Pats Pulpit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Postgame, Week 7: New England 49 @ Miami 28

Fish .. Squished
Boston Returns as Hub of Sports Universe

I say this with all sincerity: Enjoy this.

I hate to sound so Private Ryan-esque, but this could be a very special time in history, not just for New England sports fans, but for American sports entirely.

  • The Boston Red Sox came back from a 3-1 deficit in Major League Baseball's American League Championship Series.
  • The New England Revolution begin pursuit of a title in the Major League Soccer playoffs Saturday.
  • The Boston College Eagles football team is ranked No. 2 in the NCAA Bowl Championship Series.
  • Your New England Patriots are now 7-0 and rewriting the National Football League record book just shy of the season's halfway point.
  • The Boston Bruins are 5-2 early in the National Hockey League season.
  • The Boston Celtics were Patriot-like in the offseason, contracting the services of Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen to team up with perennial All-Star, Paul Pierce, and the C's have sky-high expectations.

Boston is once again the Hub of the Universe.

P1hotobucket - Video and Image Hosting 49 - - - P1hotobucket - Video and Image Hosting 28

Before we return our attention to your New England Patriots, I want to encourage you to visit a couple of my brother sites on the Sports Blogs Nation network:

  • Over The Monster, SBN's home of the World Series-bound Boston Red Sox
  • Green Bandwagon, home of the greatest franchise in sports history, the Boston Celtics
The BC Eagles, Boston Bruins and New England Revolution remain unrepresented, so if you're interested or know of any solid existing blogs, drop me a line.

Now about the Patriots and yesterday's shellacking ...

Star-divide

Rise of The Animal -- Patriots receiver Wes Welker muscles his way past Miami's Renaldo Hill during the second quarter Sunday. Welker had 9 catches for 138 yards and 2 TDs.

Photo courtesy: Boston Herald / Nancy Lane

With all respect due the team with the only undefeated NFL season ever, the Patriots and Dolphins were hardly playing the same game. New England obliterated Miami for 30 minutes before allowing them to come up for air. For all the hot air about the Patriots running up the score, it was all they and Bill Belichick could do not to utterly embarrass the Dolphins.

It was like watching an old WWF match when the villain would beat the snot out of the "good guy," pin him for a two-count and then pick him off the canvas to continue the punishment. Except the Patriots had not the luxury of pinning Miami. So they held them at arm's length and left them bloodied, but not broken. When the Dolphins chose to fight back late -- which I completely expected and would have lost respect for them if they didn't -- New England delivered another power slam, effectively ending the match.

It wasn't fair, but Miami was the opponent on the schedule, so that was the team New England played -- as many a dominant team has done before.

"It's not fair" was a common phrase used up and down the eastern seaboard Sunday, as millions watched Randy Moss snatch two deep balls away from pairs of defenders in the end zone as though he were the only one there among a couple mosquitos. As amazing as was that catch, the most amazing catch was an incompletion out of the back of the end zone. Tom Brady threw one of his many perfect passes -- did you see those spirals? -- but this one was just a little too deep. Moss stretched out his right hand like a frog stabbing at a flying insect and snatched the ball out of the air. That was one of just 4 incompletions.

Two Sides of the Same Coin -- Patriots inhuman wide receiver Randy Moss hauls in a touchdown reception in double coverage of Sunday's 49-29 obliteration of Miami. Moss is becoming mythical in NE.

Photo courtesy: Boston Globe / AP and Reuters

Miami had shown no ability to stop any other team's passing game -- well, except for Oakland and Daunte Culpepper, who won despite the leading passer being Miami's Trent Green who had 158 yards -- had no chance of stopping Brady, Moss, Donté Stallworth and former Dolphin Wes Welker. Moss caught just four passes, two for touchdowns, and still broke the 100-yard barrier (122).

But four catches meant that Moss wasn't open often. He wasn't even open on the two touchdowns, but when you decide to throw deep, you throw deep. Just that now Brady has one of the great receivers in the game.

But most of the rest of the time, Moss was covered, so Brady, a master at finding the open man, found the open man. And boy were they open. Sorry, I already covered this.

Despite the gaudy passing numbers, the Patriots offense was relatively balanced. New England ran 28 passing plays and 22 rushing plays. Laurence Maroney (playing at less than 100 percent), Kevin Faulk and Kyle Eckel ran the ball six times each, and Heath Evans carried it four times.

Nowhere to Run -- Patriots safety James Sanders and linebackers Junior Seau and Adalius Thomas swarm toward Miami running back Ronnie Brown during Sunday's action

Photo courtesy: Boston Globe / AP photo

And despite the final statistics, the defense played very well. At the half, Miami had 70 yards on the ground and 76 in the air. That included a 79-yard drive from the end of the first quarter to the start of the second. That left the Dolphins with 67 yards in the other 25 minutes.

The Patriots offense was so overpowering, Miami actually led in time of possession -- slightly at halftime (15:25 to 14:35) and tremendously at game's end (35:05 to 24:55). What that means is that New England toyed with the Dolphins. They allowed them to hold onto the ball in the second half.

They held them at arm's length.

Each team had seven possessions in the first half (if you count Willie Andrews's kickoff return for a touchdown. New England scored on six of them, including the return. And they scored quickly, putting the ball in Miami's hands. Excluding the one long drive, the Patriots shut down Miami, limiting the Dolphins to drives of 5, 3, 4, 3, 5 and 1 play.

In the second half, each team had just four possessions. That's because New England didn't storm down the field and run up the score. That's because the defense didn't annihilate Miami, impose their will and stop them in their tracks. Miami had drives of 14, 10 and 11 plays over the third quarter and start of the fourth. It wasn't halftime adjustments.

Objects in Rearview Mirror -- So much for kicking away from Ellis Hobbs. The Dolphins saw nothing but taillights as Willie Andrews returned a kickoff 77 yards.

Photo courtesy: Boston Herald / Nancy Lane

And when Matt Cassel allowed Miami a free touchdown and Brady reassumed control, the Patriots sped down the field: four plays, four first downs, 60 yards, 1 touchdown, 2:19 off the clock. Score at will.

And then the defense held Miami at arm's length so as not to punish them.

There's little doubt in many people's minds that the final score easily could have been 63-14 or 70-14. But for all the complaining, Belichick and the Patriots did not run up the score.

Meanwhile, "old man" Tedy Bruschi led the Patriots with 10 solo tackles, tacking on a pair of assists. Brother geriatric, Rodney Harrison, was second, tied with Adalius Thomas, with 7 solos, including a sack, and an assist. But with just three sacks, an interception, only 4 passes defended, and no forced fumbles, one may think the defense didn't show up.

Look at Miami's first-half possessions again. There was only one drive on which the defense had many opportunities to do those things. And in the second-half prevent defense, there was little opportunity or motivation for such. Randall Gay's interception was the epitome of bend-don't-break defense, nabbing Cleo Lemon's pass in the end zone.

The beauty of it is that Patriots fans have had not to sweat out the last-minute 2-point victories. Many of us certainly miss Brady and company's unbelievable comeback wins, but these new-fangled comfortable wins are sitting just fine with us.

By the way, during ESPN's Monday Night Countdown, two real coaches, Bill Parcells and Mike Ditka, said Belichick was justified in sending Brady back in the game in the fourth quarter. They said people should stop whining, and (in Ditka's words) "if teams don't want the score run up against them, play better."

So disregard the sour grapes. Ignore the whining, the condescension. Your New England Patriots pay no mind. And there's one other thing they do that you should as well:

Enjoy this.

Poll
With the Patriots 7-0 after Week 7, they will finish ...
... 13-3
4 votes
... 12-4
2 votes
... 11-5
0 votes
... 10-6 or worse
8 votes
... 16-0
52 votes
... 15-1
28 votes
... 14-2
28 votes

122 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 33 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

running it up
I agree that we could have won that game 84-7 if we had wanted.  We intentionally did not.

You know something, though?  The NFL had this coming from New England.  They were owed.  In 2001, we won the Super Bowl and everyone called it a fluke because noone had ever heard of Tom Brady before.  So who was this team that had won (I think) 9 straight to make the playoffs?  They said we were not one of the better teams.  We weren't the best at the beginning of the year, that's true, but we WERE the best by the end of it.

In 2003, we had the first of two back to back 14-2 seasons.  We set the NFL's consecutive win record.  Yet for both of those 14-2 seasons, we heard nothing but how our football wasn't pretty and that Manning was better than Brady and all other manner of verbal fellatio on Manning.  We heard about how great the Colts were and that it was a matter of time before we didn't pull out one of our typically close wins.  

Well, that didn't happen.  We won 3 Super Bowls in 4 seasons.  We should have won 3 straight but injuries and some bad breaks at Mile High knocked us one years while Reche Caldwell and the Officials did the job the next and we heard about how we were never that good.

Well, there we have it.  You asked for it, NFL and now you've got it.  We ARE that good.  We were darned good before but now we are unstoppable.  We WILL destroy every team we play because they earned it with their trash talk and stupidity.  You reap what you sow.  Eat it.

by PaulRevere on Oct 23, 2007 1:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The NFL
hates us. I swear they sit around and think of ways to undermine and insult us. After all we've done, we deserve some respect.

I'm waiting for the next big "scandal" to come out against us. There is no end to what these media haters will come up with...

Oh, and let's not forget the Red Sox and those Yankee worshipping reporters everywhere.

Looking forward to a February vacation in Arizona...

by Ring4forFoxborough on Oct 23, 2007 6:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you honestly believe what you are saying about
the NFL hating the Pats???? Did you watch the MNF game last night? Kornhole and the rest of the crew worshipped at the feet of Brady and the Pats ALL game. Everybody says "Pats are unstoppable, undefeated season, brilliant bill". All the while, the champs have been swept under the rug. Other team's fans hate the Pats, not the NFL.

by biosBSOD on Oct 23, 2007 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Both half right
The Patriots are hyped by media types. Those who know what they're talking about, like Ron Jaworski, Bill Parcells, Mike Ditka (interesting: players and coaches) and those who don't, like Kornheiser.

The Patriots are hated by fans of other teams and a lot of other teams' players (Keith Bulluck, LaDanian Tomlinson, Eric Steinbach).

I don't know that the Patriots are "hated" by the league, but they have been subject to ongoing systematic bias since Super Bowl XXXVIII, as evidenced by the barrage of punishments that are more severe than they are for other players of other teams (e.g. - the chinstrap fines) and the inequitable enforcement of game rules.

Have something to say? Create a free account and step up to the Pulpit! (Please: No vulgarity. Thanks.)

by tommasse on Oct 23, 2007 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the interesting thing...
about being hated by the other players is that it's generally by the ones that have been raised up to have a sense of destiny about themselves.  in the case of LDT, last year he was given plaudits for being 'the greatest' and the chargers were the team to beat.  then they were beaten.  the response was along the lines of "how dare they beat us!? don't they know we're the greatest?!" etc.

sort of a sense of entitlement.  which is how most people have reacted to being beaten by the patriots since 2001.  remember the reaction of the rams, eagles or colts in any of the superbowl years?  "we were the better team out there, we just got beat."

now I'm somewhat out of touch with media the last few years, was that the patriots response last year when they lost to the colts?

being hated by the other fans on the other hand, everybody hates the team that beats theirs.  what sox fan doesn't hate the yankees?

by circusboy on Oct 24, 2007 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well Said
Great Article, Tommasse.  And you're absolutely right.  We need to enjoy this.  This may be the most dominant team in Boston sports history. We may never see something like this again.  Enjoy this.....great advice.

by smteri42 on Oct 24, 2007 12:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

has anyone read easterbrooks' column this week??
I think he's gone off the deep end...

sorry, I know this is off topic, but not entirely sure where to put it...

I just can't believe how incredibly short sighted some people can be...

by circusboy on Oct 24, 2007 2:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

As a matter of fact ...
SPOT posted the text in a diary titled "Ya Gotta read this clown yesterday.

I didn't get far through it. I really don't have that much time to waste reading something so nonsensical.

Have something to say? Create a free account and step up to the Pulpit! (Please: No vulgarity. Thanks.)

by tommasse on Oct 24, 2007 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the fun part about it...
is having read an excerpt of michael strahan's book, where he talks about marvin harrison being the epitome of evil.  (my word there, not his)
granted it was a just polemical moment about cut blocks, but still...

by circusboy on Oct 24, 2007 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Taking all betters
this weeks game is over by mid 2nd quarter. in fact 1st teamers will be boarding plane at half time to get an early jump on the colts game.

by superbowlinthebag on Oct 24, 2007 1:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

NFL Hates the PATS
When we started our title run everyone downplayed us , as circus boy said "we we're better we just got beat" then Indy started whining and getting rule changes. That coupled with the disparaging treatment on fines and such, leads me to believe the NFL does indeed want to slow this train,they just cannot.

by SPOT on Oct 24, 2007 2:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd be curious...
about the inside/outside view of other teams and their fans.

I think there is a certain "love" for the teams that have some "storied history" from years back. expansion teams don't get the love at the beginning.

I have a theory... remember what people thought of AFL teams when they first started winning in the NFL after the merger, these days, even the jets get a certain amount of the "historical love" from the memories of super bowl 3 and the namath days.  the raiders and the steelers are another couple of teams that have gained respect for their historical stature.  jacksonville and carolina have not won it all yet, and still get the "isn't that cute" love of being a new team that is trying really hard.

I think there is some specific dislike of the pats which I can't quite understand, but it's worth noting that there aren't a lot of national pundits who started out as patriot players.  I suspect some of the mythos of other teams is promulgated by the wealth of former players of the other teams.

having been in seattle for a couple of years now, I have to believe that if the seahawks won it all a couple of years ago, the response would be nearly the same as it has been for the patriots the last little while.  as it is, the seahawks are the oldest post merger team that hasn't won a super bowl, (only the falcons, saints and bengals are older without winning a championship of some sort.) I think that when you have a team that has never made it for such a long time, most fans come to think of them as "that other team" that always lost.  then when they actually win, no one can separate the winner from the image of the old loser.  I think that's what happened to the Patriots.  in years to come I think this will change.  (but it's annoying as hell for the time being...)

by circusboy on Oct 24, 2007 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it also has to do with...
...the team's orientation.

Think about it this way: if you weren't a Pats fan, how many Pats could you have identified in previous years? Now subtract Tom Brady. Is there anyone left?

Under Belichick, this has always been a real team, not a collection of a handful of prima donna superstars with a supporting cast. That inevitably results in other teams, led by their prima donna superstars, thinking that there's no way those "upstarts" could possibly have beaten them, and yet the Pats did it again and again and again. When a supposedly clearly inferior opponent defeats you repeatedly, it's embarrassing, and that provokes hatred.

by RSNexile on Oct 24, 2007 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well put, well put...
I think that's what always bugged the marketers too, what stars could you name?  I would suspect a colts or rams fan could have named Ty Law... (I still have a Law jersey)

It is one of those things that the pats first hall of famer was an offensive lineman.

(side note, I always thought one of the classiest things that Brady did was to push other players into the advertising that he did.  the offensive line turned out to have more personality than he did.  (I think I remember marino at least referencing his O-line in those isotoner ads way back when...))

