Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

A Beautiful Game

I make no bones about it. I am a Pats Pulpit vulture (I find that analogy slightly more apt than troll). I come here when the Pats lose (although that wasn't as true when the Colts were plus one Manning - because life as a football fan was far less depressing). And I am back. But I come in peace. I know what it feels like to lose a Super Bowl that was legacy defining (I guess you all knew what it felt like as well). I know what it is like when nothing goes your way in a game. For us, it was Garcon's huge drop on what would have been a 30+ yard pass up 10-3. Or Kendra's lap-dog husband muffing that onside kick. Or our coach asking our ancient kicker to attempt a 51 yard field goal. For us Colts fans, because of the events of the following 24 months since February 2010, that game hurts more and more. I don't want the Pats to win another Super Bowl in this era (maybe one around 2030 will be fine), but I hope that you feel worse about the game today than you will in February 2014 (and also that your QB is not having a public pr game with an over-his-head owner).

As for the game. It was one of the most even Super Bowl's I have ever seen, and a game where I think every unit played well. The Pats defense tightened in the red zone like they always do. The Giants defense held the Patriots to only short gains, and once the rush got going in the middle of the 3rd quarter, they effectively held the Patriots at bay. Both offenses had their moments, with the Giants starting hot and rarely having a bad drive (just too many that petered out even before field goal range), while the Pats for two straight drives looked like a machine on offense. This was a Super Bowl, but after all the hype and the buildup it was just a game of football. A good one. A beautiful one.

I like defense. By rule, this made me hate the ridiculous offensive numbers that the 2011 football season produced. That opinion might have changed had my favorite quarterback been able to get it on the fun, but it still hurt me to see three teams score 500 points, and three QBs throw for 5,000 yards and two of them smash Marino's record. I mean, nothing better exemplified this ridiculous season like Matthew Stafford throwing for 5,000 yards and 40 tds and being statistically no better than the 4th best QB in the NFL in 2011. Nothing then made me happier than the last three games of the 2011 NFL season. No team scored more than 23. No QB threw for more than 316 yards, and that QB needed 61 passes to do so. More incredibly, no team topped 400 yards of total offense. I loved it. I might have hated the outcome of the AFC Title Game, but it was good to know that defense still mattered.

And nowhere was this more true than in Super Bowl XLVI. One team scored 19 offensive points, and the other scored 17. This was probably the best game the modern pass-happy NFL can give you. Each yard was hard to come by. Eli Manning had to hit some really tight windows. Tom Brady was pressured, and when he wasn't, nothing was open downfield. The defenses weren't perfect, but a 9-6 game would have been boring. The defenses were good enough. The offenses were good enough. In all honesty, both teams were good enough. One team just got a little more breaks.

This wasn't Super Bowl XLII. That was one of the greatest teams having a bad game against a good team having a great game. This was different. This was two teams that by this point of the season were both about equal, and both played about equal, but one team just made one more play. This is the type of game that the NFL is all about. The fact that it was a Super Bowl made it all the more special. To me, this was the best, most evenly played, Super Bowl since the Rams evaded overtime by a yard. This was pure football. And honestly, it made me feel for the Pats for the first time ever.

I obviously felt nothing but glee after the last playoff game the Pats played in Indy. I felt nothing but more glee about seeing 18-0 go down in flames in the most amazing way possible. I even lapped up every bit of that beatdown the Ravens handed to them two years ago. But this, I actually felt bad. It might have been that haunting look at Robert Kraft react to the hail mary bouncing on the ground, and realizing that the season that helped him escape his personal tragedy was over. It humanized Kraft. Seeing Wes Welker, a man that I've never liked ever since his "F**k you" that he yelled after catching the game-icing pass in Super Bowl 41.5, reduced to tears because he dropped what was, in my mind, a damn hard pass humanized him. (I should say that to you all these guys have always been human, but to a Pats hater, not so much). I actually felt bad for even Brady, who I think was hurt in some way by that sack by Tuck in the 3rd quarter, as he was quite mediocre after that. He was playing lights out in the biggest game, but was undone by his body (again, I'm assuming he was injured in some way). I hate the fact that this game made me feel bad about hating the Pats so much.

This was a great exhibition of football played well. It wasn't just great offense, just great defense, it was good everything. It was the definition of a good, close, tight, well-played football game. And, if the end result is it makes me reconsider my hatred of a team that doesn't do anything but win and get silly levels of praise from people living from 7 years ago (see: "You can't bet against Belichick with two weeks to prepare"), then I'll take it. That's a fine side effective of a beautiful game.

The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.

Comment 10 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Meh

if you wanna talk about feeling the Pats pain, this wasn’t that bad, actually. In a month, I’ll probably be over this. In a week, I’ll probably be back to my normal routine when it comes to football. It took me three years to recover after 2007.

Now about it being a “good” Superbowl, I think I can mostly agree with you there. The teams were evenly matched. It wasn’t a blowout. There weren’t any fluke plays in in 2007, and nothing really made you question whether the winner was actually the best team. I do, however, think things would have been alot different if Gronk was 100%. Good teams overcome injuries and we just about did, but no Gronk would have been like having no Moss in 2007.

90% of the pain comes from the fact that it was against the Giants.

Oh my god a floor zombie! Oh wait, thats you
- Toby Turner

by New Century Silver on Feb 7, 2012 10:44 PM EST reply actions  

Fair post

and may I presume to understand exactly where you are coming from.

As my good friend summed it up immediately after Colts-Saints SB XLIV ended, ‘That was the 4th best Super Bowl I’ve ever seen.’ That sentiment wasn’t because we had any great love for Drew Brees, but more a burning desire to not have Peyton Manning get another ring. I hear ya loud and clear.

I don’t know if I’d call the game ‘beautiful’, but I see why that you used that term. To me, it seemed a bit sloppy on both sides for much of the game. But one person’s sloppy is another’s good defense. Admittedly, I was too anxious & wired to watch the game with any type of anlytical eye so your observations are appreciated. I can’t help but still wonder how a healthy Gronkowski might have tipped the balance just enough (#!@&#! Bernard freaking Pollard).

Either way, I look at this season as Belichick and Brady taking a talented-but-flawed, over-achieving team to the Super Bowl and acknowledge Wilfork and the defense coming together to take down the Ravens in the AFCCG. The Giants were the better team Sunday, and while the loss eats me up, I can’t be too disappointed in the team that won more games than I or anyone thought.

And having your team make it to the Super Bowl 5 times in 10 years is no small feat.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 7, 2012 10:45 PM EST reply actions  

It was beautiful in that both teams offenses and defenses played well.

I prefer that to seeing that 51-45 abomination of a wild card game two years ago. That was entertaining, but not particularly a good showcase of what the game of football was about. This was, I thought, just that. Two good teams that are pretty evenly matched (despite the record difference, as I thought the Pats record was built on playing a line of sub-par QBs over the 2nd half) playing a close tight game.

The way you viewed this past season was the way a lot of Colts fans viewed 2009. That was a talented but flawed team (I guess that team’s flaw was less of one, in that the o-line was just awful but Manning could cover it up) that until the Super Bowl managed to win every game they tried. I think Bill Polian for resting the starters, because even if we had the mirage of 18-0 heading into teh Super Bowl, I would not have felt like we were that much better than the Saints. I think that was the reason why I didn’t hurt too bad immediately following the game. But later, when I kept remembering that I would never have to answer questions about Manning’s failings in the playoffs if Hank Baskett just fielded the onside kick with his hands and not his face, the pain just get worse.

EVH+DLR=BFFs........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Feb 7, 2012 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh Gronk would have done more then tip the balance

When we have Gronk, Hernando, and Welker playing well AND theres not much pressure on Brady, we score 30+. Its just going to happen, no matter what. Since we barely scored half of that, the only thing I can really blame is Gronk’s injury. Thats not to say it wasn’t winnable, but with a healthy Gronk I think we win by at least a TD.

Oh my god a floor zombie! Oh wait, thats you
- Toby Turner

by New Century Silver on Feb 8, 2012 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Ok you scored what 20 with him the first meeting with the giants this year. So what are you saying? you make zero sense. Even though i agree Gronk could have made some of a difference……………….. maybe. You never will know this. For the record brady just did a much better job of stepping up but was still running for his life most of the game. That is why he threw the ball bad some of the time during the game.

"They got a big-mouthed coach, a big mouth and a big-bellied coach that talks too much and now it's finally time to shut up- Brandon Jacobs

by Giantstep on Feb 12, 2012 6:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Both teams were waaaaaay different then

Its not “maybe”. No Gronk is like having no Moss in 2007.

Oh my god a floor zombie! Oh wait, thats you
- Toby Turner

by New Century Silver on Feb 13, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

He wasn't running for his life.

For the most part, our OL did a pretty solid job with the occasional hiccup. WRs dropping passes, and a couple bad decisions from brady, 3 fumbles that bounced the giants way, and drops (not just talking about the welker one) were huge against you guys. The pats didn’t mentally prepare as well as you guys did, which is why you executed more plays then we did.

I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP

by Jack'sAxe on Feb 14, 2012 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com


Managing Editor

Patriot_small Greg Knopping

Assistant Editor

Belichick_2_small Marima

Headshotoj_small Richard Hill

Dscn0127_small Jared Stegall

Contributing Writers

Photo_small Austin Martin

Small Stephen Verman

Bill-belichick_small Ashto12

Peter-heisman_small Alec Shane

Moderators

Kiwi_small Comedic.Sans

A-clockwork-orange-alex_small Jack'sAxe