Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

NFL Draft 2011: Patriots Won't Rely on Rookies - That's a Good Thing

With the 2011 NFL Draft now in the rear mirror, I think one of the biggest things scaring Patriots fans is the fact that the Patriots did not fill any "major needs" along the front seven of the defense.  I would attest that there was not a major need along the defensive front seven, but that is another story.  

The only need I would say the Patriots had heading into the draft was along the offensive line, with the uncertainty going on there.  While the Patriots drafted two players along the line, left tackle Nate Solder and guard/tackle Marcus Cannon, neither player will be expected to assume a starting role from day one (assuming the Patriots manage to bring back Matt Light).  Ras-I Dowling, Shane Vereen, and Stevan Ridley could also all be year one contributors, but the Patriots don't necessarily expect and will not be relying on those guys to contribute.

And I think this is what has some Patriots fans up in arms.  In 2010, the Patriots were in a rather unique situation.  The team had holes to fill.  When Rob Gronkowski and Aaron Hernandez were drafted, people expected them to be contributors from day one because the only body they had at tight end was Alge Crumpler.  Jermaine Cunningham was expected to contribute as a pass rusher immediately because the Patriots were so thin there (and the team had no idea Rob Ninkovich would be a viable option).  At inside linebacker, as soon as Brandon Spikes was drafted, it was pretty obvious the Patriots would be relying on him as the strong-side inside linebacker.  Zoltan Mesko was counted upon to be the team's punter of the future as soon as he was drafted.

You could make the argument that based on the way the Patriots drafted last year, there was no room for error.  For the team to succeed, many of the players drafted had little room for error.  Luckily, for the Patriots, all of those players turned out to be great successes (I'm not discounting McCourty, he just wasn't penciled in as a starter day one, the team had Bodden and Butler supposedly ready to be starters).  Many of those players will be expected to take on even bigger roles next year.

But keep this is mind: the 2011 draft class is not the 2010 draft class.  These rookies will not have the pressure to step into starting roles immediately.  If they do not develop as quickly as expected, the Patriots will fare just fine.  They have the depth and more importantly quality depth to succeed without these guys.  But this is a good thing!  While the 2010 class was certainly more exciting because of the fact that the rookies were expected to play such prominent roles, anything extra the 2011 rookie class provides will be as an upgrade to the current personnel (provided injuries do not force them into major roles).  If the Patriots re-sign Matt Light, Nate Solder will likely be the third tackle and any playing time he does receive will be an attribute to his development.  Ras-I Dowling will likely be the top back-up as a boundary cornerback, with Leigh Bodden and Devin McCourty firmly entrenched as the starters.  Again, the Patriots will not be relying on Dowling to perform.  Shane Vereen and Stevan Ridley should get some touches as rookies, but if they do not develop as quickly as possible, BenJarvus Green-Ellis and Danny Woodhead will share the running back duties just fine.

Would I have liked to see the Patriots address the front seven of their defense earlier than the sixth round of the draft?  Sure.  I thought there were some good players available at certain that could have competed well.  But there's a reason I am not a talent evaluator.  The Patriots were in a position where they could simply select the best player available and continue to upgrade their depth.  That is exactly what they did.  Even if the Patriots have drafted an outside linebacker early, the team has Tully Banta-Cain, Jermaine Cunningham, Eric Moore, and Rob Ninkovich already atop the depth chart.  No rookie would have just stepped in and played.  They wouldn't have been relied on, just as with all of the other positions the Patriots addressed in the draft.  The reason the Patriots never selected a pass rusher is because the board just never fell that way.  And I do not know about you, but I am not one to question Bill Belichick's draft board.

Bottom line: Patriots fans should be happy that the rookies will have the time to develop and not be forced into any major roles early.  For many teams, the opposite is true.  While that strategy seemed to work for the Patriots in 2010, it's risky business.  The fact that Bill Belichick has the confidence to draft simply on best player available is a testament to the current quality of the Patriots starters.

Poll
Should the Patriots have drafted defensive front seven help earlier in the 2011 NFL Draft?
Yes, it was a clear need and the Patriots whiffed
302 votes
No, Bill Belichick stayed true to his draft board and it turned out the way it did
391 votes
No opinion
37 votes

730 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 46 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Maybe I should have said "impartial" or "not sure what to think"

Think of it for people who want to take the easy way out of a vote

by Greg Knopping on May 2, 2011 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

PATS have the players they need

I fault coaching for the post season loss against the Jets.

The PATS were out coached. Play calling was inflexible, D-calls were either wroing, or the execution was poor. This is not a talent issue. They have plenty of talent. They lost because they were out coached, and I suspect some execution issues factored into the Jet’s loss as well.

They have Ty Warren and Boden returning. Those two, alone, elevate the defense significantly. Spikes, Cunningham, Pryor, Deaderick, and Brace are a year older in the system. Fletcher, More, Nink, Guyton, Meriweather, and Chung are more seasoned.