I'm quite happy with a collection of good players rather than one ego maniacal star.

by circusboy on Oct 24, 2007 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and then there's this reason...
here is an essay explaining why the sports media is annoyed by new england teams.  see they liked it when we were losing. and as that writer said, being "something literary"  this happens in other fields too, if a person makes up a story about someone, and it turns out that the subject does not actually fit that story, it angers the person who wrote the story.

I'll have to look around for it, but somewhere there is an essay that talks about the american penchant for building up heroes and the even greater penchant for deliberately tearing them down afterwards.

by circusboy on Oct 25, 2007 4:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

CBS Say WHAT?!?!?
Hey Guys,

have any of you read the CBS analysts' preview of the Pats-Redskins game this week?  3 out of 6 picked the Redskins to win.  They're saying we haven't faced a good defense yet (Washington hasn't faced a good team yet) and they think we're going to get caught looking ahead.  I really think they ought to fire these guys for not knowing what they're talking about.  If you still think the Pats are going to get caught looking ahead after all this time with Bellichick coaching us, then you haven't been paying enough attention to our franchise to write about one of our games.

by PaulRevere on Oct 24, 2007 9:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If you think of it .. post a link
Always good when you guys ask if anyone saw something to post a link so we don't have to go searching for it.

I will of course have my prediction later this week.

Have something to say? Create a free account and step up to the Pulpit! (Please: No vulgarity. Thanks.)

by tommasse on Oct 24, 2007 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, thanks Tom
Sure Tom.  Here are two links I think you guys should see.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/071023&sportCat=nfl

which is an article about how Colts vs. Patriots is good vs. evil written be one of the biggest whining idiots I've ever heard of.  The lower link is the one with the CBS analysts week 8 preview of the Redskins vs. the Patriots.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/gamecenter/preview/NFL_20071028_WAS@NE

by PaulRevere on Oct 24, 2007 11:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yessssss..
we've been discussing the easterbrook column.  he's gone completely loopy.

I'm waiting for the battle royale between him and simmons...  I don't think espn is big enough for the both of them... easterbrook got a smack from espn's ombudsman recently as well, for writing like this.

by circusboy on Oct 25, 2007 2:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

link to ombudsman column
here, a little ways down

by circusboy on Oct 25, 2007 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

fired
Maybe they enjoy the hits they get when Easterbrook writes such a column, but I think he should be fired or at least severely reprimanded.  

by PaulRevere on Oct 25, 2007 12:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Even Joe gibbs says dont put any money
on the skins! Essentially this game is over before it will even start. Their secondary is playing on name recgonition and thats it! they will faulter big time like everyone else has.

Lets get out the Hatchets baby!

by superbowlinthebag on Oct 25, 2007 12:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't go that far
If the results are predetermined, there's no reason to play the game. In sports, teams defy probability with great frequency.

I think we'll win this one pretty handily, but you still have to play the game because you don't know what's going to happen. What if Brady gets hurt? What if the entire defense gets food poisoning the night before the game? What if every single Redskin plays the game of his life?

by RSNexile on Oct 25, 2007 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmmm
First, I am addicted to this blog and check it manically.  Second, while I think RSNexile's first two 'what ifs' are legitimate concerns for the Patriots losing, I'm not sure about the third.  Every Redskin playing the game of their life will probably still result in a loss for the 'skins.  The Pats just kinda make everyone else look like idiot children out there.  

<Envisions Brady throwing the ball from his own 40, 65 yards through the air to Moss in double coverage who caught it with one hand.>

by PaulRevere on Oct 25, 2007 3:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What Gives?
Hey Tommasse, You haven't been very prolific as of late. Do you not have much to write about? Or have you been busy with life etc...? The Fish squished has been the latest story for several days. I really like this blog, but hey, give us some fodder to comment about. Are you boycoting this blog because of trolls? Lets get it going. I only wish that I could write like you. I got this thing, you know, numbers make complete sense to me, however at 34 years old, I still have that incomplete sentence and fragment thing going on. So....with the scrutiny arround this league, and the status of the Pats, you should have plenty to write about. I hope all is well pal. I think the skins should be a formittable challenge for the Pats. Do you realize that Brady has never beet them? Any way, write some more stuff. K!

by davidjohhn2 on Oct 25, 2007 9:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, loyal readers
I do my best. I just don't have the time. Personally, I think some of you new guys have been doing a great job keeping the chatter going.

I'll do my best to get more content up, but my job prevents me from posting (or even reading/researching much) during the day.

In the meantime, I encourage you to post ideas, questions, observations, links, whatever in the Diaries Section. That at least gets some information out there and lets everyone join in the discussion. I'll also post my own responses and comments there.

Remember, this may be my site, but it's our community. I'm not here to monologue, and I'm very happy to see the recent increase in participation.

So, many thanks to all the "old timers" (RSNexile, scsatr, 6thround, smteri42, mrbandw, and anyone else I missed) who have continued to support this community, some from the very beginning; and thanks to all you rookies who are really helping to give Pats Pulpit some shape.

Have something to say? Create a free account and step up to the Pulpit! (Please: No vulgarity. Thanks.)

by tommasse on Oct 25, 2007 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not just Tommasse
He's not the only one that's been mugged for time. I was hoping to write more for this site than what little I have, but work and family issues have kept everything else at a minimum. I can make time for the game, but have little to no time for research on any pieces that I want to do. Tom's a great editor, but he can't fix my mistakes if I don't even submit them. ;)

by 6thround on Oct 26, 2007 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

writing
This one is for Tommasse.  Tom, would you like me to do some writing for the Patriots?  I do not have a TON of time as I'm pursuing simaltaneous degrees in math and theoretical physics, but between us and other site writers I don't know about, we may be able to get a good deal of information.  Let me know if you'd like me to assist.

by PaulRevere on Oct 26, 2007 11:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Paul, we will need your help on Sunady evening.
Look for the signal from the lighthouse at Gillette Stadium and then ride through the streets of Indianapolis shouting "THE PATRIOTS ARE COMING!! THE PATRIOTS ARE COMING!!"

by scsatr on Oct 27, 2007 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
1 if by land, 2 if by ..

AIR.

3 if by both.

Have something to say? Create a free account and step up to the Pulpit! (Please: No vulgarity. Thanks.)

by tommasse on Oct 27, 2007 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is everyone feeling
on the eve of the

"Modern day Boston massacre"  at Foxboro

Dont look away the game may end with our first score.

by superbowlinthebag on Oct 27, 2007 5:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ha ha ha
Go Red Sox.  Nice Revolutionary War reference.  I think the Patriots will be coming by air.  And yes, this should be a massacre.  I don't think Washington poses a threat.  Our defense is easily as good and our offense is 100x better.  It's going to be a beating.

by PaulRevere on Oct 28, 2007 12:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New England Patriots Blog

Media requests: Please email patspulpit at gmail.com

Start posting about the Patriots »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Smpavatar_small
Caption Contest

Recent FanPosts

10424_528302137858_173702948_31567344_967269_n_small
Patriots Single-Game Tickets?
Patriotsthrowbacklogo_small
Tom Brady vs. Peyton Manning: Who's the Best? - Part V
August_2008_175_small
10 Super Bowl Observations
August_2008_175_small
Parcels or Belichick?
Small
I've been looking for potential RBs in the second round.....
Bill_belichick-vader_mask_small
Patriots announce 2010 Defensive Coordinator... Bill Belichick?
12-22-07_1831_small
Luck or destiny?
Small
Patriots interested in CFL sack leader
Nnamdi_small
The End of an Era?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Acme Packing Company
Replay: Tracy Porter's Super Bowl INT Return
Mocking The Draft
Morgan Burnett NFL Draft scouting report
The Phinsider
A quick look at free agent tight ends

SPONSORS


Managing Editor

Patspulpit_small MaPatsFan

Contributing Writers

Belichick_2_small Marima

Smpavatar_small SlotMachinePlayer

Small Comedic.Sans

Bg_small The Hill