Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

21-28: A Possible Unheralded Reason for the Early Conclusion to the Patriot’s 2010- 2011 Season

Stephen_gostkowski_large_medium

via cdn3.sbnation.com

I don’t think it is a stretch to say that the end of this past season, when our beloved Patriots lost to the brash trash-talking New York Jets and their rotund maestro Rex Ryan, was nothing less than devastating.  It is hard on us fans when our team- its future so full of expectations- falls flat on their face in the most important game of the season.  This loss was especially hard.  We laughed at Mr. Ryan’s expense as Wes Welker slyly made references to the Gang Green coach’s personal “foot”age becoming a hot topic in the media-centric sports world with which we’ve become inundated; Welker, a normal beacon of professionalism, heavily coded his speech, not knowing that it would be dissected over the course of the next few days again and again by the media and national sports pundits.  Despite knowing better (hello, 2007 Giants ruining our perfect season), we used past results to gauge future expectations, and this oversight came back with a vengeance.

 After New England’s 45-3 destruction of the Jets in Week 13, in which the 1st seed in the AFC east, a split of the season series, and a possible guaranteed playoff birth was on the line, there was seemingly no doubt that the opening playoff game was all but a wrap.   Our high powered offense had managed no less than 31 points in the eight weeks leading up to the playoffs, and held opponents to a touchdown or less in half of those games.  Their fearless leader, the long-locked MVP Thomas Edward Patrick Brady, Jr. was on a pace for his second Most Valuable Player award as he completed the season with an unheard of 36-4 touchdown to interception ratio and 300+ consecutive passes without a turnover to finish the season. The Pats were primed, and we were ROLLING.  Finishing the season at 14-2, most had us early favorites for a Super Bowl- the fourth of Brady’s tenure, and the one that would tie him with Joe Montana- possibly catapulting him into place as the best quarterback of all time.

Then, it happened. A miserable touchdown loss to our hated rivals in a game that was completely uncharacteristic of the regular season Pats- filled with untimely turnovers, mental mistakes, and the man known in these parts as “Hoodie” being “outcoached” by his bombastic counterpart.  Fingers were pointed and metaphorical (in some cases, actual) tears were shed.  There were many plays left on the field, and three lauded as interchangeable scapegoats- Brady’s first drive interception (his first in 338 passes), tight end Alge Crumpler’s untimely drop in the end zone, and safety Patrick Chung’s botched fake punt conversion on a critical possession late in the second quarter while the game sat at 7-3.  The Jets subsequently scored, going into the long intermission up a surmountable 14-3.  All these plays definitively contributed to the end result, and each has it’s own merit in the argument for paramount factor in the loss.  However, I believe there is a little-discussed factor that came into play in our loss- due to the absence of a player that never set foot in Gillette Stadium that day.

Star-divide

The big-footed University of Memphis product Stephen Gostkowski had been taken for granted in the minds of Patriot’s fanatics until his untimely demise in the shocking midseason loss to the surging Cleveland Browns- a team that rode high on the shoulders of the surprisingly excellent season of the “other Peyton”, Hillis.  Hillis finished the game with 184 rushing yards and 220 all purpose yards; respectively stout numbers against a New England defense led by the mammoth Vince Wilfork that had started establishing a reputation as run-stuffers.  With the exception of a surprisingly bad start for Stephen in the early goings of the 2010 season, he had put together a 100% conversion rate for extra points and a 67.9 yard average on kickoffs.  The midseason loss of Gostkowski forced the Patriot’s to acquire an aging Shayne Graham, and subsequently place Stephen on Injured Reserve due to a torn quadriceps muscle.  While Graham possessed fantastic numbers in terms of accuracy through the goal posts (12-12 for field goals, and 35-37 for extra points), the differential in leg strength to Gostkowski was evident: Shayne finished with a season average of 61.4 yards on kickoffs, and recorded a paltry 2 touchbacks in 57 kickoff attempts.  Contrast that with Stephen’s kickoff numbers- while he only surpassed Shayne by 6.5 yards in average distance (67.9), he had kicked for 15 touchbacks in 42 attempts.  In Bill Belichick’s system, consistency is the greatest asset a player can possess; with Gostkowski, the Hooded One could model his defensive system on his opposition frequently initiating possessions on the 20 yard line.  With Graham, there was no such consistency, and the bend-but-not-break defense of this past decade’s Patriots suffered as a result.  We didn’t see the full realization of this suffering until it mattered most- when it played a part in our playoff demise.

 Shayne’s average kickoff yardage on the day was 44.8 yards, and that number is obviously skewed unfavorably by his onside attempts late in the game- both failed to convert, and respectively resulted in New York’s possession at New England’s 25 and 43 yard lines..  However, let us examine the starting position for the Jets before we were relegated to onside kicks- NYJ 32, NYJ 40, and NYJ 25. Rex Ryan wisely chose to use the swift Antonio Cromartie as a kickoff returner for the game, and the strategy paid dividends- as the Jets began these three possessions post-kickoff nearly 13 yards beyond the 20 yard mark set for touchbacks.  Strangely, of the three actual kickoff attempts (non-onside), only the opening position of the NYJ 25 resulted in a touchdown- still though, one has to wonder in such a hotly contested game, could we have seen a different result had Gostkowski been kicking from the tee?

 The numerical results from this inquiry don’t fully support the basis of the theory; however, we have to realize that sometimes, numbers don’t tell the whole story.  The master game-planner in Belichick often designs coverages and defensive schemes for the game before the clock even starts running.  In this game of inches, did the absence of his ability to rely on touchbacks alter his efforts to design a gameplan?  Did the lack of Stephen Gostkowski’s big kickoffs have just as large an effect on the end result as Brady’s interception, Crumpler’s drop, and Chung’s failed conversion?