Let’s hope Price plays this year. I’d like to see Price and Tate share downs with Branch in a transition year (Branch 50%, Tate, 30%, Price 20%). I hope we see more of Edelman in the slot sharing snaps with Welker (Welker 70%). They need to mix in these other talents to help with the deception and to keep players fresh, hungry, and learning.

Talent is not in need. Execution and PLAY CALLING will determine the fate of this team.

by WinningisEverything on May 3, 2011 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

the players came out flat and didn't execute

that isn’t the coaches fault. nice try though

by pats4life on May 3, 2011 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Playcalling was fine.

Running the ball over and over – fine. What was not fine was running the clock down on each play. Brady was clearly out of it, because he’s never made that kind of mistake before.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 3, 2011 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

before the Jets game?

He was rattled and had the foot issue. Reminiscent of Black Sunday, now that I think of it…

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 3, 2011 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

hurts me just as much.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 3, 2011 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know

but nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

by pats4life on May 3, 2011 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Flat

That’s a coaching flaw in the preparation leading up to the game.

Either the players felt uninspired by the preparation, or the lead up was perceived as “routine” thus lacking a sense of urgency imparted by the coaching staff onto the players.

by WinningisEverything on May 4, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

have you ever played sports?

sometimes you go into a game and just don’t have the usual motivation. Tom Brady’s lack of intensity? That is all on Tom Brady. That isn’t on Belichick.

by pats4life on May 4, 2011 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Individuals are accountable for their own performance. I completely agree.

I just sensed an overall flatness as you pointed out, and that seems more to do with game preparation. If the team, in mass, is pumped up, it will usually elevate the few who might be lacking the intensity.

I keep coming back to the endless fan requests for an OLB: a pass rusher. They have Cunningham who should be far better than ANYONE that could have been drafted this year. He is the pass rusher. Add back Ty Warren and Bodden, and they both directly impact the pass rush.

As for the draft, Solder and the two RB’s were great picks. The Morris and Fred Taylor days are done. Neal is retired, and Light should be kept for one more season. Kaczur should be kept. I’d like to see a rotation on the O-line, like the D-line, to keep guys fresh, healthier, and motivated. I also like the RB by committee. It offers unique running styles and play calling diversity. It negates the one injury we’re doomed scenario.

by WinningisEverything on May 4, 2011 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

as far as the pieces on this team

and the coach, our team has playoffs written all over them. They’ve only missed the playoffs twice in Brady’s tenure, and one of those years he went down week 1. When you come out flat, the coach can only do so much. It is up to players to take it upon themselves to get their butts back in the game, and their brains too. Had Brady shown some emotion he used in that Steelers game they probably would have won despite the incredibly crappy play. Instead he was mum, as was everyone else. With a young team like the Patriots, the veterans need to take it upon themselves to do that job. They didn’t.

by pats4life on May 4, 2011 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

It looks like we're forgetting how amazing the Pats looked in the first two O drives (minus the pick and the dropped TD)

They came out fired up. They looked fantastic in the first drive – who thought it was going to be another 46-3 beat-down when they moved 50 yards?

And then Brady got knocked out of rhythm and things went wrong… but that’s not coaching, nor pre-game motivation. Those two drives showed they went onto the field ready to play.

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit

by Comedic.Sans on May 5, 2011 3:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I concur!

/Forgot this is a SB blog!
I meant to write ‘THIS’

Lewis Hamilton~ 2011 F1 Champion!!!
Don't cut your locks Tom Terrific!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on May 5, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think a component

of BB’s reasoning would be the current defensive roster. 2010 featured a large injection of young players. Wouldn’t it add to the degree of coaching difficulty to add still more?

I think most folks know how i feel about the Pats need of a pass rusher. I feel that BB does not VALUE pass rushing or pass rushers. There are a number of reasons for this fact, none of which i can even guess at, But, i suggest that everyone let go of “needing” a pass rusher who gets lots of sacks because, the coach of team doesn’t value either.

Belichick does not commit his defensive personnel to chasing opposing QB’s. if you averaged the number of JETS who drop into coverage VS the number of PATS who drop into coverage it would be easier to perceive the trend. Ryan is a gambler, Belichick is not.
2010 JETS got a lot of sacks because this is what their coach wants. 2010 Pats ended up with a lot of picks (#1 in NFL) because more Patriots were dropping into passing lanes and catching them.

Belichick watched a very defensive talent laden draft go by for a reason…he thinks he has all the young defensive talent he needs. The Pats are one of the, if not the youngest teams in the league. Why add more guys trying to get up to speed?

I agree with you on the break down except for Solder…they think he can start sooner rather than later. btw thank you for your posts I enjoy reading them.

by tstorey1 on May 2, 2011 7:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank you for your thoughts

I believe that Nate Solder could start from day one. But my point is just that if the team brings back Matt Light, there won’t be any pressure for him to start. In other words, the Patriots will not be relying on him as a starter. That being said, if he were to unseat Light from his starting role by the end of the year, that would simply be a testament to his progression.

by Greg Knopping on May 2, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if Light leaves

We still have Kaczur who could be put in at RT and Vollmer moved to LT if need be. Worse case scenario for the Pats is Mankins and Light both go. In which case plug Solder in at LT, Kaczur at LG, Koppen, Connely, or Wendell C, Cannon or Connely RG, Vollmer RT. Then make sure you run the heck out of the ball and quick throws the first couple of weeks while D.Scar. coaches them up.

by BenCoatesFTW on May 2, 2011 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Koppen, Connolly and Kaczur inside?

But I liked Tom Brady :(

If knowledge is power and power corrupts...

by satsunada on May 3, 2011 5:14 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

THIS.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on May 3, 2011 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

/too much?

by pats4life on May 3, 2011 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Might be why they drafted another QB...

No Guards = need backup QBs…

/shudder

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit

by Comedic.Sans on May 4, 2011 4:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Keep the line

I expect the entire O-line (less Neal) to return. I just think the PATS and Mankins will iron out their differences to both parties satisfaction, and Light will gladly take a local contract to stay put here in the area. Solder, Kaczur, and Connely will create a nice rotation.

I think the weak link is Koppen. He is too small or not strong enough to contain these mammoth NG’s. I wish the PATS had drafted a huge center last year or this year so he could be groomed under Koppen’s guidance. A center in today’s NFL needs to be around 215lbs and be impressively strong. Koppen’s size and strength no longer apply.

by WinningisEverything on May 5, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

MIKE BREWSTER 2012!!!!!!!!!

Non Sibi Sed Patriae ;I bleed Scarlet and Grey...A Buckeye for Life.
In Bill We Trust.

by NinjaZX6R on May 5, 2011 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

And you didn't even mention about this whole lock out situation

Rookies this year have been robbed their invaluable time to get to know coaches and playbooks throughout OTA, which makes even harder for them to contribute from Week 1

by cruelangelT on May 2, 2011 7:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I sure want Solder to start day 1

and if he isn’t ready for left tackle play him at right tackle and put Sebastian Vollmer at left tackle

by pats4life on May 2, 2011 7:57 PM EDT reply actions  

That was my only with the Solder selection, he's not very versatile

I see him as a pure LT. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, I just sort of think it limits the Patriots in what they can do at certain spots. I don’t see Solder on the right side

by Greg Knopping on May 2, 2011 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

BB called him a left tackle when they drafted him

Optimistic me says: jack of all trades = master of none. So maybe what he lacks in versatility will be made up for in sheer beastness at LT when he steps in there.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on May 2, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Thoughtful article Greg

Rookie mini-camp would have been held on May 6th, without the lockout. Here is what Belichick had to say at the start of the session last year:

“It’s kind of the ultimate contrast from the last game of the year, when you’ve been working with the guys [on] game plans, [and on] real sophisticated stuff. This is kind of the other end of the spectrum and [that] is what we will build toward,” Belichick said.
.
“It’s good to have some new faces out there and its fun as a coach to be working on some fundamentals and some real basic things, which they all need. It’s a good reminder for how far some of our veterans have come and hopefully where these guys will progress to – some of these spots. It’s a long way to go. One step at a time, and we’re underway.”

A long lockout could cripple teams that need to have rookies at key positions contribute right away. The Patriots aren’t in a bad position at all in that regard – as long as everyone keeps on working out on their own.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on May 2, 2011 8:03 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Sophomore slump anyone?

i hope 09 and 10 draft classes don’t fall prey to that phenomenon…else it will b a long (short most likely) season.

See, I'm a man of simple tastes. I like football and models and money. Do you know what all these things have in common? ...don't stare at me_i don't know either!

by kwakuvi on May 2, 2011 10:28 PM EDT reply actions  

We could suffer a sophomore slump

But honestly, if we fielded the same team as last year that went 14-2, would we not still be front runner for winning the Superbowl. Especially if you include the players lost to IR before the 2010 season even started. T.Warren instantly upgrades the Dline. Now the remaining cast of characters only has to fill in at RDE. And imagine Bodden/McCourty over McCourty/Arrington. Instant upgrade from the 10th best defense in the league(which was actually better than 10th if you only look at the last half of the season). And our offense…the league best….can’t see it any worse with Gronk, Herndo, and Woody with a season under their belts especially if Mankins plays from day one.
The folk who complain that this team “NEEDS” this or that are the sort that would complain their Ferrari needed 5 more HP to put it over the top.

by BenCoatesFTW on May 2, 2011 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I reserve any large judgement until we see them in action for the 2nd year.

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on May 3, 2011 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I have to admit I was surprised

that the Pats didn’t use any of their early picks on front seven talent, even if it meant trading up a bit to get someone they liked. They certainly had enough picks to play with. Having said that, my guess is that BB really didn’t think the value was there.

by OldJetsFanatic on May 3, 2011 3:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm still convinced that's why they sounded out a potential trade with the Browns...

“What would it take for me to get up to you [and draft Aldon Smith]?”

Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit

by Comedic.Sans on May 4, 2011 4:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Travis LaBoy is a free agent…

by quadruple option on May 5, 2011 3:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe