New England Patriots Links 1/09/12 - AFC Divisional Round Brings Broncos to Foxboro
Mike Reiss serves up some quick-hit thoughts on Patriots-Broncos.
1. Patriots benefit from rematch. One of the takeaways from the Patriots' 41-23 win over the Broncos on Dec. 18 was how the defense had to adjust to Denver's unique option-based offense. Players talked about how it was one thing to practice against it -- they had Julian Edelman as the scout-team QB on the option package, and Ryan Mallett as the scout-team QB in the passing game -- but something significantly different to actually play against it. The Patriots' run defense struggled in the first quarter before settling down, and that experience should benefit the Patriots in this playoff rematch. Turnovers were big for the Patriots in that Dec. 18 game.
4. Should help to have Spikes back. Given the importance of limiting the Broncos' running game -- they had 252 yards on 31 carries against the Patriots on Dec. 18 -- the return of Brandon Spikes is notable. Spikes, one of the Patriots' best run-stuffing linebackers, did not play that day because of a knee injury. He returned for the season finale, giving him an important tune-up for a game in which the Patriots figure to play their fair share of eight men in the box. Safety Patrick Chung also didn't play in the Dec. 18 game.
5. Broncos struggled against Hernandez. In the Dec. 18 meeting, the Broncos held the Patriots' top two pass-catching weapons relatively in check -- Rob Gronkowski had four catches for 53 yards, while Wes Welker had 4 for 41 -- but it was tight end Aaron Hernandez who hurt them most (9 catches, 129 yards, 1 TD). It was a game in which receiver Deion Branch did not play (groin). The Broncos figure to place a heavy emphasis on better tackling after the catch.
6. Short week and Tim Tebow's passing not to be overlooked. This is good spot for the Patriots, playing at home and getting the Broncos on a short week (they played Sunday and now come back for a Saturday road game). That's one of the big benefits of the bye. Tim Tebow was 11 of 22 for 194 yards against the Patriots on Dec. 18, but he looked like a more confident passer against the Steelers (10 of 21 for 316, 2 TDs), converting on the deep ball. The Patriots figure to play differently than the Steelers, with the idea of not leaving themselves as exposed on the back end to protect against the big play.
TEAM TALK
- Game Preview - New England Patriots vs. Denver Broncos. Broadcast info, series history, team connections and more.
- Paul Perillo and Andy Hart debate whether Bill O'Brien's departure will be a distraction to the team.
- The New England Patriots announced that Josh McDaniels has joined the team as an offensive assistant for the remainder of the 2011 season.
- New England Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichick released a statement on Bill O'Brien.
- Patriots Today - Arrington's thoughts on playoffs. (4.22 min. video)
- Patriots Today - Fletcher on playoffs, Gronkowski. (3.38 min. video)
- Patriots All Access: Part 1 (17.27 min. video) and Part 2 (22.56 min. video)
- Patriots Roster Report - 1/06/12 Edition (13.29 min. program)
LOCAL LINKS
- Mike Reiss reports director of player personnel Nick Caserio was viewed by the Colts as a top candidate for their vacant GM position, but turned down the opportunity.
- Jeff Howe thinks Nick Caserio turning down a very enticing opportunity in Indy, shows just how highly he values his place in New England.
- Ian Rapoport reports the team's director of pro personnel, Jason Licht, has also been contacted by the Colts along with director of player personnel Nick Caserio.
- Christopher Price offers five early thoughts on the Patriots, Tom Brady and Josh McDaniels going against Tim Tebow and the Broncos Saturday night.
- Ian Rapoport discusses Josh McDaniels' return and how his pairing with Bill O'Brien can work.
- Kirk Minihane states the obvious (just like Phil Simms) that a Patriots loss to Tim Tebow would be a disaster.
- Tom E. Curran thinks that if the AFC Championship isn't played at Gillette Stadium in two Sundays, the Patriots have no excuses.
- Greg A. Bedard reports the Broncos are ecstatic at getting another shot at the Patriots.
- ESPNBoston passes along some comments from Broncos coaches and players on Saturday's AFC divisional round matchup against the Patriots.
- Paul Kenyon says the Patriots-Broncos storylines keep getting better.
- Ian Rapoport recaps the Broncos' wild-card win over the Steelers last night, and recalls Tom Brady's prediction that Denver and New England would meet again.
- Karen Guregian puts Tebowmania in perspective and tells us why it's a good matchup for the Patriots.
- Christopher Price notes the Patriots' playoff vets know how the game changes in the postseason.
- Mike Reiss shares his initial reaction to the news of Josh McDaniels rejoining the team.
- Jeff Howe sees the re-hire of Josh McDaniels as great for the Pats' offense, but it won't give them an added advantage over the Broncos.
- Bob Hohler gives us a peek inside the mad, mad world of Patriots star Rob Gronkowski, the touchdown machine and fan favorite.
- Nate Dow compares the first two years of TEs Rob Gronkowski and Hall of Famer Mike Ditka.
- Mike Reiss thinks it's unlikely that the Patriots will strike any contract extensions during the playoffs, but the team and Wes Welker might take another shot.
- Karen Guregian can easily see Robert Kraft has a special bond with this year's Patriots team, even if he won't say it directly for the record.
- Christopher Price posts his postional playoff preview: Defensive line.
- ESPNBoston posts some soundbites from Bill O'Brien's introductory press conference at Penn State, confirming his commitment to see the Patriots through the playoffs.
- Michael Whitmer pinpoints Sept. 7, 2008, as the last time the Patriots won the coin toss and elected to receive the football.
- Greg A. Bedard says no team has ever appeared in a Super Bowl allowing as many yards per pass attempt as the Patriots and Packers.
- Zuri Berry comes up with five things to worry about, and not worry about, for the Patriots in the postseason.
- ESPNBoston looks back at Pats-Broncos, Part 1.
- Mike Petraglia says he's going to miss the Jets in the playoffs this January, and why we should too.
NATIONAL NEWS
- Adam Schefter (ESPN) Source: Patriots Nick Caserio denied Colts.
- James Walker (ESPN) Quick take: Broncos at Patriots.
- Mike Klis (Denver Post) Broncos, playoff teams should officially protest Josh McDaniels hire in New England.
- Don Banks (SI) Inside the NFL: Steelers dared Tim Tebow to win with his arm, and he did.
- NFL Live (ESPN) Merril Hoge and Eric Mangini take an early look at Pats-Broncos. (2.13 min. video)
- James Walker (ESPN) Patriots, Josh McDaniels need each other.
- James Walker (ESPN) The 2011 Walker Awards.
- Peter King (SI) MMQB: Tebow, Thomas validate McDaniels' big draft with Broncos' OT upset.
- Matt Bowen (Nat'l Football Post) Breaking down NFL Wild Card weekend.
- Clark Judge (CBS Sports) Wild-card Judgements.
- Andy Benoit (NY Times) How Tebow and his helpers beat man coverage.
36 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wasn't aware until last night, of the Colts' attempts at raiding two Pats execs
Good news that Nick Caserio declined the offer to interview, but no word yet from Pats director of pro personnel Jason Licht of what he’ll decide to do.
Keep the faith!
Bob Hohler thinks a 2.9 at the University of Arizona is a sign of a sharp intelligence.
God help us.
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
I'm fairness, it's a sliding scale
I think lamichael James was all PAC 10 academic last year with a 3.0. And the PAC 12 and big 10 generally have the highest standards in the bcs. Players spend a lot of time on football.
Oklahoma State will beat LSU in the National Title game by more than 7 points.
by No Pity on Jan 9, 2012 10:26 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Loved this one from Mike Klis:
There may be no rule against McDaniels working immediately for the Pats. But this clearly violates the spirit of fair competition. It’s so Belichick. It’s so McDaniels, for that matter.
In other words, “There’s not rule against it, and nothing really to even suggest that it’s unfair, but it’s probably not a good thing for the team I support, so someone should put a stop to it!”
Plus, the Pats sought him out when almost everyone thought they'd be playing the Steelers.
and I don’t expect any real help from him on the Broncos – the Pats already showed they could beat him already, without McD’s help.
Keep the faith!
The only help he might offer
is in creating situations that exploit certain players’ weaknesses. He’ll know off-hand which receivers can be jammed, which are good at finding zone soft spots (and which spots, specifically), what disguises they are susceptible to… He may not offer anything ground breaking, but he’s sure to have some in-depth knowledge that will add at least something to the game plan.
It will never end
No matter what Belichick does, he’s cheating. And Brady is a sissy. And the Patriots are the only team to tape calls. And the Patriots cannot win without cheating (despite going 16-0 and losing due to the biggest fluke catch ever).
The amount of information McD can give is paltry at best. It’s a totally different offense with a different QB. I would like these goofballs to list exactly what they think McDaniels can give them. They can’t and they won’t because they just want to whine about something.
Hey, Belichick used to work for the Colts, no wonder he's beat them so often.
Same thing with the Jets, and Browns Ravens.
It’s just not fair. It’s also not circus, or sideshow, or vaudeville, or ….
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 9, 2012 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
carnival.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 9, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
I thought I smelled cabbage.
True wealth is a shelf full of unread books.
by Hometown Gyro on Jan 9, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
Groovy, baby!
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Rex Ryan and his brother Rob openly teamed up to plot against the Pats this year
Wouldn’t that be in some sort of violation of the “spirit” of fair competition in the view of the Denver Post writer Mike Klis? You never heard any wining from the Patriots or the NE media about it though.
Keep the faith!
If only we'd had some tape on the helmetcatch play. We'd totally have punked them.
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
by JohnHannahRules on Jan 9, 2012 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
They fired him because he was so terrible, but now he might be too good for the Patriots.
The logic — it buuuurns!
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
by JohnHannahRules on Jan 9, 2012 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
There is the letter and the spirit of the law.
This violates neither. It might violate someone’s delicate sensibilities, but there’s nothing to prove they weren’t ravished in the first place.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 9, 2012 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
When you start appealing to the "spirit of the law"
it usually means your argument is crap. Not always, but usually.
Yeah -- that's like one of the Unwritten Rules.
"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."
by JohnHannahRules on Jan 9, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
I know.
What if O’Brien just up and left or worse, died? Are we supposed to go without a coordinator.
So sorry, you can’t hire someone because it would be, “Bad”.
Michael Silver’s also got his undies in a bind over this. He says it violates the spirit of the player trade deadline where playoff teams can’t stock up late in the season. But wait, that is a deadline, as in a time, right?
Meanwhile, the Dolphins can go shopping for a head coach, and there is no deadline, but we can’t hire a offensive assistant, even though there is NO DEADLINE?
Sense? It makes none. Oh, their season isn’t over? Well, guess what? Either the season is over for everyone, or it’s over for no one. The season is still going, they’re under the same player rules as we are, so why would the coaching rules change?
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
Some people can learn from the mistakes of others, while some people need to pee on the electric fence themselves.
Belichick is looking for a new name for his boat: VI Rings sounds pretty good.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Jan 9, 2012 1:13 PM EST up reply actions
If teams want to gain the moral high ground they might start by guaranteeing contracts and not cutting players every day
by quadruple option on Jan 9, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
I think the Pats should play same strategy as steelers
The Steelers played the correct strategy against the Broncos. They just didn’t execute very well AND the Broncos got a little lucky on several big pass plays. I counted at least 4 big pass plays where the defender was in near perfect position and/or touched the ball.
Do the Patriots have a better secondary than the Steelers? No. But the Steelers had too many injuries. They couldn’t get to Tebow as much as they should have and could not bring him down when they did. The Patriots contained well the last matchup and didn’t really let Tebow out of their grasp when they got there.
Tebow doesn’t put the ball high in the air either – which gives very little room for error in the accuracy department. He also doesn’t seem to look off safeties either. The Pats shouldn’t go straight man as much as the Steelers but they should stack the box and take their chances in coverage. And despite the long tosses yesterday, I think they should play underneath routes and force long throws. They might connect on a couple (or none) but forcing Tebow to continually do what he is least suited for is the best strategy.
I was rooting for Denver the entire game, but when they went up big – I started to second guess who I should really root for. A banged up Steelers team not playing their best or the offensively challenged Broncos that shed the moniker before half time? I still like our chances to at a minimum outgun the Broncos.
I was rooting hard for the Broncos
because I absolutely hate the Steelers. But we were all laughing during the 1st quarter, wondering why anyone at all was concerned about playing a very beatable looking Pittsburgh team.
Keep the faith!
Weird. I think it was a bad strategy.
I think the way to defend Tebow is to make him beat you on the intermediate stuff. Take away the underneath and over-the-top options and let him TRY to be consistent enough on the intermediate throws to outscore the Patriots. As good as the game-winning throw was—and it was EXCELLENT—he missed a wide-open 15 yard throw in regulation to end their final drive. It gave the Steelers one last chance, and I’d say 2 out of 3 times, the Steelers win the game on the final drive there.
In conclusion, make Tebow beat you with consistency, not huge chunks. (This also suits the Pats bend/don’t break style).
True wealth is a shelf full of unread books.
by Hometown Gyro on Jan 9, 2012 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
I have to disagree with your assesment
Part of the reason the Steelers lost was because of the strategy they used, not in spite of it. All game, they had almost everyone in the box, playing the run, and they got burnt, obviously, by Tebow to Thomas. And once, by the way, to the tight end who Tebow almost never throws to, when he did, in fact “look off” Polamalu, and found the tight end wide open for 20 yards.
I am very grateful for how the Steelers played because it showed us how not to play. There is no way we will be allowing Thomas to be single covered, i mean he was 85% of the throwing offense, and absolutely torched the Steelers while 10 guys were rushing up to the line to stop the run. I don’t think we would have been expecting the plays to Thomas, had we not seen them this week, and that is a big advantage for us.
Or the Pats could use the strategy they used to BEAT the Broncos
Just sayin’.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Jan 10, 2012 12:22 AM EST up reply actions
This article is a great look at what happened. The Steeler's play calling was horrendous
particularly in overtime throw. And they had no pressure. I almost wish they had won at this point.
http://nfl.si.com/2012/01/09/break-it-down-tim-tebow-takes-to-the-air/?sct=hp_t11_a2&eref=sihp
Well, in hindsight...
…everyone wants to play the team that lost.
by tossin on Jan 9, 2012 1:25 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Having made game plans against teams like New Orleans, Josh will offer more experience with NFC teams.
Having Chung and Spikes back should help minimize McGhee and running game
I think if Patriots play both pass and run, they should be fine. Emphasizing and placing too many players in the box has burnt other teams before. Minimize the big gain plays. Tebow will make some run and pass plays. The key for Tebow is that his receivers make the catches when they are on target enough.
Spikes
I think he could be a major factor in this game if he’s not too terribly rusty. This could be the big chance for him to prove himself and become a “real” Patriot since this should be the type of offense that he thrives against.
by Aluminum Penguin on Jan 9, 2012 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
Taking the Broncos seriously
may have been Pitt’s biggest mistake. Houston,however, looks like a really good team. If they win it will not be a fluke.
Houston looked good agains tthe worst team in the playoffs, at home
by the way all home teams won this week. I do think Houston can be a very physical team, and whoever comes out of that game should be good and banged up.
Reading Greg Bedard's article
Is it really possible the Pats could land Brandon Lloyd? I suppose that would kill Ochocinco’s confidence, but…sometimes you have to be ruthless.

by 