Poll
Did Stephen Gostkowski's absence contribute to the 2010-2011 Patriots first round playoff loss?
Yes
26 votes
No
39 votes
Is it free agency yet?
16 votes

81 votes | Poll has closed

The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.

Comment 14 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting take

However, I would argue that the mental and physical errors including the ones mentioned in your article played a much larger role than the field position after the four Patriot kickoffs. Especially considering the fact that most of the NYJ points were scored after turnovers, 3-and-out failed drives, and of course losing the ball on downs just before the end of the half. That is really what led to the better field position more so than the kickoffs.

by Oughat on Jul 5, 2011 5:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Simple.

The 2010 defense wasn’t good enough to win a game on its own. When the offense struggled, the defense couldn’t overcome the differences between the Pats and the other team.

Happened in week 2, happened vs Cleveland, and it happened in the playoffs.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Jul 5, 2011 7:41 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Very solid evaluation.

And I totally agree. The defense could support the offense, it could keep the team in the game, but it couldn’t be asked to win the game. That might change next year, but last year it could not be an expectation of the young defense.

by Richard Hill on Jul 5, 2011 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t agree. The defense held up against Miami even when the offense struggled to score points in the first game. And the defense showed up again against the Vikings to help out. It just wasn’t meant for the Patriots to win the Super Bowl last season. I don’t feel that way this season though.

by Patriots12 on Jul 6, 2011 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right.

What happened in our last 3 playoff losses(including the superbowl) was that our offense was not doing anything. The defense can only do so much. Although… i believe Ninko was out against the jets game, and apparently he is good against the run.

However, its tough for a defense to win the game when the offense keeps getting 3 and outs, and putting the defense back on the field (like the raiders of the years before last season. the offense kept failing and eventually the defense was too tired).

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Jul 6, 2011 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly. And really the youth showed a bit. That and the fact that the running game needed to produce when it mattered needed.

by Patriots12 on Jul 6, 2011 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, there's probably more to it than that.

But they weren’t the 03/04 defense, that’s for sure.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Jul 6, 2011 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I definitely think they're capable of saving games...

…and they’re able to keep the team in the game. But they couldn’t be counted on to win games. Maybe next year, but last year they supplemented the offense- it’s wasn’t a balanced relationship.

by Richard Hill on Jul 7, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brady had bad games....The Ravens game was over in the first quarter

In a playoff game there is little room for error. If Brady is playing well there is room for error. Clearly, no room in either of the last two playoff games.

Jets VS Steelers Ben was terrible. You could say he played as poorly as Brady had played the week before. Ben had one thing Brady didn’t. Mendenhall. This guy played a huge game and bailed out the Steelers. Don’t look at the box score please. Watch the games.

Despite rumors to the contrary, the Pats running game is more “complimentary” than central to the game plan. If you disagree look at the play calling. The coordinator does not call on the running backs to bail him out….because they can’t.

Ask yourself…does ANY opposing defensive coordinator spend five extra sessions trying to figure out how to stop BJGE and Danny? It isn’t about stats…it is about who you go to in crunch time. The defense played well enough to win both games. Tom just didn’t have it. What the Heck Josh Beckett threw batting practice for the entire 2010 season….it happens.

by tstorey1 on Jul 7, 2011 3:16 PM EDT reply actions  

The defense didn't play well enough to win the Ravens game.

You must be forgetting Ray Rice putting up a thousand yards that day.

And against the Jets, when we finally get back into the game following an 8 minute TD drive (all runs, down by 10 – not a problem, but at least go hurry-up in that situation, don’t take 39 seconds to get the play off, Tommy and BoB!!!!!!!!), they give up an 80 yard TD drive in a minute. The one time they really needed a stop, and they gave up a 60 yard play. A poor day for the entire team, and they were still only a couple of plays away from winning.

As long ad Brady’s QB, no-one’s planning on stopping the run game.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Jul 8, 2011 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

You must be forgetting Ray Rice putting up a thousand yards that day.

Dont forget the OL not giving brady enough protection(remember the sack fumble by suggs) and brady also didnt do so well either.

And against the Jets, when we finally get back into the game following an 8 minute TD drive (all runs, down by 10 – not a problem, but at least go hurry-up in that situation, don’t take 39 seconds to get the play off, Tommy and BoB!!!!!!!!), they give up an 80 yard TD drive in a minute. The one time they really needed a stop, and they gave up a 60 yard play. A poor day for the entire team, and they were still only a couple of plays away from winning.

The defense was in the game A LOT to tell the truth. There was a lot of 3 and outs by the pats offense that put the defense on the field. But yeah, they screwed up there, but there were plenty of screwups by the offense as well.

And our running game was very good last year. hell, we ran all over the steelers (who at the time did not allow over 75 yards in the running game). They are not household names, but they are effective. they werent against the jets, but our overall offense was not either. =/

This isnt a blame everything on the offense type of thing. im just saying to not put all the blame on the defense. there were other factors that went in the jets favor that the defense had no control over.

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Jul 9, 2011 2:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just a poor game.

By everyone.
And it was a fumble on a fake punt that was the difference.

Still, I’d say the Packers would have won the Super Bowl anyway, unless Brady was able to score 40 second half points.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on Jul 9, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

lolz

its the nfl. Anything can happen. XD

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Jul 9, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe