Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Patriots Beat Themselves in 34-31 Loss to Bills

If you were expecting me to offer some type of reasonable answer to how the Patriots lost to the Buffalo Bills this afternoon, you will be disappointed, because I have absolutely no idea what I just witnessed (although, I will attempt to give you a thorough explanation).

The Patriots offense, despite numerous injuries to starters, got off to a really hot start.  Tom Brady was in top form, completing his first eight passes.  The opening drive was capped off with a Brady to Welker touchdown, giving the Patriots a 7-0 lead.  Kyle Arrington then intercepted Ryan Fitzpatrick on the Bills' first drive, and Tom Brady used a combination of Wes Welker and Rob Gronkowski to help the team take a quick 14-0 lead.

As the half continued, the Patriots extended their lead to 21-0 after Brady's second touchdown pass to Rob Gronkowski.  At this point, the Patriots were beating the Bills in the turnover battle 2 to 0, and were moving the ball at will.  But then everything unraveled.

After the Bills went down the field and put their first points on the board with just under two minutes to play, Tom Brady marched the Patriots offense straight down the field.  However, while in the red zone, Brady threw a pass to the flat to Danny Woodhead.  The pass was slightly high, and Woodhead tipped the ball in the air, allowing Bryan Scott of the Bills to make an acrobatic interception.  Ryan Fitzpatrick then led the Bills to a late field goal drive.  Instead of going into the half up 28-7 and in control, the Patriots were up just 11 with a 21-10 lead.

The Patriots continued to unravel as the second half began, on Brady's first pass, he thew another interception on a pass intended for Chad Ochocinco that was undercut by Leodis McKelvin.  The Bills offense took advantage of the great field position, and cut the lead to 21-17 with a three yard Fitzpatrick to Scott Chandler touchdown.

But once again, the Patriots showed they could move the ball at will.  Within six plays, Brady had the Pats at the Bills' 13 yardline.  But after two Danny Woodhead runs and a completion short of the first on third down, the Patriots had to settle for three points and a 24-17 lead.  Sensing a theme?  The Patriots left points on the board all day on Sunday.

As the Patriots marched into field goal range at the end of the third quarter, the team had a killer holding call on a BenJarvus Green-Ellis run that killed the drive.

On the team's next drive, a Wes Welker 19 yard end around put the Patriots deep in Bills territory.  Three plays later, however, Tom Brady forced a throw to Rob Gronkowski down the seam that was intercepted by the Bills' George Wilson.  Patriots points left on the board count: 24.

The Bills took back over - and the Patriots really started to kill themselves defensively.  After a questionable roughing the passer call on Kyle Love, Ryan Fitzpatrick completed a long bomb down the field to Donald Jones who had burned Leigh Bodden down the sideline.  But on the next play, Ryan Fitzpatrick made a bad decision and thew another bomb to the end zone in double coverage as pressure was applied.  Josh Barrett intercepted the pass, but a Sergio Brown pass interference not only negated the turnover, but gave the Bills the ball at the one yard line.  Fred Jackson punched the ball into the end zone on the next play to tie the game at 24.

Rest of the recap, and an explanation of what happened after the jump!

Star-divide

The Patriots first play of the next drive was just the ultimate example of how everything went wrong for New England this afternoon.  Tom Brady threw the ball on a routine crossing route to Julian Edelman.  However, the pass deflected off the helmet of an unaware Marcell Dareus.  It was intercepted by Drayton Florence and returned to the house to give the Bills a 31-24 lead.  There really isn't an explanation for these back to back plays, but I think it left every fan in Patriots nation in complete shock.

With their backs against the wall, Tom Brady then led the Patriots on a long, grinding drive that ultimately led to a touchdown, and possibly a few heart attacks as well.  The drive was sparked by three straight Stevan Ridley touches (1 reception for 8 yards, 2 carries for 22 yards).  Two plays later, Tom Brady threw a deep pass to Chad Ochocinco down the right sideline.  The ball was placed perfectly, but Ochocinco dropped the pass.  It hit him square in the hands.  In the game that was supposed to be Chad's "coming out" party, he was pretty much nowhere to be seen.  Thankfully for the Patriots, Tom Brady was able to rebound.  Rather, I should probably say Wes Welker.

Welker had what was arguably his greatest career game.  He came down with 16 catches for 216 yards.  On the Patriots' final touchdown drive, Welker came down with Tom Brady's final four completions.  On a fourth and goal from the six yard line, Brady found Welker in the end zone for the tying score.  Despite having left 24 points on the board and committing four turnovers in the final 32 minutes of the game, the Patriots offense punched the ball into the end zone in the crucial moment.

But at the crucial moment defensively, things fell apart.  In three plays, the Bills went all the way down the field.  I'm not sure what happened after a Fred Jackson would be touchdown was reversed (ball placed at the one).  I have no idea why the Patriots were charged a timeout.  I have no idea what happened on that final sequence of events.  But what I do know is that the Patriots deserved to lose this game - as they did when Ryan Lindell hit a 28 yard field goal as time expired to give the Bills the 34-31 victory.

I feel like my recap highlighted most of the main reasons why the Patriots imploded in this game, but I'll recap them here:

  • Team never established a running game
  • Patriots lost the turnover battle with Tom Brady's four interceptions
  • The Patriots were killed by penalties on both sides of the ball, a total of 8 for 93 yards.
  • The Patriots couldn't rush the passer - at all
  • Straight bad luck - sometimes, as they say, sh*t happens.

In the long-term, this loss isn't the end of the world.  99 times out of 100, the Patriots are going to win this game.  Tom Brady won't throw four interceptions again this season.  The odds that the Patriots have this many mental mistakes are very slim.  I doubt that the offense will leave that many points on the board again this year.  However, this game did highlight many of the Patriots inefficiencies.  For one, it showed that the team needs to establish some balance on the offensive side of the ball.  Second, it showed that there are some serious issues on the defensive side of the ball.  These are things that need to be fixed going forward.  The Patriots can't expect Tom Brady to throw for 400 yards and four touchdowns every game.

While the Patriots certainly "beat themselves" in today's game against the Bills, I'm not trying to discredit what the Bills did against the Patriots today (although my roommate, a Bills fan, running around like an idiot yelling "Fitzmagic! Fitzmagic! Fitzmagic!" has caused me to resent the Bills in some fashion), they were impressive.  The play calling in the second half was really fantastic.  Fred Jackson and Ryan Fitzpatrick are real pros.  The Bills look like they will be competitive late into this season.  Nonetheless, the atypical mistakes the Patriots made throughout the final 32 minutes of the game were simply frustrating.

This is definitely the type of game you want to move on from quickly.  The Patriots play the Raiders next week.

Comment 241 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Double covered Dion all game..

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

*The Bills double covered Dion all game..

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only post I'm making

I have stayed away but Marima is awesome with links so she is THE best news source for Pats stuff and it kept me around lurking. Don’t expect anything after this either.

2 things about today that need mentioning (one very obvious):
The refs won this game for the Bills. Those 3 phantom penalties for 46 yards (including negating an INT) were absolutely preposterous. “Hands to the face” = WRONG. “Illegal contact” = what contact?!. “Pass interference” = Brown was looking at the ball and the Bill ran into him AND it was short and uncatchable. Then, that was topped by the final bills drive where they stalled calling a replay for like 10 seconds (even though no TD was called), reviewed it and then apparently wanted to give the Bills a full playclock and restart the game clock forcing Bill to take a timeout arguing (i’m assuming on this, I’d LOVE to hear the explanation). Then AFTER that, there was a possible fumbled snap where offsides was called on Logan Mankins.. who was on the bench… with no real effort at correction. Give it to the Bills for playing pretty solid and getting good bounces but c’mon.

2. Playcalling – Every play was a dead giveaway because you only had one TE. You could literally watch him and know where the play was going the whole game because we only had 1 TE on the roster. No fakes, no play action magic, the Pats were hamstrung by injuries and strange roster decisions. BOB called a damn good game to get anything going at all and I can’t blame Brady too badly for those INT’s.. he was basically throwing at 8 or 9 people every time.

by satsunada on Sep 25, 2011 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

I hear you on the ref problem...

and this isn’t the first week that there have been horrible calls. This week and previous weeks, in the Pats game and in many other games. I get the feeling that during the lockout while players were practicing for the upcoming season, the (professional?) refs were just sitting around until the season started. It may be a real problem if this doesn’t improve.

by PatsFan13 on Sep 25, 2011 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Patsfan(look at philly;s game)

Canty Nailed vick with a Helmet to His face mask and NO Call.REF;s are too me giving the “calls” to the under-dogs…

But with Pats OCHO Needs to go…any other REC would Have caught that perfectly thrown ball..But it “slipped” threw His Hands talking about one at the Goal-line….

say what you all want BUT..they Need to bring Back Moss!!!..also why didnt they Bring In “Mills” from the PS?…..

and when is this Price Kid going to play? they say has a Hamstring since what the 3rd preseason Game..Yet they Cut “Gronks” because of His Hamstring injury?…

BB latest moves dont make sense!!!!!!!….Def line too me needs Help…the DB;s need HELP!!!!

by Jack2466 on Sep 25, 2011 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

By rule, every scoring play is reviewed this year.

by tpsabres on Sep 25, 2011 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except that they HAVEN"T been doing so.

That was announced as the new policy, but the fact is, they have blatantly NOT reviewed several key scoring calls this season.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

It doesn’t mean that they go to the “hood” but they look upstairs and decide if there is anything to make them think that the ruling on the field might be wrong and then they call for a review. So it is reviewed by someone, just not always the ref on the field.

Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz

by bluecollarbuffalo on Sep 25, 2011 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

This was discussed in detail on one of the sports shows this week

there have been atleast 3 or 4 TD plays this season which screamed for review and at least a couple of which probably should have been over-turned, but there was not a peep from the officials.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

The goal is to review every touchdown play without the viewer noticing the difference in time

Every play is reviewed upstairs. If the replay assistant upstairs thinks that a play warrants further review, he contacts the crew on the field. In that case, the ref goes under the hood for an all-out review.

by Greg Knopping on Sep 26, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

refs were a tale of two halves

In the first half, there were a lot of questionable calls against the bills, but in the second half, the calls went the other way, which kinda defines the way the game went went. and i believe that the timeout was charged because it looked bellicheck was actually on the field of play getting an explanation from the ref for too long. but i do agree that the refs this year in general have been really bad, i don’t usually see the penalties since i am not looking for them, but i saw a lot of uncalled penalties for both sides, and several of the calls that were made were questionable.

by EskimoAlva on Sep 25, 2011 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

The refs were bad for both teams, and had a big part in the Bills spotting the Pats 21 points.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Sep 25, 2011 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree with this analysis

I’m a Bills fan, and I don’t think that any of us are fooled into believing that Buffalo is the more talented team. 99 times out of a 100 is a bit of an exaggeration (but I’m assuming that’s a Little Giants reference), but we know the pats are still the team to beat in the AFC East. I take some issue with the “beat themselves” line, as the Bills kind of “beat themselves” in the first half with some questionable play-calling but were good enough/lucky enough to overcome it. I believe the are entitled to some props for that. Good game Pats, see you in week 16, hopefully still playing meaningful football!

by inthegaddadavida on Sep 25, 2011 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Even though this one hurts

Congrats to the Bills on a strong game and good season so far.

by PatsFan13 on Sep 25, 2011 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good game.

Obviously, I was wishing for a different outcome but congrats to the Bills. I’ve been saying they’re up and coming and knew this game was gonna be tough. See you in week 16.

Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.
1 Cor 13:13

by thirteen on Sep 25, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with most of this, especially the part about the Bills “beating themselves” during the first half just like the Pats beat themselves in the second. And the refs were certainly instrumental in the Bills’ spotting the Pats 21 points.They were bad for both teams.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Sep 25, 2011 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

This game just plain hurt.

Two positives though, Bill will use this as a great motivational tool. And the Jets lost(game is still on, but basically over). Defense needs to get healthy and TFB won’t repeat this performance anytime soon. We’ll be fine.

I'm not drunk, I'm...... Okay, I'm drunk.

by wetfeet on Sep 25, 2011 7:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

We need an embarrassing performance to get motivated? We really aren't a SB team if that's the case!

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

First part is correct.
Embarassing is 31-0. 34-31 is frustrating

The second is embarrassing also considering we were up 21-0 and managed to lose.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 27, 2011 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

for those wondering about the second timeout called

i believe that once the call was overturned the clock would have continued to run, so bb was stopping the clock

by Stephen M on Sep 25, 2011 7:21 PM EDT reply actions  

^This.

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

The defensive line wasn't bad.

We got a lot of 3 and outs from them. But we have some enormous problems in the secondary… especially at safety.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Sep 25, 2011 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I am glad we lost to the Bills and not the Jets

Also: Brady had a stinker of a game and only lost by 3
Sanchez had a career high game and lost by 10

If that makes anyone feel better

by Chari on Sep 25, 2011 7:25 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

@furiousd

this might make You feel even better “Sanchez” was sacked 4 and 1/2 times.ended up with having to wear a face-shield to protect the nasty beating His face took on a few sacks!!!

I think the Bills -Pats re match in FOXBORO will be for 1st place..I see jets falling to 3rd place..

But I look at it this way..we lost thus ended a 15 game win streak..now when Bills comes to Foxboro we can begin a New Streak!!!!

BUT!!! BB needs to address that secondary…and Haynesworth looks like a injury waiting to happen

But “Chad” needs to go!!!!!..perfectly thrown Pass and He doesnt catch it!!!!!!….say what You all want BUT..they need a deep rec, and Chad isnt it!!!!!….Price has been out since what, the 3rd preseason game with a “hammy”!!!!….

Deon was a No-Show today….Bring back Moss.so he “takes” play-off at least if He was the one rec;ing that Ball brady threw He would have caught it….

CUT CHAD…..too me he is useless!!!!!!!…

by Jack2466 on Sep 25, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, I watched the Raiders game

    It was a helluva good game. For a moment it looked like the Jets were going to run away with it, as they were up 17 -7, and Raiders had done nothing since their first drive. Then suddenly everything swung the Riaders way(it was somewhat similar to Bills-Pats). In the second half the D-line started to get constant pressure, and Sanchez was getting pummeled – a possible broken nose. For a drive or two, he was rattled, but I give him credit for getting it together and making it interesting down the stretch. Made some nice throws late in the game. But, the Raiders were the better team, and even though Jets fans are still whining about the Cromartie penalties, of which there were many, replay showed that all but one were legit, and even the one was not terrible.

by furiousd on Sep 26, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bill Belichick's time out:

The clock would have kept running so he had to call a time out. He was upset because Fred Jackson made it into the end zone (before they overturned the call) with 1:56 or so left on the clock. However, the next play happened with 1:43 on the clock. Belichick was upset over the fact that :13 seconds passed on the clock without him having the ability to call a time out and stop the clock.

by Richard Hill on Sep 25, 2011 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

That's what I thought...

…When it pours it rains, I guess..

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

*Rains it pours...

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

We only had two options on offense today

Welker and Gronk. Obviously, they keyed into that. Where were Branch, Ocho, and Edelman? Until Aaron is back defenses are going to clamp down like they did in ’09 when all we had was Wes and Randy.

Another bright spot is Stevan Ridley looking like the best early-down RB option on the team. Limited touches for him, but he made the most of them. If he gets more playing time the running game might get us somewhere.

I’ve defended Ocho, and I think he deserves credit for working hard and trying to get acclimated here. But he should be very worried if he repeats some of his mistakes. I don’t think it’s out of the question to think the team might look at his production at the bye week and make a decision about keeping him. This was his game to break out and he really disappointed.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 25, 2011 7:44 PM EDT reply actions  

And those two "only" options were almost enough to do it without some bad bounces for you.

A lot of us realize we got pretty lucky catching the Pats so banged up and missing so many players. You guys are still the team to beat in the division.

This was big for us to end “The Streak”. It’s nice to know the football gods don’t shart on us every week now.

All said and done, amazing game that was exciting to the very end. Now, let’s all go out and beat those irritating and arrogant Jests until you extract your revenge on us on New Years Day.

"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop

by lonestar_ak on Sep 25, 2011 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Welker and Gronk were incredible yesterday, no doubt about that

It is frustrating, as a Pats fan, to think about all the turnovers from Brady and realize that if just one of them didn’t happen – considering the one late in the 1st half and the pick six were tipped – the game may have ended differently.

Buffalo played a great game though, so credit to you guys. And not that losing didn’t sting, but I was glad to see the Jets drop a game as well.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 26, 2011 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oddly, the Bills consistently 'gave' routes to both Gronk and Welker all day

It is almost as if they were so sure that the Brady was tired of throwing to Welker and Gronk and were trying to anticipate his next play going to Branch or Ocho! So Tom kept throwing to Welker and Gronk anyway.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

@JeffyB

Chad by all rights should have caught that perfectly thrown pass…I mean it went right thru HIS hands..no excuse for not catching it..NONE!!!…No wonder Brady Has NO FAITH in HIM….But why didnt they use “lawfirm” more?….too me they hardly have what I call a good run game this season..

