Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Film Breakdown: Cruz Control

He must be stopped. (Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

Wide receiver Victor Cruz is one of the league's rising stars. From his underdog status (straight out of the University of Massachusetts), to his impressive production on the field, to his widely known Touchdown Salsa Dance in memory of his grandmother, there's a lot to like about Cruz. The only problem is that he's a receiver for the New York Giants.

Standing a 6-0, 205 lbs, Cruz isn't a dominating physical specimen. However, he runs a very respectable 4.47, has solid explosion out of the snap and out of his breaks, and is known for having one of the better body fakes in the league. So how can the Patriots go about defending him?

It starts with the slot. According to Pro Football Focus, Cruz has spent 45.8% of his total snaps in the slot and has gained an impressive 1379 yards (77.5% of his total receiving yards) from the slot. Those yards are tops in the league, with the Patriots Wes Welker 2nd with 1290- and they are the only two slot receivers to break 750 yards this season. Cruz has one of the higher drop rates out of slot receivers, letting 12.8% of passes in his direction hit the ground. The Patriots will have to be physical with Cruz in order to prevent him from making the completion.

So who should square off against Cruz in the slot? I wouldn't put it past the 5-11, 200 lbs Julian Edelman to play at a high level. Edelman was noted as the defensive back who struggled during the Ravens final drive, but his total season numbers are actually towards the top of the league (although his snaps are considerably lower than others):

Julian Edelman: 125 defensive snaps, 10 targets, 7 receptions, 87 yards.

Rates (league rank/slot corner rank): 12.5 snaps/target (1st/1st), 17.85 snaps/reception (3rd/1st), 0.696 yards/snap (5th/1st)

Combine Cruz vs Edelman:

40: 4.47 vs 4.52 - Edge: Cruz

10 split: 1.56 vs 1.52 - Edge: Edelman

3 Cone: 6.96 vs 6.62 - Edge: Edelman

20 Shuttle: 4.17 vs 3.92 - Edge: Edelman

Edelman has the physical capabilities to keep up with Cruz and, when he's been covering the slot, he's had the on-field performance to match up with some of the best corners in the league. Maybe the Patriots play someone else in the slot; I wouldn't be surprised if it was Edelman.

Let's look at how the Patriots can slow Cruz after the jump!

Star-divide

I selected footage from the Giants vs 49ers NFCCG where the 49ers were demolished by Cruz in the first half, but were able to recover in time for a success second half stop on Cruz. The 49ers reviewed film on the Redskins vs Giants game, where Cruz was held to 5 receptions and 44 yards for one of his lowest outputs on the season. Here's how the Patriots can copy the game plan:

Pre-snap read

Here's the play breakdown.

Giants: Hakeem Nicks is on the near side of the field, with Victor Cruz in the slot. Mario Manningham is on the far side of the field. The blue arrows signifies the tight end with the potential as an outlet. Ahmad Bradshaw is in the backfield as the blitz pick-up and potential outlet.

The Green X signifies where Cruz typically makes his break, whether it's inside (usually) or outside.

49ers: Lined up in the 3-3-5, one of the LBs is lined up showing blitz, but is standing with potential to drop into coverage. The defense is lined up in a Cover Two Man formation with the two safeties responsible for the deep halves of the field and the cornerbacks and coverage linebackers are in man coverage. The far side outside linebacker drifts into the flat to deter the linebacker from breaking free, while the middle linebacker (white arrow) is spying the running back in case Bradshaw tries to break into the open field as an outlet.

The defensive line is heavy on the nearside (the side with Cruz) and is able to collapse the pocket and force Eli Manning to slide away from the pressure and, most importantly, away from Cruz and Nicks. Manning would have to throw across his body to reach Cruz, which is a risky throw every single time.

The 49ers defensive line creates pressure and collapses the entire right side of Manning's pocket. Both 49ers safeties prevent a deep throw to any of the receivers. The tight end is engaged by defensive end Justin Smith, which eliminates another outlet, while the 49ers linebackers do a good job of containing Bradshaw.

The green cone coming from Cruz is his vision. If he wants to make a break outside, it's right into Nicks and a 49ers defensive back and Manning won't want to make that throw with the right side of his pocket collapsing. Also, the slot corner on Cruz is doing a great job of staying on Cruz's inside shoulder.

By staying on Cruz's inside shoulder, it forces Cruz either to the outside or up the field. If Cruz wants to run outside, the slot corner is in his back pocket and provides a barrier between Manning and Cruz. Also, the outside wide receiver is in the way and can deter Manning from making that throw. If Cruz wants to run up the field, the deep safety is in position for the coverage.

With the pressure in his face, Manning has to look to the left side, which leaves both Nicks and Cruz out of the play.

No receiver is open on the left side and Manning is left to be sacked. Cruz shakes his way into the middle of the field, but it's far too late to make a play. If the defensive line can do its job, Manning won't have the time to wait for Cruz to break free.

---

So what can the Patriots learn?

By pressuring the pocket from the side where Cruz is in the slot, Manning will be forced to look towards the other side of the field or, at the very least, towards the middle.

By placing the slot defender on the inside shoulder of Cruz and being physical at the line, Cruz will be forced outside or up the field. Either direction is out of Manning's vision.

Deep safeties are crucial in preventing a desperation toss up by Manning and are able to deter Manning from making throws in the first place.

Look for the Patriots to try and bracket Cruz for most of the game. Whether the slot defender is Edelman, Nate Jones, Kyle Arrington, or Pat Chung, they have to force Cruz to the outside and away from Manning's throwing range.

If the Patriots can control Cruz, they have a tremendous chance of controlling the game.

---

Also, for good measure:

Wide Receiver Tendencies:

Mario Manningham - Downfield threat.

Hakeem Nicks - Mid-range threat.

Victor Cruz - Slot threat. Look for Cruz to try to run to the middle of the field.

Manning's Typical Progressions:

First Read: Tight End/Cruz in the slot/Nicks to the outside/Manningham deep

Second Read: Check down to Bradshaw or a tight end in the flat

Third Read: Cruz will be free styling down the field and Manning will try to throw to wherever he is heading

Hopefully the Patriots can contain the Giants passing attack.

Comment 34 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice writeup

Forcing him outside is a great strategy. I’m sure the Giants can adjust, but it’s still better than giving Eli and Cruz any comfort. Plus, a throw to the outside is a longer throw – giving the defender (a speedy Edelman) time to close any gap. Add in pressure on that side and now you are dictating instead of reacting. We need disciplined safety play this game.

by iLikeStuff on Feb 1, 2012 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

Awesome analysis Hill.

Makes perfect sense, and will hope that BB instills this into his gameplan.

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Feb 1, 2012 3:25 PM EST reply actions  

Great write up and analysis on that play

but of course its so much more complicated than this for an entire game. The offense will mix up its packages, not always keeping Nicks and Cruz on the same side of the field.

Additionally, this play worked only because the pressure on Manning was on the same side of the field as the first read (as you mentioned)… but with a normal 4 man rush its impossible to guarantee you’ll consistently put pressure on the QB, let alone on a specific side. Of course you can try to gameplan so you overload sides more often and tend to get pressure that way. I agree it a nice wrinkle and idea to add to the D gameplanning, but there is no 1 cure to stopping a good WR core.

I didn’t mean for that come off as critical of your post… I thought it was a very interesting, well written, and researched post… and I learned quite a bit. tx.

by Matt dubs on Feb 1, 2012 3:35 PM EST reply actions  

Very good points.

I think this is more of a map on how to stop Cruz when he’s in the slot (where he has over 75% of his production). The pressure from the DL is helpful, but I think the most crucial part is the inside coverage by the slot corner. Pressure will force Manning to throw, but the DB’s job is to force Cruz away from his typical route.

by Richard Hill on Feb 1, 2012 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe...

Looking at the 2nd picture (one with the green cone).. it looks like if manning hadn’t been pressured from his right, nicks could’ve continue his route deep, which would’ve taken his CB deep and probably commanded the safety to follow along the top of the route and Cruz could’ve headed straight toward the sideline along the 43 yard line. It looks like on the turn he would have 1-2 steps on the defender and Eli could step up and throw a ball to the outside where only Cruz would have a chance to make a play on the 8-10 yard gain (or more if he breaks a tackle or catches the pass in stride).

Its not a certainty, and its still a well defended play, as this is a very difficult throw/catch to make, but I think the Giants still have a shot at a nice play here if the pressure doesn’t force Manning to his left.

The “X factor” here is if Cruz/Nick are on opposite sides of the field… also, Manningham isn’t a chump. He still needs to be covered well, but double coverage (deep safety) will usually do the trick.

by Matt dubs on Feb 1, 2012 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Some coverage adjustments owuld be made if they are on opposites sides of the field.

Of course the point is to pressure the side Cruz is on, and force eli to look on the opposite side of the field. Of course, execution comes a long way, but this seems to be a good gameplan on your attack.

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Feb 1, 2012 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

If it was that easy

They would have beaten the Redskins and the other teams they lost to this year. But they didn’t. So, there is a disconnect somewhere.

The Patriots put up crazy yards and points this year but you don’t hear Welker, Branch, Hernandez and Gronk discounting the Giants defense. Most of the fans (on here at least) are hoping they play a good game – rather than their counterparts proclaiming the greatest receiving core on earth will dominate Sunday.

I believe the Giants have talent all around but the confidence on that side is getting a little out of hand. We will see how justified it is.

by iLikeStuff on Feb 1, 2012 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

woah woah woah....

I’m not saying i know the Giants will dominate sunday or anything crazy like that. I was just trying to point out that it looked like on that one particular play against the 49ers it looked like the pass COULD have been completed if the 49ers didn’t put pressure on Mannings right side.

I never said it was easy, infact i’ll pull this quote from my post:
“well defended play, as this is a very difficult throw/catch to make”

I was not dissing the Pats D, the SF coverage or anything like that. I thought it looked to me like the pressure on manning was the pivotal part of that successful stop for the D, not the coverage. I also stated that I believe there is no 1 scheme you can use to stop a good trio of WRs, but this wrinkle is a good idea for some formations.

Maybe other posters have said things to anger you, but I think you jumped the gun on this one.

by Matt dubs on Feb 1, 2012 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Impressive Observations

On the defensive side, I think the Patriots have the personnel to make this a competitive match-up, being healthy and all.

I’d say another important aspect of this game is limiting YAC. Nailing down their recievers and not giving up huge plays is critical. Their WR core will make plays no matter what we do, they’re just that talented, but solid tackling will do the trick.

Edelman is seriously underestimated, and because playing DB isn’t his natural position, of course the NYG will attempt to exploit it. But as his statistics would suggest, he’s done rather solid and I’m pretty confident in our secondary. Our problem is going to be how can we create enough pressure to bother Manning? If there is enough pressure, even an average secondary can be quite lethal.

by Kris_Risk on Feb 1, 2012 3:52 PM EST reply actions  

Easier solution

Why not have some inactive patriots dress up as aliens and right before game they abduct Cruz, Nicks and Mannington until game over. They will say aliens abducted them but no one will believe them.

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 3:56 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

and we’d be hearing about it from giants fans for years

LOL

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Richard...

You are like Bill Belichick lite. You always provide us with basic game plans that BB uses in more complicated ways on game day. You should be a writer for ESPN.

Lakers and Patriots forever.

by D.S.T. on Feb 1, 2012 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

I’d like to run ESPN. If someone can pull some strings to make that happen, I will hire Richard and give him a lofty writer position with great pay and benefits.

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

He should but we want him here. lol

He is so awesome…

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Feb 1, 2012 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

becuz we all love him, let’s keep him a pat pulpit writer here until he dies. also he can quit going to school. he already has a PHD in pat pulpit.

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

That's right. lol

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Feb 1, 2012 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

That is an impressive write-up.

The concept that San Fran employed, with great success I might add, is dependent on getting a lot of pressure on Eli WITHOUT the need to blitz.

Of course you (and BB) know, that you can contain any of our receivers but not all of them. Nicks and Manningham will cause you massive trouble if you are focused on Cruz.

And playing a 3-3-5 will help us open the run game, which in turn will open the play action game.

i think most realists involved here know that these two teams are very evenly matched up, each team has a couple units that are better and a couple that are worse. Both QB’s are champions, both coaches are first rate… this game will come down to the team that shows the my heart and commits the fewest errors… and being on the good end of a weird bounce won’t hurt either.

I have always liked the Patriots, since Parcells came here but I am first and foremost a Giants fan. I hope for a great game, right to the end and hopefully a Giants victory but I won’t be a sore loser if things do go my way.

by Metalgarn on Feb 1, 2012 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

your in a good position for watching the game because whoever wins there is some consolation

For me, the real SCARY Eli passes will be those long vertical ones. He has pretty good accuracy with those. All three can go vertical. Don’t know how well Patriots will be able to stop them as a group.

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Your tight ends scare me.

I think that is the biggest concern the Giants have on defense.
We know we can get pressure, we can somewhat contain Welker (you can’t ever stop him) not really worried about the other receivers but the tight ends…

But no, no real consolation. I am all Giants fan here for numerous reasons but I am not one of those (I think crazy) “evil empire” haters and versus anyone other NFC team, I would be routing for the Patriots.

by Metalgarn on Feb 1, 2012 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

gronks debilitated ankle scare me more

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I figure it's not as bad as we think and he will be 100% come game time.

But I am hoping I am wrong.

With Gronks out of the picture (or diminished capacity) that could really tip the scales in my favor.

by Metalgarn on Feb 1, 2012 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

i am hoping that eli’s passing is kind of off and nicks is very limited by his shoulder

:-)

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Dropped like a hot piece of coal

One day before Rodgers’ season ended at Lambeau Field, Laura Kaeppeler — Miss Wisconsin herself — used the showcase of the Miss America pageant to make a wholesome pass at the Packers’ signal-caller.

“If you’re watching, Aaron Rodgers, call me,” Kaeppeler said.

And then once the Packers lost, Kaeppeler said she was just kidding.

in other news …

Kim Kardashian wants Tebow. That would be halarious to watch.

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 4:51 PM EST reply actions  

Nice work

(from a Giant fan). One thing worth mentioning is that the Giants, and Cruz in particular, tend to run a lot of option routes (Grantland had a nice article describing their offense recently). This gives Cruz a lot of flexibility to react to what the defense is giving him, and get to a place where Eli can find him. In your scenario, Cruz could easily go deep and Nicks come across the middle, leaving Cruz 1-on 1 going deep against a safety (a matchup the Giants would love to have, I’m sure).

There was a great “sounds of the game” clip from 49’ers CB Carlos Rogers telling a coach that he couldn’t guard Cruz on the option routes, because he would always go the opposite way of where the coverage was. I’m sure New England will be prepared for this, but it is worthy of note that a pro bowl corner in Rogers was confused by the Giants’ scheme, and a novice to the position like Edelman could have some trouble (though he’s definitely fast, athletic, and smart enough to adjust).

As you mentioned, pressure is probably the best defense against the Giants’ receiving corps, However, I don’t really see the Pats’ pass rush being as dominant as SF’s was (no disrespect to NE, but SF had some absolute beasts on their defense, whereas only Wilfork falls into that category for the Pats), so either Eli will have more time or the Pats will have to send more blitzers.

It will definitely be an interesting chess match to watch. Too much focus on Cruz could lead to Hakeem Nicks having a huge game (as he did in the Giants’ 1st 2 playoff games) or Mario Manningham going off. I don’t think the Pats will be able to stop these guys entirely, but sure tackling to stop them from getting lots of YAC is essential to slowing them down (Nicks and Cruz especially are tough to tackle in the open field).

Is it Sunday yet?

http://www.yankeeanalysts.com

by lemonjello on Feb 1, 2012 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

I predict

the Giants score 21.2 pts

by Oughat on Feb 1, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

it is a good rational number

by prioris on Feb 1, 2012 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Impressive write up once again MR.HILL

I think this is just more proof of what we expect to see from the BB playbook, and Jules will be out there against the WRs.

by Yardpenalty.com on Feb 1, 2012 9:07 PM EST reply actions  

Your usual excellent breakdown. But...

it’s hard to overlook just how much better the Niners are across the board on defense than we are. The Smiths are better on the front, their linebackers are better, their DBs are MUCH better, safeties in particular. I’m not saying that it can’t be done or that we can’t do it. But as much as scheme matters (and it very definitely does) you can’t completely discount player-margins.

"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."

"The longer they play, the more they lose. In the end, we get it all."

by JohnHannahRules on Feb 1, 2012 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

(singing) "QB in a coma, I know, I know it's seeerious."

"Every time I call it a game, you call it a business. Every time I call it a business, you call it a game."

"The longer they play, the more they lose. In the end, we get it all."

by JohnHannahRules on Feb 1, 2012 9:44 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe