FanPost

Predicting the next unpredictable: Split Backs formation (Part 3)

Variants of Split Backs formation

20131117_bsd_sd2_227.0_standard_730.0_medium

via cdn1.vox-cdn.com

No Gronk? No problem. We can run the split back formation with 3WRs

A common variant of this formation removes the tight end and replaces it with a third receiver in the "slot" position. The formation is utilized to remove a defensive player from the tackle box to give the offense a 7-on-6 matchup.

Example:

839flat_medium_medium

via cdn2.sbnation.com

LSU lines up in the Twins formation and runs 839 Flat. The Z runs a go-route and his corner follows him. The Y runs an out-route, turning just after passing the nickel back lined up over him. Meanwhile, the F runs out to the flat and this puts the nickelback in a bind. It looks like he assumes the safety will pick up the Y, so he runs toward the flat. But the safety isn't able to get to the Y before the pass is complete for a 15-yard gain and a first down.

Now it would be nice to have a slot receiver who can still seal the edge adequately against (lighter) linebackers in outside run play. Such player will make it less certain that changing a TE to a slot WR indicates a pass...

Except Patriots already have one in Brandon LaFell. Hooray!

You can do the split back formation with 1RB and 1FB instead of 2RBs.

375px-pro_formation.svg_medium

via upload.wikimedia.org

But most FBs are not that good receiver anyway so it somewhat undermines its effectiveness.

However, if your FB is at least capable of some damage in passing game, it's a different story.

First, this set consists of EXACTLY the same personnel as the I-formation. In other words, D# coordinators up there in the booth can't decipher the formation when offensive players break the huddle.

Two, it still leaves the element of power run by leaving a FB (bigger back) compared to having two 3rd down backs.

Three, did I say the FB still can hurt you in passing game if you fall asleep? He won't break a big play but sometimes what we need is mere three yards.

James Develin has generated some positive vibe during this offseason.

We still don't know for sure whether he can be a reliable receiver from the backfield, just yet.

But on this play, he looks pretty comfortable running the route.

Not to mention if Develin picks up how to do some traditional TE stuff, the formation can also morph into a two TE set.

After all, there are a lot of uncertainties involved this prediction. Mostly because the key pieces I've mentioned are newbies to this team (White, Finch, LaFell and James Develin as a TE).

We may just go air raid with our wide receivers a la 2007. Or Nick Saban sees this post, share with BB and all of the sudden this becomes their playbook. We never know.

But hey, a little unpredictability is fun. As long as it does not involve any murder cases, off course.

The views expressed in these FanPosts are not necessarily those of the writers or SBNation.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Pats Pulpit

You must be a member of Pats Pulpit to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Pats Pulpit. You should read them.

Join Pats Pulpit

You must be a member of Pats Pulpit to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Pats Pulpit. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker