security to think this long term! It is also complex enough that many fans can’t grasp it. Really cool post man. Thanks for this Richard! Go Pats

by bluke1 on Apr 29, 2011 3:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks!

It was Ernie Adams who worked on Wall Street for many years before rejoining Belichick with the Patriots. Belichick’s in a unique position where he doesn’t have to worry if he’ll survive the next season so he can plan for years in advance, unlike other coaches who are fighting for their lives.

by Richard Hill on Apr 29, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great piece Mr. Hill!

recd

Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.

by NinjaZX6R on Apr 29, 2011 4:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice piece, Richard.

I was thinking the same thing from an engineering perspective.

Great title, too.

The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Official Fire-Puncher for Pats Pulpit an SB Nation Blog

by SlotMachinePlayer on Apr 29, 2011 4:40 PM EDT reply actions  

is this bold…

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 4:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Seems to just be the other tread, then.

Oh well. Won’t be for much longer.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Apr 29, 2011 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

shhhhh

your giving away the pats secrets!!!

by canadianpat on Apr 29, 2011 4:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe