Postgame, Week 7: New England 49 @ Miami 28
Fish .. Squished
Boston Returns as Hub of Sports Universe
I say this with all sincerity: Enjoy this.
I hate to sound so Private Ryan-esque, but this could be a very special time in history, not just for New England sports fans, but for American sports entirely.
- The Boston Red Sox came back from a 3-1 deficit in Major League Baseball's American League Championship Series.
- The New England Revolution begin pursuit of a title in the Major League Soccer playoffs Saturday.
- The Boston College Eagles football team is ranked No. 2 in the NCAA Bowl Championship Series.
- Your New England Patriots are now 7-0 and rewriting the National Football League record book just shy of the season's halfway point.
- The Boston Bruins are 5-2 early in the National Hockey League season.
- The Boston Celtics were Patriot-like in the offseason, contracting the services of Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen to team up with perennial All-Star, Paul Pierce, and the C's have sky-high expectations.
Boston is once again the Hub of the Universe.
49 - - -
28
Before we return our attention to your New England Patriots, I want to encourage you to visit a couple of my brother sites on the Sports Blogs Nation network:
- Over The Monster, SBN's home of the World Series-bound Boston Red Sox
- Green Bandwagon, home of the greatest franchise in sports history, the Boston Celtics
Now about the Patriots and yesterday's shellacking ...
![]() |
|
Rise of The Animal -- Patriots receiver Wes Welker muscles his way past Miami's Renaldo Hill during the second quarter Sunday. Welker had 9 catches for 138 yards and 2 TDs. Photo courtesy: Boston Herald / Nancy Lane |
It was like watching an old WWF match when the villain would beat the snot out of the "good guy," pin him for a two-count and then pick him off the canvas to continue the punishment. Except the Patriots had not the luxury of pinning Miami. So they held them at arm's length and left them bloodied, but not broken. When the Dolphins chose to fight back late -- which I completely expected and would have lost respect for them if they didn't -- New England delivered another power slam, effectively ending the match.
It wasn't fair, but Miami was the opponent on the schedule, so that was the team New England played -- as many a dominant team has done before.
"It's not fair" was a common phrase used up and down the eastern seaboard Sunday, as millions watched Randy Moss snatch two deep balls away from pairs of defenders in the end zone as though he were the only one there among a couple mosquitos. As amazing as was that catch, the most amazing catch was an incompletion out of the back of the end zone. Tom Brady threw one of his many perfect passes -- did you see those spirals? -- but this one was just a little too deep. Moss stretched out his right hand like a frog stabbing at a flying insect and snatched the ball out of the air. That was one of just 4 incompletions.
![]() |
|
Two Sides of the Same Coin -- Patriots inhuman wide receiver Randy Moss hauls in a touchdown reception in double coverage of Sunday's 49-29 obliteration of Miami. Moss is becoming mythical in NE. Photo courtesy: Boston Globe / AP and Reuters |
But four catches meant that Moss wasn't open often. He wasn't even open on the two touchdowns, but when you decide to throw deep, you throw deep. Just that now Brady has one of the great receivers in the game.
But most of the rest of the time, Moss was covered, so Brady, a master at finding the open man, found the open man. And boy were they open. Sorry, I already covered this.
Despite the gaudy passing numbers, the Patriots offense was relatively balanced. New England ran 28 passing plays and 22 rushing plays. Laurence Maroney (playing at less than 100 percent), Kevin Faulk and Kyle Eckel ran the ball six times each, and Heath Evans carried it four times.
![]() |
|
Nowhere to Run -- Patriots safety James Sanders and linebackers Junior Seau and Adalius Thomas swarm toward Miami running back Ronnie Brown during Sunday's action Photo courtesy: Boston Globe / AP photo |
The Patriots offense was so overpowering, Miami actually led in time of possession -- slightly at halftime (15:25 to 14:35) and tremendously at game's end (35:05 to 24:55). What that means is that New England toyed with the Dolphins. They allowed them to hold onto the ball in the second half.
They held them at arm's length.
Each team had seven possessions in the first half (if you count Willie Andrews's kickoff return for a touchdown. New England scored on six of them, including the return. And they scored quickly, putting the ball in Miami's hands. Excluding the one long drive, the Patriots shut down Miami, limiting the Dolphins to drives of 5, 3, 4, 3, 5 and 1 play.
In the second half, each team had just four possessions. That's because New England didn't storm down the field and run up the score. That's because the defense didn't annihilate Miami, impose their will and stop them in their tracks. Miami had drives of 14, 10 and 11 plays over the third quarter and start of the fourth. It wasn't halftime adjustments.
![]() |
|
Objects in Rearview Mirror -- So much for kicking away from Ellis Hobbs. The Dolphins saw nothing but taillights as Willie Andrews returned a kickoff 77 yards. Photo courtesy: Boston Herald / Nancy Lane |
And then the defense held Miami at arm's length so as not to punish them.
There's little doubt in many people's minds that the final score easily could have been 63-14 or 70-14. But for all the complaining, Belichick and the Patriots did not run up the score.
Meanwhile, "old man" Tedy Bruschi led the Patriots with 10 solo tackles, tacking on a pair of assists. Brother geriatric, Rodney Harrison, was second, tied with Adalius Thomas, with 7 solos, including a sack, and an assist. But with just three sacks, an interception, only 4 passes defended, and no forced fumbles, one may think the defense didn't show up.
Look at Miami's first-half possessions again. There was only one drive on which the defense had many opportunities to do those things. And in the second-half prevent defense, there was little opportunity or motivation for such. Randall Gay's interception was the epitome of bend-don't-break defense, nabbing Cleo Lemon's pass in the end zone.
The beauty of it is that Patriots fans have had not to sweat out the last-minute 2-point victories. Many of us certainly miss Brady and company's unbelievable comeback wins, but these new-fangled comfortable wins are sitting just fine with us.
By the way, during ESPN's Monday Night Countdown, two real coaches, Bill Parcells and Mike Ditka, said Belichick was justified in sending Brady back in the game in the fourth quarter. They said people should stop whining, and (in Ditka's words) "if teams don't want the score run up against them, play better."
So disregard the sour grapes. Ignore the whining, the condescension. Your New England Patriots pay no mind. And there's one other thing they do that you should as well:
Enjoy this.
0 recs |
33
comments
Comments
running it up
You know something, though? The NFL had this coming from New England. They were owed. In 2001, we won the Super Bowl and everyone called it a fluke because noone had ever heard of Tom Brady before. So who was this team that had won (I think) 9 straight to make the playoffs? They said we were not one of the better teams. We weren't the best at the beginning of the year, that's true, but we WERE the best by the end of it.
In 2003, we had the first of two back to back 14-2 seasons. We set the NFL's consecutive win record. Yet for both of those 14-2 seasons, we heard nothing but how our football wasn't pretty and that Manning was better than Brady and all other manner of verbal fellatio on Manning. We heard about how great the Colts were and that it was a matter of time before we didn't pull out one of our typically close wins.
Well, that didn't happen. We won 3 Super Bowls in 4 seasons. We should have won 3 straight but injuries and some bad breaks at Mile High knocked us one years while Reche Caldwell and the Officials did the job the next and we heard about how we were never that good.
Well, there we have it. You asked for it, NFL and now you've got it. We ARE that good. We were darned good before but now we are unstoppable. We WILL destroy every team we play because they earned it with their trash talk and stupidity. You reap what you sow. Eat it.
by PaulRevere on Oct 23, 2007 1:31 AM EDT 0 recs
The NFL
I'm waiting for the next big "scandal" to come out against us. There is no end to what these media haters will come up with...
Oh, and let's not forget the Red Sox and those Yankee worshipping reporters everywhere.
by Ring4forFoxborough on Oct 23, 2007 6:54 AM EDT 0 recs
Do you honestly believe what you are saying about
by biosBSOD on
Oct 23, 2007 5:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Both half right
The Patriots are hated by fans of other teams and a lot of other teams' players (Keith Bulluck, LaDanian Tomlinson, Eric Steinbach).
I don't know that the Patriots are "hated" by the league, but they have been subject to ongoing systematic bias since Super Bowl XXXVIII, as evidenced by the barrage of punishments that are more severe than they are for other players of other teams (e.g. - the chinstrap fines) and the inequitable enforcement of game rules.
by tommasse on
Oct 23, 2007 7:17 PM EDT
up
0 recs
the interesting thing...
sort of a sense of entitlement. which is how most people have reacted to being beaten by the patriots since 2001. remember the reaction of the rams, eagles or colts in any of the superbowl years? "we were the better team out there, we just got beat."
now I'm somewhat out of touch with media the last few years, was that the patriots response last year when they lost to the colts?
being hated by the other fans on the other hand, everybody hates the team that beats theirs. what sox fan doesn't hate the yankees?
by circusboy on
Oct 24, 2007 12:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well Said
by smteri42 on Oct 24, 2007 12:59 AM EDT 0 recs
has anyone read easterbrooks' column this week??
sorry, I know this is off topic, but not entirely sure where to put it...
I just can't believe how incredibly short sighted some people can be...
by circusboy on Oct 24, 2007 2:29 AM EDT 0 recs
As a matter of fact ...
I didn't get far through it. I really don't have that much time to waste reading something so nonsensical.
by tommasse on
Oct 24, 2007 8:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
the fun part about it...
granted it was a just polemical moment about cut blocks, but still...
by circusboy on
Oct 24, 2007 12:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Taking all betters
by superbowlinthebag on Oct 24, 2007 1:32 PM EDT 0 recs
NFL Hates the PATS
by SPOT on Oct 24, 2007 2:00 PM EDT 0 recs
I'd be curious...
I think there is a certain "love" for the teams that have some "storied history" from years back. expansion teams don't get the love at the beginning.
I have a theory... remember what people thought of AFL teams when they first started winning in the NFL after the merger, these days, even the jets get a certain amount of the "historical love" from the memories of super bowl 3 and the namath days. the raiders and the steelers are another couple of teams that have gained respect for their historical stature. jacksonville and carolina have not won it all yet, and still get the "isn't that cute" love of being a new team that is trying really hard.
I think there is some specific dislike of the pats which I can't quite understand, but it's worth noting that there aren't a lot of national pundits who started out as patriot players. I suspect some of the mythos of other teams is promulgated by the wealth of former players of the other teams.
having been in seattle for a couple of years now, I have to believe that if the seahawks won it all a couple of years ago, the response would be nearly the same as it has been for the patriots the last little while. as it is, the seahawks are the oldest post merger team that hasn't won a super bowl, (only the falcons, saints and bengals are older without winning a championship of some sort.) I think that when you have a team that has never made it for such a long time, most fans come to think of them as "that other team" that always lost. then when they actually win, no one can separate the winner from the image of the old loser. I think that's what happened to the Patriots. in years to come I think this will change. (but it's annoying as hell for the time being...)
by circusboy on
Oct 24, 2007 4:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think it also has to do with...
Think about it this way: if you weren't a Pats fan, how many Pats could you have identified in previous years? Now subtract Tom Brady. Is there anyone left?
Under Belichick, this has always been a real team, not a collection of a handful of prima donna superstars with a supporting cast. That inevitably results in other teams, led by their prima donna superstars, thinking that there's no way those "upstarts" could possibly have beaten them, and yet the Pats did it again and again and again. When a supposedly clearly inferior opponent defeats you repeatedly, it's embarrassing, and that provokes hatred.
by RSNexile on
Oct 24, 2007 5:08 PM EDT
up
0 recs
well put, well put...
It is one of those things that the pats first hall of famer was an offensive lineman.
(side note, I always thought one of the classiest things that Brady did was to push other players into the advertising that he did. the offensive line turned out to have more personality than he did. (I think I remember marino at least referencing his O-line in those isotoner ads way back when...))
I'm quite happy with a collection of good players rather than one ego maniacal star.
by circusboy on
Oct 24, 2007 9:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
and then there's this reason...
I'll have to look around for it, but somewhere there is an essay that talks about the american penchant for building up heroes and the even greater penchant for deliberately tearing them down afterwards.
by circusboy on
Oct 25, 2007 4:23 AM EDT
up
0 recs
CBS Say WHAT?!?!?
have any of you read the CBS analysts' preview of the Pats-Redskins game this week? 3 out of 6 picked the Redskins to win. They're saying we haven't faced a good defense yet (Washington hasn't faced a good team yet) and they think we're going to get caught looking ahead. I really think they ought to fire these guys for not knowing what they're talking about. If you still think the Pats are going to get caught looking ahead after all this time with Bellichick coaching us, then you haven't been paying enough attention to our franchise to write about one of our games.
by PaulRevere on Oct 24, 2007 9:39 PM EDT 0 recs
If you think of it .. post a link
I will of course have my prediction later this week.
by tommasse on
Oct 24, 2007 10:31 PM EDT
up
0 recs
ok, thanks Tom
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/071023&sportCat=nfl
which is an article about how Colts vs. Patriots is good vs. evil written be one of the biggest whining idiots I've ever heard of. The lower link is the one with the CBS analysts week 8 preview of the Redskins vs. the Patriots.
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/gamecenter/preview/NFL_20071028_WAS@NE
by PaulRevere on Oct 24, 2007 11:37 PM EDT 0 recs
yessssss..
I'm waiting for the battle royale between him and simmons... I don't think espn is big enough for the both of them... easterbrook got a smack from espn's ombudsman recently as well, for writing like this.
by circusboy on
Oct 25, 2007 2:48 AM EDT
up
0 recs
link to ombudsman column
by circusboy on
Oct 25, 2007 2:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
fired
by PaulRevere on Oct 25, 2007 12:08 PM EDT 0 recs
Even Joe gibbs says dont put any money
Lets get out the Hatchets baby!
by superbowlinthebag on Oct 25, 2007 12:24 PM EDT 0 recs
I wouldn't go that far
I think we'll win this one pretty handily, but you still have to play the game because you don't know what's going to happen. What if Brady gets hurt? What if the entire defense gets food poisoning the night before the game? What if every single Redskin plays the game of his life?
by RSNexile on
Oct 25, 2007 1:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
hmmm
<Envisions Brady throwing the ball from his own 40, 65 yards through the air to Moss in double coverage who caught it with one hand.>
by PaulRevere on Oct 25, 2007 3:16 PM EDT 0 recs
What Gives?
by davidjohhn2 on Oct 25, 2007 9:11 PM EDT 0 recs
Sorry, loyal readers
I'll do my best to get more content up, but my job prevents me from posting (or even reading/researching much) during the day.
In the meantime, I encourage you to post ideas, questions, observations, links, whatever in the Diaries Section. That at least gets some information out there and lets everyone join in the discussion. I'll also post my own responses and comments there.
Remember, this may be my site, but it's our community. I'm not here to monologue, and I'm very happy to see the recent increase in participation.
So, many thanks to all the "old timers" (RSNexile, scsatr, 6thround, smteri42, mrbandw, and anyone else I missed) who have continued to support this community, some from the very beginning; and thanks to all you rookies who are really helping to give Pats Pulpit some shape.
by tommasse on
Oct 25, 2007 11:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Not just Tommasse
by 6thround on
Oct 26, 2007 12:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
writing
by PaulRevere on Oct 26, 2007 11:28 PM EDT 0 recs
Paul, we will need your help on Sunady evening.
by scsatr on
Oct 27, 2007 8:58 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I agree
AIR.
3 if by both.
by tommasse on
Oct 27, 2007 5:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
How is everyone feeling
"Modern day Boston massacre" at Foxboro
Dont look away the game may end with our first score.
by superbowlinthebag on Oct 27, 2007 5:59 PM EDT 0 recs
ha ha ha
by PaulRevere on Oct 28, 2007 12:13 AM EDT 0 recs















