Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Last time vs. the Giants


No, I'm not referring to the Super Bowl. Other than Brady and a couple other holdovers this is a completely different team. I'm talking about the 24-20 loss to the Giants at home earlier this year. It was the only loss at home this year for the Pats, and one that is probably worrying a number of fans. So I went back and watched the game to see what went wrong.

-Throwing deep is dangerous. In the Super Bowl, the Pats were constantly trying to throw the ball deep to Randy Moss. Add in the lack of a consistent running game due to Maroney's happy feet, and the front four of the Giants was simply able to tee off on the Pats offensive line. This was not so much the case in this year's game, but there were a couple of similar plays. The few times when the pressure got to Brady, it was when he was waiting for deep routes to develop downfield. Michael Boley had a key strip sack early in the 3rd quarter that allowed the Giants to score an easy TD one play later. It was 3rd and 10 and the Giants blitzed off the edge. Instead of the usual dump offs that Brady thrives on during a blitz, he was holding the ball to throw it deep. Staying away from these obvious passing situations as much as possible is crucial, and when they do come up, there need to be quick outlets for Brady to look for if he's about to be swarmed.

-The offense was just plain sloppy. More than anything that the Giants were doing defensively, what stood out to me in this game was how poorly the Patriots executed on offense. Brady missed some throws and threw some that he shouldn't have into non-existent windows. There were drops, penalties (including a surprising number of false starts for a home game), and guys who weren't on the same page. Ochocinco in particular was a complete non-factor, as none of Brady's throws in his direction even looked close to being completed. Four turnovers and a missed chip shot field goal should tell you the story of this game. The Pats could have scored 40 points if they had simply executed better

Star-divide

-Welker is a beast. As he did in the Super Bowl years ago, Wes Welker eventually had his way with the Giants defense. They don't seem to have anyone who can match up with his sudden quickness, and his ability to get open in a hurry makes him an ideal target when facing the Giant pass rush. I look for the Pats to pull out the full bag of tricks when it comes to creative ways to get him the ball. Also Gronkowski's health is key for a number of reasons, but one of the biggest ones in this game could be taking defensive attention away from Welker.

-The D did a nice job...except at the end of the game. Considering how they had been carved up the week before by Pittsburgh, the defense was surprisingly good in this game. They held the Giants to 4/14 on third downs and had a couple of nice red zone stops, including a great interception by Arrington in the end zone. But at the end of the game they reverted to some of their bad habits. On the next to last drive Arrington had a bit of a ticky tack 35 yard pass interference call that could have probably been prevented if he turned his head even a little bit. Then, on one of the last plays of the game, Sergio Brown inexplicably crashed into a receiver in the end zone on a ball that had no chance of being completed. Again, he didn't get his head around at all, and it cost him. Overall though the D did its job. The offense did them no favors with the four turnovers, and some bad clock management by the offense left Eli with a lot more time than he should have had at the end of the game. Speaking of which...

-Don't leave time at the end! I was scratching my head on the Pats last drive when, after running for a first down at the Giants 35 yard line, instead of letting the clock run down to the two minute warning they rushed up to the line and threw a quick incompletion, leaving 2:01 on the clock. On the next play they had a big completion to Gronkowski at the 15, but the two minute warning prevented them from running some clock. Add in a running play one snap later where Woodhead went out of bounds, and instead of scoring with less than 30 seconds left, they left Eli Manning with 1:36 left and all 3 timeouts. In a 3 point game! Eli is often at his best in the two minute offense, so the Pats would be foolish to make that same mistake again.

Really this was a game that the Pats should have won. A lot of missed opportunities, a lot of mistakes, and an offense that for much of the game looked totally out of sync. Kind of like what we'd be saying about the Baltimore game if Lee Evans had managed to hold onto the ball. But really, other than the strip sack, the Giants D didn't do anything special. If the Pats don't beat themselves, the opportunity to put up some big numbers could be there. Hopefully the defense can have a similar performance, although this time they'll have to deal with Hakeem Nicks as well. It should be a great game, and an exciting one!

The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.

Comment 52 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Giants D isn't better than the Ravens D.

That’s why I think the NE O will be fine.

Cruz, Manningham, Nicks, Ballard, Bradshaw do scare me a bit. We don’t do well covering big tall guys. (Megatron, V-Jack, Bills guys, Marshall)

Lakers and Patriots forever.

by D.S.T. on Jan 24, 2012 1:48 PM EST reply actions  

This.

Front to back, the Ravens’ D is far more balanced and complete than that Giants’. The Ravens can rush the passer, stop the run, cover over the middle and cover deep. The Ravens D really did prevent the Pats O from getting into any sort of real rhythm – an uncommon feat.

Conversely, the Giants have one of the worst run Ds in the league and a secondary that is about as porous as the Pats’. They, like the Pats, have stepped it up in the playoffs, but they are by no means as balanced a unit as the Ravens’ D. The Pats’ O should be able to get into a rhythm at some point against this opponent. The question then becomes whose offense fares better against its opponents’ flawed defense. The matchups to watch are Arrington, Moore, McCourty, Chung, et al. v. Cruz, Manningham, Nicks, Ballard, et al.

by nbradley07 on Jan 24, 2012 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Pats running game is important

Not only do the Giants have a bad run D, but running the ball consistently helps to stop those pass rushers from simply flying up the field every time. If BJGE is good enough they might even be able to do some play action without Brady being sacked. Law Firm looked good against the Ravens, who are much harder to run on, so it seems like he could be a bright spot.

by Aluminum Penguin on Jan 24, 2012 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Giants used mostly dime-packages in Week 9.

Pats got to learn how to either clobber that or win outside the numbers. Welker, Gronk, and Hernandez are truly slot-guys. Pats need more WRs who can beat press-man. Branch disappears, Ocho/Underwood haven’t been on the same page with Brady, Edelman’s really just another slot-receiver who isn’t that good as a receiver, and Slater is really someone who should be focused on being the captain of our special-teams.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Jan 24, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

run the ball against the dime and force more defenders in the box

and then kill em with the gronk

Tedy Bruschi- "How do we feel about being AFC Champs?"
Team- "Aww Yeah!!!"

by freeland1787 on Jan 25, 2012 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

A thought...

The Giants have played a virtual murderers row of TE’s over the past 5 weeks. With alot of success. The two balls that Vernon Gohlston beat us on were both on the outside of the defense against a corner and safety. Over the middle we are taking guys out with LB’s Boley and Williams.

The edges might be a better area to attack with your TE’s as opposed to the middle of the field where the Giants have been neutralizing the likes of Whitten, Keller, Gonzalez, Finley, and even Vernon Davis. He did nothing over the middle.

And in crunch time, Davis was eliminated as threat completely, though the pass rush did account for some of this.

The truth. The REAL voice of reason

by tommy d. on Jan 27, 2012 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

heh

Vernon Gholston… where is your head. Our tight ends, when going deep tend to stick to the seam routes. Although deep outs are not out of the question.

by Oughat on Jan 27, 2012 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Too much work, kids, etc, not enough sleep lol

Shrugs and kicks rocks…

The truth. The REAL voice of reason

by tommy d. on Jan 27, 2012 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Just would like to fix a couple things....
but they are by no means as balanced a unit as the Ravens’ D

Packer,Cowboy,Jet,Falcon and 49ers fans may disagree.

Giants run D was rated 19 th overall in the reg season. But in the last 5 games (winning streak)

Jets 105 (13 Sanchez)
Dallas 49
Atl. 64
GB 147 (66 Rodgers)
SF 150 (42 A Smith)
The Giants have been pretty stout vs RBs . Running QBs have been a x factor . Take away the QB runs (something Brady wont be doing) they give up 78 yds a game.

Giants have a pretty good secondary as well . Since the scheme change . the Giants have aloud Playoff QBs(Ryan,Rodgers and A Smith) 212 yds and a 73 QBR.

I understand its hard to follow other teams in the league when focus is on your own team . But dont be mistaken , the Giants are a very different team from the last time we played.

Factor in Nicks and Bradshaw playing . .. BB is well aware of this and will be a very different game plan in the SB.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't saying the Giants' D is bad by any stretch.

But they Ravens D is a better unit. I don’t think that’s a particularly controversial conclusion. I also recognized that they have stepped it up in the playoffs.

Of course BB’s gameplan is going to be different than in the prior game. Because his team lost! They did a number of things poorlly in that game and failed to adjust schematically. They haven gotten significantly better at adjusting since that part of the season, and they will bring the experiences of that loss to this game, obviously tempered by the differences in personnel available to each team now that they are healthier.

by nbradley07 on Jan 24, 2012 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats the perception and i don't blame u for thinking that.

The Giants go 7 deep on the Dline.

at LB have Mike Boley playing out of his mind, Kiwi is a hybrid lb, strong against the run and can be scary when blitzing. Rookie J Williams is as fast as any TE and has been blanketing TEs of late . and C Blackburn taken over the Mike duties for the injured J Goff with gusto..

