Silencing Hank: Super Bowl Edition
It's amazing what you'll do to keep your mind occupied, isn't it?
Yesterday provided us with the first awful, awful reminder of what Sundays without football feels like. 1 PM came around and neither Fox, CBS, nor NBC had their usual crews of blithering idiots fawning over Tim Tebow as they tried to call games. There were no halftime shows, no postgame wrap-ups, and no highlights on SportsCenter last night. I know that I'll eventually get used to it again, and once the weather gets nicer it will be an odd relief to be able to spend a Sunday afternoon outdoors away from the stress of watching the Patriots play, but that first football free Sunday always hits me like a ton of bricks covered in dog crap and deep fried in vomit.
Yes, I know that the Pro Bowl was on yesterday. But anyone who watched more than three downs of that game will agree that the Pro Bowl is not football.
So with no football to watch and the January weather just cold enough to make me want to avoid going outside at all costs, I resigned myself to seeing what people who aren't obsessed with football watch on Sundays. And let me be the first to say - I was extremely disappointed. I always thought that the official time for re-airing the worst movies ever made was Saturday afternoon; at least it was when I was a kid. But there must have been a schedule shift somewhere along the line, because yesterday I flipped through channel after channel of what can only be described as absolute schlock for a solid hour before my thumb simply got too tired to do any more work. I ended up settling for Armageddon on FX, a movie I saw and disliked years ago. And trust me when I say it isn't any better the second time around. By the time I peeled myself off the couch and stumbled off to bed, I had logged a solid 14 hours of crappy TV as I achieved the laziest of lazy Sundays.
Now for some, this may sound like an absolute dream come true. And honestly, zoning out in front of the television isn't a terrible way to spend a cold winter Sunday. The only problem was that I just couldn't relax at all. Every time I got up to go to the bathroom, went to get more food, or turned away from Ben Affleck's bumbling ineptitude for long enough to glance at the clock, all I could think to myself was where I will be and what I'll be doing this time next week as the Super Bowl draws closer. And the more I thought about it, the more restless I became. By the time the movie was reaching its end, I almost wanted to trade places with Bruce Willis so I could just blow myself up and end all this madness.
So, I thought I would try and maintain my sanity by writing my "Silencing Hank" article this morning. I know I usually post this these on Thursday or Friday, but if any of you are even half as anxious as I am right now, it might be helpful to have these points on the table to help keep us all sane over the next few days. Plus, I'm sure Hank will be so kind as to bring even more reasons to be terrified to my attention, so I figured I'd give myself a little window of time should I need to write a Silencing Hank Redux. This week is going to go by even more slowly than last week did, and odds are I'm going to spend almost every minute of it in a jittery, nervous state of embarrassingly overzealous anticipation. Plus, if this past week of media analysis is any indicator, we're going to hear more than our fair share about the Giants pass rush and how well Hakeem Nicks is playing right now.
Hank and the media seem to be saying the exact same things this week. Coincidence? I think not.
But Alec, the Giants beat the Patriots in 2007! They have the edge over us!
Shut up, Hank. I have a shocking piece of news for you that has somehow gone unnoticed this past week. Believe it or not, this is NOT the year 2007. These are two completely different teams, and these are going to be two completely different Super Bowls. It's a rematch, and rematches are sexy, I know. But replaying that stupid helmet catch over and over and talking about Super Bowl 42 nonstop isn't going to make a lick of difference as to the outcome of this game. It's easy to get sucked in and think that Tommy B is going to spend 60 minutes on his back on Sunday the way he did four years ago- but he won't. This offense is simply a faster offense than the one that was on the field in ‘07. One of the reasons why New York was able to get to Brady so many times in that Superbowl was because of the time he needed for plays to develop. Receivers were actually fairly open during that game, but completions came at a premium because Brady simply didn't have enough time in the pocket. The 2011 Patriots are not reliant on the intermediate passes to set up the deep ball; this team is much more proficient at getting a quick release and moving the chains via short and mid-range passes. What that means is that, regardless of outcome, this is a completely different Super Bowl and we can't lose sight of that.
But Alec, how are the Patriots going to handle the Giants' pass rush? New York can create all kinds of pressure by only rushing four! That leaves seven in the secondary to disrupt routes and throw off timing!
Shut up, Hank. I don't like the prospects of what the Giants' pass rush can do to disrupt this offense any more than the next guy. But you know who else had a pretty good pass rush? The Denver Broncos and the Baltimore Ravens. I'd say this offensive line handled them OK, seeing as Brady has only taken one sack so far all postseason. New England's offensive line is playing as good as they have all year, and I can see Sebastian Vollmer FINALLY getting back out there on Sunday. Patriots' receivers are fast and knowledgeable enough to find the holes in New York's suspect secondary, even if they are able to consistently drop seven back into coverage. If Brady has time, he will take this defense apart, and there is enough beef on the front line to give him the time he needs. It's more important than ever that the line gives Tommy B time to settle and find his groove - the Pats absolutely have the personnel to expose this secondary. Don't pay attention to what the media has to say.
But Alec, Rob Gronkowski is injured! Stupid Bernard Pollard did it AGAIN! What are we going to do?
Shut up, Hank. Gronk is injured, we know. But anyone who thinks Gronk won't be out on that field and won't make a serious impact likely spent a lot of time hanging out with Aaron Hernandez in college. Gronk is going to be fine. He was walking without any kind of a limp yesterday when the team landed in Indianapolis, and players have played through much worse. Remember Terrell Owens in SB XXXIX? He played on a broken ankle with two screws in it, and he had a pretty damn good game. Players can play on an ankle sprain, and they can be effective. Plus, even hobbled, Gronkowski is a player the Giants have to account for at all times, and just his presence on the field will open things up for the other receivers. Yes, it would be nice if he was 100%, but Gronk is a talented and dedicated enough player that he will be the difference maker he has been all season.
But Alec, the Giants are red hot right now! They have all kinds of momentum coming into this game!
Shut up, Hank. Are they really that hot? The New York Giants have played very well and 100% deserve to be representing the NFC on Sunday, but they didn't exactly do it on their own merit. The Green Bay Packers did themselves no favors with an 8 drop, 3 fumble offensive performance in the divisional round, and the NFC Championship Game was one of the only times in the history of professional sports where I can accurately say that one player completely cost his team the game. Yes, the Giants have played well, but they haven't exactly done it entirely on their own. Contrary to what most media outlets are saying, the Giants didn't obliterate everyone in their path and have looked very ordinary for parts of this 2011 postseason campaign. One bounce or fumble goes differently in the last game they played, and the Giants are watching this game from home. These Giants are very, very beatable - we can't lose sight of that.
But Alec, the Giants beat the Patriots in Week 9, and they did it without Ahmad Bradshaw and Hakeem Nicks! How is this secondary going to handle Nicks, Victor Cruz, and Mario Manningham?
Shut up, Hank. Week 9 was a long time ago, and I for one am glad that that game happened. Bill Belichick isn't going to lose to the same team three times in a row. Plus, let's keep the way the Giants won those last two meetings in mind; New England had a lead late in both games, and the Giants were only able to pull out the win off some ridiculous catches and/or extremely costly penalties. New York already used up their ridiculous Hail Mary helmet catch for the postseason against Green Bay, and now that Sergio Brown is out at safety and Tracy White is out at linebacker, we don't need to worry about 45 yard PI calls that set up a playaction throw on an obvious passing situation. What I'm trying to say here is that the Giants needed a lot of magic to beat New England during their last two meetings, and based on how they've won their last two playoff games, you have to wonder how many crazy plays can possibly go their way before their luck runs out. It's hard to argue that the Giants receivers don't have the edge against this Patriots secondary, but New England's defensive unit is playing as well as they've played all year, and are truly playing as a cohesive unit. And I'll take 11 guys playing together than any one stud linebacker or shutdown corner any day of the week. Look for Julian Edelman to make his first career interception on Sunday - you heard it here first.
But Alec, what if the Patriots lose? How is that going to affect Tom Brady and Bill Belichick's legacy? And how am I going to be able to survive?
Shut up, Hank. I know how nerve-wracking this is. I know how much a Super Bowl loss hurts - we all do. But we can't focus on what a Patriots loss will mean in regards to the big picture. Tom Brady's legacy is already cemented, no matter how much the haters love to argue otherwise. This current era of professional football is completely different than the eras in which the quarterbacks Brady is most often compared to played in, and yet Brady has still been unbelievably successful. Tommy B has been in the NFL for 12 years. He didn't play at all his rookie season, and he was lost to injury in 2008. That gives him 10 active seasons as the Patriots starting quarterback. In those 10 seasons, he has led this team to 6 AFC Championship Games and 5 Super Bowls. He has done all of this in the salary cap era where he spent the bulk of his career throwing to David Patten, David Givens, Deion Branch, and Reche Caldwell. That's absolutely insane, and an achievement not likely to be repeated ever again. And even if the Patriots do lose this game, even if they get blown out and Brady gets completely dominated by the Giants pass rush and all we hear for the next 50 years is how Eli Manning is a better quarterback than Tommy B and the G-Men simply have the Pats' number and all that nonsense, it is absolutely impossible to not appreciate all of the continued success we as Patriots fans have enjoyed for the past decade. There are fans of about 30 NFL teams that would give pretty much anything just to watch their team play in one Super Bowl, let alone five in 12 years. I don't want to take this remarkable run for granted by worrying about what people I honestly don't give a damn about think a Patriots loss will mean for Brady and Belichick's legacy. I'm just trying to enjoy it for what it is and not worry about anything other than blocking out all of these New York kuckleheads stomping around the streets of this city in brand new jerseys and hats that still have the price tags on them while they try to claim that they have been Giants fans since day one.
I'm going to try as hard as I possibly can to stay positive over the next week and remain grateful that there were no Patriots playing in the Pro Bowl yesterday. Life is too short, and Super Bowls are too few and far between, to spend one second of it doing anything but enjoying myself. So let's not get nervous and let's all just enjoy ourselves!
And if any of you actually figure out how to do that, please let me know. I'm on the brink over here.
Armageddon may be coming. But I know we're going to be ready.
See what I did there? The way I tied the movie I referenced at the beginning of this article back into the ending in order to compare it to the Super Bowl? That's pretty damn clever.
49 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice analysis, but 2007 was 10x the offense 2011 is. Also
the shorts routes are gone because the pats have no deep threat at all.
Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit.
Edward Abbey
by TONYBOI08 on Jan 30, 2012 12:02 PM EST via Android app reply actions
The "no deep threat" criticism has been leveled at the Pats so many times.
And so many times, they’ve proven that it doesn’t matter. At some point, you have to stop making an argument that isn’t borne out by the facts.
Randy Moss is one of the fastest people to ever step foot on a football field.
In a 40 yard dash, there are only a handful of people faster than him (Bo Jackson, Don Beebe, Deion Sanders, Chris Johnson, and that may be it.) In a 60 or 70 yard dash? I don’t think there’s anyone even close.
That being said, Brady had to wait even for Randy Moss to move down the field. He couldn’t throw it 60 yards away as soon as he gets the snap, and have Moss settle under it. He’s blazing, but he’s not the Flash. In 2007, Brady had to wait for Welker to get open (which is much quicker than Moss) Moss to get open or Dante Stallworth and his Martian friend to get open. If you can get pressure with your front 4 (as the Giants did) you can essentially stop the offense by doubling Welker, doubling (or tripling) Moss, and putting a man or two on Stallworth. There goes every viable receiver, and on top of that, Brady was getting sacked before he could even toss it up to those three. With no legitimate running game after Sammy Morris got hurt (no, Laurence “Dance Dance Revolution” Maroney does not count as a run game) the Giants secondary could just sit back and double cover everybody, and the Giants d-line could pin their ears back and have a quarterback feast.
This year, the Patriots have a legitimate running game (whether or not they use it will be the key) receivers who can run short routes (Welker, although he does it all) intermediate routes (Deion Branch, Aaron Hernandez, Gronkowski) and even deep routes (Ocho, Gronkowski, Slater/Underwood.) They may not have the greatest deep threat of all time anymore, but Brady has no qualms about throwing it deep. In fact, I hope on the first play of the game, Brady throws it deep to Ochocinco. That’ll loosen up the defense straight away.
Another thing about the 2007 Super Bowl is that the Patriots had highly over rated Nick Kaczur playing right tackle, and Stephen Neal playing on one leg at right guard. Against Tuck or Strahan, that’s basically unabated to the quarterback on every play. Now, they have wily veteran Brian Waters playing out of his mind (and maybe even better this week, since it’s his first Super Bowl) and either Nate “I shut out Cameron Wake in my first game” Solder or the return of Sebastian Vollmer at Right Tackle. The Patriots offense is much quicker, with far quicker routes than 2007, resulting in Brady holding the ball up to a full 2-3 seconds less, and resulting in him not getting hit/sacked nearly as much.
My point is as follows: the 2007 offense will always go down as the most prolific offense this side of the Greatest Show on Turf, Air Coryell, and the K-Gun offense. But the 2011 Patriots offense is so diverse, so multiple, that the Giants will have a much harder time defending it, even without Randy Moss taking two-three defenders downfield every play. With a healthy, more talented O-line and a more diverse offense, Brady has a lot less to worry about than in 2007.
It matters not how strait the gate, nor charged with punishments the scroll:
I am the Master of my fate. I am the Captain of my soul.
by BigRussNovak on Jan 30, 2012 6:53 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
I see what you did there with the tie-in of Armageddon. Nice. :-)
I also see what you did there more than once. Call the Giants lucky.
Everyone, please, disrespect the Giants post season accomplishments this year and keep calling them lucky. Keep qualifying and discrediting their wins. It always goes the same way, as it did here as well. It starts out by saying something along the lines of, “the Giants definitely deserve to be here and I give them credit, BUT”…Then the writers true feelings emerge.
I’m so friggin used to it from bitter Eagle fans that it doesn’t surprise me one bit anymore.
I love being lucky. LUCKY LUCKY LUCKY
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
Hey, it's good to be lucky
and whatever the heck we say here has zero impact on the game. You do know that. Right? And what the hell are you looking for here? I swear you’re either looking for proof that Patriots fans believe their team will win – which somehow directly translates into that not happening – or a post where the writer frets openly about how there’s no freaking way the Pats will win and then you can triumphantly point to that article as finally the truth being told. Yeesh.
Keep the faith!
by Marima on Jan 30, 2012 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
I want it all, Marima...
I want friendly exchanges of information, which I have gotten alot of since last Sunday night, I want to get insight into the Pats and their fans, give insight on the Giants and their fans, get riled up when I see anyone call us lucky, show my appreciation for the greatness that is the Pats organization, BB, and TB, and etc., etc.
Basically just enjoy this time in my teams history as much as possible, which includes your team and it’s fans on this site. But I have sensed from conversing with you that I rub you the wrong way. If so, I’m sorry if I offend, but at the same time…tough shit.
And thanks alot for bursting my bubble about what we write here having zero impact on the game. Yeesh. :-)
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
You're not going to get a positive reaction
When your average comment on here is along the lines of “Tom sure looked nervous and unsure of himself during the Bob Costas interview … thoughts?” I hate to drop the big “T” word, but what other reaction are you possibly expecting when you intentionally rile up the fan base of the opposing team? I assure you leaving a comment on Big Blue View along the lines of “If Dallas didn’t end up screwing the pooch, the Giants wouldn’t even have a shot at the postseason this year. Thoughts?” would only garner a less-than-stellar reaction from Giants fans. It’s common sense. Don’t try to spin it as anything otherwise.
Can I Scream?
I'm not spinning nuthin
Take it however you like. If your pissed, be pissed, I won’t try to convince you of anything.
I’ll just keep posting. If you wanna read, read. If you wanna comment, comment.
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
Award to the most passive agrressive poster from another fanbase goes to.........
tommy d.!!!!!!! speech!
by furiousd on Jan 30, 2012 3:43 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
No impact at all...
Unless there’s some way of accurately measuring how many fans on each side will be wearing their lucky boxers, socks, shirts, jerseys, helmets, etc… and sitting in the EXACT same chair they sat in the last time their team won, and serving the same foods, drinking the same brand of beer, not showering since, hanging with the same group of people at the same place, with the same lucky banner and the tacky team-themed soap dispenser in the bathroom (don’t ask)… I’m guessing what we do here sure helps us pass the time until the game gets underway, but that’s about all the impact it has on the players in Indy.
Keep the faith!
I know, I was kidding, thats why I put a smiley face at the end.
I don’t perform any rituals, do you?
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
I love the 'apology' too
I’m sorry… but tough shit. Why pretend to sugar coat it in the first place?
I don’t know you from a hole in the wall but I do know that you want respect for your Giants and a concession that they can’t be beaten Sunday, especially from this Patriots team. As much as I would love a blowout as it’s easier on the heart, I have no illusions that this game will be anything but a hard-fought slug-fest that may come down to whichever team makes one less turnover or misses one less opportunity than the other.
Keep the faith!
I can be duplicitous.
And you are reading things in my comments suggesting I want a concession?
I don’t know why that is for you, but I’ll say sincerely I don’t expect any kind of concession, nor do I think my team is so superior that anyone would expect a blowout. I don’t expect a blowout.
I expect something along the lines of what you describe.
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
"sincerely"?
from someone who’s admittedly duplicitous, I’ll take that for what it’s worth.
Keep the faith!
Do you just want to dislike me,
or do you tend to view most things in a negative light?
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
Tommy d, this is for you... You rub all Patriots fans the wrong way!
Don’t you guys have BBV so you can post all that crap about being “fired up” because we as fans think our team is gonna win? And why do you want information for? Are you gonna coach the giants in the SB based on what we tell you??? And YES whatever Marima and the rest of the editors write here has ZERO impact in the game, NADA!!! So why don’t you guys stop posting your crap in here we are all fans and we can care less about what the other team’s fans think about us…
P.D. Don’t you have a life, wife, kids or friends? I mean there’s not a single post in which you haven’t comment it, GET A LIFE!!!
by gap2539 on Jan 30, 2012 7:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Don't be so hard on the guy
He’s been way more cordial than a lot of the other opposing fans that come on here. I don’t mind if he thinks his team is the better, or if he gets fired up, as long as he is respectful and isn’t being a blatant patriot hate or spamming the site with male genital then im ok with him postin
Rex Ryan: "There’s no way that we’re looking to replace Mark Sanchez"
Patriots Nation: "Thank God"
Giants Fans: "FOUR MORE YEARS!! FOUR MORE YEARS!!"
Ok. Luck and fandom aside...
…who’s the better team at the moment?
Haven't seen them play for over a week.
How would we know? Maybe we could, I don’t know, get them together for a game and find out. How does Sunday look?
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 30, 2012 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
lol 2007
No it wasn’t twice the offense, you had to cover 2 people, Wes Welker underneath, and Randy Moss over top. When you took them away the offense was nonexistent.
It's true we have a better running game,and better tight ends this year
Donte Stallworth was a nice piece though.
Your thinking of 09
Jabar Gaffney and Donte Stallworth were good 3rd and 4th options. Ben Watson also had a good year (that makes 5 legit options).
Rex Ryan: "There’s no way that we’re looking to replace Mark Sanchez"
Patriots Nation: "Thank God"
Giants Fans: "FOUR MORE YEARS!! FOUR MORE YEARS!!"
In the Super Bowl:
Faulk had 6 ctaches out of 8 targets for 42 yards.
Maroney had 2 ctaches out of 3 targets for 12 yards.
Welker had 11 catches out of 14 targets for 103 yards.
Stallworth had 3 catches out of 5 targets for 43 yards.
Moss had 4 catches out of 12 targets for 44 yards.
Gaffney had 0 catches out of 3 targets for 0 yards.
Kyle Brady had 1 catch out of 1 target for 3 yards.
Watson had 0 catches out of 2 targets for 0 yards (and 15 yards worth of penalties).
I think we can easily beat that production.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 30, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions
Basically, we had 0 production from the Tight-Ends that game - even from a blocking standpoint.
Wes accounted for 61% (11/18) of the receptions hauled in by Patriots wide receivers in SB XLII, and he accounted for 62% (122 of 196) of the receptions hauled in by Patriots wide receivers in 2011. He will basically play the part of himself in this Super Bowl.
The part of Kyle Brady / Randy Moss will be played by Rob Gronkowski who should have a better catch rate than 38%.
The part of Ben Watson, Donte Stallworth will be played by Hernandez who should improve on the 42%.
That means we’ll need about 8 catches from the rest of the guys to make up for Faulk (who might play himself), Maroney, and Gaffney and a catch rate of at least 57%.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 30, 2012 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
A little prediction:
Ben Jarvis Green-Ellis is going to be the most valuable Patriot skill-guy (other than TFB).
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
"The longer they play, the more they lose. In the end, we get it all."
by JohnHannahRules on Jan 30, 2012 12:51 PM EST reply actions
I've thought this too and kind of hope it comes true
but I could also see BB designing a completely different game plan full of 4 WR sets to try to exploit NY’s secondary. I don’t really care what he does as long as it works.
And if it’s not working I pray to god he adjusts. It was so frustrating last week when the run game was working so wonderfully but it seemed like they just HAD to pass for some reason.
by DrJgopatsgators on Jan 30, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
I would be shocked to see 4WR's used extensively.
That would leave only the front five and a RB or TE to try and give Brady time to find one of those WR’s who are going against DB’s who are better press corners than zone corners.
BTW, BB sure looks like he is enjoying this SB so far. I see the guy smiling alot and cracking jokes. That has to be a good thing.
The truth. The REAL voice of reason
We're a passing team
last week we ran the ball beautifully, including for 2 touchdowns, which I believe it was said that Law Firms’ td was the first Pats postseason rushing td in 4 games or something. We are going to throw the ball, but I do believe we found something that will be valuable this game, and I believe we will run and run pretty well throughout the game. Are we going to run 25-30 times, no, even if we somehow have a big lead late, but I like how LawFirm looks as healthy as he has all season, and I look forward to him carrying the rock at least as much as last week.
But but but the Giants are so hot right now!
I guess the Patriots 10 game win streak isn’t considered being hot, but that’s because they only beat one team with a winning record! Well that streak included wins against the Dolphins and Redskins, who the Giants were 0-3 against this year. But Bradshaw is going to be healthy for this game! So i guess now the Giants have the other half of their league worst rushing attack playing for them, huge advantage!
by Stephen M on Jan 30, 2012 2:06 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
But Hank
Madden picked the Giants to win!
It was wrong 2 times in the past 8 seasons. 2007 being one of them. Hopefully, it’s wrong again this year with it choosing the Giants over the Pats this time around.
Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.
1 Cor 13:13
Just watching that simulation gives me heart pain
A comeback just to fall short again to the Giants would be horrid.
by Always Sunny Next Year on Jan 30, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions
i think Hank is my uncle...
we had a family dinner last night, and it was quite interesting. my family is a bunch of giant fans (my dad grew up on long island). i became a patriots fan mostly because of the giants – i followed parcells. after parcells went to new england, coupled with Bledsoe (my favorite player ever) being drafted by the pats, it just stuck. now i’m in the middle of a family crisis. a brief excerpt of dinner last night, that fortunately did not get out of hand.
my uncle: c’mon, the game isn’t even going to be close.
me: for who? the giants or the pats?
uncle: c’mon, the giants. they are better at every position except maybe tight end, but who cares about that.
me: oh, you mean besides the best tight end combo of all-time?
uncle: so you have a tight end, who cares?
me: ok, let’s say tight end is a watch. so the giants are better at every position?
uncle: yeah!
me: are you including quarterback? o-line? linebackers? special teams? and not to mention the best defensive player on either team (wilfork)? how about coaching?
uncle: the giants are hot, and their position players have all been playing better lately.
me: i know they are hot. but the pats aren’t?
uncle: whatever, it’s gonna be a blowout. giants are playing their best footbal.
me: yeah, i get that the 9-7 giants are playing thier best football. but so are the 13-3 pats, but that doesn’t mean anything to you does it?
let’s just say the conversation ended there. i truly hope all giants fans aren’t this deranged. fortunately we hadn’t had enough to drink at that point to take it to fists.
Well, every family has a crazy uncle.
In my family, it’s my brother, but at least he’s a Pats fan.
crazy is a little better to take when at least you can root for the same team
We have some that we can’t talk about politics, religion, raising children, schools, college football… anything except the Patriots, lol. Thank God the Pats are always playing during the holidays, lol.
Keep the faith!
Edelman prediction
I was actually thinking the same thing, i thought he would get a pick earlier in the playoffs. hopefully it happens on sunday, that would shut mario manningham up! by the way, any ounce of respect that i doubt i’ve ever had for ny fans is completely gone. in 2007, everyone was a giant fan. then they switched over to the jets when they made back to back afc championship games. then they had a difficult decision when both teams seemed somewhat even this year. now, all the bandwagon giant fans are starting are beginning to crawl out of their pathetic, caves to call themselves fans. living in Connecticut i see all of this first hand. i even see conditional patriots fans coming into the mix. i just hope the pats win so am in a good mood when all the bandwagon fans, whichever side they end up taking (hopefully the pats, notice the effort to avoid any jinxes…), dare to show themselves. otherwise, i could get pretty ugly. lastly, i am the only one that started out surprisingly calm and am getting more and more anxious with every tick of the superbowl countdown clock?
I'm doubling up on my meditation practice this week
Hopefully come game time I’ll be cool as a cucumber, regardless of how the game unfolds. Plus I’ll be fairly hydrated
Hey guys
Madden says Giants will win Superbowl 43, 27-24. Is it time to prove them and the media wrong? Looks like we’re the underdogs!

by 