I mean last yr we used alot of “woody” in screens….or out of backfield this YR not seeing it how come?

But if this def..doesnt get all there problems figured out.Pats arnt going far on post season…NO PASS RUSH!!!..what happened to that Pass-rush we all saw in that 1st pre-season game?.was that just a fluke?….

by Jack2466 on Sep 25, 2011 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's too soon to compare Chad to Galloway

But if he doesn’t start becoming a real part of this offense in the next 2-3 weeks he should seriously start to worry about his roster spot. Especially if Taylor Price gets on the field.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 26, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fun Fact:

Gary Guyton was in Fred Jackson’s zone when he caught and ran the ball to the goal line at the end of the game.

by Richard Hill on Sep 25, 2011 7:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Grumble grumble

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Available Safeties???

Darren Sharper still unemployed??? How about Lofa Tatupu? Maybe he can cover better then Stinkovich?

by dt1713 on Sep 25, 2011 7:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Awful game
* Team never established a running game
    * Patriots lost the turnover battle with Tom Brady’s four interceptions
    * The Patriots were killed by penalties on both sides of the ball, a total of 8 for 93 yards.
    * The Patriots couldn’t rush the passer – at all
    * Straight bad luck – sometimes, as they say, sh*t happens.

Establishing the run game wasn’t necessary. They came out ahead and what they were doing was clearly working.

The penalties didn’t seem to be that big of a deal to me.

Rushing the passer wasn’t what caused us to lose the game.

I agree about turnovers and bad luck. Its sickening that they had so many chances, even despite all the mistakes, to come out and win. If they had won we could say they made it through what will be one of the most terribly played game of the season and come out with a win.. but now all we can say is that it will be end up being one of the most terribly played games of the season.

Oh my god a floor zombie! Oh wait, thats you
- Toby Turner

by New Century Silver on Sep 25, 2011 7:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm hoping

this will be THE most terribly played game of this season. Simply bad Patriots football today. Hopefully this is their stinker and dominate the rest of the season. Same goes to Tom Brady. Here’s your crappy game, now play like an MVP the rest of the way!

Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.
1 Cor 13:13

by thirteen on Sep 25, 2011 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

The penalties were half what cost us this game

They negated a potential scoring drive early in the fourth

They were the sole reason the Bills tied the game at 24

They cost us the ability to get Tom a shot at the end of the game

by Greg Knopping on Sep 25, 2011 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah - I'd give them 50% credit.

Clearly the turnovers were the other half and probably the most killer was Brady’s throw to Gronk over the Safety – it wasn’t a terrible pass because the Safety made a perfectly timed leap to snag it, but it COULD have been a better pass since he had plenty of room to lead Gronk all the way to the end zone. Just a couple inches higher on that throw …

Basically, in that play we went from probably being up 31-17 to suddenly not having the ball and within minutes instead being down 24-31.

The drive after that int was just freaking surrealistic. I’m still looking for the roughing the passer penalty by Love. I just don’t see it. And the pass interference call on Brown in the end zone – the refs aren’t supposed to call that when the reciever runs through the defender – the defender has equal right to space. We played suck in between those two plays, but the drive doesn’t happen without those two calls.

That whole sequence – starting with Brady’s picked throw to Gronk and ending with the helmet-assisted pick 6 – has got to be one of the most bizarre sequence of plays I have ever seen in my life.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't blame it all on penalties

The BS PI call on Sergio was really iffy. ball was uncatchable and h was in position to make the play.
The refs tried to make up for it when they called the deffenseless receiver hit on Welkers reception at mid field which was a clean tackle

GFY

by TFBismywingman on Sep 26, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's why he said 'half'

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

tough loss

I appreciate the Pulpiteers so much more after reading the Pats ESPN blog comments.

Just think of the joy this game brings Callahan and Borges.

by sweetjesusihatethejets on Sep 25, 2011 7:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Tough loss. Hat tip to the Bills..

..On to Oakland.

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 7:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Just looking at the schedule

    Last game of the year against the Bills. How much will it mean?

by furiousd on Sep 25, 2011 7:59 PM EDT reply actions  

hopefully history repeats itself, if it does, this will be the BEST loss this year

by SDK on Sep 25, 2011 7:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Welker is unreal right now

After 3 games: 31 rec 458 yards 14.8 yards/rec 152.7 yards/game 4TD 74.2%1st down

by frogfromthemud on Sep 25, 2011 8:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Welker is a beast..

..Wow, those are crazy numbers..

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wish had him on my fantasy team

luckily I’ve got Brady and Gronk, and they have bailed me out every week so far.

by furiousd on Sep 25, 2011 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have Brady, Welker, Gronk and Pats D on one team.

I am crushing everyone so far in that league. I’ll have bye week hell to survive, but no biggie.

Unfortunately, in my other league I just have Gostkowski as my only Pats rep. I’m getting killed in that one (Mainly because Arian Foster was my first pick and Peyton Hillis was my 2nd. It is REALLY hard to win when you don’t have your 1st & 2nd picks playing …).

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

so far, but last year they were decent

keep in mind (in the leagues I play in) it is both the defense AND special teams so last year they not only did well because of all the interceptions, but also because of all the great ST play.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thoughts on the game....

…4 INT’S by Tommy, not good. We should not have even been within 3 points with our QB throwing 4 INT’S.

What can you do but suck it up and get ready for Oakland.

We have not lost 2 in a row in a long time if I am not mistaken?

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Ya, it is something crazy like that..

..So i feel pretty good about next week, facing a tough Oakland team..

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully they have no dirt on the field.

    Baseball season will be over by next Sunday(for Oakland, anyway). Not a fan of the dirt on the field.

by furiousd on Sep 25, 2011 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

2009 dude

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's only 2 or 3 back to back losses in NE.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, "only"

With this defense, we shall see.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

@JDOT

true on the 4..BUt 1 if I am correct happen after ball bounced off a defenders helmet…another 1 was because of a “deflection”….3rd was trying to thread the needle between 2 defenders..it worked great 1st time But never works every single time…

BUt where was the RUN game?…I mean to think PATS base so much of there game on a 2-TE set..lose 1 and our other 2 rec;s were useless….Chad too me is useless…./////////////////////////////////

we need a deep REC. and CHAD is Not the answer!!!!!!..I mean I didnt even see the quick side-line passing to deon like last week…

by Jack2466 on Sep 25, 2011 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

the 3rd one was not threading the needle between two defenders

that was to Gronk who had blown past his defender and was wide open for the TD – but the safety timed his leap perfectly to grab it. If Brady lobs it just inches higher, or if the safety doesn’t get his leap off perfectly, it was going to be an easy TD for Gronk.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Talk to Belichick as to why he drops seven guys into coverage all day

Next time I see him I will ask him

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

:)
Literally the game plan read PASS TO WELKER EVERY THIRD PLAY…they sent a copy of this plan to the Bills before the game and they still were helpless.

Question of the day:
Who presented Wes Welker (voted as 50th-Best NFL Player 2011)? ;)

by frogfromthemud on Sep 25, 2011 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boom!!!

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that the Bills won it. The scoreboard says so.

But I think its also pretty clear the Pats could have won it, but for their own self-inflicted mistakes.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2011 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is what separates pats fans from the other afc teams

it was a great game and could of gone either way im glad though that the streak is over and december looks to be interesting

. Nobody and I mean Nobody circles the Wagon Blasters like our Buffalo Bills. The Wagon is coming to collect your soul.-abayarde

by Gpluehri on Sep 26, 2011 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Any team that comes from a 21 point deficit

two weeks in a row deserves Kudos in my book, Especially against Oakland (decent defense) and us (awesome offense). Come back victories build great teams. The Bills appear to be for real, they have averaged amost 38 points per game these first three games with pretty consistent points in each game. We certainly blew the game with 4 turnovers and too many penalties, but part of the game and usually is the difference between a W or an L. It’s early in the season, but we do need to improve in several areas to be playoff ready. Ocho also seems to possibly be more of a liability than an asset.

by FloridaPatsFan on Sep 25, 2011 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

>Bills are in first…we live in an upside down world

we’re either in the Twilight Zone or Outer Limits episode for at least a week

by prioris on Sep 25, 2011 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not an upside down world, just the 90s.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Sep 25, 2011 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't feel bad...

you could be one of us Dolphin fan!

by MassFinFan65 on Sep 25, 2011 8:05 PM EDT reply actions  

I really thought you guys were gonna be pretty good this year.

   I think you’ve been in every game, but come up short.

by furiousd on Sep 25, 2011 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you guys going to take a run at Jeff Fisher?

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have a feeling Sparano will be gone by mid season.....our new owner will bring in a big name

especially after failing to get Harbaugh…could be Fischer…Cowher….Gruden…please someone good….and at this point we may get the #1 draft pick…..Andrew Luck please!!

by MassFinFan65 on Sep 25, 2011 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's it for me...

Sucks the Pats lost, awesome the Jets lost. Crazy the Bills are in first in the AFC east. Lot’s of season to go..

"There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together." - Bill Belichick

by JDot on Sep 25, 2011 8:12 PM EDT reply actions  

The play calling continues to be a sad example of high level clock management. Twice, they have a lead while entering the red zone. Instead of seeing the bigger picture, they twice turn it over with the pass.

Two running plays and a throw to the back of the endzone, each time, would have used some clock, given them one safe shot at a TD, and produced two important FG’s. Those two FG’s, alone, would have meant more pressure on the Bills to score. It would have helped with stagnating the Bill’s momentum.

It’s time to start asking BB and staff to improve their play calling – namely their understanding of clock management which can START in the 1st half!!!

He always says “we need to coach better …” after a loss. Well, it’d be nice to see that equate to something beyond verbage.

I blame the 4 ints on play calling. Period. Things happen. Odd deflections, mis communicated pass route, and a great lay by a pass defender. That’s the game. These things should not be allowed to happen when the circumstances dictate a better play call. I’d be completely fine if they fumbled on a running play in the red zone when its intention is intelligent – because fumbles happen – ints that happen in the red zone are results of poor play calls because they allowed for those ‘things to happen’.

by OneOpinion on Sep 25, 2011 8:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Wait, what?

When a running back fumbles, it’s just “those things happen” and not because of a mistake made executing the play, but a pass interception only happens because it should’ve been a different play and not because of execution of the called play?… I mean, sure, sometimes interceptions happen just because of bad luck (or good depending on which side you’re on) but to design what plays you call around the small chance that something might happen just seems stupid.

And also, intentionally settling for FGs when you have a QB who rarely ever turns the ball over normally against an offense that has lead the league in points scored when you’ve got a suspect defense would be an example of bad play calling to me.

by indy pats fan on Sep 25, 2011 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Settle for a FG after two run plays and shot at the back of the endzone isn’t exactly kneeling down for three plays and kicking the FG. It’s merely being smart and using the clock to add further pressure to the opponent’s offensive play calling.

As for the “suspect defense”, we’re still discussing the same coach and staff. I have read endless “In Bill We Trust Comments” and “Defensive Genuius” comments over the months on this forum.

I’m not seeing it. The defense has been abused three straight games.

And, for this reason, those two FGs would have helped the defense!

by OneOpinion on Sep 26, 2011 6:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can't run with this team

All it accomplishes (usually) is leaving Tom with a 3rd and long.

I understand exactly where BB is with this stuff. He has to score because his defense bites, and his best options for scoring are with Brady and the passing game. Gotta go with what works.

by SSiewar on Sep 25, 2011 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right, but, why does the defense bite?

    Not that I think it bites, per se, could obviously be better, but if that’s your line of thinking, then why does the defense bite?

by furiousd on Sep 25, 2011 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love watching Brady and this offense

It’s unlike watching any other team, in it’s precision, execution and most times, it’s domination.

But it’s just about the time we all look at this team realistically, and know that if Brady has a poor day – forced by opposing defense or bad luck, such as today – this team is no better than an average NFL team.

Since Tom returned in 2009, which is right around the time this team morphed into an all-pass, forget about running and defense, team, NE is 8-11 in games Tom doesn’t finish with a 100 QBR or better. That’s what the Pat’s have become. Does that suck? No, not in my opinion. As I already said, I love watching this offense. Does it pretty much disclude the Pat’s from winning another SB in Tom’s time? Yeah, probably.

by SSiewar on Sep 25, 2011 8:38 PM EDT reply actions  

woops meant to say

Welcome to Colts world. It’s frustrating, but at the same time, it makes it kind of awesome to see great QBs at work. Tom Brady being one of them.

by 18man on Sep 26, 2011 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

The saddest thing about that though

is “defensive genius”

BB obviously isn’t a defensive genius, but he is just as obviously a coaching genius.

Defense sucks. I’m over it..

by SSiewar on Sep 26, 2011 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

On the QBR point

I think there is some truth regarding the 100 QBR comment, but I think blaming it on being a pass-first team or becoming Indianapolis is a little inaccurate. Generally, the complaint about the 8-11 record post-injury is misleading. First off, it’s not 8-11 but rather 8-9 (two losses in 2009 were with a QBR > 100; he has 3 in his career).

Check out the following season-by-season records when the QBR is less than 100 (I excluded 2008 and the first two games in 2001 when Bledsoe started; record includes playoffs):

2001: 11 wins, 3 losses (8-3 regular season)
2003: 10 wins, 2 losses (8-2 regular season
2004: 7 wins, 2 losses (6-2 regular season)
2007: 6 wins, 1 loss (5-0 regular season)

The biggest trend you see in the Super Bowl seasons is that there have been fewer games when Brady had less than 100 as time’s gone on. But those 2001 and 2004 offenses looked nothing like the 2007 offense; the 2007 offense bears more resemblance to 2011 than either of those (granting the big difference regarding the tight ends).

Now, the non-Super Bowl appearances:

2002: 3 wins, 7 losses
2005: 5 wins, 6 losses (5-5 regular season)
2006: 8 wins, 5 losses (7-4 regular season)
2009: 6 wins, 5 losses (6-4 regular season)
2010: 2 wins, 3 losses (2-2 regular season)
2011: 0 wins, 1 loss

The 2005 and 2006 teams looked nothing like the Colts, and those records aren’t too dissimilar from 2009 – 2011 to date. What this tells me is that in the Super Bowl seasons, the team had something that could win games when the passing game wasn’t working, while in the other seasons they didn’t. Could be a running game, could be a defense. But it’s not simply the “pass-first” philosophy because they won with it in 2007, and they lost without it in 2002, 2005, and 2006.

Could also be just the “mental toughness” factor that Belichick always talks about — is the team mentally tough enough to win a game when they’re not at their best? That used to a hallmark of their winning teams; the last times I truly remember seeing it was against San Diego last year (but that had a lot of mess ups on their part) and the 2009 season opener against Buffalo.

It is a bit interesting…. looks like they need to have a 70% winning percentage going into the playoffs to make the Super Bowl.

by Hammer of Thor on Sep 26, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

Didn’t notice that Yahoo double counted playoff games.

Unfortunately with football, the sample sizes are so incredibly small it’s always hard to get a good read on what something like that input actually means. But I think we both see BB relying very heavily on Tom. And if a top priority for a defense is to take away what an opposing offense wants to do, it shouldn’t surprise us that the Pats fare worse on those days.

by SSiewar on Sep 26, 2011 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt it

Just don’t have tom finish under 100. Simple.

Oh my god a floor zombie! Oh wait, thats you
- Toby Turner

by New Century Silver on Sep 26, 2011 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

My thoughts.

1- Welkers production was nothing short of amazing, but it was also scary. I was having flashbacks of 2009 with Brady forcing passes to Welker and Gronk (Moss) instead of anyone else on the field. Herndos absence really showed the glaring lack of depth at WR. Ocho has a brief camp, preseason and 3 games to figure out the playbook and still doesn’t get it (even under scrutiny). If he doesn’t get it soon, they need to give him the boot. They did just fine without someone like him last season.

2- BB has to start doing conventional stuff for once. Having Ridley go out there and play well just to put an unproductive Lawfirm in to do nothing was just baffling. Also, with a 21 point lead, start working the running game if you’re uncomfortable with it instead of having Brady throw the ball 45 times when he doesn’t need to.

3- This goes without saying, but their defense is just bad. I watch BB on the sidelines on “A Football Life” complaining to Brady that he can’t get the players to play how he wants them to. I blame none other than BB. He has all but wiffed on draft day for the last 5 years with the exception of 2010. Mayo and Chung are the bright spots. This goes back to conveentional football. Use the picks on physical specimens instead of trading down to pick up undersized/unathletic players based on their smarts. The defense isn’t improving and they can only count on Brady to carry them for so long.

It’s one loss, blah, blah, but these games really bring to light why I still don’t think they’re a legit SB contender at this point. It’s pretty bad when any team can consistently drive the ball all the way down the field in 4-5 plays against them.

It’s early, they’ll be fine… but there is quite a bit of room for improvement.

Also, Fred Jackson has been one of the most underrated players in the NFL. The Bills need to reward him with a new contract.

"We're going to win this game."

-Tom Brady, September 14, 2009

by MVPKiller12 on Sep 25, 2011 8:42 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I didn’t see the game and I don’t know what the game plan was. But you are correct in some of your synopsis. But part of the problem is the defense in certain areas are young. And when things get tight they play like it. Sometimes I think Bill out thinks himself on somethings. But the defense is missing some key players out of it. And that will hurt. There are some adjustments to be made for sure but it is only game 3 of the season. I have my doubts about Chad because you either make plays or you don’t. And many a Steeler fan has said that he drops the balls he needs to catch. I’m ready for Taylor now. Still think that Tate would be better than Chad. But that is too late now.

by Patriots12 on Sep 25, 2011 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

The team needs to continue to find ways to improve.

While Chad’s drop was really disappointing, and we don’t know yet how that will effect him in the future mentally. The fact that he was open on the play is a good sign that he can’t still make plays from a physical stand point.

So in a way, i still view this game as a positive for him.

Brady > Mallett > Hoyer > Sanchez

- beantownboy171

by B.H.Talbot on Sep 25, 2011 8:42 PM EDT reply actions  

That was a drop heard around the world.
He will be called OchoSTINKO if that continues.
By game 7 or 8, he better be in the groove

I wanted to see Taylor Price put to the test
I don’t think he would have dropped that TD

by prioris on Sep 25, 2011 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Didn't matter

They scored anyway. It could have though.

by SSiewar on Sep 25, 2011 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, I take that back

That drop cost them about 2 minutes of time. It could have effected the game’s outcome.

by SSiewar on Sep 25, 2011 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

what is Chad making $3 million a year?

Just getting open doesn’t cut it when the ball hits you right in the hands, especially if he’s the super star he thinks he is. Something is wrong somewhere, maybe he needs contacts, or something.

by FloridaPatsFan on Sep 25, 2011 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t have much criticism for offense. They played well enough to win.

I think the one key missing link on defense is McCourty’s high level of play.
If he can’t defend against shorter receivers, he has a deep hole to climb out of.
I expect McCourty to get torched next week. Announcers gush about opposing coaches loving the match up between Devin and their receiver before the game.

Dowling and Chung need to remain healthy while McCourty is down and out or else secondary will take some more severe beatings.

The lack of blitzing this week is puzzling especially with all this talent . Last week they couldn’t blitz because Rivers is so dangerous and clever against it. It’s hard to criticize the front four since that is the coaches decision.

by prioris on Sep 25, 2011 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

also too bad devin made tackle near 1 yard line instead of letting BUF score

by prioris on Sep 25, 2011 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree prioris

McCourty must have tendencies that other coaches have picked up on and are taking advantage of them.

by FloridaPatsFan on Sep 25, 2011 9:12 PM EDT reply actions  

the second year is a critical test for nfl players since the opposing teams have lots of film and analysis to discern those tendencies but i wouldn’t expect that to be problems for cb’s. it’s usually the other way around.

it seems mccourty appears slower so he can’t recover well to get back into position. he is so busy catching up sometimes that he can’t track ball or cover receiver. that’s all i can observe so far

by prioris on Sep 25, 2011 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

he became a Mormon

who knows the Star Wars mythology while remained surprisingly unfamiliar with the Book of Mormon

by frogfromthemud on Sep 25, 2011 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

One thing about young defensive players and Bill

The one’s who last generally see an increase in playing time and the bad one’s fans ask if they played or not.

I didn’t see him.

by SSiewar on Sep 25, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what I saw (yes, i'm a Bills fan)

The Patriots may have been charged with that TO because Belichick got feisty with the refs. Seriously wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what happened.

Also, I see the questionable call comment concerning the Bills’ defense. The Patriots were the beneficiaries of quite a few of those in the first half. It’s football and humans are still overseeing the rule book on the field.

If you find this loss difficult, imagine how it must have felt for Bills fans to expect this feeling following the previous 15 games.

It’s a great team, these Patriots. Today they faced an opponent that fights best after it’s catastrophically wounded.

Anyway: fantastic game and I can only hope the rematch is as meaningful for both teams.

"Go check on the ribs!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Sep 25, 2011 10:09 PM EDT reply actions  

yup,

The bills were the only team i did not have hate for. As long as we beat the jets its all good.

by JerodMayoFan on Sep 25, 2011 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes. beating the jets 100 times more important than the bills.

bills have been living in the bottom heap for long time so buffalo needs a little sympathy

by prioris on Sep 25, 2011 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Pats called the timeout b/c the clock was going to run after the TD was overturned. I just think he was ticked that 1. The clock had already started, and 2. It reviewed a play he didn’t want reviewed or overturned.

Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz

by bluecollarbuffalo on Sep 25, 2011 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not an excuse, but the defense isn’t healthy. The whole team is banged up for that matter. It is hard to pull talent together when you have a lot of turnover going on. 22 roster moves have been made since cut down day. Per Mike Riess. I did not witness the game as I was out today. But this is only one game. And yet this is a tough stretch for the Patriots to be injured like they are. Guys are still learning their roles on defense. Learning a new scheme. And trying to fill the holes by injuries. A difficult combination to overcome. Chad is now on notice. I wasn’t particular about getting him to begin with. But I am still holding out hope that he will contribute positively to the offense at some point and time. But I’m ready for Taylor Price now. I am also ready for the team to act like Tom doesn’t have to win it all by himself as well. If your defense is having trouble stopping them, protect them. Run the football. Don’t be afraid to take the ball out of Tom’s hands and have confidence in your running game.

by Patriots12 on Sep 25, 2011 10:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Right, credit to the Bills

they played well enough to win, but if we had Chung, Haynesworth, Hernendez, Dowling, and maybe even D Gronk, this could have been different. That being said, not the best defensive performance, but really just one of those days. I’ve never seen the ball bounce that badly for Brady like it did today. Even one of those INT’s hit the ground instead, and we are 3 and 0.

by furiousd on Sep 25, 2011 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

I asked on my facebook earlier this week what kind of excuses would the Pats come up with the Bills beat them….Well here it is folks..injuries lol

by Jeremy Galton on Sep 26, 2011 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, it's understandable...

…The Packers would have won the SB last year if not for all the injuries. ***cough***

13.

Grossman: Sup, you insulin needing bitch! The sex cannon has arrived! Now get the hell out of my locker room, you chinless mother fucker!

by Wiedmann on Sep 26, 2011 3:39 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm not making excuses

   Just pointing out how the day presented a unique challenge coming in to this game. My headline was Credit, to the Bills, so I am not taking anything away from them. They won the game. Do you think they care who we had on the team? You won’t see any Patriot player talk about injuries. Their heads are in Oakland now. But, as a fan, I can look back, appraise, take in hindsight, talk about what if’s etc etc. And really may larger ppoint was the INT’s had way more to do with the Pats losing this game then any injuries did. So put that on your yearbook, I mean, myface, or whatever it its you kids are doing these days.

by furiousd on Sep 26, 2011 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not making excuses either. The Bills were the better team.

by Patriots12 on Sep 27, 2011 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

So if those players on defense played, Brady wouldn’t have contributed to 4 INTs?

"Go check on the ribs!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Sep 26, 2011 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Really just Hernandez.

I honestly think he wouldn’t have thrown four INTs if Hernandez had played. He forced a lot of passes because he didn’t have one of his safety net receivers. Just by watching you can see that Ocho isn’t reliable or trusted and Deion Branch just isn’t efficient without a receiver taking the top off the defense. Hernandez would have stopped Brady from forcing it underneath to Welker. The only INTs I see happening if Hernandez plays is the INT to Ocho and the INT to Gronkowski. I don’t see him throwing a swing to Woody or bouncing a ball off of Dareus’s face underneath to Welker.

That said, a battle of “ifs” is pointless. Bills won!

by Richard Hill on Sep 26, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not to mention that having TWO TEs available

completely changes your play calling sequence because that adds a whole different set of formations you put out there.

Going into this game, weren’t our most used formations all with 2 TEs?

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

So true. But because he threw it so often, he has more chances for that kind of thing to happen. And we can say if this and if that. Had he not thrown 4 ints. If the defense made one more stop. It is frustrating, but there are more games to be played.

by Patriots12 on Sep 25, 2011 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

very classy

Taylor Price will be the starter by the end of the season (Said before Training Camp)

by Chris Kole on Sep 26, 2011 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

When you win

you shouldn’t expect any homage. Act like you belong there. Fitz didn’t perform for Brady’s approval. Who cares who shakes who’s hands. That’s loser talk.

"These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick

by Mainiac on Sep 26, 2011 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

How do we know all this about the handshakes?

Were you there? Were you next to Brady the whole game, and saw him choose to walk off without looking for Fitzpatrick?

Don’t be one of these douches that jumps around saying unclassy just because you didn’t see a handshake in the 10 seconds of post game footage from the field.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I saw Brady b-line straight for the lockerroom as soon as that clock struck zero.

And I am not saying her is classless at all, Brady is one of the classiest guys in the league. But the two QB’s should always shake hands after a game, its a respect things. Seemed to me like he was embarrassed that his super powers weren’t there today, and wanted to see the back of his locker as quickly as possible.

But hey, you are right, I don’t know if Brady congratulated those guys after. But this was a big deal for Buffalo and those guys, you guys are the cream of the crop (even though you haven’t won a playoff game in 4 years) But I am sure it is no big deal to you guys that they won that game, you guys usually don’t have moments like that struggling franchise had today.

"'If there isn't a bone sticking out of my leg, I'm playing" - Marshall Yanda

by Mr MaLoR on Sep 26, 2011 1:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's hoping your team whoops ass next week against them stinking Jets!!

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Damn straight man, Sanchez and Rex know they don’t want any of this.

"'If there isn't a bone sticking out of my leg, I'm playing" - Marshall Yanda

by Mr MaLoR on Sep 26, 2011 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nah, they're an AFC contender.

Like the Pats, Jets (ugh), Chargers, maybe the Steelers…

There’s no clear #1 at this stage, but the Ravens are in the conversation.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 27, 2011 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chargers aren't contenders. they are perennial pretenders.

The Ravens are more in the convo imho.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 27, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Chargers should win the division,

Or at least enough for a WC. Then you only need to win 3 games to get to a SB, and they can put up enough points to do it. They’re more of a competitor than the Texans or Titans.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 27, 2011 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree with this!
They’re more of a competitor than the Texans

I think offensively the Texans are more potent with regards to the leagues best QB, RB, and WR combo. There defense though giving up 40 to the Saints (but they’re the Saints…some teams give up 34 to other squads) this past Sunday, they are much better than they were last year. Special teams are a wash. And i’ve seen all i think i will see from the Chargers. A nice regular season team that falters in the postseason. That seems oddly familiar. I don’t think either team will get far this season, but if anything my money is on Houston as the better team right now.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 27, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Texans are liable to come out and lose to... a very bad team, like Kansas City, or Indy.

I can’t see the Chargers laying an egg against a terrible team, but they could lose against a good team they should beat – the Jets in the 09 playoffs, for instance.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 27, 2011 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey get over it

Bills won and it’s not like they have 0 talent, they have a lot of talent. It’s not like the Sea Hawks came in. and it was a close game with lots of stupid penalties, picks, and a lot of hurt players sitting on the side lines.

Just think we lost one game, and i’m happy it was to the Bills. Please Bill kick the Jets ass.

Also there are a lot of teams out there with tons of talent that are in really bad shape Eagles (Vick hurt), Chicago (suspect OL QB sacked 11 times in two games), Colts (no QB), Giants (depleted everything), Steelers (almost lost to the team with no QB), and a few others are living up to past reputations. The amount of points being put up this year is having Defenses across the NFL on their heads.

Pats need to work on pass rush, i’m worried the only game changer that was brought on board is Andre Carter.

i’m happy for the cards we got dealt you don’t always win i never want another 16-0 regular season.

by Slim Rickins on Sep 26, 2011 12:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Lord have mercy!!

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

That....is outstanding.

I ignored three cars doing over 50 in a 35 zone because I was pretty certain I would be unable to write tickets without openly cursing.

"Carlos, this is a STUPID problem to have. But, it is a problem, nonetheless" - Johnny Tapia

by Dark_Knight5811 on Sep 26, 2011 3:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know this is stating the obvious, though some may choose to be naive, but we have a piss poor secondary

and weak pass rush. We are not a SB contending team at all with the way in which we operate. Like i mentioned in a different thread earlier, we will win about 13 games or so, but so what? 13 wins should get us a bye, and then what? Lose again at home, because of the aforementioned factors? There is not one player in our secondary that is a true playmaker or shut down defender. Its sad, because like many others i figured McC would’ve been further along than he currently is. Maybe, just maybe this is who/what he really is. RaID may be a nice player, but far from proven. he like Bodden, can’t stay healthy it seems. Cunningham and some of the other defenders can’t stay healthy either. Price needs to step up now if/when healthy. Raiders saw what Brady did with his tunnel vision to G-Force and Wes. They will game plan for it. Not to mention their running game, and the fact that i won’t be at all surprised to see JC have a career day on our defense.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Have faith. If anything, the team has yet to come together. My concern has been that while everyone has been crying pass rusher, they have forgotten that the team is young. Some of the key players are young! And the defensive game plan is a bit strange to me. Ninkovich isn’t a great pass rusher. But because he is currently ahead of Jermaine is why he is playing. Its too early to panic. Obviously there are changes to be made. But now isn’t the time to panic. Just stay with it.

by Patriots12 on Sep 27, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Michael Irvin nailed it

on NFL Gameday Final. To paraphrase, “Tom Brady has been carrying this defense through games for years, covering for their mistakes. Now, we have a once in a blue moon occurance where Tom has a bad day and needs the defense to carry the game for him. Just one stop, guys. Just one big play. And can they do that for him, after all these years? No. That’s just sad.”

Pretty much sums up my frustration perfectly.

"Carlos, this is a STUPID problem to have. But, it is a problem, nonetheless" - Johnny Tapia

by Dark_Knight5811 on Sep 26, 2011 2:43 AM EDT reply actions  

When our 4 or 5 elite pieces on defense got too old and their play dropped off.

January 07.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

We became the Colts in Indy in the AFC Championship where we blew a 21-3 lead. Since the end of the 2006 season we haven’t had a championship caliber defense, and unsurprisingly have gone 2-3 in the playoffs.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 26, 2011 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey Guess What? Our Defense is last in the nfl

and BB is suppose to be a defensive genius?

Hey President Brady, Can you sign my Son ?

by BostonBeasts on Sep 26, 2011 6:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Never thought I'd say this

but Ridley may be almost as good as Ingram. He was one of the few bright spots of the game last night (along with Welker, who’s on pace for record season, and Gronk, who has 5 TDs after 3 games). Ridley seems to be the real deal, both in the run (led the team last night) and in the pitch/catch. BJGE is great in red zone, but otherwise I feel he’s good and reliable not great.

by PatsFan13 on Sep 26, 2011 7:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought Ridley was a small bright spot yesterday

With the same quality blocking against the same defense he put up 44 yards on 7 carries, while Benny got like <20 yards on 9. Ridley should get more touches in the next few weeks.

Random thought: Benny is playing on his RFA tender for just the season. If he loses his starting job, do you think the Pats let him walk?

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 26, 2011 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt he's a Patriot next season.

So once again we’ll be RB shopping for a 4th guy.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Far too early to say

So far, the Pats have faced three teams that are much better against the run than the pass. BJGE (nor any other RB) hasn’t gotten many opportunities, because the gameplans haven’t focused on establishing any sort of rushing attack. When we go up against teams with stronger pass defenses, we’ll get a real sense of how the RB corps stacks up and who the Pats are thinking about for the long haul.

by nbradley07 on Sep 26, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was just saying that he may be in his final year bcuz his deal is only for a year and with 3 other backs, his

production/value will dip. Hence, he may very well not like whatever deal we come up with. Then again maybe not. I want him here though.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

ummm...

probably not, depending on what he’s willing to re-sign for. He’s not a feature back, all 2010 evidence to the contrary, but he’s a useful depth guy who can start (read: get 25 carries) for a few weeks if injuries happen.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still can't understand why Ridley wasn't used more heavily.

The Bills were smothering Benny and Woody. The offense, while pretty effective (when Brady wasn’t throwing INTs), really struggled to set the tempo, letting the Bills control the pace and flow of the game. Ridley really could have helped the Pats win back some of that control, especially later in the 4th quarter, when a longer, slower drive would have left the Bills with far less time to put together the scoring drive that ultimately won them the game.

I thought it during the game, and I think it’s even more apparent today, that Bill O’Brien did not have his best day yesterday. They clearly had a good gameplan going in, but when it came time for in-game management and adjustments, they fell flat on their face. Again.

by nbradley07 on Sep 26, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree on all of the above

Bill O’Brien is very frustrating to me. I can’t think of anything in particular holding back our offense besides his play calling at times (and turnovers, though they are rare). Plus, you can’t do the same things all the time. That’s how teams game plan for you, like the Bills obviously did.

Also, we have a good offensive line, reasonably talented running backs and Gronkowski and Solder who can both block well as line TEs. Sometimes you need to take the ball out of Brady’s hands and go to the ground with it.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 26, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bad idea.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

we are not going to make noise in the playoffs with this defense

irvin had it right. the onus is all on TB to have a great outing, every week. just not gonna happen w/ better defenses and cold weather. mccourty has regressed significantly, the d line acquisitions have had little impact, linebacker blitzes in preseason have not been realized, safety cuts to merriweather and sanders look bad in retrospect, we are bending and breaking with regularity for what seems like 5 years now. this offense is potent, and this D is not built to win. they will inevitably get better, if only because it couldn’t get much worse.

the window is closing on tb12 and belichick has not rebuilt this defense contrary to what many of us thought in the preseason.

Goddamnit

by bizarrowelker on Sep 26, 2011 7:36 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

'Didn't need TB to have a great outing yesterday.

Four interceptions is not a ‘great outing’ by any yardstick. It’s a terrible, “tied-with-his-career-worst” outing.

If you get rid of just one of those four interceptions, then the Patriots would have won.

The Bills scored TWENTY FOUR POINTS off those four turnovers!

If Brady throws only 3 of those, then that would still be considered a ‘poor’ outing by Brady …. but the Patriots would have won.

So no, Irvin doesn’t have it right. An average or even ‘poor’ game by Brady would have been enough. But 4 interceptions (even accepting that 2 were off tips) is a horrible outing.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brady was fine

I thought he had just as good a game as his prior two, albeit not as lucky. I don’t mean to piss anyone off by saying that, but that’s what I saw. He had all the time in the world to throw the ball and, as what usually occurs when that’s the case, he performed marvelously.

Only INT he blew was his underthrown pass to Gronk. Ocho slept through his cut, Welker popped one up, and his 4th grazed a lineman’s helmet. File all those under ‘shit happens’.

by SSiewar on Sep 26, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I totally agree that 'shit happens'

and I’d go even further to say that the throw to Gronk was not a bad throw by Brady – it was a GREAT play by the safety to time that leap.

Two of the others were tips and while one could argue Brady should not have thrown the one to Ocho, one can’t ignore that Ocho wasn’t on his route.

So yeah, ‘shit happens’.

But the net result was a horrible outing for Tom Brady.

And the point of my post is that it took a horrible outing by TB to keep this team from winning. Even WITH those 4 TOs, we only lost by 3 points.

So we didn’t need TB to be great. We just needed him to be not as bad as today. Just one pick less would have been fine. Oh well.

That’s only the second time in his career that Brady threw that many picks. As you point out, it took a lot of odd shit happening for that to occur and statistically is not likely to occur again for quite some time.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point about Scott

Tom’s pass was a little low, but that was a great timed catch for a safety.

As far as your 2nd and primary point, bear in mind that Buffalo let Tom throw at will, something NYJ, BAL and any other high quality defense doesn’t allow, usually. And our offense (TB) scored 31 points because of that. 31 points by our offense should always be good enough for a win.

If Tom had been able to score 31 against NYG, BAL and NYJ the past four years, well, there would have been at least one more parade in Boston.

BTW, Tom’s had 5 games where he was intercepted 4 times.

by SSiewar on Sep 26, 2011 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

IS 31 points enough?

When the offense that scores 31 also gives up 24 points worth of turnovers?

My primary point remains – it is missing the mark to just blame the defense for the number of yards allowed and the number of points allowed. A huge portion of what was surrendered yesterday is on the offense and due largely to an anomalously bad day for Brady.

The fact that he (as I corrected up above) has thrown for 4 picks 5 other times doesn’t make it any less an anomaly. He hadn’t done that since 2006.

Whether Buffalo ‘let Tom throw at will’ or not seems sorta irrelevant.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just because an offense turns the ball over

doesn’t give the defense the right to lie down.

BUF scored those 24 points off drives of:
51 yds for TD
43 yds for FG
77 yds for TD

and Florences unfortunate pick6

by SSiewar on Sep 26, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

No one said the defense had "the right to lie down"

The lengths of those drives is inconsequential to the point. You can’t point out the length of those three drives without also acknowledging the multiple Bill’s possessions that were stifled.

You give a team enough possessions and they will eventually get in. It also doesn’t help when you turn it over right away and put your defense back on the field before they’ve rested.

My intention – which I’ve stated clearly – is not to give the defense a free pass here. I’ve said repeatedly that they clearly have problems. But the results we see in yardage and points surrendered here are NOT entirely on the defense. The offense and defense are intertwined and in this game the offense deserves a very, very healthy dose of the blame for what happened.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, not entirely on the defense

I wouldn’t suggest otherwise. But your comments at least implied that it was mostly Brady’s fault, and that I cannot agree with.

Again, I thought Brady had a real good game. Unlucky, yes, but there are less than a half dozen QB’s who would have been as effective as he was yesterday, so hardly possible that he personally lost the game.

I blame the D far more than Tom. Yes, he overworked them, and yes, they were good on occasion, but they did lie down more than once – and if this team is going to advance this year, they gotta stop doing that.

by SSiewar on Sep 26, 2011 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can't reasonably expect a defense to step up against that many turnovers.

If Brady made one or two mistakes, and the defense completely imploded, I would agree with Irvin 100%. But the offense turned the ball over four times – once for a TD, twice in the red zone – putting tremendous pressure on the defense. That’s basically a 21 point swing, right there. This was not a defense collapse in the face of slight pressure – it was a second half offensive meltdown of epic proportions.

by nbradley07 on Sep 26, 2011 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I read all the comments, stood up, and went outside.

Know what I saw? Blue sky. It was still there, despite all evidence to the contrary.

So what happens now? We come out next week expecting Brady to play like Brady, because that’s what he’s shown for 140 of his 150 career games.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 8:07 AM EDT reply actions  

All the Bills fans I know started blowing up my phone/fb after the game

I got up, made some food, and turned on the 415 game. It’s one loss. Yeah, I think it exposes some flaws in the team, but it’s 1 game out of 16. Bills fans are just about rioting. It’s pretty pathetic, if you’ve ever seen it in person, how much they tie their self esteem to a rival sports team.

Deep in enemy territory

by JeffyB on Sep 26, 2011 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bills fans are just about rioting. It’s pretty pathetic,

You have no clue what we are doing.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Sep 26, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Seem to be celebrating this like a Super Bowl win.

Of course, you guys wouldn’t know that…

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

not at all

we want to make the playoffs, not win three regular season games. We were fans of an AFC dynasty and we do know what it takes to win in this league and not one of us old enough to have lived those years thinks this is anything more than an important division win.

Of course, you guys wouldn’t know that…

Not sure why that was necessary.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Sep 26, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

then you're full of it.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Sep 26, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fixed!

I was really concerned you would think so.

In GOD I TRUST>In BB i trust......faith where it belongs!!
Life is about who makes it, not who makes it the fastest! Drive slow homie.

by PatNation85 on Sep 26, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, all good... back to work

When you come here…
1) Do your job
2) Work hard
3) Be attentive
4) Put team first

Gonna be a long week for our guys in blue… BB will make sure of that

by Nuf Ced on Sep 26, 2011 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

But on the next play, Ryan Fitzpatrick made a bad decision and thew another bomb to the end zone in double coverage as pressure was applied. Josh Barrett intercepted the pass, but a Sergio Brown pass interference not only negated the turnover, but gave the Bills the ball at the one yard line. Fred Jackson punched the ball into the end zone on the next play to tie the game at 24.

one of the worst calls i have ever seen.

by delta on Sep 26, 2011 9:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Eh...

Both seemed to be holding each other. The Love penalty before that was absolutely terrible.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Our horrible, terrible, worst-in-the-NFL defense

Listening to all the Monday morning quarterbacking this a.m. on the drive in, it was popular to just beat on the defense. T&R on 98.5 kept going on about how this is such a horrible defense based on stats – they just couldn’t let go of the yardage surrendered.

I don’t want to give the defense a complete pass – they clearly are NOT executing well in multiple phases.

But the yardage spec is a horrid measure at this point. Three games is too small a sample to worry about per game yardage totals. Further, in a game where 4 interceptions lead directly two 24 points (and a couple hundred yards on the accompanying drives) I have a hard time pinning this on the defense.

If the offense doesn’t commit those 4 turnovers, not only do THEY look better (because 2 of them were in scoring position and left 14 pts on the table) but they also would have made the defense look a ton better. Two drives by the offense consisted of one pass – both interceptions. So instead of possessing the ball and chewing up clock, the other team got the ball.

So the defense ultimately gets tagged with a ton of points and yardage based partly on failures by the offense. Get rid of just ONE of those four turnovers and the defense is good enough to win this game.

This doesn’t mean the defense shouldn’t be held accountable for the penalties and errors that they made on a couple of the long drives by Buffalo. At several crucial points, our secondary looked like a sieve.

This is a team game though, and both the offense and the defense are intertwined far more than a lot of folks seem to understand.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Defense is the easy scapegoat.

It’s easy to gloss over the 21 points the offense basically gave away. It’s easy to ignore how good the Bills’ offense really is. It’s easy to ignore that three starters – Dowling, Haynesworth and Chung – were inactive. It’s easy to ignore the 5 three-and-outs the defense forced.

Bill Cowher said it first, when he picked the Bills to upset. He said they match up frighteningly well against the Pats, but they would still some a few lucky bounces – a deflection here, a tipped pass there – to overcome the Pats. And they got those lucky bounces. The Bills played exceptionally well when it mattered. Chan Gailey’s experience as a play caller really showed late in the game, again exposing the Patriots’ immaturity (not lack of talent, just lack of experience) at crucial coaching positions. The Bills deserve a lot of credit. The Patriots’ offense deserves a lot of scorn. The Patriots defense is somewhere in the middle – it wasn’t pretty, but they in no way committed the costly mistakes that ultimately resulted in the loss.

by nbradley07 on Sep 26, 2011 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good summary.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

defense gives up 370+ yards and their in the middle somewhere

i don’t think so

by prioris on Sep 26, 2011 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was sad to see us just crumble.

Our pass rush is non-existent, not sure I even saw good hurry all day let alone a sack. Our secondary look bad too and the fact that Fitzgerald had all day to throw did help their chances.

This is going to happen all year because the teams that used to be walk-overs are now playing solid ball (Oakland next weekend.)

All I remember is getting into arguments on here after the draft when I said we didn’t address the pass rush at all and all I got back was you don’t understand BB then. He has a plan. I didn’t think that plan was to draft 2 backs and another TE (that we released) instead of getting better and younger on the line.

I won’t be able to sit through another draft of trading picks for future drafts and TEs.

by Robert Kaminsky on Sep 26, 2011 9:42 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree about the concerns on the pass rush

Zero sacks and I think only two touches – considering the number of pass plays by the Bills, that’s not acceptable.

(Yeah, I know, the penalty on Love negated a great instance of getting pressure on Fitz).

And I agree that the lack of pass rush pressure is like an extra knife stabbing the beleaguered secondary.

That said, as I point out above, if the offense doesn’t give up the ball 4 times – heck even if they gave it up just three times – then our defense would have been good enough to win this game.

If the offense doesn’t give up FOUR turnovers, then that’s possibly as many as 24 points that the Bills don’t convert. Which would definitely change the way people are looking at the defense today.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know you see it a certain way. But Bill has a plan. My argument with what you say has more to do with the fact that the defense hasn’t come together yet. Hard to do that when they have yet to really play together yet. You make a point that will be revisited at some point and time. But for right now, I think 3 games is not a good barometer for judging this team.

by Patriots12 on Sep 27, 2011 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, basically, if we are not allowed to discuss the ramifications of key plays in the game ...

why are we watching?

What should we talk about?

It sounds like you are saying we should just parrot variations of: The Defense sucks! No pass rush! Blah, blah blah! This is not a championship caliber team!

From now on, we’ll ignore watching the game and just look at the final score and then offer sweeping summary judgments based only on the sportscenter highlights.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually championship defenses do have off days too. I’m really struggling with a lot of what I’m reading after 3 games. I really am. I’m wondering are these bandwagon fans posting or guys who expect everyone to surrender allow the Patriots to walk to the championship game?

by Patriots12 on Sep 27, 2011 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like to point out that there are no championship defenses this year, so far.

Look at all the “good” ones. Green Bay? Slashed by Brees and Cam Newton. Pittsburgh? Couldn’t stop their bunny in Flacco week one, and then should have been beaten by the two headed monster in Indianapolis. The Ravens were lit up by Matt Hasselbeck’s arm, hardly an elite QB. The Jets aren’t the 09 defense.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 28, 2011 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

True. But some team will win the championship this year. No one’s defense is outstanding at this point and time. But I still feel like its too early to panic. Which is a lot of what I am reading. Panic! And after 1 game. sigh…..

by Patriots12 on Sep 28, 2011 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Another thing to consider

is how much stock we really put into these early season games, given the practically non-existent offseason. We’ve seen defenses struggle mightily almost uniformly across the league. Heck, the vaunted Jets’ defense gave up as many points to the mediocre Raiders’ offense as our supposedly atrocious defense gave up to the league-leading Bills. The Steelers defense looks to be a shade of last year’s AFC-leading squad, yet almost nothing changed between January and now.

I told myself before the season started that these early weeks would be strange, and that November and December games would never be more telling than they will be this year. I still think that’s true, and I think it might help everyone “digest” this loss a little more easily if they think about it from that perspective, instead of Chicken Little’s perspective.

by nbradley07 on Sep 26, 2011 10:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Something did happen to the Steelers D during the offseason

they got older, and it is showing up
I give some credit last night to Colts D-pass rush but the Steelers O-line was going to the back-ups backups backup.
That was a more glaring display of how parity can work in the NFL

GFY

by TFBismywingman on Sep 26, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

You can't just dial up pass rush when Fitz was finding receivers so quickly

It may have stopped some of the deep bombs but the secondary was getting torched.
BB gameplan seemed to be stopping the run and making Bills one dimensional pass, which worked for first half.
The turnovers then really turned the tide.
The one pass to Ocho that was intercepted was totally on OCHo he completely gave up on the route, stopped and it was easy pick.
The tips are gonna happen once in a while, The INT on target to Gronk in the endzone was totally on brady, too low should have been a floater over def head

GFY

by TFBismywingman on Sep 26, 2011 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you're going to do this,

drop a hair dryer in the bathtub and save us more rational folks some whining.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chad OH NO

Time is running out for Chad to be an impact player on offense. The Pats should be playing Taylor Price, if he is healthy, not Chad. Price has better hands and is the future. I hope to see Price in the line up against the Raiders. I think he will be an impact player on offense, we need him badly.

by PVS53 on Sep 26, 2011 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

I didn't know the playoffs had been moved to September

Bummer that we are already out of them, huh? It feels like there have only been a few games this season.

by Chari on Sep 26, 2011 11:42 AM EDT reply actions  

lockout shortened everything.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Sep 26, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not going to go chicken little

over this, not at all. I agree with, as has already been said a lot, that if TFB threw even one less INT, we’d have won the game. Truth. The sky isn’t falling yet, and we’ve got a lot of season to go.
Now, with that said, I am NOT going to give the defense a pass here. We have a real problem, and that problem is that for the past three games, we have allowed three different QB’s (some pretty good, some not-so-much), to put up Peyton Manning-like numbers. That is not how you win ball games. It’s how you lose ball games, especially in the postseason. Pass completions have to be prevented by either attacking the QB or taking away his receivers, preferably both. Right now, we’re not doing either, and that worries me.

"Carlos, this is a STUPID problem to have. But, it is a problem, nonetheless" - Johnny Tapia

by Dark_Knight5811 on Sep 26, 2011 1:45 PM EDT reply actions  

This defense is worse than last year. No question.

i would rather lose playing physical football, than win arena style. They have been bad for 5 years, and despite everyone who watches the games stating the obvious, management acknowledges nothing. Very frustrating. They need a pass rush, because they do not have one.

by U. S. Grant on Sep 26, 2011 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

"i would rather lose playing physical football, than win arena style."

Go root for another team then.

The Raiders like to pound the ball. You can root for them next week.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Sep 26, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah,

way to get rid of Brady, he just throws it too well. Oh, boy…

by frogfromthemud on Sep 26, 2011 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe