Three Lombardi Trophies and 16-0? I'll take it.
After the AFCCG, Greg Knopping wrote, recalling Superbowl XLII, that "On that day, Patriots fans learned the hard way that the Lombardi trophy is a lot more important than an unblemished regular season record." Even more bluntly, D.S.T. wrote a fan post remarking that: "A team that has gone into history thanks to at least three lucky plays. The Catch. The missed interception. The Plaxico Burress touchdown. The Aftermath? The Patriots are now the Cheatriots. The moral of the story? Cheating never pays. Blowing out teams never pays." And these views are not rare. I still remember reading before Superbowl XLII that the game would decide whether the 2007 Patriots are remembered forever or whether they quickly disappear as a footnote.
Really? One play, one drive does not, should not, and cannot define the 2007 New England Patriots, what they accomplished, nor their place in history. So I'm here to say ENOUGH ALREADY.
Superbowl XLII still hurts. No, it still kills. It's more painful than any other "event" in my life -- and I'm sadly not exaggerating at all (possibly why people tell me I'm too into sports). My heart will always ache at what could have been. It hurts because we were so damn close. It hurts because I can still picture, in slow motion, everything that had to go exactly right -- and did -- for the Giants in that fateful last drive. One un-dropped pick, one more step for a sack, one more incompletion, one defended pass in the end zone, one more foot on a desparate hail mary throw -- one different play and the story ends differently.
But I'll take it. If I was given the choice, for 2007, between an 18-1 season with a 16-0 regular season or an 11-5 season with a Superbowl win, I'd take 18-1, 16-0. Why? Because Brady and Belichick did the Superbowl thing -- 3 times in 4 years. But who has done 16-0? If the Patriots hadn't won the Superbowl in 2001, 2003-4, I'd make a different choice -- I'd take the Lombardi. But 3 Lombardi trophies and 16-0? I'll take that over 4 Lombardi trophies.
Quick, who won the Superbowl in 1975? I'm guessing most of you don't know -- I sure as hell don't. But everyone knows who the 1972 Miami Dolphins are. The 2007 New York Giants won't be remembered because they won the Superbowl -- they'll be remembered because of the circumstances of who they beat. They stopped 19-0. But is anyone really going to forget who they stopped? Of course not. Be real. In ten years, Superbowl XLII is forgotten if not for the Patriots run at perfection that year. A footnote in NFL history? Give me a break. And in the next 50 years, assuming no lockouts, 50 teams are going to win the Superbowl; but in the next 50 years, how many teams are going to have perfect regular seasons? Far fewer. Again, I'll take 3 Lombardi trophies and 16-0.
The pain of losing -- the way we lost -- will never go away. But enough already. The 2007 season was, is, and will always be historic for the New England Patriots. A David Tyree helmet catch does not erase:
- A 16-0 regular season. Last I looked, its the only one in NFL history (a big thank you to Jim Caldwell in 2009 and the Kansas City Chiefs in 2011).
- 50 and 23. The NFL record number of TD and TD Receptions in 2007 by Tom Brady and Randy Moss, respectively. Peyton, who?
- 589 and +315. The total points and point differential for the 2007 Patriots, both NFL records. That year, the Patriots beat the Bills in their two games by a combined score of 94-17, the Jets by a combined score of 58-24 and the Dolphins by a combined score of 77-35. Sucks to be the AFC East.
- 15. This is the number of 4th down conversions for the New England Patriots in 2007. The stat itself is very ordinary, but who doesn't remember us going for it on 4th down plays, already up by 30 points? Maybe running up the score doesn't pay, but somehow it just seemed so fitting that year.
- Speaking of 4th down conversions, how about the Week 13 game against the Ravens? Lost in the memories of the 2007 blowouts is a simultaneously thrilling, lucky, clutch drive by Brady with 3 minutes to play that kept the pursuit of perfection alive. Thanks for that timeout, Rex Ryan.
- 49 out of 50. The number of MVP votes Brady received in 2007, the most votes for one player in NFL history. This record, of course, was broken in 2010.
- Brady to Moss bombs. It's not a stat. It's probably nothing even that special in the history of the league. But I'll never forget the thrill of Brady winding up and launching it deep. I actually think, a long time from now after Brady retires, that Brady to Moss will be an enduring image shown over and over again in highlights.
Most of these records will be matched and broken. That's the reality of sports. And none of these stats are quite as enduring as 19-0 could have been. But so what? 2007 was epic. The New York Giants won a Superbowl, like the Colts the year before, like the Steelers the year before that, and like the Patriots 3 of the 4 years before that. But the 2007 New England Patriots, for good and bad, are the most memorable NFL team thus far from the 21st century.
So the next time a Giants fan or Patriots-hater gives you a hard time about Superbowl XLII, congratulate them on their Superbowl ring and ask them to get back to you when their team transcends the sport. To paraphrase the almighty Hoodie: Three Lombardi trophies and an unmatched perfect regular season, s--- my d---.
I'll take it.
The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.
13 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This reminds me of a FanPost I once wrote.
http://www.patspulpit.com/2011/1/6/1920216/18-1-was-the-best-thing-that-ever-happened-to-us
After I wrote it, I realized that it’s all just a bunch of excuses to make us sleep better at night. Maybe you do truly feel this way, that you’d rather have 18-1 with no Super Bowl victory than 11-5 with a Super Bowl victory but I disagree, and I think if you put up a poll on the site, my sentiment would be shared by many more.
Sure we’ll be remembered for a long time. But it’s not for a good thing that we’ll be remembered for. Everyone will point to 2007 and laugh at the Patriots at going 18-0 and then losing the only game that mattered. In this sport, greatness is not measured by how many records you break, but that the Lombardi trophy is in your hands, hoisted up, at conclusion of the season. We didn’t get that far, so greatness was not ours.
I understand what you’re saying, but on any given day, I’d rather we have won the Super Bowl. Think of the records that could’ve potentially been broken had that happened. 19-0. Brady would’ve tied for most SB wins by a QB and he would’ve been vying to break that record this year. It hurts to just look back so I’m going to end here. Nice article though.
Cyril P
liryc715@yahoo.com
Oh, don't get me wrong.
If I had to choose between 19-0 and 18-1, I’d choose 19-0 without even thinking about it. That’s not really the point. I’m not AT ALL saying losing the Superbowl was a good thing.
If I was to say I’d rather take the Superbowl, it would entirely be because getting that close and missing out on 19-0 hurts. It really, really sucks and its the easy way out to say “anything that avoids that hurt is better”. But I completely mean it when I say I’d take 3 Lombardi trophies and a perfect regular season over 4 Lombardi trophies. The 3 SB wins are key though, and really, hopefully, another one in a couple of weeks.
People will “point and laugh” out of jealousy, out of spite of the “cheating” Patriots, or the Patriots team that demolished their own team for a decade. I point and laugh at the Packers for losing to the Chiefs, but it’s completely because I’m relieved they didn’t go 16-0.
Greatness is, in part, measured by SB wins, but it’s obvious that isn’t the only criteria.
by CanadianPatriotsFan on Jan 25, 2012 1:29 PM EST up reply actions
you down with ALT...
I hold it true, whate’er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
’Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.
It's your thing, do what you wanna do, I can't tell you, who to sock it to. The Isley Brothers
by sweetjesusihatethejets on Jan 25, 2012 7:21 PM EST reply actions
dude
you are my hero. that is a fantastic perspective and i wholeheartedly agree. we are so spoiled and our hearts were ripped apart by the SB loss. but SB 42 and 2007 will forever be remembered by the pats team. they were favored by 20+ points several times that year. that’s how good that team was. yeah ,we lost the last game, but the guts, the f-you touchdowns, and the strive to try to go 19-0, is just unprecedented. ask the colts – oh wait, they pussied out. saints in 2009? they tried but couldn’t do it. packers in 2011? tried, but couldn’t.
we made history, regardless of the fact that it stings.
Agreed
And another thing that people forget is how GOOD that team actually was. Even though it didn’t get a championship it is without a doubt the best Pats team we’ve ever had. When you consider the talent, the experience, the QB play, it was just the best roster we’ve ever assembled. I remember some people thinking before the season that we were going to have a better team this year than the 07 team. The Patriots will not have a roster like they did in 07 any time soon. Even the Packers with how good they were weren’t as talented as a team as the 07 team.
Rex Ryan: "There’s no way that we’re looking to replace Mark Sanchez"
Patriots Nation: "Thank God"
Giants Fans: "FOUR MORE YEARS!! FOUR MORE YEARS!!"
Respectfully disagree
I will take the 04 pats. Same record, 18-1. I love me some Ty law and holding the colts to 3 points in the arc championship.
I also feel that having the colts comeback against us in 06 was just as heartbreaking as the 07 superbowl.
by feetey on Jan 27, 2012 9:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Same record?
Didn’t we go 17-2 in 2004? (i.e. 2 regular season losses)
by CanadianPatriotsFan on Jan 28, 2012 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
I know who won the SB in 1975. LOL
And every other year but I’m a SB FREAK.
And I liked your point about the reason that SB 42 and the Giants winning it will be remembered more than anything else, and that is because of who they beat. And I don’ think that is a knock on the Giants, just a testament to how great the Pats were, and how historically great they would have been if they had won. But they didn’t…
BTW, all those other numbers nobody cares about. Baseball likes it numbers, football likes it’s champions.
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
Really?
Because if you read basically any football website, people are just as big of fans as statistical records. I agree that, in general, championships are the most important. I don’t think that’s untrue in ANY sport. But I think you’re kidding yourself if you think nobody cares about stats. There are examples literally all over the place. Single season passing yardage record anyone?
by CanadianPatriotsFan on Jan 28, 2012 10:11 AM EST up reply actions
I don't know what to say...
It just is what it is. In baseball, fans remember exact numbers, who has them, year, etc. So many records are so important to the story that is the history of baseball.
In football, beyond the all-time leading rusher, passing yards, and TD’s, people just don’t get all that excited about, or remember who has, the exact numbers.
But talk about QB’s, and everybody seems to know who has won 1, 2,3, SB’s etc…
The only time I see stats matter in football is during a broadcast they throw numbers around to titilate the viewer, or on these blogs when people are making a point.
In historical context, there just aren’t that many records in football that people care about. Shrugs
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
Except, that's not what it is at all.
I honestly don’t know how you can think this…
The most recent example, of course, is Drew Brees breaking Marino’s record. This stat was literally everywhere for the last 3 weeks of the regular season. Not a single mention of how many SBs Brees had won. There’s also a certain 4th quarter record for Eli Manning that was set this year and is pretty well known. Again, it’s not about his SB ring.
And it’s not just the media. Read through some of the game threads from Pats Pulpit from the middle of this season. I assure you that you’ll see that many fans very much care about stats/records — even ones I don’t even consider real records, like consecutive games throwing at least 2 TD passes. But it’s out there. People do care.
It doesn’t mean you need to, but I think you’re fooling yourself if you think people don’t care about records in football. Championships are more universal, but every Patriot fan knows Brady has the single season TD record, and every Patriot knows whose record he beat.
by CanadianPatriotsFan on Jan 31, 2012 9:20 AM EST reply actions
Just to add...
Maybe people don’t know the exact numbers in football like they do in baseball. I’ll be honest, I had to double check the number for some of those. But we do remember the fact that the record exists and who owns it.
by CanadianPatriotsFan on Jan 31, 2012 9:21 AM EST up reply actions

by 




























