Open Thread: All NFL Games, Week 10
Hope you're all settled in. Your New England Patriots are off, so sit back, relax and enjoy today's games.
I might watch more of Minnesota and Green Bay, because I don't think I can listen to Jim Nantz and Phil Simms call Cleveland at Pittsburgh, though that's clearly the game I'd rather watch.

Even though our team is taking a break this week, Go PATRIOTS!!
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I didn't see that false start
Now there's a weak makeup unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Pittsburgh.
So, you see? It's not just terrible officiating in Patriots games. It's just that in Patriots-Colts games, 98 percent of the bad calls go against New England.
regarding the announcers
I'm listening to the dolphin's broadcast now, and it's pretty funny. there's a certain freedom that you have when you are the public voice of a losing team. (god knows I remember when that was the case for us...)
That's home field
I'm for cleveland,
(That and I am not a fan of the steelers...)
What about the Bills/Dolphins?
I'm sure the braintrust at CBS
I'd rather see the intra-division game against two teams in my team's division, especially since we are schedule to play them both again. It's good to see Pittsburgh, since New England plays them in a few weeks, but they were just on Monday.
how do you guys feel about bills-dolphins?
One of my best friends...
Besides, even if they don't lose this week, the Pats will still clinch the division by beating Philly in week 12.
well at the moment...
Adrian Peterson
VERY interesting replay in Cleveland-Pittsburgh
BUT .. it looked like Edwards may have dragged his right toe out of bounds before he got his left foot down.
Hmmm .. Interesting call. No mention by Nantz or Simms, which is no surprise. We'll see if anyone else catches it.
Also, you can hear LOTS of cursing from these field-level microphones. I guess the league just doesn't care about it anymore.
Browns
Also, I hate the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Since I no longer consider there to be a threat to home-field advantage for the Pats (whom I truly believe are going 16-0), I'm rooting for Indy in tonight's game. The Colts are a great team and the referees are not their fault. Manning may be a commercial prostitute, but he's an outstanding quarterback and a class act and he pretty much never has anything negative to say. I think he's a class act, so to speak. The same can not be said of the (tongue in cheek here)'Most talented team in the NFL'. Merriman and LT talk more smack than Mohammed Ali and back it up a heckuva lot less. In other words, I hate San Diego. I never thought I would find myself saying this, but go Colts.
bend but don't break?
There is no way I will root
by scsatr on Nov 11, 2007 5:24 PM EST up reply actions
LOTS of cursing....
Why would anyone be fined?
Fine
Are live sports events exempted from this rule?
Specifically the part that says, "What makes material "profane?" "Profane language" includes those words that are so highly offensive that their mere utterance in the context presented may, in legal terms, amount to a "nuisance." In its Golden Globe Awards Order the FCC warned broadcasters that, depending on the context, it would consider the "F-Word" and those words (or variants thereof) that are as highly offensive as the "F-Word" to be "profane language" that cannot be broadcast between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. "
I agree
It's generally the network who places the parabolic microphones on the sidelines. I would think that the network would be responsible any way you slice it.
Also, when I said the league doesn't care, I also meant that the league apparently doesn't care about the image it's been so visibly been trying to attempt. I would think that the league, if it's truly interested in un-tarnishing that image would be more concerned about audible cursing during broadcasts.
Lastly, I don't think live sporting events are exempt. Remember the "wardrobe malfunction"?
it kind of depends on the circumstances...
I don't think that has anything to do with it
President Bush's slip was caught (I think) by a microphone that was inadvertently left on, and was not (again, I think) during a live broadcast.
The networks purposely put those microphones on the sidelines, and they know the kind of language players, coaches and fans use. And the players know they're being taped.
After the "wardrobe incident"...
Something that will not be repeated here
it's tough
Do I see this right? Miami 3, Buffalo 2?
Is anyone
I think that's fair to say
Obviously, the worse the Niners do, the better draft pick the Patriots get; so, yeah, I'd be OK with them finishing 2-14.
It's going to be tough for them to finish last, but with Miami leading Buffalo and St. Louis leading New Orleans, it's looking more possible.
hey quick...
Hard to say
On the other hand
I'm watching it
But since he's not, reality can rule: it's more a matter of Minnesota never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity than anything else. And Peterson is hurt, too.
ha ha ha
when was that?
I am uncertain
If you could...
browns just got 100yd return for TD
Except that
cleveland just blew it
hold on...
Cleveland misses 52-yard FG to lose
Probably not. This stuff happens every week. It's pro football, for crying out loud. Well, except when the Patriots do it, when it's a systematic pattern of bad behavior.
Incidentally .. it was a Browns player ..
what are everyone's picks in the Dallas/NY game?
(for the record, my pathological dislike of the cowboys has (at least partially) to do with growing up a fan of the "Patriots" and not understanding how some other team got the title of "America's team" grrrr...)
ha ha ha
there was a point where...
heading out to a bar somewhere to catch the second half and the indy game.
Philip Rivers is a terrible QB
Their first 2 TDs were on returns
Do you think Chargers fans are (as I asked in my weekly picks) wishing they had Marty Schotttenheimer and Drew Brees back?
Missed that one
It is raining there, and the apologists will use that as their excuse. I had high hopes for this game, and while the defenses have made some great plays, this has been mostly a comedy of errors so far.
Ya, this is generally an awful game
Am I seeing that right?
Yes, clearly the quality of a great QB's receivers has nothing to do with the numbers he puts up.
Oh, no .. I disagree
ha ha ha
The situation being referred to was the one where your team is down by a wide margin and you need to mount some offense. Sorry John, but I can think of someone better to have in that situation. You've been making excuses all night about poor Manning not having his receivers. Sorry Madden, but shut up. Manning has to get it done. Brady got it done without Marvin Harrison or anyone even as good as the Colts' 4th receiver. Could it be that we are truly seeing the first irrefutable [even by a Colts fan with his head in his sphincter] evidence that Brady is better than Manning?
I think
Whoa, look at L.T running tacklers over. It looks like last year.
I don't know how ..
Chargers running back just got horse-collared, and they didn't call that either.
They don't call the horse-collar on S.D. either
Well, at least this week...
Not really
San Diego: 9 for 73 yards
Indianapolis: 3 for 17
Philip Rivers
He is utterly pathetic
wow, someone
That was CLEARLY defensive pass interference
It was the same exact thing -- but worse -- that Mike Pereira just explained was why Hobbs was called for defensive pass interference. But the fact of the matter is: That's a penalty against every team, except the Colts. Man, Bill Polian pulls those strings tight.
Norv Turner is an awful coach too
When Automatic Adam played for the Pats...
I guess ..
That's a shame.
Colts holding...
INT #6...
but in the end...
heh-heh-heh
sorry, just a bit of celebration...

by 




























