Postgame: New England 48, Dallas 27
Greatest Show on .. ?
OK, OK. Let's Not Go Too Far
Why not? Why shouldn't we enjoy this?
After all the "junk" we've had to put up with from almost every fan of every other team in the league, from the national media -- like Peter King and Dr. Z -- why shouldn't we bask in the glory of the team for whom we live and die?
The national media said this would be a statement game for whichever team won. The Patriots aren't into statement games, but the message has been sent: The Patriots are for real, and all the scurrilous allegations in the world aren't going to change that.
I'll have a lot more later and over the next few days. For now, don't forget to vote in our Player of the Game poll. (Again, can't find an individual defensive player to nominate, but the defense was generally spectacular as a unit as usual.)
Update [2007-10-14 22:28:27 by tommasse]:
Some additional notes:
- Brady's 5 touchdowns were a career high, tied a Patriots franchise high (4th time), and gave Brady an NFL record 6 games to open a season with 3 or more touchdowns in each game.
- Brady's passer rating was 129.6, his third highest of the season. His rating for the season is 128.9. Brady has a passer rating of 100 or more in every game so far this season.
- Brady's 5 touchdowns gives him 21 on the season and puts him on pace to throw 56 touchdown passes on the season. When Peyton Manning broke Marino's record, and it was clear that Indy's offense was geared simply to get the record for Manning and the Colts were running up game scores, you didn't hear the outcry you hear as the Patriots obliterate the league through just six weeks.
- The quality of supporting players doesn't matter, right?
- Randy Moss and Terrell Owens both had 6 catches, and each had a touchdown. Owens out-gained Moss, 66 yards to 59. But who do you think feels more satisfied tonight?
- The offensive play calling was a little more lopsided today. New England threw the ball 46 times and ran it 29. Of course, the passing game netted 388 yards and 5 touchdowns, while the running game accumulated only 75 yards and 1 late touchdown.
- The defense held the opposition under 100 yards rushing again. Just barely. Julius Jones (51 yards) and Marion Barber (47) combined for 98, and Tony Romo lost a yard on the game-ending kneeldown.
- Romo had 199 yards passing and a passer rating of 91.0. He had a rating of 109.0 in the first half on 12 of 18 passes for 142 yards and a touchdown. He was 7 of 8 for 104 yards (due to yards lost on penalties) on the last drive of the half. That made him 5 of 10 for 38 yards the rest of the half.
- The Patriots offense was a mind-boggling 11 of 17 (65 percent) on 3rd down conversions, and 2 for 2 on 4th down. The defense limited Dallas to 4 of 11 (36 percent) on 3rd down.
- New England was 4 of 5 (80 percent) in the red zone. Dallas was 2 of 3 (67 percent).
- The Patriots utterly dominated time of possession: 38:15 to 21:45.
- The Cowboys killed themselves with penalties -- 12 for 98 yards. New England had 5 for 50 yards.
- Punter Chris Hanson punted twice, both fair catches, for an average and net of 41.5 yards. Much improved over the Cleveland game.
- New England's individual defensive statistics are wholly unspectacular. Reminds me of 2001 when all the "experts" said the Patriots weren't that good because they had no superstars. No most people know their names, and they still play the same way.
- New England played well, considering Sammy Morris and Ben Watson were both injured and didn't return. A lot of people predicted they would be extremely important keys to New England's game plan.
For all the complainers out there: You can't run out the clock taking a knee on 4th down. Why should the Patriots take a knee and turn the ball over on downs with time left on the clock? If Dallas drove the length of the field in the last 20 seconds and punched in a meaningless touchdown, would Patriots fans be whining about Dallas being classless for scoring "unnecessarily"?
The Patriots didn't try to pass or purposely run up the score. They had the ball on the 20 with 3:45 left on the clock, and they ran 7 rushing plays. The Cowboys called a timeout at 1:48 instead of letting the clock run. It's not New England's fault that Dallas couldn't stop -- Kyle Eckel. Suck it up and stop crying like school children.
Most every fan** of every team, and a lot of players and coaches, has been trashing the Patriots every chance they get, calling them cheaters, saying their accomplishments are tainted, calling them classless and dirty and every other base and crass insult in the book. And then they want the Patriots and their fans to kowtow to them?
Keep kicking the dog and express outrage when he bites back. There are words for people like that.
You want respect? Give respect.
One More Thing
Roy Williams reminds me of Jack Tatum. Looks like he's out there just trying to injure people. Maybe it's just a huge coincidence.
** No, not every fan. I've read several comments by Cowboys fans on other sites that intelligently realize that New England couldn't run out the clock by taking knees.
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
typo
by Tippecanoe on Oct 14, 2007 8:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep. Fixed that. Thanks.
by tommasse on Oct 14, 2007 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The clock would run out
by scsatr on Oct 14, 2007 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
do you find it interesting...
having been a pat's fan since childhood, ('70s) I have generally noticed that there are certain teams with (for want of a better word) "aura", and those teams get a lot of adulation. I find there's almost a bit of desperation in the announcers and pundits as they talk about the team that they want to be great. I'm curious, I haven't had a TV for 4 years now, so I manage to miss a lot of the TV speculation, but the last time I had one I recall the patriots getting little love compared to opposing teams, and that which they got always seemed to come across as begrudging. is this still the case?
the little I had heard before the game tended to follow much of the pattern I remember from before, along the lines of "Yeah the Patriots are great... but how 'bout them ___!" (insert flavor of the week...)
one of the nice things about having randy moss this year is actually having a "marquee"/highlight player, rather than just very good players. for all the talk of supporting team winners, I find that people still value individual achievement more highly... (which makes it all the funnier when moss acts the perfect team player. I think you can actually hear the disappointment that he hasn't had an "episode"
ah well, pointless rambling... I look forward to the day (if it ever happens,) when people look back in reverence to the days of the amazing patriots, the way they currently do with the steelers, cowboys etc. (hah!)
by circusboy on Oct 14, 2007 10:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly
However, you run into guys like Jim Nantz and Phil Simms who are just so in love with Tony Romo and Peyton Manning. You wouldn't think the Patriots defense was on the field today.
But even more this year (unlike 2001 when everyone said the Patriots' success was a fluke and they were just lucky), it's not that people think the Patriots aren't that good, it's pure, unadulterated jealousy and hatred.
by tommasse on Oct 14, 2007 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
didn't they used to rotate the announcers?
as it is out here on the west coast, I listen to gil and gino.
as a curious point, have you listened to other teams radio teams? for the first couple of years that nfl.com was streaming games, I think BCN's parent network wouldn't allow streaming audio, so I always had to listen to the other teams radio team. really grew to appreciate gil santos as a radio announcer. no other team's radio announcers can as completely describe the events as he can.
(admittedly I sometimes submit to my schadenfreude and listen to the other teams broadcast during games I feel pretty confident about.)
by circusboy on Oct 14, 2007 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
schadenfreude
by PaulRevere on Oct 15, 2007 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean...
I wonder exactly how much effort it took for the poster to shove his head that far up his posterior?
by RSNexile on Oct 15, 2007 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's pretty impressive
it was the colt heavy lead-in to most pats-colts games that I have seen for the last 5 or so years that are prime examples of what I was originally asking about.
by circusboy on Oct 15, 2007 3:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
running it up? ridiculous
I didn't see it that way at all. First off, if you get to that part of the field, and there is still time on the clock for the other team to do something, anything with the ball, why in the world would you kneel on it and give it back. Oh, we're inside the 5, but we don't really want to score and be 'mean'. Here's the ball back. That is ridiculous!
2nd, this is football so F-THAT. Punch it in.
Although I am sure that final TD was purely tactical in the coaches mind, I also saw it as a nice little 'statement' to some of those who want to hate our team. That statement basically being: 'BITE ME'.
by mrbandw on Oct 15, 2007 10:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Plus...
by DanieXJ on Oct 15, 2007 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mr Tommasse
by SPOT on Oct 15, 2007 7:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Knock yourself out
by tommasse on Oct 15, 2007 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unofficial Player of the Game poll result
by tommasse on Oct 15, 2007 9:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