Rolle & KP are very good safetys and have looked like their old self since the scheme change.

I understand it sounds crazy but, I would out doubt take our D over the past 5 games . its just been that good. u will see! :)

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus C Web is a top notch corner.

Prince Amukamara has looked very good after a slow/injured start and Ross has shut down some very good WRs in the playoffs.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

haha yeah there good.

Not claiming to be better , but the Giants are now ( unlike prior to week 15) playing up to their talent level.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 25, 2012 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Giants won't go 7-deep on the line except in certain situations

or to disguise. They’ll probably do what they did last time; throw a lot of dime packages at the Pats.
Pats will probably respond by running it and using those big TEs to keep small DBs away from the RB.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Jan 24, 2012 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

When he is talking 7 deeps is you have 7 guys who can speed rush the passer with very different styles. Example your the right guard and most games you study one or two guys of the opposite team for certain situations. The giants can line up 7 different guys on you in that position. Unlike the ravens we won’t blitz you promises. we live and die getting to your QB before you able to throw the ball.

Osi
Tuck
JPP
Canty
Kiwi
Joseph
Tollefson

by Giantstep on Jan 25, 2012 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

yes 7 deep in regard to talent .

And they use every one of them.

I’m not to sure the PATS will c a lot of dime this time. In our prior meeting PF was trying to cover up for a lot of deficiencies on D. That’s no longer the case .. My guess would be more nickel(man I miss J Tryon in the slot). a lot 3 Safety 2 LB looks.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 25, 2012 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Giants had I think 2-3 snaps

with 4 DBs on the field in Week 9, otherwise it was 5 or more DBs.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Jan 26, 2012 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't know why the nIners went away form the run

in the second half. They ran well in the first half, and then in the second half they went to a throw first, run 2nd, almost every drive. The throw would be an incompletion, so on second and 10 the Giants were ready for the run, and it would be either a one yard loss, no gain, or a one yard gain, then a 3rd and long which they could not convert. I think they really screwed up the playcalling in that half, and as a result, they did nothing – of course, give credit to the Ginats D. They played well, and have been playing very well. I still think that we can have success running, not 150+ yards mind you, but similar to the Ravens game, we will pick our spots and occasionally LawFirm and Woody will be getting 4-8 yards per carry, here and there.

by furiousd on Jan 24, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Pats need to learn to run

run run and then run some more. Completely shock a defese, wear them out, and then with the Boston TE Party on the field drop into the no-huddle and rip at them. Say what you will about the Slater pass, but the Pats should try that again if only to draw coverage away from the guys between the numbers. They either need to win like that or get Brady to find a connection with either Ocho or Underwood. If Welker, Gronk, and Hernandez are swarmed between the numbers it leaves the true WRs(wide outside the numbers) the chance to take advantage IF they can beat man-coverage. Branch hasn’t been able too, Welker’s truly a slot-receiver and always drawing attention, Slater’s better on STs than O and Edelman’s a better DB than WR. Problem is, for whatever reason, Brady isn’t on the same page with either Underwood or Ocho.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Jan 24, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

obviously the 9ers seen something at 1/2 time and tried to make adjustments.

they understood that they couldn’t win when their QB was passing at a sub Tebow completion rate…….

They also threw on 2nd after passing on 1st down.

I also believe the Pats will be able to run effectively . I dont see us having Chase Blackburn (run stopper)on the field a lot . prob more 3 Safety looks with Boley and J.Will/ Kiwi looks. Plus i like your trio of backs.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

That was a result of scheme

The Giants confused the Niners in the second half. They would put 8 in the box, or make it look like like they were stacking the box with a safety(s), but they had the genius Harbaugh figured out for the most part in the later stages of the game.

And the Niner D was so good we couldn’t muster any drives of length. If you watch, the Giants figured out late in that game to not make a mistake. Bradshaw was covering up the ball, WR’s were going down instead of fighting for every last yard, and punt returners were going down on first contact.

Our coaches knew they could trust Eli however, and let him take chances, but it sure looked like they coached the rest of the team to play conservative and not lose it, cause they knew which ever team did make the big mistake would end up going home. And they were right. Smart “big picture” coaching IMO.

The truth. The REAL voice of reason

by tommy d. on Jan 27, 2012 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I would come back at you with

our O-line is plating at it’s highest level right now, and our D has surely improved(although our secondary is still a bit suspect).

by furiousd on Jan 24, 2012 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

i was only commenting on the Giants.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

gotcha

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Cruz is the guy they MUST stop

The emergence of Cruz and the win streak the Giants are on is no coincidence. He’s getting open, he’s making great catches, he’s all over the place and improving every game! But most importantly for the Giants – Eli has total faith in him under any conditions. We don’t want Eli being comfortable at all. We need to make sure he knows if he’s going to Cruz, he’s playing with fire. This will take a combination of LB’s and probably Edelman and will most likely leave the Giants TE’s open more often than usual. You have to pick your poison though.

Just like mitigating Rice let Boldin, Evans and Smith get more opportunities, it worked. In fact, there were several throws to the open TE’s of Balitmore that didn’t go well. You throw to a guy that isn’t dependable vs. throwing to Rice enough times and the outcome isn’t the same. I guess the same goes for Lee Evans. He wasn’t dependable all year and did get some catches that game, but when it came down to it he couldn’t hold onto seemingly a sure TD.

by iLikeStuff on Jan 24, 2012 3:05 PM EST reply actions  

Kind of the opposite of the Baltimore game

In this case, I think we might WANT the Giants to try to beat us with the run. Jacobs and Bradshaw both have talent, but they haven’t shown themselves to be game-breakers this year and the Giants have struggled at times with their run blocking.

Eli is very difficult to sack, and either Cruz or Nicks can go the distance on any play. To me this seems to equal extra defensive backs for the Pats, not just for double teaming but to keep the receivers from escaping once they do get the ball.

by Aluminum Penguin on Jan 24, 2012 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Bradshaw has been hobbled with a foot injury most of the year

Jacobs must have spent some of his money cause he seems a lttle swifter as of late.
I wouldn’t think the plan is to let them run and control the clock.
Sure that’s the week to week mentality when Brady and the O have an off performance.
For all the Eli is Elite talk everyone overlooks the ~70% chance of all his incredible completions being near INT’s. (Note that’s a personal perception stat)
The way Vince and the rest of the D-line has played recently I’d expect Eli to have to rely on his TE’s or Bradshaw out of the backfield as the deep routes won’t develop with what has become a fairly effective Pats pass rush.

GFY

by TFBismywingman on Jan 24, 2012 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Rewatching the NFCCG

and the Vernon Davis 28 yard touchdown reception caught my eye. He flat out beat Phillips, and that got me thinking that perhaps Hernandez against Phillips will be a very favorable matchup. Hernandez is similar in size and speed to Davis (although Davis is straight-line faster and Hernandez is more agile) and I think that could be a matchup that Brady can exploit until the cows come home. Or, if all goes well, until the Lombardi comes home.

It matters not how strait the gate, nor charged with punishments the scroll:
I am the Master of my fate. I am the Captain of my soul.

by BigRussNovak on Jan 24, 2012 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

yeah KP missed the bump at the line and did not retreat well.

im sure it will be a lot of 2 deep safety looks with Rolle being the 3rd in the box.

I may not be the most noble of men but in a town of lepers, im the one with the most fingers.

Giant LB'zz SUCK!! Mark Herzlich, Jacquian Williams,...Maybe .. Sadly this has been modified.

by Troy O on Jan 24, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Goes without saying

but I’ll say it anyways, we won’t win this game with a minus turnover differential. No way, and the Giants have been getting them the last couple of games. We may need a pick as well. Eli has been clutch, but he is due for one. Hopefully Tommy used his up already.

by furiousd on Jan 24, 2012 7:39 PM EST reply actions  

Pats O-Line and D-Line

are their best assets right now. Even though they’re in the Super Bowl, the Giants O-Line isn’t that good. As for their Defense, they’ll be going with a lot of dime packages. They were in dime more often than not in Week 9 vs. the Pats. Pats O-Line and D-Line are playing at a high-level and should be used to do what everyone least suspects; aim to win on the ground. Pats need to take advantage of smaller defenses by out-muscling them with their TEs and line-depth.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Jan 24, 2012 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Love our O-line right now

We all know they deserve some blame for our recent playoff losses, but not this year. They have answered the bell, and if they can play at this level one more game, I like our chances.
I don’t think it has been talked about much, but people are wondering how we won this game when all the stats, t.o.p., turnovers etc, favored the Ravens. Simple, we won the battle of the trenches. Ravens were confident they would win it, and now the Giants are. In contrast to 2009, we won on both sides of the ball, protected Brady, ran blocked well, and also controlled the line of scrimmage on D. So proud of those guys.
How much of Giants in dime was based on personnel in that game? I think they were missing a few players, so they may change it up for the bowl.

by furiousd on Jan 24, 2012 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

If you aim to win on the ground,

I don’t think that is a winning formula, because that will translate to a closer, lower scoring game if you succeed. I don’t think these Giants are a team you can beat like that, not with your defense vs. our offense.

However it is played, I just don’t want to see Brady have the ball last.

The truth. The REAL voice of reason

by tommy d. on Jan 27, 2012 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Just went back and watched 2007 SB highlights for the first time since that year

Want to puke. So bad.

After seeing the zero push our D-line got. The times we got beat on passes. The horrific protection for Brady. The missed TD off the helmet. The interception that was missed. The Catch. The Burress touchdown.]

WE FUCKING WON THIS GAME> BRADY LED US DOWN THE FIELD AND FREAKING MOSS CAUGHT THE GAME_WINNING TD!!!

Dammit.

Words cant describe.

Makes me even more pumped for this game.

Lakers and Patriots forever.

by D.S.T. on Jan 24, 2012 9:18 PM EST reply actions  

I mentioned it briefly, but it was a terrible offensive game plan

WAY too many deep routes and plays that took a long time to develop in that game. The Giants front 4 was rotating guys like crazy so that they could always be charging up the field toward Brady at 100 MPH. Only when the Pats started passing it short to Welker on a regular basis did their offense get any kind of rhythm. And Moss only started getting catches when they had him break off his long routes, which nullified the deep safety. Those adjustments were almost enough, but they were so late in the game that they left the door open for a miracle…

PS – Other than a pass interference call that Watson drew early on, the Pats TEs in that game were a complete waste of space. What a difference one draft can make.

by Aluminum Penguin on Jan 24, 2012 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

The Pats have one fatal flaw, If they face a great defense, Brady freezes, been happening all year

Cowboys, Giants, Steelers, and Ravens more or less. They already know what defense they will bring, theyve known all year, tight man to man. They need a person who can get open down field and I expect a pretty big game from a certain 85

Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit.
Edward Abbey

by TONYBOI08 on Jan 24, 2012 11:53 PM EST reply actions  

giants don't strike as a great defense

dime packages only work the first time- you can’t fool BB twice

Tedy Bruschi- "How do we feel about being AFC Champs?"
Team- "Aww Yeah!!!"

by freeland1787 on Jan 25, 2012 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

dime packages work amazingly when you have the type of pass rushers the Giants have, and have had over the years, you should know that.

Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?

by FrankWyt on Jan 25, 2012 1:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Smaller defenders?

Our LB’s are not huge, agreed if that is who you are thinking about, but they are not schemed to be huge run stoppers. Though Kiwi is a natural DE and is taller and heavier than most LB’s, and he is very good against the run.

However, if you think the Dline is small, only Osi and Tollefson are “smallish,” and well, you know what Osi’s game is. Other than that:
JPP DE 6’ 5" 280
Tuck DE 6’ 5" 270
Joseph DT 6’ 4" 323
Canty DT 6’ 7" 317
Bernard DT 6’ 3" 310

They are big as all hell….

The truth. The REAL voice of reason

by tommy d. on Jan 27, 2012 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Vs. the Pats in Week 9,

Giants almost always had anywhere from 5-7 DBs on the field. That’s what I mean by smaller defenders.

It is what it is

by Middlesex on Jan 28, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

gotcha

The truth. The REAL voice of reason

by tommy d. on Jan 28, 2012 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Aren’t most of the O linemen the same? It’s tough to outmuscle those Giants d linemen. They are beastly.

Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?

by FrankWyt on Jan 29, 2012 3:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Brady however also did fine vs the Jets (4th), Eagles(8th) and middle of the pack defenses like Maimi or Kansas city

by lololol on Jan 26, 2012 2:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Quick Sand

I agree with you that if we don’t kill ourselves…! Giant is like some sort of thing that we can’t over come, like our ex, we don’t like them but seeing them, still giving us the uncomfortable feeling; somehow we [Brady and Co] could overcome it then we could win this game as easy as Rex speaking his mind—-Jet watch Pats win their 4th Superbow!

by NE4NE on Jan 25, 2012 11:33 PM EST reply actions  

Brady in interviews have said he can not even watch highlights of the super bowl lose. Most of the pats won’t comment on it. It just going to get worse during next week with media days ahead. I think the Giants are in the Pats heads. If they can not over come that it could make the difference. I believe Brady is very mentally tough as it comes as a player in the NFL.

by Giantstep on Jan 29, 2012 2:37 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe